OP is a term used loosely...

AV is not that OP. Against good tankers that know when to retreat and who know how to keep distanced, my Ishukone does only enough to take out shields which usually results in an endless cycle of a back and forth between myself and the tank.

You're kidding, right? Have been in a vehicle and witnessed half your armor melt away from one volley? If not, you lack the experience to comment.

You're kidding, right? Have been in a vehicle and witnessed half your armor melt away from one volley? If not, you lack the experience to comment.

AV is not that OP. Against good tankers that know when to retreat and who know how to keep distanced, my Ishukone does only enough to take out shields which usually results in an endless cycle of a back and forth between myself and the tank.

offcourse they are OP, i'll give an example. Yesterday i was trying a new fitted madrugar, 180 and 120 mm armor modules, two 11 % anti damage modules, 1 shield anti damage 10%, and some module that gives another, 6 % to armor and shield. it took them two hits with a swarm to take my shields out and 1 proto type AV, boom....there goes the HAV. It does not matter what one uses, atm as it is now, AV destroy everything no matter, what you use. You know last build i could withstand an OB with a fit like this, now its nothing more then a glorified paperweight.

two 11 % anti damage modules

I think not; The game doesn't let you fit more than one Damage Control onto any vehicle.

Honestly can't comment too much on this.

As a perfected Shield HAV with about 15K EHP with boosters running, I deal with infantry running AV perfectly well if I'm driving smart and not being too greedy. My main issue lays with the armor tankers who are aggravatingly hard to destroy currently, but I do see them blow up much more often against AV...

if they do nerf the armor reppers but buff the other areas of armor and shield HAVs then I'll be okay with that.

what crack are you on? you need to share.

AV is not that OP. Against good tankers that know when to retreat and who know how to keep distanced, my Ishukone does only enough to take out shields which usually results in an endless cycle of a back and forth between myself and the tank.

All the good tankers are gone...

Question. How many proto AVs does it take to destroy a fully proto shield/armor upgraded tank?

If you say more than 3, then they are not OP.

Good tankers? Actually, you must be a **** AV player then. All the good tankers are gone and if you can't solo a HAV by now, you should find a new specialization.

I can make three assumptions here:

1. You are an AV player who chases down **** fitted militia and standard tanks from rooftops

2. You are a tanker with a **** fitted militia or standard tank

3. You don't even tank or AV bro

Dude he is one of the most vocal tank player on the forums. I can't speak to whether or not he is a good tanker because I NEVER pay any attention to people's names in battle (so I couldn't even tell you of I have ever fought him). But quite certain that he has the SP necessary to create a well fit tank, and it's not like creating a well fit tank is something difficult to learn how to do.

Now back to CoD with you scrub.

I don't care if he is the equivalent of Jesus in tanker terms. He's implying that soloing HAVs is easy. I admit that MLT and STD tanks can be handled with minimal effort, but soloing a well-fitted ADV tank? Please.

If an ADV HAV can't solo a lone FGer, then the fault lies within the tanker. The only time things become problematic is if the FGer has an advantage of being perched on a roof.