DUST Search - They will nerf collision damage but...

Den-tredje Baron wrote:

Jaqen Morghalis wrote:

Den-tredje Baron wrote:

Eurydice Itzhak wrote:

They won't do anything to make the llav useful. It will become another useless vehicle like the scout lav, all forms of dropships, and enforcers tanks.

It'd be like if only one or two weapons were viable for infantry.... Oh wait that is exactly the case.

Why do we play this game?

I've put this idea out here quite a few times.
Why doesn't CCP rework the LLAV rep tool to be an AOE rep tool instead of this "hey stand still for 3-5 secs and i'll see if i can keep this square on you and THEN !! i can rep you" winky wanky rep tool it got.
Changing it to work with an AOE effect will basically just mean that it'll be a very tanky triage nanohive on wheels.

^^ COME ON !! isn't this an awesome idea !! ^^ Question

Basically, instead of targetting a single individual, you'd be passively repping as many allies as could fit within the AoE. I only see this as an option if they split the repair rate (hp/s) between every player in range.

For example (using made-up numbers for illustration purposes):

Single recipient @ 60hp/s, 2 players @ 30hp/s, 3 @ 20hp/s, 4 @ 15hp/s, etc., etc.

While I like the idea in principle, I think that providing full rep rate to everyone in the radius, with zero effort required, might be just a little OP.

Yeah very true i usually don't include numbers into my ideas as it's usually those that define whether it's OP or not. Though you gotta remember you won't be able to rep through walls (like you won't get ammo standing inside the bubble of a nanohive but on the wrong side of a wall)
So yeah maybe if it got something like 100hp/s and a radius of 30 meter that would then get split out to how many are inside the rep radius. It's a lot but ok look at how much damage an AR does Roll

That's actually a really really nice idea Big smile

It's gonna be like calling for you team car in cycling instead it'll be angry mercs steering and they'll come to pimp up your armor / shield

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Eurydice Itzhak Militaires Sans Jeux 156	Posted - 2013.08.04 05:43:00 - [1] - Quote They won't do anything to make the llav useful. It will become another useless vehicle like the scout lav, all forms of dropships, and enforcers tanks. It'd be like if only one or two weapons were viable for infantry.... Oh wait that is exactly the case. Why do we play this game?
aden slayer Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation 555	Posted - 2013.08.04 05:47:00 - [2] - Quote Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Why do we play this game? Is this a trick question?
Delta 749 Kestrel Reconnaissance 1565	Posted - 2013.08.04 05:49:00 - [3] - Quote Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for
Rusty Shallows Black Jackals 209	Posted - 2013.08.04 05:50:00 - [4] - Quote Do you really think CCP will set things up so that you roadkill one merc and suddenly your LAV or LLAV will explode? I'm betting it will be a little/minor damage and a slight reduction in speed if all goes well. So that running people over will become a split second risk/reward decision instead of an automatic HELL YEAH!
Eurydice Itzhak Militaires Sans Jeux 156	Posted - 2013.08.04 06:01:00 - [5] - Quote Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for Uhhh, it really can't. The module it comes with is impossible to use.
Eurydice Itzhak Militaires Sans Jeux 156	Posted - 2013.08.04 06:03:00 - [6] - Quote Rusty Shallows wrote: Do you really think CCP will set things up so that you roadkill one merc and suddenly your LAV or LLAV will explode? I'm betting it will be a little/minor damage and a slight reduction in speed if all goes well. So that running people over will become a split second risk/reward decision instead of an automatic HELL YEAH! I imagine collision damage being all but removed or instadeath lavs. Dropships used to be really useful for squishing mercenaries but now they explode if they so much as look at the ground.
Foundation Seldon Gespenster Kompanie Villore Accords 64	Posted - 2013.08.04 06:24:00 - [7] - Quote Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for Have you tried using the thing before? Unless the rebalance pass does something to address how extremely unintuitive the infantry repair module is in an actual battle then you'll still never see the thing used.
gbh08 Kinsho Swords Caldari State 71	Posted - 2013.08.04 06:32:00 - [8] - Quote Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for to be fair, repping infantry with this thing is a royal pita, vehicle's, not so bad, but no wp's (repping shields), you could go the whole match using it for its intended purpose, yet get no points theres always time to nerf the hell outa weapons, but simple fixes just get overlooked for months upon months upon months It does get tiring
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 990	Posted - 2013.08.04 06:34:00 - [9] - Quote Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for Uhhh, it really can't. The module it comes with is impossible to use. I've seen it used so you point is invalid
Cass Caul Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 27	Posted - 2013.08.04 07:12:00 - [10] - Quote An LAV running into an armored tanked person should be like a sedan running into a deer. Running into a Heavy should be like hitting a moose.

Heimdallr69 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 435	Posted - 2013.08.04 07:15:00 - [11] - Quote Atleast now there won't be pricks running people over anymore oh wait..my bad, atleast I only did it once in a while usually after I got run over
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 6924	Posted - 2013.08.04 07:43:00 - [12] - Quote /me secretly wishes the repair tools was a passenger controlled item via turret like.
gbghg L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION 2936	Posted - 2013.08.04 08:33:00 - [13] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: /me secretly wishes the repair tools was a passenger controlled item via turret like. I'd prefer a radial AoE module like the active scanner, if done right it could be very useful in engagements. Also the gallente SLAV while useful, can be very fun with 2 jovians on it.
Cat Merc BetaMax. 3826	Posted - 2013.08.04 09:14:00 - [14] - Quote Wait for 1.5 vehicle rebalance. /thread
Khal V'Rani Nephilim Initiative 233	Posted - 2013.08.04 09:36:00 - [15] - Quote Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Rusty Shallows wrote: Do you really think CCP will set things up so that you roadkill one merc and suddenly your LAV or LLAV will explode? I'm betting it will be a little/minor damage and a slight reduction in speed if all goes well. So that running people over will become a split second risk/reward decision instead of an automatic HELL YEAH! I imagine collision damage being all but removed or instadeath lavs. Dropships used to be really useful for squishing mercenaries but now they explode if they so much as look at the ground. >_> <_< ...had a dropship land on me on purpose and fly away just a few weeks ago... Didn't catch the pilots name because I was laughing so hard. Props to the pilot. It was awesome flying!
Himiko Kuronaga SyNergy Gaming EoN. 1093	Posted - 2013.08.04 10:54:00 - [16] - Quote Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for Uhhh, it really can't. The module it comes with is impossible to use. Funny, I use it all the time. It's frighteningly effective, in fact.
Beld Errmon D3M3NT3D M1NDZ 761	Posted - 2013.08.04 11:01:00 - [17] - Quote The last time a vehicle caused this much anger they got nerfed into the dropships you see today, enjoy your murder taxis while they last cause soon they'll be like the laser rifle, F'd in the A.
Ronan Elsword Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 83	Posted - 2013.08.04 11:07:00 - [18] - Quote Cass Caul wrote: An LAV running into an armored tanked person should be like a sedan running into a deer. Running into a Heavy should be like hitting a moose. My Lav can take direct Forge Gun shots and survive. You really think hitting a heavy guy will crush our LAV's. Modern day transport cars are meant to crumble when they hit things. It lessons the impact on the passengers.
Mortedeamor Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback 141	Posted - 2013.08.04 11:09:00 - [19] - Quote uprising 1.3-1.4 suit balancing armor vs shield tank reworking. maybe a collision nerf 1.4-1.7 ccp is reworking vehicles that includes giving us a greatly requested vehicle lock. this game is a work in progress and ccp can be a bit slow if you cant hack it while its being tweaked then gtfo. vehicles have been in the trashcan for over a year the horizon on which they are balanced is in sight stop crying. and if you cant stop crying you should stop playing dust until its finished and deal with having less sp than everyone who stuck with it
Sgt Buttscratch G I A N T EoN. 582	Posted - 2013.08.04 11:11:00 - [20] - Quote I think for the LLAV, it should maybe have a healing AOE of a timer, so it can be driven close to the intended targets without that horrible lock on. For Vehicle healing the lock on needs to be much simpler also, for tank healing tanks it aint that bad, but drop ships, and there current state, its awful.

Blake Kingston Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 24	Posted - 2013.08.04 11:46:00 - [21] - Quote Cass Caul wrote: An LAV running into an armored tanked person should be like a sedan running into a deer. Running into a Heavy should be like hitting a moose. So we can tie their bodies to the side of the LAV? Not seeing a problem so far!
Deluxe Edition TeamPlayers EoN. 680	Posted - 2013.08.04 11:56:00 - [22] - Quote all they really need to do is decrease the lock on time for the curren LLAV infantry repair tools and add a WP reward for them. Those things are rediculous, make the person you are repairing invincible. They are also great for repairing the tanks on the field as well, with a good LLAV a tanker can use a lesser repair module and focus more on offense and using call outs for reps when needed. The current system of LLAV murder taxi makes pub matched a joke, usually each side has 2-3 of them just driving in circles collecting easy kills because they have the best vehicle tank in the game with almost the same HP count (if you include their amazing passive resistances) as actual tanks, while moving at over 80 meters a second.
darkiller240 K-A-O-S theory 127	Posted - 2013.08.04 12:12:00 - [23] - Quote Khal V'Rani wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Rusty Shallows wrote: Do you really think CCP will set things up so that you roadkill one merc and suddenly your LAV or LLAV will explode? I'm betting it will be a little/minor damage and a slight reduction in speed if all goes well. So that running people over will become a split second risk/reward decision instead of an automatic HELL YEAH! I imagine collision damage being all but removed or instadeath lavs. Dropships used to be really useful for squishing mercenaries but now they explode if they so much as look at the ground. >_> <_< ...had a dropship land on me on purpose and fly away just a few weeks ago... Didn't catch the pilots name because I was laughing so hard. Props to the pilot. It was awesome flying! Were you a heavy?
Shotty GoBang Pro Hic Immortalis League of Infamy 503	Posted - 2013.08.04 17:31:00 - [24] - Quote Ronan Elsword wrote: Modern day transport cars are meant to crumble when they hit things. Modern day transport cars aren't equipped with shields.
TheAmazing FlyingPig Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 2275	Posted - 2013.08.04 17:33:00 - [25] - Quote 1.5.
Ynned Ivanova Bragian Order Amarr Empire 39	Posted - 2013.08.04 17:37:00 - [26] - Quote Liking the radial aoe repping. Now give me a cannopy and wp akin to a logi and I would hand in my Taxi badge.
Aizen Intiki Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack 335	Posted - 2013.08.04 17:49:00 - [27] - Quote They've already said what they are going to do: in 1.4, they will make it to where unless going at top speed, you will just be brushed aside, but at top speed, you will die. now be quiet., and L2read. Peace, Aizen
Harpyja DUST University Ivy League 446	Posted - 2013.08.04 18:16:00 - [28] - Quote All these people say that dropships can't crush people anymore, but I'm just wondering how I've accidentally crushed people with my Python while getting too close to the ground?
Den-tredje Baron ParagonX 181	Posted - 2013.08.04 18:22:00 - [29] - Quote Eurydice Itzhak wrote: They won't do anything to make the llav useful. It will become another useless vehicle like the scout lav, all forms of dropships, and enforcers tanks. It'd be like if only one or two weapons were viable for infantry.... Oh wait that is exactly the case. Why do we play this game? I've put this idea out here quite a few times. Why doesn't CCP rework the LLAV rep tool to be an AOE rep tool instead of this "hey stand still for 3-5 secs and i'll see if i can keep this square on you and THEN !! i can rep you" winky wanky rep tool it got. Changing it to work with an AOE effect will basically just mean that it'll be a very tanky triage nanohive on wheels. ^^ COME ON !! isn't this an awesome idea !! ^^
Mobius Wyvern BetaMax. 2870	Posted - 2013.08.04 18:38:00 - [30] - Quote Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for Uhhh, it really can't. The module it comes with is impossible to use. Tell that to the people I see activating it on their passenger when he hops out so that he can gun down everyone who comes near him while having near-invulnerability until the cycles run out.

Cyrius Li-Moody The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 627	Posted - 2013.08.04 18:40:00 - [31] - Quote There is definitely a difference between impossible and just annoying to use.
Jaqen Morghalis Abandoned Privilege General Tso's Alliance 252	Posted - 2013.08.04 18:53:00 - [32] - Quote Den-tredje Baron wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: They won't do anything to make the llav useful. It will become another useless vehicle like the scout lav, all forms of dropships, and enforcers tanks. It'd be like if only one or two weapons were viable for infantry.... Oh wait that is exactly the case. Why do we play this game? I've put this idea out here quite a few times. Why doesn't CCP rework the LLAV rep tool to be an AOE rep tool instead of this "hey stand still for 3-5 secs and i'll see if i can keep this square on you and THEN !! i can rep you" winky wanky rep tool it got. Changing it to work with an AOE effect will basically just mean that it'll be a very tanky triage nanohive on wheels. ^^ COME ON !! isn't this an awesome idea !! ^^ Basically, instead of targetting a single individual, you'd be passively repping as many allies as could fit within the AoE. I only see this as an option if they split the repair rate (hp/s) between every player in range. For example (using made-up numbers for illustration purposes): Single recipient @ 60hp/s, 2 players @ 30hp/s, 3 @ 20hp/s, 4 @ 15hp/s, etc., etc. While I like the idea in principle, I think that providing full rep rate to everyone in the radius, with zero effort required, might be just a little OP.
CoD isAIDS Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 112	Posted - 2013.08.04 18:53:00 - [33] - Quote Rusty Shallows wrote: Do you really think CCP will set things up so that you roadkill one merc and suddenly your LAV or LLAV will explode? I'm betting it will be a little/minor damage and a slight reduction in speed if all goes well. So that running people over will become a split second risk/reward decision instead of an automatic HELL YEAH! We already take a little damage, and depending on how a red dot is hit, either keep moving along or we stop dead.
Eurydice Itzhak Militaires Sans Jeux 160	Posted - 2013.08.04 19:01:00 - [34] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for Uhhh, it really can't. The module it comes with is impossible to use. Tell that to the people I see activating it on their passenger when he hops out so that he can gun down everyone who comes near him while having near-invulnerability until the cycles run out. Except it requires 5 seconds to lock on, plenty of time for the infantry to die. And if they go around a corner the health beam is broken. Or if they take. 5 steps away from the lav. It's much more effecient to just jump out of the car and shoot the enemy, or physically block the bullets so your ally can regenerate his shields (which doesn't require a logistics lav). Anyone defending the current mechanic is bad. Anyone who has faith in ccp making it actually work, I used to be like you :(
Den-tredje Baron ParagonX 182	Posted - 2013.08.04 19:03:00 - [35] - Quote Jaqen Morghalis wrote: Den-tredje Baron wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: They won't do anything to make the llav useful. It will become another useless vehicle like the scout lav, all forms of dropships, and enforcers tanks. It'd be like if only one or two weapons were viable for infantry.... Oh wait that is exactly the case. Why do we play this game? I've put this idea out here quite a few times. Why doesn't CCP rework the LLAV rep tool to be an AOE rep tool instead of this "hey stand still for 3-5 secs and i'll see if i can keep this square on you and THEN !! i can rep you" winky wanky rep tool it got. Changing it to work with an AOE effect will basically just mean that it'll be a very tanky triage nanohive on wheels. ^^ COME ON !! isn't this an awesome idea !! ^^ Basically, instead of targetting a single individual, you'd be passively repping as many allies as could fit within the AoE. I only see this as an option if they split the repair rate (hp/s) between every player in range. For example (using made-up numbers for illustration purposes): Single recipient @ 60hp/s, 2 players @ 30hp/s, 3 @ 20hp/s, 4 @ 15hp/s, etc., etc. While I like the idea in principle, I think that providing full rep rate to everyone in the radius, with zero effort required, might be just a little OP. Yeah very true i usually don't include numbers into my ideas as it's usually those that define whether it's OP or not. Though you gotta remember you won't be able to rep through walls (like you won't get ammo standing inside the bubble of a nanohive but on the wrong side of a wall) So yeah maybe if it got something like 100hp/s and a radius of 30 meter that would then get split out to how many are inside the rep radius. It's a lot but ok look at how much damage an AR does That's actually a really really nice idea It's gonna be like calling for you team car in cycling instead it'll be angry mercs steering and they'll come to pimp up your armor / shield
Jaqen Morghalis Abandoned Privilege General Tso's Alliance 253	Posted - 2013.08.04 19:13:00 - [36] - Quote Den-tredje Baron wrote: Jaqen Morghalis wrote: Den-tredje Baron wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: They won't do anything to make the llav useful. It will become another useless vehicle like the scout lav, all forms of dropships, and enforcers tanks. It'd be like if only one or two weapons were viable for infantry.... Oh wait that is exactly the case. Why do we play this game? I've put this idea out here quite a few times. Why doesn't CCP rework the LLAV rep tool to be an AOE rep tool instead of this "hey stand still for 3-5 secs and i'll see if i can keep this square on you and THEN !! i can rep you" winky wanky rep tool it got. Changing it to work with an AOE effect will basically just mean that it'll be a very tanky triage nanohive on wheels. ^^ COME ON !! isn't this an awesome idea !! ^^ Basically, instead of targetting a single individual, you'd be passively repping as many allies as could fit within the AoE. I only see this as an option if they split the repair rate (hp/s) between every player in range. For example (using made-up numbers for illustration purposes): Single recipient @ 60hp/s, 2 players @ 30hp/s, 3 @ 20hp/s, 4 @ 15hp/s, etc., etc. While I like the idea in principle, I think that providing full rep rate to everyone in the radius, with zero effort required, might be just a little OP. Yeah very true i usually don't include numbers into my ideas as it's usually those that define whether it's OP or not. Though you gotta remember you won't be able to rep through walls (like you won't get ammo standing inside the bubble of a nanohive but on the wrong side of a wall) So yeah maybe if it got something like 100hp/s and a radius of 30 meter that would then get split out to how many are inside the rep radius. It's a lot but ok look at how much damage an AR does That's actually a really really nice idea It's gonna be like calling for you team car in cycling instead it'll be angry mercs steering and they'll come to pimp up your armor / shield Plus, it would introduce an element of risk, because anyone who wants repair would need to leave cover, and crowd around your LAV like kids gathering around an ice-cream truck! One well-placed explosion and... well, you get the idea!
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 916	Posted - 2013.08.04 19:27:00 - [37] - Quote It's sad that so many players believe the main function of a LAV is to run people over. Running people over should be the last thing LAV drivers focus on. Look, even if they nerf the collision damage to make running people over nearly impossible, you still have a LAV that is almost invincible from all but prolonged and intense AV. Which means driving into a hot-zone, whether to drop people off or to reach a heavily guarded objective, is still a very useful aspect of the vehicle. It just amazes me how tanked some of these LAV's are, where taking 3 lai dai nades barely scratches the shields, or even taking 3 assault forge hits and the shields drop only a miniscule amount. Not sure if this has to do with some kind of module for damage resistance or not, but it is ridiculous. IMO, vehicles should be like suits, you have a certain set HP. So if your LLAV/tank has 4000 shields and 1000 armor, that means after 3 hits from a assault forge (roughly 1600 damage), you will only have about 200 HP left. These modules that can make you guys nearly invincible once turned on, has got to go.
Mary Sedillo Pure Innocence. EoN. 192	Posted - 2013.08.04 19:50:00 - [38] - Quote Fix the WP rewards for Logistic Vehicle services and you will see a decline in those running people over. Also, ground players, stop bitching and think for once. Vehicle operators should not and WILL NOT bend over and let you stick us, so CCP shouldn't force us into that position. Think and win, rather than *****, moan and lose.
Mobius Wyvern BetaMax. 2871	Posted - 2013.08.04 19:52:00 - [39] - Quote Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for Uhhh, it really can't. The module it comes with is impossible to use. Tell that to the people I see activating it on their passenger when he hops out so that he can gun down everyone who comes near him while having near-invulnerability until the cycles run out. Except it requires 5 seconds to lock on, plenty of time for the infantry to die. And if they go around a corner the health beam is broken. Or if they take. 5 steps away from the lav. It's much more effecient to just jump out of the car and shoot the enemy, or physically block the bullets so your ally can regenerate his shields (which doesn't require a logistics lav). Anyone defending the current mechanic is bad. Anyone who has faith in ccp making it actually work, I used to be like you :( You COULD try repairing vehicles with it, you know? Even when it was broken as hell back in Codex, it was still neat to drive into a HAV v HAV fight, rep up the friendly one, and then speed away while the enemy one exploded.
Eurydice Itzhak Militaires Sans Jeux 160	Posted - 2013.08.04 19:54:00 - [40] - Quote An invincible lav that can't kill or support is useless djinn. You don't see kujo using.... Oh wait you don't see kujo at all :0

Alaika Arbosa Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows 857	Posted - 2013.08.04 19:55:00 - [41] - Quote Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for The LLAV repairs things? Wow, you learn something new everyday.....
Jaqen Morghalis Abandoned Privilege General Tso's Alliance 253	Posted - 2013.08.04 19:55:00 - [42] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for Uhhh, it really can't. The module it comes with is impossible to use. Tell that to the people I see activating it on their passenger when he hops out so that he can gun down everyone who comes near him while having near-invulnerability until the cycles run out. Except it requires 5 seconds to lock on, plenty of time for the infantry to die. And if they go around a corner the health beam is broken. Or if they take. 5 steps away from the lav. It's much more effecient to just jump out of the car and shoot the enemy, or physically block the bullets so your ally can regenerate his shields (which doesn't require a logistics lav). Anyone defending the current mechanic is bad. Anyone who has faith in ccp making it actually work, I used to be like you :( You COULD try repairing vehicles with it, you know? Even when it was broken as hell back in Codex, it was still neat to drive into a HAV v HAV fight, rep up the friendly one, and then speed away while the enemy one exploded. Maybe they should change it so it ONLY repairs vehicles an installations, but not infantry? Seems to me that was probably what they were intended for anyway.
Eurydice Itzhak Militaires Sans Jeux 160	Posted - 2013.08.04 20:00:00 - [43] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Delta 749 wrote: Yeah, it totally cant be used to repair things in a support role like logistics is designed for Uhhh, it really can't. The module it comes with is impossible to use. Tell that to the people I see activating it on their passenger when he hops out so that he can gun down everyone who comes near him while having near-invulnerability until the cycles run out. Except it requires 5 seconds to lock on, plenty of time for the infantry to die. And if they go around a corner the health beam is broken. Or if they take. 5 steps away from the lav. It's much more effecient to just jump out of the car and shoot the enemy, or physically block the bullets so your ally can regenerate his shields (which doesn't require a logistics lav). Anyone defending the current mechanic is bad. Anyone who has faith in ccp making it actually work, I used to be like you :( You COULD try repairing vehicles with it, you know? Even when it was broken as hell back in Codex, it was still neat to drive into a HAV v HAV fight, rep up the friendly one, and then speed away while the enemy one exploded. Mm memory may be failing me but im almost certain the llav module only works on infantry. The shield transporter module works on vehicles but that isnt llav specific.
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 362	Posted - 2013.08.04 20:27:00 - [44] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: /me secretly wishes the repair tools was a passenger controlled item via turret like. That would be the coolest thing. Most people that hop in my LAVs/LLAVs don't get in the turret and of those that do fewer still actually manage to kill anything. I'd fit a repping turret no matter the cost. Words can not express how much I, as one of those players that is drawn to support, love that idea. Words can also not explain how much I hate you for putting such an idea out there when there is absolutely no chance of it becoming a reality. You bastard. He is the core gamer, the bastard child of the casual and hardcore gamer. He invests the former's effort and cries when he doesn't get the latter's results. CrotchGrab 360 wrote: You're so philosophical. please adorn me with more pearls of wisdom.
gbghg L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION 2939	Posted - 2013.08.04 21:06:00 - [45] - Quote I tried to rep someone earlier to save him from enemy fire in my chary, the lock on took so long that he almost died, and as soon as he moved the lock on broke, he then died. After that I went back to murder taxi'ing.
Eurydice Itzhak Militaires Sans Jeux 171	Posted - 2013.08.05 05:42:00 - [46] - Quote gbghg wrote: I tried to rep someone earlier to save him from enemy fire in my chary, the lock on took so long that he almost died, and as soon as he moved the lock on broke, he then died. After that I went back to murder taxi'ing. Every attempt at using the current iteration of the infantry healing module in a nutshell.
Rusty Shallows Black Jackals 213	Posted - 2013.08.05 06:05:00 - [47] - Quote Eurydice Itzhak wrote: gbghg wrote: I tried to rep someone earlier to save him from enemy fire in my chary, the lock on took so long that he almost died, and as soon as he moved the lock on broke, he then died. After that I went back to murder taxi'ing. Every attempt at using the current iteration of the infantry healing module in a nutshell. At least he tried. *shrug*


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]