Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
Since ccp put the effort into copying all the bad parts of nullsec (grinding and passive npc isk generation) I figured we should treat it as such.
So here is the plan.
Divide up systems into 5 equal parts and blue donut this ***** and watch the isk come in.
1-PRO being the biggest NPC corp gets their own side. 2-ROFL you get yours 3-STB you get your 4-SI you get your (let the betamax kids be renters I know you want to ) 5- We will pick up PFBHz, RND, SyN
We will do a lottery to pick home systems so all is fair. AFter that is fantasy football style system drafting but it must touch a system you control
Last leave a small section of lowsec sov <------------ let the small corps battle it out
If you dont like this tell ccp because this is how its going to be.
Note: I left any and all EvE based alliances out of this since it is academic at the moment |
DUST Fiend
Immobile Infantry
2041
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yea, we're gonna kick you all out of our playground, so don't get too comfy |
ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds
Imperfects Public Relations
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
All we need is dice and we can start playing a real RPG MMO |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1240
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:Since ccp put the effort into copying all the bad parts of nullsec (grinding and passive npc isk generation) I figured we should treat it as such.
So here is the plan.
Divide up systems into 5 equal parts and blue donut this ***** and watch the isk come in.
1-PRO being the biggest NPC corp gets their own side. 2-ROFL you get yours 3-STB you get your 4-SI you get your (let the betamax kids be renters I know you want to ) 5- We will pick up PFBHz, RND, SyN
We will do a lottery to pick home systems so all is fair. AFter that is fantasy football style system drafting but it must touch a system you control
Last leave a small section of lowsec sov <------------ let the small corps battle it out
If you dont like this tell ccp because this is how its going to be.
Note: I left any and all EvE based alliances out of this since it is academic at the moment I think that's a bit excessive. As well, this is only the first phase of this system, and Nullarbor said in IRC that they're already tweaking the stuff they've just announced specifically to take that into account. They don't want Dust FW to be like null-sec any more than we do. |
Klivve Cussler
Ransoms Incorporated
59
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Yea, we're gonna kick you all out of our playground, so don't get too comfy
*facepalm* We're gonna see goon titans with small turrets doing orbital support, aren't we? |
N1ck Comeau
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
72
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
There definitely needs to be a section for corps with over 500 members and a section for people with less then 500 members |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
788
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Free Beers wrote:Since ccp put the effort into copying all the bad parts of nullsec (grinding and passive npc isk generation) I figured we should treat it as such.
So here is the plan.
Divide up systems into 5 equal parts and blue donut this ***** and watch the isk come in.
1-PRO being the biggest NPC corp gets their own side. 2-ROFL you get yours 3-STB you get your 4-SI you get your (let the betamax kids be renters I know you want to ) 5- We will pick up PFBHz, RND, SyN
We will do a lottery to pick home systems so all is fair. AFter that is fantasy football style system drafting but it must touch a system you control
Last leave a small section of lowsec sov <------------ let the small corps battle it out
If you dont like this tell ccp because this is how its going to be.
Note: I left any and all EvE based alliances out of this since it is academic at the moment I think that's a bit excessive. As well, this is only the first phase of this system, and Nullarbor said in IRC that they're already tweaking the stuff they've just announced specifically to take that into account. They don't want Dust FW to be like null-sec any more than we do.
You like talking this way huh?
|
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Free Beers wrote:Since ccp put the effort into copying all the bad parts of nullsec (grinding and passive npc isk generation) I figured we should treat it as such.
So here is the plan.
Divide up systems into 5 equal parts and blue donut this ***** and watch the isk come in.
1-PRO being the biggest NPC corp gets their own side. 2-ROFL you get yours 3-STB you get your 4-SI you get your (let the betamax kids be renters I know you want to ) 5- We will pick up PFBHz, RND, SyN
We will do a lottery to pick home systems so all is fair. AFter that is fantasy football style system drafting but it must touch a system you control
Last leave a small section of lowsec sov <------------ let the small corps battle it out
If you dont like this tell ccp because this is how its going to be.
Note: I left any and all EvE based alliances out of this since it is academic at the moment I think that's a bit excessive. As well, this is only the first phase of this system, and Nullarbor said in IRC that they're already tweaking the stuff they've just announced specifically to take that into account. They don't want Dust FW to be like null-sec any more than we do.
lol you think tweaking is going to change the **** system the gave us?
also mobius I was looking out for you man SI is going to give you guys a spot. Sha is good for it |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:44:00 -
[9] - Quote
N1ck Comeau wrote:There definitely needs to be a section for corps with over 500 members and a section for people with less then 500 members
Nope you guys got the peeps you deserve your isk to farm. Now don't ever say i didn't show respect for ContraScrubJoe and PRO |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
779
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:48:00 -
[10] - Quote
And where the **** are TEST and Goon on that list Sir?...
How many systems are we getting? 250?... |
|
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:51:00 -
[11] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:And where the **** are TEST and Goon on that list Sir?...
How many systems are we getting? 250?...
It would have been nice for ccp to build in contracts after a year in now to allow us to take contracts on behalf of others.
Since they didn't you are just going to have to take someone elses stuff the old fashion way ( pssst take PRO stuff will be easiest) |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
355
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:52:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:And where the **** are TEST and Goon on that list Sir?...
How many systems are we getting? 250?...
You'll take what we give you and like it, what you think this is?
its not like this is firmly in your territory in nullsec space |
DUST Fiend
Immobile Infantry
2041
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
Gunner Nightingale wrote:what you think this is? its not like this is firmly in your territory in nullsec space
Space IS our territory |
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
452
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:55:00 -
[14] - Quote
Beers&Co,
What specifically is it that you don't like about the planetary conquest system as described? |
Elijah Sol' Dzusaki
Onward Defrosted Tuna Team
513
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:57:00 -
[15] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:And where the **** are TEST and Goon on that list Sir?...
How many systems are we getting? 250?... You have no power here. |
slap26
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz
498
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:57:00 -
[16] - Quote
this way ROFL doesn't have to win to hold any sov. How convenient for them seeing as we aren't carrying them anymore |
Klivve Cussler
Ransoms Incorporated
60
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:59:00 -
[17] - Quote
Quote:How many systems are we getting? 250?...
Err...no. Just 250 districts. It's like...40 planets in 30 systems in one region. Or as TEST or Goons would say... "chump change"
I'm interested to see what this will do to space traffic in the region, whichever it is. It's a lowsec region, and we're going to see traffic of orbital bombartment vessels who have to stay on-grid with district sattelites. Easy pickings for pirates. Will it be worth it to pay eve pilots to escort these destroyers just to have orbital strikes? Will having space supremecy in a district (by putting an entire fleet on grid) signficantly enhance a Dust corp's chance of winning a region? Or will the risk be too high, and we'll all make do with precision strikes instead? |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
779
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 22:59:00 -
[18] - Quote
Elijah Sol' Dzusaki wrote:Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:And where the **** are TEST and Goon on that list Sir?...
How many systems are we getting? 250?... You have no power here.
I've got a lot more space to swing my **** around in Dust than you think.
Don't forget that. |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
779
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:00:00 -
[19] - Quote
Klivve Cussler wrote:Quote:How many systems are we getting? 250?... Err...no. Just 250 districts. It's like...40 planets in 30 systems in one region. Or as TEST or Goons would say... "chump change" I'm interested to see what this will do to space traffic in the region, whichever it is. It's a lowsec region, and we're going to see traffic of orbital bombartment vessels who have to stay on-grid with district sattelites. Easy pickings for pirates. Will it be worth it to pay eve pilots to escort these destroyers just to have orbital strikes? Will having space supremecy in a district (by putting an entire fleet on grid) signficantly enhance a Dust corp's chance of winning a region? Or will the risk be too high, and we'll all make do with precision strikes instead?
Jesus, i thought 250 systems was bad, 250 districts is even worse.
So the 6 jump rule must be because it's all within 6 jumps.... |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:00:00 -
[20] - Quote
howard sanchez wrote:Beers&Co,
What specifically is it that you don't like about the planetary conquest system as described?
Lots and Lots. I am working on a real post about it with the math and ecnonomics involved it takes a bit more to develop and try and explain it to everyone.
also didn't mean to leave guys out. I am sure stb will be will be happy to give you a planet |
|
Geth Massredux
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
97
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:01:00 -
[21] - Quote
Legacy rising alliance will just sit back and watch you all die>>> bahahaha |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:04:00 -
[22] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:Klivve Cussler wrote:Quote:How many systems are we getting? 250?... Err...no. Just 250 districts. It's like...40 planets in 30 systems in one region. Or as TEST or Goons would say... "chump change" I'm interested to see what this will do to space traffic in the region, whichever it is. It's a lowsec region, and we're going to see traffic of orbital bombartment vessels who have to stay on-grid with district sattelites. Easy pickings for pirates. Will it be worth it to pay eve pilots to escort these destroyers just to have orbital strikes? Will having space supremecy in a district (by putting an entire fleet on grid) signficantly enhance a Dust corp's chance of winning a region? Or will the risk be too high, and we'll all make do with precision strikes instead? Jesus, i thought 250 systems was bad, 250 districts is even worse. So the 6 jump rule must be because it's all within 6 jumps....
lol that could be like 20 planets in a few systems
OMG i need to activate my eve lowsec pirate toon
|
howard sanchez
Conspiratus Immortalis
452
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:05:00 -
[23] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:howard sanchez wrote:Beers&Co,
What specifically is it that you don't like about the planetary conquest system as described? Lots and Lots. I am working on a real post about it with the math and ecnonomics involved it takes a bit more to develop and try and explain it to everyone. also didn't mean to leave guys out. I am sure stb will be will be happy to give you a planet Thanks but when I am ready I will get my own planet.
And I do look forward to you detailed post because, despite your bluster and arrogance, I consider you a serious gamer with some good insights. Get typing. |
ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds
Imperfects Public Relations
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:06:00 -
[24] - Quote
TBH totally applying to the Great Waffles themselves if this happens. |
znignflo72
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:07:00 -
[25] - Quote
PFBHz, IMP, IE, RND, and SyN will be OP |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
465
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:10:00 -
[26] - Quote
Everyone can keep moving if you think your sitting in feythabolis |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:10:00 -
[27] - Quote
znignflo72 wrote:PFBHz, IMP, IE, RND, and SyN will be OP
"I don't want to ruin the game, I just want to ruin everyone elses"
I figure we have to team up to beat the number 2 corp in the game unreal. Its the only way we have a chance
|
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:12:00 -
[28] - Quote
Geth Massredux wrote:Legacy rising alliance will just sit back and watch you all die>>> bahahaha
Wait... I thought you guys were just a voting block for zionshaddy? I dont think you will have time over the next year to hold districts if you need to get campaigning |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1217
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:13:00 -
[29] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Everyone can keep moving if you think your sitting in feythabolis
See someone gets it. |
Crimson Moon V
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
224
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 23:15:00 -
[30] - Quote
znignflo72 wrote:PFBHz, IMP, IE, RND, and SyN will be OP Combined we can turn new eden on its head. Move over goons. Voltron is coming for your throne. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |