Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ansiiis The Trustworthy
Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS.
65
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 21:37:00 -
[31] - Quote
dust is 8 min in... |
VLIGHT5
The Judas Coalition
244
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 21:40:00 -
[32] - Quote
>Pilot suit and we still don't have Jets, MTAC's, MAV's, and Dropships are still absolutely useless
>New anti-Dropship vehicle when Dropships are still useless
|
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
310
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 21:46:00 -
[33] - Quote
Felix Totenkreuz wrote:Problem with basing matchmaking on gear is that people don't pub with all their proto gear on unless they are total try-hards.
This means that veterans deploying in their cheap gear will face off against full militias. Besides, how can it be based on gear when we are able to change loadouts at supply depos or mid-spawn?
Has to be based on lifetime WP or SP.
I think "gear" is somewhat short hand for "gear, SP, WP and skill"
Also I really do not mind it when High SP players get on their low SP alts and do well.
The FPS skills of most vets (bunny hop and run around in the open Wheeeee!!!!) really are not very good compared to most FPS players so it is not like new players are getting face stomped when going against alts of vets.
Perhaps in time the skill of vets will improve so it becomes a problem....but at least now it sounds like a good fix for the high SP PUB stomps which are driving new players away. |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
1588
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 21:47:00 -
[34] - Quote
The Pilot Suit will buff the Destroyer vehicles to add injury to insult. |
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation
137
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 21:47:00 -
[35] - Quote
No PVE in the horizon , he did not say new maps, only variations of what we have today, later we Get new maps with new buildings.
More grinding ... |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
3630
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 21:50:00 -
[36] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: New vehicle roles ("Destroyers" were given as one example - anti-air HAV with faster tracking / RoF)
CCP be trollin'
|
Benari Kalidima
The Restless Masquerade Hedonistic Imperative
3
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 21:50:00 -
[37] - Quote
lordjanuz wrote:No PVE in the horizon , he did not say new maps, only variations of what we have today, later we Get new maps with new buildings.
More grinding ... They're working on PvE, but it just isn't a top priority right now I think. There were some awesome concept art for drones at fanfest, I can find a video of it if you're interested. |
Bubba Brown
Militaires Sans Jeux
150
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 21:50:00 -
[38] - Quote
**** YEAH COMMANDO SUIT I WANT IT BAD
picture a heavy with an assault scram and that minmatar projectile rifle. burst down shields then switch to burst down armor. HELL YES |
Xender17
Intrepidus XI Omega Commission
169
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 21:51:00 -
[39] - Quote
It better have some sort of different look to it. |
Bones McGavins
TacoCat Industries
317
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 21:54:00 -
[40] - Quote
Bubba Brown wrote:**** YEAH COMMANDO SUIT I WANT IT BAD
picture a heavy with an assault scram and that minmatar projectile rifle. burst down shields then switch to burst down armor. HELL YES
Ill raise you Scrambler + MD.
Charged shot followed by launching nades. Exposed for all of .5 seocnds while firing the charged shot, murder-city. |
|
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
310
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:00:00 -
[41] - Quote
This...does....not....look....horrible....
Anyway my biggest hope is the matchmaking comes out soon and that it works.
The lack of player retentions is bleeding this game dry, and fixing the PUB noob stomp would give new players breathing room to enjoy the game. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
54
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:00:00 -
[42] - Quote
lordjanuz wrote:No PVE in the horizon , he did not say new maps, only variations of what we have today, later we Get new maps with new buildings.
More grinding ...
He said new SI.
Which is surface infrastructure or the bulidings or complexs we fight on alot ie biomass and communication.
|
Benari Kalidima
The Restless Masquerade Hedonistic Imperative
3
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:01:00 -
[43] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:Templar Renegade119 wrote:anti air HAVs. What do we need these for? dropships r easy to kill with rails. Lol Dropships don't need more things killing them, but keep in mind other aircrafts will come and might justify the addition of the destroyer HAVs. Also front added guns on dropships :D |
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
771
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:06:00 -
[44] - Quote
No Secondary Marketplace.....
Sorry CCP, still cant forgive you for Uprising.
Even a player to player trading system would be acceptable, just something so I can get rid of all these useless Officer Weapons. |
Cyrius Li-Moody
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
139
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:16:00 -
[45] - Quote
Bones McGavins wrote:Bubba Brown wrote:**** YEAH COMMANDO SUIT I WANT IT BAD
picture a heavy with an assault scram and that minmatar projectile rifle. burst down shields then switch to burst down armor. HELL YES Ill raise you Scrambler + MD. Charged shot followed by launching nades. Exposed for all of .5 seocnds while firing the charged shot, murder-city.
Good luck landing some damage with that MD.
Scrambler plus flaylock would be more reliable. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
679
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:18:00 -
[46] - Quote
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:Bones McGavins wrote:Bubba Brown wrote:**** YEAH COMMANDO SUIT I WANT IT BAD
picture a heavy with an assault scram and that minmatar projectile rifle. burst down shields then switch to burst down armor. HELL YES Ill raise you Scrambler + MD. Charged shot followed by launching nades. Exposed for all of .5 seocnds while firing the charged shot, murder-city. Good luck landing some damage with that MD. Scrambler plus flaylock would be more reliable.
For the record, the flaylock has most of the same issues as does the MD. There is a general problem with splash damage at the moment, and all splash damage seems to be affected. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
609
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:19:00 -
[47] - Quote
Azura Sakura wrote:Texs Red wrote:RKKR wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:RKKR wrote:Tons of Dropships are useless threads and then a anti-air HAV, Yes CCP does indeed listens to feedback. New vehicle roles ("Destroyers" were given as one example- anti-air HAV with faster tracking / RoF) It's not the only new role coming. You missed my point. CCP hates dropships, it's nothing new. I've been playing for months and I can't recall I single improvement to making dropships useful, only things that make them worse. Once the player count increase (32v32 or even larger) + larger maps. DS will most likely be 1 of the most important vehicles to have :). I can see this new destroyer role as a new lav, something tells me that's it going to be a LAV to fix/replace the scout LAV. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
5093
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:38:00 -
[48] - Quote
Reason why they are going to be added the anti-air tank is that dropships are getting a new variant known as the bomber which probably unlike current dropships and will be actually literally dropping bombs on ground targets. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
311
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:39:00 -
[49] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:Bones McGavins wrote:Bubba Brown wrote:**** YEAH COMMANDO SUIT I WANT IT BAD
picture a heavy with an assault scram and that minmatar projectile rifle. burst down shields then switch to burst down armor. HELL YES Ill raise you Scrambler + MD. Charged shot followed by launching nades. Exposed for all of .5 seocnds while firing the charged shot, murder-city. Good luck landing some damage with that MD. Scrambler plus flaylock would be more reliable. For the record, the flaylock has most of the same issues as does the MD. There is a general problem with splash damage at the moment, and all splash damage seems to be affected.
Fought Lordchaos last night.
He doesn't seem to have a problem using the flaylock....he just hits you with every shot and does not seem to care about splash damage.
There are high skill (real skill not SP) high pay off weapons in this game.
Let them stay high skill high pay off. |
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
773
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:39:00 -
[50] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Reason why they are going to be added the anti-air tank is that dropships are getting a new variant known as the bomber which probably unlike current dropships and will be actually literally dropping bombs on ground targets.
Thats cool n' all.....
But any word on when Logi DSes will get their WP? |
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
679
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:41:00 -
[51] - Quote
hooc order wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:Bones McGavins wrote:Bubba Brown wrote:**** YEAH COMMANDO SUIT I WANT IT BAD
picture a heavy with an assault scram and that minmatar projectile rifle. burst down shields then switch to burst down armor. HELL YES Ill raise you Scrambler + MD. Charged shot followed by launching nades. Exposed for all of .5 seocnds while firing the charged shot, murder-city. Good luck landing some damage with that MD. Scrambler plus flaylock would be more reliable. For the record, the flaylock has most of the same issues as does the MD. There is a general problem with splash damage at the moment, and all splash damage seems to be affected. Fought Lordchaos last night. He doesn't seem to have a problem using the flaylock....he just hits you with every shot and does not seem to care about splash damage. There are high skill (real skill not SP) high pay off weapons in this game. Let them stay high skill high pay off.
I wasn't disputing the direct damage. MD has direct damage too. That's not the problem with it though. Flaylock has the same splash issues.
|
Nguruthos IX
Purgatorium of the Damned League of Infamy
560
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:43:00 -
[52] - Quote
How did I know they'd add more AV before fixing Drop-ships or adding a useful air role?
That's just what we needed, lol. "Destroyers".
We already have those, they're called Rail Tanks. They can two the highest EHP DS out of the sky from a mile back in red line while you're behind your own MCC.
GG CCP |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
609
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:44:00 -
[53] - Quote
Knight SoIaire wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Reason why they are going to be added the anti-air tank is that dropships are getting a new variant known as the bomber which probably unlike current dropships and will be actually literally dropping bombs on ground targets. Thats cool n' all..... But any word on when Logi DSes will get their WP? first, never had any problems shooting down dropships. good old rail put them down in a hurry. and a bomber.. lol old world tech, nice. get ready for the carpet bombing runs. 3rd this still doesn't fix the MCRU at all. |
Zeylon Rho
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
765
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:47:00 -
[54] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Reason why they are going to be added the anti-air tank is that dropships are getting a new variant known as the bomber which probably unlike current dropships and will be actually literally dropping bombs on ground targets.
Is this a 1.2 addition? I realize variants are easier... I'd still like to see Amarr and Minmatar vehicles though. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
3635
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:48:00 -
[55] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Reason why they are going to be added the anti-air tank is that dropships are getting a new variant known as the bomber which probably unlike current dropships and will be actually literally dropping bombs on ground targets.
It's cute how CCP has no ******* idea what a dropship is.
|
Kevall Longstride
DUST University Ivy League
259
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 22:53:00 -
[56] - Quote
Some good stuff there but they better keep up the monthly update schedule for at least 6 months. When Destiny and Titanfall hit, dust is going to look very pedestrian. |
EternalRMG
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
267
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 23:11:00 -
[57] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Reason why they are going to be added the anti-air tank is that dropships are getting a new variant known as the bomber which probably unlike current dropships and will be actually literally dropping bombs on ground targets. AMEN for that I CAN SPEC ON DSs AND NOT BE POOR LIKE FOR EVER THANKS CCP THANKS IRON WOLF THANKS EVERYBODY
as soon as we get "Bombers" well you could say that my name will mean death for you ( CAUSE ILL MAKE THE BOMBS RAIN) |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
3639
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 23:17:00 -
[58] - Quote
EternalRMG wrote:you could say that my name will mean death for you ( CAUSE ILL MAKE THE BOMBS RAIN)
My militia Gorgon will kill you just the same
Also....how the **** is this going to work....this sounds literally like the least skilled way of playing...ever.....
I love how CCP makes a troop transport vehicle, and then literally does gymnastics to avoid making it good or useful at transporting troops..... |
Nguruthos IX
Purgatorium of the Damned League of Infamy
561
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 23:27:00 -
[59] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:EternalRMG wrote:you could say that my name will mean death for you ( CAUSE ILL MAKE THE BOMBS RAIN) My militia Gorgon will kill you just the same Also....how the **** is this going to work....this sounds literally like the least skilled way of playing...ever..... I love how CCP makes a troop transport vehicle, and then literally does gymnastics to avoid making it good or useful at transporting troops.....
Well, they're doing contortions to avoid adding new air vehicles. Just rehashing the same skin in different unintended roles to satiate the few pilots still around.
I mean, on one hand it's better than nothing, but on the other I can see this leading to some balance issues down the road. |
Mike Poole
Kirkinen Risk Control Caldari State
225
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 23:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
You would have figured an update to the WP/SP/ISK system would have enough of a priority to make it into this patch. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |