Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ccp isn't paying attention to tanks at all... Still waiting on the shield buff... Getting REAL tired of the "invincibility" module on the armor tanks. (also known as a armor rep). It's got a faster cooldown, and is waaay stronger than anything shield tanks have.
Also, a rep tool for infantry to work on Shields. also, Shield tanks speed? Also, along with the other things, armor has more hp. |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
83
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Oh shut up. Stay off the front lines scrub. You hit harder. |
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:Oh shut up. Stay off the front lines scrub. You hit harder. Shield tanks most certainly, do NOT hit harder. And even if they did. It's not strong enough to go thru the armor rep a madrauger. makes a neutron blaster null. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
970
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
If you're not hitting harder find the damage mods. |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon DARKSTAR ARMY
263
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
vehicle shield energizer module, wih it i would battle with armor tanks. |
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:If you're not hitting harder find the damage mods. powergrid is too weak. Low slots are used to extend the power grid. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
970
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Yotta Guns wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:If you're not hitting harder find the damage mods. powergrid is too weak. Low slots are used to extend the power grid. The power grid is only too low when you try to fit proto or the high pg advanced rail. |
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:32:00 -
[8] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Yotta Guns wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:If you're not hitting harder find the damage mods. powergrid is too weak. Low slots are used to extend the power grid. The power grid is only too low when you try to fit proto or the high pg advanced rail. Nope, just a neutron blaster. |
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:vehicle shield energizer module, wih it i would battle with armor tanks. I'm not seeing a shield energizer... Only armor energizers. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
970
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Yotta Guns wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Yotta Guns wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:If you're not hitting harder find the damage mods. powergrid is too weak. Low slots are used to extend the power grid. The power grid is only too low when you try to fit proto or the high pg advanced rail. Nope, just a neutron blaster.
That's odd, because I didn't have a problem fitting a standard blastet |
|
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:52:00 -
[11] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Yotta Guns wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Yotta Guns wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:If you're not hitting harder find the damage mods. powergrid is too weak. Low slots are used to extend the power grid. The power grid is only too low when you try to fit proto or the high pg advanced rail. Nope, just a neutron blaster. That's odd, because I didn't have a problem fitting a standard blastet Not without taking away my heavy shield extender. If I did I wouldn't live long enough to actually fire the turret which would only be 10 percent stronger at best. which would hurt able to hurt the armor tank thru it's rep, but only very slowly... And again, I'd still die, especially if I gave up 1.4k Shielding. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
399
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 09:57:00 -
[12] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:Oh shut up. Stay off the front lines scrub. You hit harder.
You should know better considering who your alt is ... you run shield tanks like myself and also I knkw you dont have problems popi g less skilled pilots in maddys but I garuntee if you came up agai st me I a maddy with you in a gunlogi I would decimate you many times over . If we met in shield vrs shield it would be 50/50 if we met In armour it would be 50/50 if you had your maddy and I had my gunlogi it would be 70/30 in your favour simply because of how underpowerd shield tanks are against armour tanks. |
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
52
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 10:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
Half of the people whine because their tanks get blown up so fast, the others whine about invincible tanks. I guess this means it's perfectly balanced. |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
87
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 10:51:00 -
[14] - Quote
when it comes to vehicles in general CCP has simply abandoned us... I don't pilot tanks often but I do use LAVs quite a bit and I have posted about needing locks... different topic I know... but CCPs response is the same... no response... instead of fighting amongst yourselves about which tank has an advantage I would suggest focusing on the real issue... CCPs utter lack of respect or attention to all of us pilots be it tanks dropships or LAVs...
we must make them hear us! |
AKIMBO ASSASSAIN
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 11:25:00 -
[15] - Quote
as a shield tanker i can say without a doubt that gunnlogi's are underpowered when compared to armor although i must say they aren't invincible i use missiles for my tanks and i shred armor at a distance but its hard to do even that if sometimes because of the armor tanks high reps in all honesty if ccp wants to keep shield tanks where there at its fine by me only thing i would ask for is an increase speed |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
87
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 11:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Aizen Intiki wrote:Oh shut up. Stay off the front lines scrub. You hit harder. You should know better considering who your alt is ... you run shield tanks like myself and also I knkw you dont have problems popi g less skilled pilots in maddys but I garuntee if you came up agai st me I a maddy with you in a gunlogi I would decimate you many times over . If we met in shield vrs shield it would be 50/50 if we met In armour it would be 50/50 if you had your maddy and I had my gunlogi it would be 70/30 in your favour simply because of how underpowerd shield tanks are against armour tanks.
Not going to happen. I've learned the trick to it: get in a good spot, and fire at the HAV. If it spots you, start moving backwards. Works every time (kinda like dealing with shotties). I'm pretty sure if you die you're too close, or just being a idiot and staying still. I keep on seeing people doing that. It's not a Gallente HAV; stop trying to use it like one, fitting it like one, etc. You have to have a different mentality with it. Like I have said before, their passive shield tanking ability is to be honest **** poor and needs to be like EVE to be any good.
Peace, AIzen |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
405
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 11:49:00 -
[17] - Quote
Duu I know that my CALDARI gunlogi isnt a gallente . I also know hiw to tank in both schools I.e. armour and shield. Shields are exeelent vrs infantry up close and other tanks from afar but at the moment armour tanks both do well up close and afar against I fantry and tanks. Shield tanking needa a buff to stand up to armour tanki g and the shield tanking community has been aski g for deacent passive regen to make it viable for a while. Possibly in the form of a heavy passive shield regenerator that or some form of heavy shield enegiser not unlike the ones the infantry have. |
True Adamance
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
418
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 12:02:00 -
[18] - Quote
Gotta balance how **** us Armour Infantry guys have it compared to you Shield tanking SOB's. I've been waiting since Chromosome for armour to get good.....you can wait, get to the back of the line. |
Jakar Umbra
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
127
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 12:24:00 -
[19] - Quote
Before it's all over armour and shields will be the same, or rather shields>armour even more simply because it'll be able to do what armour does and regen itself. Shield tanks, even the HAV, skirmish and Armour tanks brawl. Armour tanks are supposed to outlast in a straight up fight. You can't expect both tanks to be able to do the same thing.
Also like Adamance said, infantry should honestly balance first in terms of armour. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 12:29:00 -
[20] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Gotta balance how **** us Armour Infantry guys have it compared to you Shield tanking SOB's. I've been waiting since Chromosome for armour to get good.....you can wait, get to the back of the line.
This is a vehicle thrwad so im being polite when I say GTFO scrub. |
|
Halador Osiris
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
421
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 12:42:00 -
[21] - Quote
Caldari design leans heavily on missiles and long range railguns. Try equipping a missile turret on your tank, see what happens. All your powergrid issues suddenly disappear. I fly a Python and consistently note that missile shield tanks are harder to kill than railgun/blaster shield tanks. Now your problem is that large missile turrets are a little underpowered. Also, it'd be nice if accelerated missiles went as far as large turret installations can shoot them (aka forever). |
AKIMBO ASSASSAIN
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 12:45:00 -
[22] - Quote
i believe a better passive rep and also more or better modules would help balance tanks more any thoughts? |
Purona
The Vanguardians
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 13:02:00 -
[23] - Quote
instead of just saying something how about offering some stats for balancing purposes
armor tanks 6210 armor recovered over a 15 second period of time with a cooldown of 15 seconds as well as 330 shields regenerated over 45 seconds
want balance shield tanks should be able to do at least 6540 over a 45 second period of time
with all passive shield regen skills and one max shield passive regen module gunnlogis regenerate for 27 hp a second
1215 shields repaired over 25 seconds
heavy shield boost Heavy Clarity Ward Shield Booster module should be able to heal for at least 5325 within 45 seconds or 355 per second over 15 seconds with a 30 second cooldown for a more stable repair rate
with current stats it seems like ccp wants shields to be more passive regen for shield tanks
meaning shield tanks should be hitting like 108 shield passive a second along with Heavy Clarity Ward Shield Booster to max armor tanks in terms of regen over a 45 second period |
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
327
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 18:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:If you're not hitting harder find the damage mods.
okay, for shield tanks to be viable again, they need to be the glass cannons of Chromosome- that means stacking 3 damage mods and maxing out turret skills to lvl 5 brings a 50% damage bonus. they HAVE to be able to do more damage at range than an armor tank can possibly rep/tank against. pretty much, they have to 2-shot just about everything like they used to. not popular, i know, but until that, or we get a 100hp/sec recharge, shield tanks will never be viable tank killers at any range. |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
157
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 19:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
tanks are only there for noobs to be impressed by.
there is no way currently to balance the tanks, and you don't make enough per match to pay for one. math is fun. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
805
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 19:46:00 -
[26] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Half of the people whine because their tanks get blown up so fast, the others whine about invincible tanks. I guess this means it's perfectly balanced. people who complain about tanks getting blowing up or are fine with tanks are talking about shield tanks and people who complain about invincible tanks are talking about armor tanks. so that not balanced. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
991
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 19:57:00 -
[27] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:If you're not hitting harder find the damage mods. okay, for shield tanks to be viable again, they need to be the glass cannons of Chromosome- that means stacking 3 damage mods and maxing out turret skills to lvl 5 brings a 50% damage bonus. they HAVE to be able to do more damage at range than an armor tank can possibly rep/tank against. pretty much, they have to 2-shot just about everything like they used to. not popular, i know, but until that, or we get a 100hp/sec recharge, shield tanks will never be viable tank killers at any range. Or just fix active shield mods and stop begging for an unbalancing attribute. |
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
43
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 05:18:00 -
[28] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:Half of the people whine because their tanks get blown up so fast, the others whine about invincible tanks. I guess this means it's perfectly balanced. Nope, just different reasons as to why shield tanks have a disadvantage. Shields get cracked quick and armor is invincible (with a rep turned on) |
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
43
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 05:21:00 -
[29] - Quote
low genius wrote:tanks are only there for noobs to be impressed by.
there is no way currently to balance the tanks, and you don't make enough per match to pay for one. math is fun. Just make the shield reps just as good as armor.it'd be that simple. |
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
43
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 05:24:00 -
[30] - Quote
Halador Osiris wrote:Caldari design leans heavily on missiles and long range railguns. Try equipping a missile turret on your tank, see what happens. All your powergrid issues suddenly disappear. I fly a Python and consistently note that missile shield tanks are harder to kill than railgun/blaster shield tanks. Now your problem is that large missile turrets are a little underpowered. Also, it'd be nice if accelerated missiles went as far as large turret installations can shoot them (aka forever). I've tried missle turrets on a Maddy... It was less effective that a blaster. He actually gained health (alot of it) thru my bombardment charged me and killed me with blasters. :/ |
|
Piercing Serenity
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
353
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 05:25:00 -
[31] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:If you're not hitting harder find the damage mods. okay, for shield tanks to be viable again, they need to be the glass cannons of Chromosome- that means stacking 3 damage mods and maxing out turret skills to lvl 5 brings a 50% damage bonus. they HAVE to be able to do more damage at range than an armor tank can possibly rep/tank against. pretty much, they have to 2-shot just about everything like they used to. not popular, i know, but until that, or we get a 100hp/sec recharge, shield tanks will never be viable tank killers at any range.
I wouldn't go back to that. That was terrible. For all of the changes tanks have gone through since then, having two second tank battles with the few players brave enough to actually run tanks wouldn't be ideal.
Secondly, while not exactly "constructive posting", I find it very insightful that Caeli Sindeo (Or however you spell it) predicted this rapid switch in the usefulness of Shield tanking. As Char wrote, rail tanks dealt damage so high that it wasn't even in line with the math behind them. I think Slap helped out in a test to determine rail gun damage, and railguns were just doing so much more damage than they were supposed to. Now rails are fixed and - as Caeli proposed - have absolutely no advantage over armor tanking. I just found it interesting how quickly (relatively speaking) this change happened. I'm interested in where it'll go, and I'll be watching from the sidelines.
Just some food for thought.
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Top Men.
1026
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 05:30:00 -
[32] - Quote
actually as a forge gunner I am in favor of buffing passive shield regen rate similarly and proportionally to shield dropsuits. make the repper a supplementary item rather than a go-to item. |
Harpyja
DUST University Ivy League
244
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 07:31:00 -
[33] - Quote
CCP recently stated that they were looking at balancig shield vs armor tanking for vehicles.
Expect a terrible "rebalance" sometime within the next few years.
Also, who wants to bet that one of the very few things that CCP will do for shield vehicles is add that new shield hardener that was accidentally published with the Saga II?
70% resists for 8 seconds with a 3 minute cooldown. Go home CCP, you're drunk. |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
134
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 08:26:00 -
[34] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:CCP recently stated that they were looking at balancig shield vs armor tanking for vehicles.
Expect a terrible "rebalance" sometime within the next few years.
Also, who wants to bet that one of the very few things that CCP will do for shield vehicles is add that new shield hardener that was accidentally published with the Saga II?
70% resists for 8 seconds with a 3 minute cooldown. Go home CCP, you're drunk.
If the make it last 20 seconds instead of just 8, then make it a 1 minute cooldown instead of 3, it'll be a great get in get out tool for dropships. |
Eris Ernaga
Super Nerds
289
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 08:33:00 -
[35] - Quote
Yotta Guns wrote:Ccp isn't paying attention to tanks at all... Still waiting on the shield buff... Getting REAL tired of the "invincibility" module on the armor tanks. (also known as a armor rep). It's got a faster cooldown, and is waaay stronger than anything shield tanks have.
Also, a rep tool for infantry to work on Shields. also, Shield tanks speed? Also, along with the other things, armor has more hp.
shield tanks have passive recharge something armor don't get at all. |
Eris Ernaga
Super Nerds
289
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 08:35:00 -
[36] - Quote
Yotta Guns wrote:Aizen Intiki wrote:Oh shut up. Stay off the front lines scrub. You hit harder. Shield tanks most certainly, do NOT hit harder. And even if they did. It's not strong enough to go thru the armor rep a madrauger. makes a neutron blaster null.
there fits make fitting railguns easy and railgun hit harder then blasters especially since u can easily catch a slow madrugar at a distance. People don't realize how powerful proto missiles are either they are very good and balanced and infantry and vehicle destruction. |
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
374
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 08:42:00 -
[37] - Quote
Yotta Guns wrote:low genius wrote:tanks are only there for noobs to be impressed by.
there is no way currently to balance the tanks, and you don't make enough per match to pay for one. math is fun. Just make the shield reps just as good as armor.it'd be that simple. no bc then armor tanks will become inferior, as they take ~50% more explosive damage than a shield tank. shield tanks need to be able to dish out more damage than an armor tank can possibly rep, but still be weak up close. also, they need to have 100hp/s passive recharge so they can passive tank |
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
376
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 09:12:00 -
[38] - Quote
ok, i run both maddies and logis with the exact same amount of SP into each.
Shield tanks are underpowered when compared to armor tanks because their reppers have a 10(30):30 cycle, and armor has a 60(25):15 cycle.
Also, armor reppers will rep over 6000 in a cycle, where shield tanks will rep 1500 (these are approximations)
Even with stacked damage mods, a shield tank will not kill an armor tank UNLESS it is a falchion with proto cycled missiles, with 3 dmagae mods, and enforcer prof lvl 5.
As long as the armor tank has reppers and hardeners going, the blaster will do more damage to the shield tank (even with reppers and hardeners on) than the shield tank can rep- therefore, the armor tank will almost every time, providing the skill is the same, ad the armor tank isnt using missiles.
Let's not forget that the armor tank, due to its speed, gets to choose the terms of engagement, provided his is not ambushed by a falchion (fitted as recently described)
For shield tanks to be viable, damage mods will have to give a 20% dmg bonus with no stacking penalty (like in chromosome), passive turret damage will again need to be 5%/lvl, and passive regen needs to be 100hp/s on shield tanks. Only then can shield tanks be viable in PC, and not a waste of money.
I've played PC against some great shield tankers and beat them 90% of the time bc i deploy a maddy to counter them. They have some of the best tactics ive ever seen and still lose, even when im playing like an idiot, just because all i need to do is sttand still, turn on all hardeners and reppers, while i carefully aim my shots at them. it is completely no-skill-required kind of thing. shield tanks need buff. the end. |
Harpyja
DUST University Ivy League
245
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 13:42:00 -
[39] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:ok, i run both maddies and logis with the exact same amount of SP into each.
Shield tanks are underpowered when compared to armor tanks because their reppers have a 10(30):30 cycle, and armor has a 60(25):15 cycle.
Also, armor reppers will rep over 6000 in a cycle, where shield tanks will rep 1500 (these are approximations)
Even with stacked damage mods, a shield tank will not kill an armor tank UNLESS it is a falchion with proto cycled missiles, with 3 dmagae mods, and enforcer prof lvl 5.
As long as the armor tank has reppers and hardeners going, the blaster will do more damage to the shield tank (even with reppers and hardeners on) than the shield tank can rep- therefore, the armor tank will almost every time, providing the skill is the same, ad the armor tank isnt using missiles.
Let's not forget that the armor tank, due to its speed, gets to choose the terms of engagement, provided his is not ambushed by a falchion (fitted as recently described)
For shield tanks to be viable, damage mods will have to give a 20% dmg bonus with no stacking penalty (like in chromosome), passive turret damage will again need to be 5%/lvl, and passive regen needs to be 100hp/s on shield tanks. Only then can shield tanks be viable in PC, and not a waste of money.
I've played PC against some great shield tankers and beat them 90% of the time bc i deploy a maddy to counter them. They have some of the best tactics ive ever seen and still lose, even when im playing like an idiot, just because all i need to do is sttand still, turn on all hardeners and reppers, while i carefully aim my shots at them. it is completely no-skill-required kind of thing. shield tanks need buff. the end. I once encountered a very skilled Madrugar pilot while I was in my Falchion. I positioned myself at the bottom of a very small incline and he came thundering out from above. Since I could aim upwards and hit him while he couldn't aim down with his blaster to hit me, I pulled off a couple salvos of proto accelerated missiles before he started shooting at me.
I get him down to very low armor, such that I would need only one more full salvo to hit and he was dead, and I was at roughly 1/2 shields. But the inevitable happened and only two of my missiles hit on the next salvo. His god-mode repper brought him back to life from near death and I started moving in the bumpy terrain so that I could get below his maximum angle of depression.
Lucky for me, I managed to get below his maximum turret depression angle which saved me about a second. I shoot 2 or 3 more salvos into him and he finally gets destroyed, and I am left with maybe 1/5 shields. My adrenaline was running throughout the entire battle.
There are a couple of things that I would like to point out that should not be happening. First, I was in an extremely close ranged engagement where only the terrain helped me win, otherwise I would've lost. I had already previously encountered him at range, but it only gave my position away and the difficulties with hitting a target at range prevented me from placing accurate hits. I was already burning in reverse and he figured that if he came charging at me he would've lost, so he pulled back and escaped with some scratches.
Second, it should not take a Falchion and local terrain to barely beat a Madrugar. I would rather it be a Gunnlogi and local terrain to barely beat a Madrugar at close range and a Gunnlogi to easily destroy a Madrugar at range without allowing the Madrugar time to escape. Without any terrain advantageous to the Gunnlogi pilot, a Madrugar should defeat the Gunnlogi at close range. |
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
44
|
Posted - 2013.07.16 21:24:00 -
[40] - Quote
Eris Ernaga wrote:Yotta Guns wrote:Ccp isn't paying attention to tanks at all... Still waiting on the shield buff... Getting REAL tired of the "invincibility" module on the armor tanks. (also known as a armor rep). It's got a faster cooldown, and is waaay stronger than anything shield tanks have.
Also, a rep tool for infantry to work on Shields. also, Shield tanks speed? Also, along with the other things, armor has more hp. shield tanks have passive recharge something armor don't get at all. As long as an armor tanks Shields are less than 100 percent (and they usually are, in combat) armor tanks have a passive shield Regen too. Not quite as strong, but your armor repper does waaaaaay more than make up fur it in any combat situation. :/ |
|
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
44
|
Posted - 2013.07.16 21:29:00 -
[41] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:ok, i run both maddies and logis with the exact same amount of SP into each.
Shield tanks are underpowered when compared to armor tanks because their reppers have a 10(30):30 cycle, and armor has a 60(25):15 cycle.
Also, armor reppers will rep over 6000 in a cycle, where shield tanks will rep 1500 (these are approximations)
Even with stacked damage mods, a shield tank will not kill an armor tank UNLESS it is a falchion with proto cycled missiles, with 3 dmagae mods, and enforcer prof lvl 5.
As long as the armor tank has reppers and hardeners going, the blaster will do more damage to the shield tank (even with reppers and hardeners on) than the shield tank can rep- therefore, the armor tank will almost every time, providing the skill is the same, ad the armor tank isnt using missiles.
Let's not forget that the armor tank, due to its speed, gets to choose the terms of engagement, provided his is not ambushed by a falchion (fitted as recently described)
For shield tanks to be viable, damage mods will have to give a 20% dmg bonus with no stacking penalty (like in chromosome), passive turret damage will again need to be 5%/lvl, and passive regen needs to be 100hp/s on shield tanks. Only then can shield tanks be viable in PC, and not a waste of money.
I've played PC against some great shield tankers and beat them 90% of the time bc i deploy a maddy to counter them. They have some of the best tactics ive ever seen and still lose, even when im playing like an idiot, just because all i need to do is sttand still, turn on all hardeners and reppers, while i carefully aim my shots at them. it is completely no-skill-required kind of thing. shield tanks need buff. the end. I once encountered a very skilled Madrugar pilot while I was in my Falchion. I positioned myself at the bottom of a very small incline and he came thundering out from above. Since I could aim upwards and hit him while he couldn't aim down with his blaster to hit me, I pulled off a couple salvos of proto accelerated missiles before he started shooting at me. I get him down to very low armor, such that I would need only one more full salvo to hit and he was dead, and I was at roughly 1/2 shields. But the inevitable happened and only two of my missiles hit on the next salvo. His god-mode repper brought him back to life from near death and I started moving in the bumpy terrain so that I could get below his maximum angle of depression. Lucky for me, I managed to get below his maximum turret depression angle which saved me about a second. I shoot 2 or 3 more salvos into him and he finally gets destroyed, and I am left with maybe 1/5 shields. My adrenaline was running throughout the entire battle. There are a couple of things that I would like to point out that should not be happening. First, I was in an extremely close ranged engagement where only the terrain helped me win, otherwise I would've lost. I had already previously encountered him at range, but it only gave my position away and the difficulties with hitting a target at range prevented me from placing accurate hits. I was already burning in reverse and he figured that if he came charging at me he would've lost, so he pulled back and escaped with some scratches. Second, it should not take a Falchion and local terrain to barely beat a Madrugar. I would rather it be a Gunnlogi and local terrain to barely beat a Madrugar at close range and a Gunnlogi to easily destroy a Madrugar at range without allowing the Madrugar time to escape. Without any terrain advantageous to the Gunnlogi pilot, a Madrugar should defeat the Gunnlogi at close range. The armor shouldn't have taken that much damage from missiles. They are literally designed to stop armor tanks and they don't even come close. |
Alena Ventrallis
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2013.07.16 22:07:00 -
[42] - Quote
Tanks are not meant to be skirmishing vehicles. They are meant to be mobile heavy weapons platforms, supporting infantry with anti-vehicle fires and limited anti-infantry fires. To this end, they should possess strong defenses, strong offenses, and be slow moving. Even our gaming term tank describes something that can take a lot of punishment, or a measure of something's ability to take punishment. They are not ,meant as get in, get out type vehicles. They are meant for staying power, lumbering behemoths on the battlefield, as opposed to the quick but fragile lavs that zip around and use speed and maneuverability to avoid destruction.
Therefore, a shield tank should be able to take just as much punishment as an armor tank. However, there should be a different mechanic that gives shields a different flavor than armor. Armor should have lots of hp, but be slow to repair that damage. shield should have less total hp, but repair that damage quickly. Therefore, shield reps should rep large amounts per tick, but have a long cooldown, while armor should repair less per tick, but have more ticks on a short cooldown.
In any case, the point of a tank is to soak up damage and keep on trucking. That's its job. It's a mobile base-of-fire for infantry to maneuver off of. They both need to be able to take lots of damage and dish out decent anti-vehicle damage and less anti-infantry damage than say a gunship. Making shield tanks a skirmish vehicle will only ruin what the purpose of the vehicle is. |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
868
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 01:48:00 -
[43] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:Oh shut up. Stay off the front lines scrub. You hit harder.
I'm fully specced into both shield and armor tanks, and while what you say is true, it's certainly not balanced. The ability to increase damage output on a shield tank is not enough to counter the defensive capabilities of an armor tank. I struggled in PC battles to counter armor rail tanks for the longest time, using both full defense and full DPS fits. I finally specced into armor and the difference was staggering. In straight up tank vs tank combat, armor outclasses shields to an insane degree.
Unfortunately because of PG restrictions on shield tanks, using damage mods significantly decreases the defensive capabilities of the shield tank. While this is great for the idea of a glass cannon, the increase of say what, 20-30% damage that you gain is simply not enough to counter the massive defensive capabilities of an armor tank.
I think that more or less, the stats for Shield Boosters and Armor Repairers need to swapped. Shields should have lower EHP but capable of insane burst tanking, and armor should have weaker reps but higher resists and HP. Some will make the argument that shields are at the advantage because of passive shield recharge, but when recharge is lower than that of a dropsuit, that's really not gaining you much at all. The addition of *proper* passive tanking modules for a shield would make that a valid argument, but right now it's really not. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
2536
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 01:50:00 -
[44] - Quote
Yotta Guns wrote:Ccp isn't paying attention to tanks at all... Still waiting on the shield buff... Getting REAL tired of the "invincibility" module on the armor tanks. (also known as a armor rep). It's got a faster cooldown, and is waaay stronger than anything shield tanks have.
Also, a rep tool for infantry to work on Shields. also, Shield tanks speed? Also, along with the other things, armor has more hp. It's not a shield tank, it's a Caldari tank. Like Amarr tech, it's slower because they build stuff for longer ranges. |
Lightning Bolt2
DUST University Ivy League
56
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 02:49:00 -
[45] - Quote
havent read past OP.
I feel you! CCP doesn't care about much (the only exception is Caldari Assaults and AR's) they balance based on the majority of DUST's playerbase (again Caldari Assaults and AR's) so CCP's nerfing everything that can beat AR's in 1 - 1!!!!! stat assaults without AV hate vehicles and want them nerfed... they want heavies nerfed to have less HP (not certain if they still want this nerf seeing how I see alot of Cal logis with more hp than a mlt heavy), scouts they got nerfed to have no speed (unless speed tanked... but assaults and logis can do it better with more stamina) CCP takes away the bone to any thing that can beat that Cal assault, next is logis (they do need it but we all know its going to be overkill than we'll get another respec)
in short CCP only likes Cal Assaults. R.I.P. CoD 514 |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
206
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 02:53:00 -
[46] - Quote
Yotta Guns wrote:Ccp isn't paying attention to tanks at all... Still waiting on the shield buff... Getting REAL tired of the "invincibility" module on the armor tanks. (also known as a armor rep). It's got a faster cooldown, and is waaay stronger than anything shield tanks have.
Also, a rep tool for infantry to work on Shields. also, Shield tanks speed? Also, along with the other things, armor has more hp.
only two races hav are available. why the hell do you want them balanced so bad now, when they'll just have to balance them again when the other two come out?
also, stop being such a cry baby also, stop being such a cry baby also, HP doesn't matter as much as effective HP. you need to understand the difference. |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
206
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 02:54:00 -
[47] - Quote
Lightning Bolt2 wrote:havent read past OP.
I feel you! CCP doesn't care about much (the only exception is Caldari Assaults and AR's) they balance based on the majority of DUST's playerbase (again Caldari Assaults and AR's) so CCP's nerfing everything that can beat AR's in 1 - 1!!!!! stat assaults without AV hate vehicles and want them nerfed... they want heavies nerfed to have less HP (not certain if they still want this nerf seeing how I see alot of Cal logis with more hp than a mlt heavy), scouts they got nerfed to have no speed (unless speed tanked... but assaults and logis can do it better with more stamina) CCP takes away the bone to any thing that can beat that Cal assault, next is logis (they do need it but we all know its going to be overkill than we'll get another respec)
in short CCP only likes Cal Assaults. R.I.P. CoD 514
dust uni.... as useless as eve uni. |
Jathniel
G I A N T EoN.
665
|
Posted - 2013.07.17 03:17:00 -
[48] - Quote
lol the pilot suit is going to make you tankers truly invincible. just hang on til then.
heard it had a -50% reduction to active module cooldown time. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |