Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2702
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 15:24:00 -
[91] - Quote
Crash Monster wrote:Regardless, wording aside, the two are equivalent so it doesn't matter anyway. The two options being offered are equivalent, yes.
One is a complete negation of the original offer of a reset on release. The other is a complete negation of any value that offer had. Neither is actually honouring the deal as agreed. Both are equivalent, because both are equally bad and equally unfair on paying customers who expected to be given what we actually paid for.
And here's part of a post from the other thread which is probably more relevant here. I notice that nobody actually adressed this point at all.
Garrett Blacknova wrote:This is an attempt to find a middle ground where nobody - paying or not - is being shafted by CCP. Do you have a VALID argument against the solution of refunding non-Booster content and leaving the Boosters as SP?
By "valid" I mean actually a relevant complaint about CCP doing it. Not "I don't get as many tears this way" and not a poorly-veiled insult to someone's intelligence instead of a rational response (which isn't the best way to support your argument, by the way). Not "I don't like it so you're a doody-head". Not "haha QQ more, scrub". Not "I don't like it". Not "I think the proposed solution is fair enough".
Can you come up with a relevant negative point that would explain why my preferred solution is a bad idea?
The only argument I've seen so far with even the vaguest semblance of validity was "it would be hard for CCP to implement". If that's it, I don't see any good reason not to do it. It would be hard for CCP to go from never having developed any FPS game in their company's history to producing one that's had over 2 million characters created, but look what's happened? Anyone got an answer? A GOOD reason why we shouldn't be given something that actually provides a valid solution? Anyone?
I'm not kidding. If you have a PROPER answer, I'd love to hear it. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2704
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 16:27:00 -
[92] - Quote
No response?
What a surprise... |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2725
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 03:09:00 -
[93] - Quote
I'm just bringing this thread back, because it's still an issue that isn't being addressed.
We have a VALID solution here, and we have legitimate arguments in favour of this solution over the offer CCP have made, including "that isn't the deal we paid for". We have, as yet, a total of ZERO valid arguments against this proposal.
Any takers? |
Thor Odinson42
Planetary Response Organization
150
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 03:14:00 -
[94] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:No response?
What a surprise... They don't respond to stuff like this. They take your suggestions and then drop a hit of acid. Then someone comes and spins them around in a chair. They then launch a dart at a wall full of words. After a few hours they piece together the words and use this document to fix stuff. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2725
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 03:18:00 -
[95] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:No response?
What a surprise... They don't respond to stuff like this. They take your suggestions and then drop a hit of acid. Then someone comes and spins them around in a chair. They then launch a dart at a wall full of words. After a few hours they piece together the words and use this document to fix stuff. No. I meant from ANYONE, not just the devs.
My post immediately before the one you quoted was an open invitation for ANYONE to provide a valid reason why the proposal in this thread shouldn't be considered. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2730
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 04:43:00 -
[96] - Quote
...and still no counter-arguments? |
Arramakaian Eka
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
459
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 23:18:00 -
[97] - Quote
I wrote a ticket, and they directed me to post this on forums. Told them I'm not spending any more money on Dust due to the fact CCP has demonstrated that they will alter a contract unilaterally and after-the-fact, without consulting the customer.
It sets a poor precedent for future cases so I can't trust CCP to not pull off the same stunt again in the future. And is likely against the law. |
DeadlyAztec11
One-Armed Bandits Atrocitas
212
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 23:26:00 -
[98] - Quote
The only way for them to totally fulfill their agreement is to go and reset EVERYONES characters. Then give everyone their merc packs in full. Do you honestly want a totall reset? |
Arramakaian Eka
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
459
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 23:50:00 -
[99] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:The only way for them to totally fulfill their agreement is to go and reset EVERYONES characters. Then give everyone their merc packs in full. Do you honestly want a totall reset?
Did you even read the OP?
But I agree: unfortunately total reset is the only way I see CCP could truly unfuck this clusterfuck. My speculation of what happened is that they were planning to do a total char reset for launch, thus the language in the Merc Pack. Over the beta they decided that a launch reset was not necessary, and forgot, neglected or plain ignored their obligation to their paying customers.
Giving them the benefit of the doubt, they most likely just didn't think of the ramifications of a lack of total reset. Nevertheless, they've had several months of people warning about this, yet they decided to force an insult of a non-choice on us - char reset for Merc Pack buyers only, or no refunds.
I wouldn't really mind a reset - most games reset for launch -, but I can just imagine the epic nerdrage and soiled lounge pants resulting from that. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2762
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 02:05:00 -
[100] - Quote
How are you guys missing the part where it says "AND for commercial release"?
Yes, that WOULD fix it, but it isn't the ONLY solution.
In many ways it is the most logical solution, but it's one the devs have specifically stated they WON'T be doing. Which leaves us with the option of shafting us as they currently seem intent on doing, shafting non-paying players, or taking the suggestion in this thread.
Which is the better option? Punishing people who didn't give you money, punishing people who did, or rewarding those who gave you money FAIRLY, without punishing those who didn't?
Seriously, read the OP. Probably twice through, just to be totally clear. Try - TRY - to come up with an argument against it, other than "a full reset is the only option" or "but you people just want more Boosters". |
|
Thor Odinson42
Planetary Response Organization
170
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 02:12:00 -
[101] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:How are you guys missing the part where it says "AND for commercial release"?
Yes, that WOULD fix it, but it isn't the ONLY solution.
In many ways it is the most logical solution, but it's one the devs have specifically stated they WON'T be doing. Which leaves us with the option of shafting us as they currently seem intent on doing, shafting non-paying players, or taking the suggestion in this thread.
Which is the better option? Punishing people who didn't give you money, punishing people who did, or rewarding those who gave you money FAIRLY, without punishing those who didn't?
Seriously, read the OP. Probably twice through, just to be totally clear. Try - TRY - to come up with an argument against it, other than "a full reset is the only option" or "but you people just want more Boosters". I think you've offered a great solution. They don't seem to care. |
Takron Nistrom
eHarmony Inc. Phobia.
87
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 02:23:00 -
[102] - Quote
No one seems to notice how many times they got to reuse their merc packs during the beta. I think it's a fair trade. every full reset they got all their stuff back. The agreement for the merc packs was written on the condidition of a full reset. We decided we didn't want a full reset so the merc packs stay used. I am ok with that. I would rather keep my progress than get my merc packs back that i got to use like a dozen times. I am happy with what they decided. if you don't like it, reset your character and get your stuff back.
otherwise, stop being greedy and shut the kitten up. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2780
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 05:24:00 -
[103] - Quote
Takron Nistrom wrote:No one seems to notice how many times they got to reuse their merc packs during the beta. I think it's a fair trade. every full reset they got all their stuff back. The agreement for the merc packs was written on the condidition of a full reset. We decided we didn't want a full reset so the merc packs stay used. I am ok with that. I would rather keep my progress than get my merc packs back that i got to use like a dozen times. I am happy with what they decided. if you don't like it, reset your character and get your stuff back.
otherwise, stop being greedy and shut the kitten up. You obviously haven't read the terms for the pre-open beta Merc Pack.
Until you have, stop being uninformed or shut the kitten up.
Just in case you want to know what's ACTUALLY going on, here's a link to my first post in the thread, where I provide the entire terms given on the Merc Pack description. You'll notice that it DOESN'T say we only get refunds at each reset, but SPECIFICALLY states that we get a further refund at commercial release. NOT that we have an optional refund requiring us to accept a reset of our character that other players won't be subjected to. |
Arramakaian Eka
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
464
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 09:01:00 -
[104] - Quote
Takron Nistrom wrote:No one seems to notice how many times they got to reuse their merc packs during the beta. I think it's a fair trade. every full reset they got all their stuff back. The agreement for the merc packs was written on the condidition of a full reset. We decided we didn't want a full reset so the merc packs stay used. I am ok with that. I would rather keep my progress than get my merc packs back that i got to use like a dozen times. I am happy with what they decided. if you don't like it, reset your character and get your stuff back.
otherwise, stop being greedy and shut the kitten up.
You are absolutely correct that Merc Pack buyers got resets during beta, as did everyone else.
That doesn't change the language of the Merc Pack, stating that there will be a refund at launch. There is a huge difference between resets during beta, and reset for launch. In beta you were expected to test things out, that's why the resets. In launch you are stuck with your choices. Many (not me) made those choices during beta with the expectation that they will get their AUR back, so they made deliberately "bad" purchases, which they would have not made if they knew that there is no reset.
But more than that, this is about changing the intent of the terms of the Merc Pack after the fact. With this type of precedent CCP can change their terms at their discretion, and their customers don't have any say in it. Instead we will again end up with literally months of warnings and threads riddled with trolls, and all we get for our efforts is frustration, anger at a good game with potential for truly epic gameplay, dissatisfied customers, and more people who pledge never to give more money to CCP.
That is a lose-lose situation for Dust, the community, and CCP. Now is the last time CCP can unkitten this - to the extent it is possible -, and the proposal outlined in the OP proposed by me, Garrett and others at various times over the last months is the best one.
The only viable alternative I have seen is a total reset for everyone, but as mentioned earlier, that is not an attractive option for many beta testers. It would be great for the new players, though. Dust is the only game I've seen which doesn't have a full reset at launch - I'm sure there are others, but by and large games reset at launch for a good reason. It is even more important in an MMO, as us beta players have almost four months head start on the newberries. But perhaps that's another topic. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2918
|
Posted - 2013.05.11 02:46:00 -
[105] - Quote
Still not seeing any valid counter-argument against this suggestion.
Any word from CCP yet? Nope. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2929
|
Posted - 2013.05.11 10:24:00 -
[106] - Quote
And another bump for visibility... |
Darius Ashran
BetaMax. CRONOS.
23
|
Posted - 2013.05.11 13:06:00 -
[107] - Quote
Stop nercroing a dead thread its over a weak old. Can a Gm lock this please? |
Arramakaian Eka
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
496
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 10:01:00 -
[108] - Quote
Darius Ashran wrote:Stop nercroing a dead thread its over a weak old. Can a Gm lock this please?
It's not necroing when the issue is very much open, and tickets raised to fix this issue urge us to post on forums instead. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2956
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 09:37:00 -
[109] - Quote
Darius Ashran wrote:Stop nercroing a dead thread its over a weak old. Can a Gm lock this please? I'll stop "necroing" a "dead" thread when it stops being relevant or there's a more recent thread on the topic with all the relevant information from this thread and something new on top of that.
When will you stop backseat moderating? |
GLiMPSE X
Elite Gamers Militia
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 09:41:00 -
[110] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Darius Ashran wrote:Stop nercroing a dead thread its over a weak old. Can a Gm lock this please? I'll stop "necroing" a "dead" thread when it stops being relevant or there's a more recent thread on the topic with all the relevant information from this thread and something new on top of that. When will you stop backseat moderating?
You received the benefits from the merc packs as you kept your progress that was gained by using those items. Let's stop trying to get something for free regardless of the language that was used.
I'm sure a reasonable person could understand the spirit in which those claims were made. |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2956
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 10:02:00 -
[111] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Darius Ashran wrote:Stop nercroing a dead thread its over a weak old. Can a Gm lock this please? I'll stop "necroing" a "dead" thread when it stops being relevant or there's a more recent thread on the topic with all the relevant information from this thread and something new on top of that. When will you stop backseat moderating? You received the benefits from the merc packs as you kept your progress that was gained by using those items. Let's stop trying to get something for free regardless of the language that was used. I'm sure a reasonable person could understand the spirit in which those claims were made. I'm sure a reasonable person could understand that "and" doesn't mean the same as "including". I'm sure a reasonable person could understand that "every reset and commercial release" means that early adopters were offered a little extra for helping to fund development on an unproven product that was still in closed beta.
A reasonable person SHOULD be able to understand the spirit in which these claims are being made. Apparently you're not a reasonable person though.
We're not asking for more than we agreed to when we bought the Merc Pack. In my case, I'm not even asking for anything I don't already have. Either the option we're being given right now or the proposal in this thread will result in literally exactly the same thing for me. Not a single change. EXACTLY. THE. SAME. It won't affect my personal situation at all. I'm arguing this because what CCP are offering doesn't hold true to what they offered, and doesn't hold true to the intent under which many customers purchased the Merc Pack. |
GLiMPSE X
Elite Gamers Militia
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 10:06:00 -
[112] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Darius Ashran wrote:Stop nercroing a dead thread its over a weak old. Can a Gm lock this please? I'll stop "necroing" a "dead" thread when it stops being relevant or there's a more recent thread on the topic with all the relevant information from this thread and something new on top of that. When will you stop backseat moderating? You received the benefits from the merc packs as you kept your progress that was gained by using those items. Let's stop trying to get something for free regardless of the language that was used. I'm sure a reasonable person could understand the spirit in which those claims were made. I'm sure a reasonable person could understand that "and" doesn't mean the same as "including". I'm sure a reasonable person could understand that "every reset and commercial release" means that early adopters were offered a little extra for helping to fund development on an unproven product that was still in closed beta. A reasonable person SHOULD be able to understand the spirit in which these claims are being made. Apparently you're not a reasonable person though.
We're not asking for more than we agreed to when we bought the Merc Pack. In my case, I'm not even asking for anything I don't already have. Either the option we're being given right now or the proposal in this thread will result in literally exactly the same thing for me. Not a single change. EXACTLY. THE. SAME. It won't affect my personal situation at all. I'm arguing this because what CCP are offering doesn't hold true to what they offered, and doesn't hold true to the intent under which many customers purchased the Merc Pack.
You're upset, I understand.
I'm sure the CCP gods are sitting behind their keyboards taking your melodramatic banter seriously.
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2958
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 11:15:00 -
[113] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:You're upset, I understand.
I'm sure the CCP gods are sitting behind their keyboards taking your melodramatic banter seriously. Thanks for being so offended by my "melodramatic banter" to help me keep the thread alive. Very kind of you. |
Arramakaian Eka
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
515
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 10:23:00 -
[114] - Quote
CCP, as of yesterday you failed to address this issue by launch, haven't responded to any of the threads about this issue, yet point us to the forums when we raise a support ticket on the subject.
I take it that means you have decided that you will not take further action, or even extend a goodwill gesture to rectify this. You are going against the very clear language of the Merc Pack advertisements and terms you yourself created. This is likely in breach of contract, and in the very least, it is clearly against the intent and spirit of the original Merc Pack offer.
Further, this sets the precedent that you will do as you please when it comes to your customer's money, and will change policies of AUR items at your discretion, with little to no regard to the impact it has on your paying customers.
That is an untenable state of affairs. I will not be spending any more money on Dust, as my trust in CCP handling this and future disputes in a transparent and fair manner is zero. |
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders Red Rock Consortium
594
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 10:46:00 -
[115] - Quote
Arramakaian Eka wrote:CCP, as of yesterday you failed to address this issue by launch, haven't responded to any of the threads about this issue, yet point us to the forums when we raise a support ticket on the subject.
I take it that means you have decided that you will not take further action, or even extend a goodwill gesture to rectify this. You are going against the very clear language of the Merc Pack advertisements and terms you yourself created. This is likely in breach of contract, and in the very least, it is clearly against the intent and spirit of the original Merc Pack offer.
Further, this sets the precedent that you will do as you please when it comes to your customer's money, and will change policies of AUR items at your discretion, with little to no regard to the impact it has on your paying customers.
That is an untenable state of affairs. I will not be spending any more money on Dust, as my trust in CCP handling this and future disputes in a transparent and fair manner is zero.
This rant is still going on? CCP did a soft roll out and reset the characters when we hit the production server. The majority of the players were totally happy with it. You want to play games with legal wording. Now they are offering you the full merc pack reset you asked for to meet those terms and don't like the how it affects you. You want to keep your SP or get your merc packs reset? You get one or the other.
Take the reset. Get your precious aurum back to spend a second or third time and end this. I'm holding on to my skill points. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2978
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 10:51:00 -
[116] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:Arramakaian Eka wrote:CCP, as of yesterday you failed to address this issue by launch, haven't responded to any of the threads about this issue, yet point us to the forums when we raise a support ticket on the subject.
I take it that means you have decided that you will not take further action, or even extend a goodwill gesture to rectify this. You are going against the very clear language of the Merc Pack advertisements and terms you yourself created. This is likely in breach of contract, and in the very least, it is clearly against the intent and spirit of the original Merc Pack offer.
Further, this sets the precedent that you will do as you please when it comes to your customer's money, and will change policies of AUR items at your discretion, with little to no regard to the impact it has on your paying customers.
That is an untenable state of affairs. I will not be spending any more money on Dust, as my trust in CCP handling this and future disputes in a transparent and fair manner is zero. This rant is still going on? CCP did a soft roll out and reset the characters when we hit the production server. The majority of the players were totally happy with it. You want to play games with legal wording. Now they are offering you the full merc pack reset you asked for to meet those terms and don't like the how it affects you. You want to keep your SP or get your merc packs reset? You get one or the other. Take the reset. Get your precious aurum back to spend a second or third time and end this. I'm holding on to my skill points. Which part of the agreement specified that we have to take a character reset in order to be eligible for the credit of our Merc Pack contents?
Hint: The correct answer is "they never said that". |
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders Red Rock Consortium
595
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 10:57:00 -
[117] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Which part of the agreement specified that we have to take a character reset in order to be eligible for the credit of our Merc Pack contents?
Hint: The correct answer is "they never said that".
EXACTLY
If you still want a refund they have the right to take away the benefit you had while using the contents of those packs. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2978
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 11:04:00 -
[118] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote: Which part of the agreement specified that we have to take a character reset in order to be eligible for the credit of our Merc Pack contents?
Hint: The correct answer is "they never said that".
EXACTLY If you still want a refund they have the right to take away the benefit you had while using the contents of those packs. Try actually reading what I said before claiming that I agree with you.
The terms specify a full credit of the Merc Pack on commercial release. NOT a conditional credit that requires us to agree to a character reset, which is what the current "offer" is.
The lack of response from CCP on this issue is frustrating as well. |
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders Red Rock Consortium
595
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 11:17:00 -
[119] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Reav Hannari wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote: Which part of the agreement specified that we have to take a character reset in order to be eligible for the credit of our Merc Pack contents?
Hint: The correct answer is "they never said that".
EXACTLY If you still want a refund they have the right to take away the benefit you had while using the contents of those packs. Try actually reading what I said before claiming that I agree with you. The terms specify a full credit of the Merc Pack on commercial release. NOT a conditional credit that requires us to agree to a character reset, which is what the current "offer" is. The lack of response from CCP on this issue is frustrating as well.
I did read what you said. Your point was they didn't say one way or another that the full reset was attached to the deal and I agreed with you. Now we are at commercial release, CCP has responded and is offering you a full reset of all Merc Packs that you have purchased.
My point remains, you don't like the fact that you have to choose between keeping what you have earned or resetting to get back the full contents of the packs. My other point remains in that most people understood that the situation changed when CCP decided to go ahead and introduce mercenaries to the live servers and reset us early. They made it abundantly clear that the reset was happening before the 'beta' tag was being removed and changed the wording on the merc packs being sold shortly after that.The situation was fluid and most of us adapted without issue.
To meet the agreement of the original merc pack they now offer a full refund with a full reset, putting you back to when we made the transition to Tranquility. If you still don't think that meets the agreement then hire a lawyer at $200 an hour and fight it.
CCP has responded. Now you get to choose.
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2978
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 11:27:00 -
[120] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:I did read what you said. Your point was they didn't say one way or another that the full reset was attached to the deal and I agreed with you. Now we are at commercial release, CCP has responded and is offering you a full reset of all Merc Packs that you have purchased. If you think that was my point, you should probably stay in school. If you're not still in school, going back is probably well worth considering. The point was that they said there WILL BE A FULL CREDIT for people who bought the Merc Pack, and they DIDN'T include any condition of a reset on that credit.
Quote:My point remains, you don't like the fact that you have to choose between keeping what you have earned or resetting to get back the full contents of the packs. My other point remains in that most people understood that the situation changed when CCP decided to go ahead and introduce mercenaries to the live servers and reset us early. They made it abundantly clear that the reset was happening before the 'beta' tag was being removed and changed the wording on the merc packs being sold shortly after that.The situation was fluid and most of us adapted without issue. The terms which CCP agreed to when we bought the Merc Pack aren't "fluid" and weren't changed by CCP's decision not to reset everyone. Customers have the right to ask for what CCP agreed to when we bought our Merc Packs. Changing the terms on the Merc Pack after people already brought it doesn't change the terms that were already agreed to with those purchases. It only means that early adopters were sold something that was no longer on the table.
Quote:To meet the agreement of the original merc pack they now offer a full refund with a full reset, putting you back to when we made the transition to Tranquility. If you still don't think that meets the agreement then hire a lawyer at $200 an hour and fight it. Or I could ask my best friend's mother who is a lawyer, or any of several friends currently in law school and willing to run as advisors for a case where I represent myself in a small claims court. Or alternatively, I can choose not to waste my money on lawyers OR on paying CCP's bills for a while. I'm not being negatively impacted by this either way, so while I'm going to keep arguing the point here, I'm NOT going to waste effort on legal action, and if CCP are offering something that I'm actually interested in (right now they aren't), I might eventually spend more money with them. But it's going to be a while before I give them anything if they don't address the legitimate complaints about this "offer" they're making.
Quote:CCP has responded. Now you get to choose. And I choose to question the legitimacy of the offer. Your point? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |