DUST Search - Still nothing on ARs?

All Channels

General Discussions

Still nothing on ARs?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 2482	Posted - 2013.07.23 23:47:00 - [61] - Quote D3LTA Blitzkrieg II wrote: LMAO a ar is suppose to be versatile. They're supposed to be OK at everything- they're too good at long range right now. The tiny scrambler rifle range difference (lasers are meant to have far more range than blasters- which the AR is) is nothing Unless laser rifles are in the tiny "sweet spot" range, either ARs will outdamage them anyway, or the extremely steep laser dropoff will turn the laser into a garden hose ARs don't overheat Due to the map design being in favor of ARs, snipers are forced into either AR range, or an extremely stupid location with a tiny firing window. Again- ARs are more reliable than 20GJ blasters. Even with the change of range, you have to be in spitting distance to kill someone with a small blaster. And you wonder why LAV drivers go murder taxi. Scratch that- ARs are more reliable than ANY small turrets, save for AV capabilities, which small turrets suck at anyway.
SOGZ PANDA The Southern Legion 5	Posted - 2013.07.24 00:03:00 - [62] - Quote I feel like after reading this post that you haven't quite understood what an assault rifle actually is meant to do.
Delta 749 Kestrel Reconnaissance 1443	Posted - 2013.07.24 00:12:00 - [63] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: D3LTA Blitzkrieg II wrote: LMAO a ar is suppose to be versatile. They're supposed to be OK at everything- they're too good at long range right now. The tiny scrambler rifle range difference (lasers are meant to have far more range than blasters- which the AR is) is nothing Unless laser rifles are in the tiny "sweet spot" range, either ARs will outdamage them anyway, or the extremely steep laser dropoff will turn the laser into a garden hose ARs don't overheat Due to the map design being in favor of ARs, snipers are forced into either AR range, or an extremely stupid location with a tiny firing window. Again- ARs are more reliable than 20GJ blasters. Even with the change of range, you have to be in spitting distance to kill someone with a small blaster. And you wonder why LAV drivers go murder taxi. Scratch that- ARs are more reliable than ANY small turrets, save for AV capabilities, which small turrets suck at anyway. ARs do overheat actually but you need to be using a Krins to see it happen
Kalante Schiffer Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 351	Posted - 2013.07.24 00:22:00 - [64] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: D3LTA Blitzkrieg II wrote: LMAO a ar is suppose to be versatile. They're supposed to be OK at everything- they're too good at long range right now. The tiny scrambler rifle range difference (lasers are meant to have far more range than blasters- which the AR is) is nothing Unless laser rifles are in the tiny "sweet spot" range, either ARs will outdamage them anyway, or the extremely steep laser dropoff will turn the laser into a garden hose ARs don't overheat Due to the map design being in favor of ARs, snipers are forced into either AR range, or an extremely stupid location with a tiny firing window. Again- ARs are more reliable than 20GJ blasters. Even with the change of range, you have to be in spitting distance to kill someone with a small blaster. And you wonder why LAV drivers go murder taxi. Scratch that- ARs are more reliable than ANY small turrets, save for AV capabilities, which small turrets suck at anyway. god damn you bltch too much. you got raped so badly by an AR to create this post?
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 305	Posted - 2013.07.24 00:33:00 - [65] - Quote Kalante Schiffer wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: D3LTA Blitzkrieg II wrote: LMAO a ar is suppose to be versatile. They're supposed to be OK at everything- they're too good at long range right now. The tiny scrambler rifle range difference (lasers are meant to have far more range than blasters- which the AR is) is nothing Unless laser rifles are in the tiny "sweet spot" range, either ARs will outdamage them anyway, or the extremely steep laser dropoff will turn the laser into a garden hose ARs don't overheat Due to the map design being in favor of ARs, snipers are forced into either AR range, or an extremely stupid location with a tiny firing window. Again- ARs are more reliable than 20GJ blasters. Even with the change of range, you have to be in spitting distance to kill someone with a small blaster. And you wonder why LAV drivers go murder taxi. Scratch that- ARs are more reliable than ANY small turrets, save for AV capabilities, which small turrets suck at anyway. god damn you bltch too much. you got raped so badly by an AR to create this post? you never see me whine about a flaylock. fused grenades, scrambler riffle n make a huge ass list of bullshit on the forums whenever i feel mad. Rememeber when you guy were fighting TP? What weapon was the most prevelant?
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 305	Posted - 2013.07.24 00:34:00 - [66] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: D3LTA Blitzkrieg II wrote: LMAO a ar is suppose to be versatile. They're supposed to be OK at everything- they're too good at long range right now. The tiny scrambler rifle range difference (lasers are meant to have far more range than blasters- which the AR is) is nothing Unless laser rifles are in the tiny "sweet spot" range, either ARs will outdamage them anyway, or the extremely steep laser dropoff will turn the laser into a garden hose ARs don't overheat Due to the map design being in favor of ARs, snipers are forced into either AR range, or an extremely stupid location with a tiny firing window. Again- ARs are more reliable than 20GJ blasters. Even with the change of range, you have to be in spitting distance to kill someone with a small blaster. And you wonder why LAV drivers go murder taxi. Scratch that- ARs are more reliable than ANY small turrets, save for AV capabilities, which small turrets suck at anyway. switching stats between AR's and Turrets would be nice.
Panther Alpha DarkWingsss 745	Posted - 2013.07.24 00:38:00 - [67] - Quote Kalante Schiffer wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: D3LTA Blitzkrieg II wrote: LMAO a ar is suppose to be versatile. They're supposed to be OK at everything- they're too good at long range right now. The tiny scrambler rifle range difference (lasers are meant to have far more range than blasters- which the AR is) is nothing Unless laser rifles are in the tiny "sweet spot" range, either ARs will outdamage them anyway, or the extremely steep laser dropoff will turn the laser into a garden hose ARs don't overheat Due to the map design being in favor of ARs, snipers are forced into either AR range, or an extremely stupid location with a tiny firing window. Again- ARs are more reliable than 20GJ blasters. Even with the change of range, you have to be in spitting distance to kill someone with a small blaster. And you wonder why LAV drivers go murder taxi. Scratch that- ARs are more reliable than ANY small turrets, save for AV capabilities, which small turrets suck at anyway. god damn you bltch too much. you got raped so badly by an AR to create this post? you never see me whine about a flaylock. fused grenades, scrambler riffle n make a list of bullshit on the forums whenever i feel mad. I started to use my Caldari suit again ... i may be pissing off few people with my GEK-38... but i wasn't expecting an AR QQ thread so quickly.
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 305	Posted - 2013.07.24 00:40:00 - [68] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Panther Alpha wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Panther Alpha wrote: AR's are little pusy cats compare to MD's, Flaylocks, Shotguns, Sniper Rifles, Tanks, LLAV's, grenades, Remote Explosive...But lets nerf the AR, right ? It takes 2 full magazines to kill a Protobear with an AR, but it only takes ONE shotgun shoot... or half of a Flaylock shoot, or one Sniper shoot, or one LAV road kill, or ONE remote Explosive, or ONE grenade .... Of all the OP ** we have right now, they AR is more UP. How much SP do you have in AR's? it takes 2-3 shotgun blasts, 3 flaylock shots, 2 sniper rounds for a Proto You have Bad aim if you can't kill with less than 1 clip of an AR 3/10 I have seen better. It takes a full AR mag and half of a SMG mag to kill just a Adv heavy, or Adv Assault ...You obviously don't use the AR, other hows you will know this. 3 Flaylock shots ? Trollolololll 2.5 million, Specced in to AR's try again. Heavies are supposed to be hard to kill, Assaults aren't hard at all. a good player can take/dodge 3 Flaylock shots. Are you serious ? ....Are you saying that the AR is OP, and that the Flaylock is OK ?... If i start using the Flaylock tomorrow, it will be nerfed in a couple of days...CCP will get scare of the ** i can do with that thing. Well yes and no AR is unbalenced not, OP, if it was any other game I would not complain but here it's a blaster Rifle switching stats between AR's and 20 GJ Blaster Turrets would solve some issues but a rework of each is in need Flaylocks ARE OP but there is rebalence is in need.


Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2013-2024, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,03s, ref 20241124/1714
EVE-Online™/DUST514™ and EVE/DUST514 imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.