Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 [70] 80 90 100 |
1381. Proxy beeping range - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Explosives detector - MAG A small electronic device that detects mines and other explosives Mines were highlighted on the road to you and also your squad if you had ski...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 16:18:00
|
1382. Proxy beeping range - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Explosives detector - MAG A small electronic device that detects mines and other explosives Mines were highlighted on the road to you and also your squad if you had skilled it up See Spkr, even English agrees, i...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 15:44:00
|
1383. what is balanced vehicles vs av to you - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: You sound like infantry. Just a realist of what is balanced in a game. The only question that really matters, and it gets consistently ignored is how long should it take a single AV perso...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 15:42:00
|
1384. Proxy beeping range - in General Discussions [original thread]
If I were you, I'd be glad I had the beep at all.
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 15:35:00
|
1385. what is balanced vehicles vs av to you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: Zene Ren wrote: balance in this situation equals: number of vehicle pilots = number of grunts needed to destroy it ps. not in a single shot ofc not even 3 AV granades pss. if you want current balance those tank...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 14:50:00
|
1386. what is balanced vehicles vs av to you - in General Discussions [original thread]
voidfaction wrote: PARKOUR PRACTIONER wrote: Casually moonwalking up to tank, placing remotes on tank, casually walking off in slow-motion while detonating. That just might be how it will be for a cloaked scout in 1.8 Your post made...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 14:48:00
|
1387. what is balanced vehicles vs av to you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rynoceros wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Rynoceros wrote: 1 clip MLT v MLT = 1 clip STD v STD = 1 clip ADV v ADV = 1 clip PRO v PRO = 1 clip And all AV to be balanced from that. Swarms or FG's because the number varies. Swarms are the...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 14:21:00
|
1388. Large and small vehicle mounted swarm launcher turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think Swarm Turrets would be a great addition, though only if they also add Chaff Turrets.
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 14:15:00
|
1389. Remote Explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
PARKOUR PRACTIONER wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: 12 with 1 RE. Don't have your entire team in one spot kids, Matari scout is hunting! 12!!!!! I would have paid to see that! Time to up my skillz with KABLAMO. I would too. My cap is ...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 14:09:00
|
1390. Faction Warfare? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I stopped since the payouts are ****. All risk, no reward. Whereas PC is the exact opposite, all reward, no risk.
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 07:53:00
|
1391. I have a question. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maybe CCP thinks that to increase direct damage they would need to increase splash too.
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 04:56:00
|
1392. Its official, we need to nerf anything that can kill my gallogi - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: I hate things that can kill me, its unfair that i don't have skill or intelligence and die to n00bs who use things like intelligence or traps, and i demand that you nerf them all. Things i want nerfed- Shotguns- these t...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 04:31:00
|
1393. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok, so this has got to be the ultimate RE **** you. You blow up five people and then need to leave the match because half of your squad DC'd. They each lose whatever they were running and get no opportunity for recourse.
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 04:06:00
|
1394. Matchmaking....... another lie - in General Discussions [original thread]
01010011 01100001 01111001 00100000 01101000 01100101 01101100 01101100 01101111 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110010 01100101 01101101 01101111 01110100 01100101 01110011 00101100 00100000 01110100 01101000 0110...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 03:50:00
|
1395. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: calisk galern wrote: it wasn't "official" the last 3 times you made this thread? nothing has changed since you made those >.> lol leave the poor guy alone re spaming vs infantry is getting pretty ridiculous. its a...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 02:55:00
|
1396. Respec with 1.8 will only bring more diversity - in General Discussions [original thread]
abarkrishna wrote: Especially with cloaks coming out. I already know I am gunna get shot gunned a lot. Downside of being a healer I guess. I <3 your sig
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 02:42:00
|
1397. Respec with 1.8 will only bring more diversity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Quite a few people are so against an infantry respec in 1.8 because they fear people would chase the FOTM and battles would become boring and stale. However, I'd wager the exact opposite would happen. Give people an infantry...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.14 01:45:00
|
1398. I would trade all the updates for chromosome. - in General Discussions [original thread]
There are things I wish we still had from Chrom, but I wouldn't say that I'd trade all of Uprising for it. Now, if they could come to a nice compromise between the two, that'd be awesome.
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.13 23:34:00
|
1399. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
iTbagyou wrote: This is just as bad as the nerf nades. They are explosives for a reason. Need bigger boom if you ask me. And bring FLG back to their old glory, PRO scrubs cried them into a nerf too.
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.13 23:31:00
|
1400. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
J4yne C0bb wrote: I'm getting a bit tired of REs as well, but I realize that, for the most part, if I walk into a RE trap, it's pretty much my fault, and that my game needs to be stepped up a tad. That having been said, there are a lot of FOTM ...
- by Alaika Arbosa - at 2014.02.13 23:26:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 [70] 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |