Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
JP the Merc
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
If so, why would anyone one spend money to get AUR? |
Kesi Raae Kaae
Much Crying Old Experts
52
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
No, just yours |
knight of 6
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
81
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
AUR is and always has been reimbursed. as for a reset i doubt it. they said the last reset was the final but who knows. |
Delirium Inferno
Chernova Industries
44
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
No, and if for whatever reason they are they would refund all AUR. |
Kay High
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
86
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
use the search function and the answer is no, we will not be reset for the release what you do now effects your character forever. |
N1ck Comeau
REGULATORS OF VALOR Orion Empire
52
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
JP the Merc wrote:If so, why would anyone one spend money to get AUR? They stated no more skill point resets unless an unexpected problem occures and the only fix is a skill point wipe. All of the money you spent on Aururm you will get back. Which by that i mean that you will got all your aururm back. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3057
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
No
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=461847#post461847 |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2087
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
This is still being asked |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3057
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:This is still being asked
Because you have haters that keep spreading rumors. |
Bald Crusader Two
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:44:00 -
[10] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:This is still being asked Because you have haters that keep spreading rumors. No, because CCP can't be clear on the matter without tack on caveats that have kept moving a bit under fire.
|
|
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2087
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
Bald Crusader Two wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:This is still being asked Because you have haters that keep spreading rumors. No, because CCP can't be clear on the matter without tack on caveats that have kept moving a bit under fire. I thought it was because people don't know how to use the search button |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
314
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 22:52:00 -
[12] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:This is still being asked Because you have haters that keep spreading rumors.
CCP still hasn't been clear on the commercial release language.
Instead they simply remove that language from the merc packs WTF!
The problem comes from the fact that the merc packs i and many others bought CLEARLY STATED that all items and AURUM would be refunded upon COMMERCIAL RELEASE.
They still haven't been straight or clear with us about that. They say no more reset but they wont definitely state this is commercial release. Or rather you get conflicting reports from the staff.
They say the consider the move to TQ and Open Beta as "commercial release" but that was after the fact and not before therefore players who expected an AURUM reset are completely left in the dark.
Rather than be direct all they do is remove the language from the merc packs.
Why because legally we are paying for a product, if we lose items not because of user error but due to game error that entitles us to refund and creates liability issues.
Its not something we've put on blast but facts are facts and this whole issue is murky at best granted its separate from the SP reset question it still confounds the issue. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3058
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 23:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
What isnt clear about 1.0 being release? |
crazy space 1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
913
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 23:40:00 -
[14] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:What isnt clear about 1.0 being release? It's not release yet, seems pretty ******* simple.
Also they should do an AUR reset, even if they don't to skills, and eve if it's only for BPOS, becuase I've got 10 of each militia bpo when they were only 500 AUR instead of 12,000 AUR. I really do see what kind of game goes open beta and final reset and THEN has the balls to to that. :/ I'm all for beta perks, like suits and bpos no one will ever get after release, but wtf, this is just silly. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3059
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 23:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
I would like to add there been plenty of betas that have taken money well before release.
Pay to get in. Pay to be a 'Founder' Pay to 'transfer to final version' Pay to 'test the micro-transaction system' (thankfully blizzard gave out fake money for this test) ect. ect. |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
314
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 00:17:00 -
[16] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I would like to add there been plenty of betas that have taken money well before release.
Pay to get in. Pay to be a 'Founder' Pay to 'transfer to final version' Pay to 'test the micro-transaction system' (thankfully blizzard gave out fake money for this test) ect. ect.
SMH still doesnt get it. Not complaining about the money i put in im happy to support CCP in their efforts.
What im not happy about is confusion on this being or not being commercial release.
Saying its not version 1.0 and offering that as proof is different from CCP saying this is not commercial release.
Why haven't they said that? Because PR or marketing effed up and the merc packs clearly stated all items would be refunded upon commercial release.
If CCP wants to hide behind this is a Beta-Work in Progress then they need to definitiely answer us that will refund all AURUM purchases on Commercial release. The reason why they cant do that is they realize thats mean likely giving away SP boosters to players with inflated SPs that can boost their SP furhter since they say they wont reset SP.
Thats the pickle they are in if they reset AURUM they have to Reset SP to keep it fair.
And there in lies the rub either this game is commercial release which means no more AURUM resets or it isnt and that means AURUM refunds for anyone who bought a merc pack prior to them changing the language.
Since this is a point of sale for goods and not just digital content they cant simply use EULA contract BS to circumvent that issue and thats the problem they have and why we are still in the dark.
Im not one to normally make waves and I usually go with the flow but this was and is still being handled very poorly. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
390
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 00:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
I really don't understand what all the confusion is about. Official statement from CCP is no more resets barring something "catastrophic" happens or language that was similar to that. I don't think that's a very ambiguous statement and isn't really open to much interpretation.
As for the merc pack thing, that was put up a long, long time ago. We don't know if that was an official statement from the DEV team or whether marketing put that up or what. They took it down so it's pretty clear they have no intention of refunding any AUR and as per the agreeement we all signed they reserve the right to change things.
Everyone wants to be a lawyer but that's not how things work. This isn't the "commercial release" just because of what was said on the merc pack from a year ago or whenever it was. It's the commercial release when CCP says it is. Officially anyway. Whether it "might as well be" is something we call all debate until we're blue in the face. |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
314
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 00:40:00 -
[18] - Quote
They can change the terms of usage all they want they cant change the terms of a purchase agreement which is what the merc pack was.
They can change the language it only applies to future sales.
And there isnt confusion on the SP reset the SP reset isnt in dispute. Learn to read what i said.
They also changed the language on merc packs a week or two after open beta not before so we're talking a 2 months at most.
Doesnt change it for everyone who bought merc packs that didnt include the closed beta access.
You can defend CCP until you are blue in the face doesn't change the fact that the whole thing was messy and ill handled.
And show me where they say this is DEFINITELY COMMERCIAL RELEASE more than that one post where they say we consider Open Beta as commercial release and see if they comment on it after we ask does that mean we will get our Aurum refunded. Ill wait. They clamored up real fast because CCP defintion of commercial release is probably very different from Marketing departments definition of commercial release and it has FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS SINCE THE MERC PACKS SAID ALL ITEMS ARE REFUNDED UPON COMMERCIAL RELEASE. They can change the language and that will be applicable to all purchasers after the language change its DOESNT APPLY TO ME OR OTHERS who bought MP BEFORE CHANGE
gday
Also this ISNT a purchase with just CCP, its also a purchase agreement with SONY, keep that in mind too please.
Im just waiting now for the thread lock and admonishment for spreading rumors despite the entire sequence of events ive stated are accurate. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
390
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 01:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
Gunner Nightingale wrote:They can change the terms of usage all they want they cant change the terms of a purchase agreement which is what the merc pack was.
They can change the language it only applies to future sales.
And there isnt confusion on the SP reset the SP reset isnt in dispute. Learn to read what i said.
They also changed the language on merc packs a week or two after open beta not before so we're talking a 2 months at most.
Doesnt change it for everyone who bought merc packs that didnt include the closed beta access.
You can defend CCP until you are blue in the face doesn't change the fact that the whole thing was messy and ill handled.
And show me where they say this is DEFINITELY COMMERCIAL RELEASE more than that one post where they say we consider Open Beta as commercial release and see if they comment on it after we ask does that mean we will get our Aurum refunded. Ill wait. They clamored up real fast because CCP defintion of commercial release is probably very different from Marketing departments definition of commercial release and it has FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS SINCE THE MERC PACKS SAID ALL ITEMS ARE REFUNDED UPON COMMERCIAL RELEASE. They can change the language and that will be applicable to all purchasers after the language change its DOESNT APPLY TO ME OR OTHERS who bought MP BEFORE CHANGE
gday
Also this ISNT a purchase with just CCP, its also a purchase agreement with SONY, keep that in mind too please.
Im just waiting now for the thread lock and admonishment for spreading rumors despite the entire sequence of events ive stated are accurate.
I did read what you said. Maybe you didn't see my edit since you put up your post while I was typing mine. I know they changed the language recently but the item was put on the market something like a year ago. My comment about SP being reset was for the OP, you're not the only person on this thread. I also said that whether they are going to be bound by what it said on the merc pack or not is irrelevant to whether or not there will be a future refund of AUR. That is what CCP said so that is the answer.
The merc pack issue is a matter for civil court in, I believe but could be mistaken, your current country of residence. So that's the answer to the OP's question.
And I'm also not defending CCP. They handled this poorly and should probably have left a statement about future plans off an item for sale on the market for a game where they knew full well those future plans would change. I agree that ad wasn't put up there by the DEV team so this seems like a communication error and poor judgement on the part of some other department. I'm merely stating the facts as they stand currently. So calm down and don't think I'm attacking you personally. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
383
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 01:14:00 -
[20] - Quote
JP, so many of your threads could have been avoided if you just used the search function.
BTW, the answer is no, except in the case of some some catastrophic unforeseeable disaster occurring. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3059
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 01:16:00 -
[21] - Quote
All legal matters would be done though the wonderful state of California court system where smaller entittes have a historic trend of losing in favor of the larger entity.
Like apple's only victory against Samsung was here. Everywhere else in the world they loss way more money than what they now reduced winnings in california. Also Samsung just bought Sharp the supplier of the Retinia screen. Samsung also makes all the chips for the apples.
Finally, if you are that pissed off...
File a damn petition, get a resolution and be done with it, because that is what is going to get told to you, your failure to contact customer support is YOUR FAULT. |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
314
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 01:28:00 -
[22] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:All legal matters would be done though the wonderful state of California court system where smaller entittes have a historic trend of losing in favor of the larger entity.
Like apple's only victory against Samsung was here. Everywhere else in the world they loss way more money than what they now reduced winnings in california. Also Samsung just bought Sharp the supplier of the Retinia screen. Samsung also makes all the chips for the apples.
Finally, if you are that pissed off...
File a damn petition, get a resolution and be done with it, because that is what is going to get told to you, your failure to contact customer support is YOUR FAULT.
My pointing out a FLAW WITH COMMUNICATION and AMBIGUITY is not me being pissed off.
I DONT NEED TO CONTACT SUPPORT BECAUSE I HAVE NO INTENTION OF SEEKING REFUND. Learn to READ your sycophantic comments not withstanding, i find it amusing you can't tell that what i said has nothing with my displeasure over not getting AURUM items refunded but rather the manner in which the whole situation was/is handled and the continued lack of communication. But you can go ahead and defend that aspect all you like we see you for what you are, a shill, a prop, and fanboi that just wont quit.
They put you on payroll yet? They should, i'll start the IWS for ISM or (whatever the forum titile is) thread. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3059
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 01:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
Gunner Nightingale wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:All legal matters would be done though the wonderful state of California court system where smaller entittes have a historic trend of losing in favor of the larger entity.
Like apple's only victory against Samsung was here. Everywhere else in the world they loss way more money than what they now reduced winnings in california. Also Samsung just bought Sharp the supplier of the Retinia screen. Samsung also makes all the chips for the apples.
Finally, if you are that pissed off...
File a damn petition, get a resolution and be done with it, because that is what is going to get told to you, your failure to contact customer support is YOUR FAULT. My pointing out a FLAW WITH COMMUNICATION and AMBIGUITY is not me being pissed off. I DONT NEED TO CONTACT SUPPORT BECAUSE I HAVE NO INTENTION OF SEEKING REFUND. Learn to READ your sycophantic comments not withstanding, i find it amusing you can't tell that what i said has nothing with my displeasure over not getting AURUM items refunded but rather the manner in which the whole situation was/is handled and the continued lack of communication. But you can go ahead and defend that aspect all you like we see you for what you are, a shill, a prop, and fanboi that just wont quit. They put you on payroll yet? They should, i'll start the IWS for ISM or (whatever the forum titile is) thread.
Job position isn't open. |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 01:40:00 -
[24] - Quote
This is the full release,at least most of it |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3059
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 01:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
Johnny Guilt wrote:This is the full release,at least most of it
Far from. |
Presti71
Valor Tactical Operations
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 06:16:00 -
[26] - Quote
There better be a character reset at Full Release if they expect to get any NEW players! This game is still in Beta and long away from full release and its already one of the most newbie unfriendly games i have seen in a while.
The gap between new players and Veterans is growing everyday and is directly affecting Battle victory where some games basically come down to which side has the most veteran players with Heavy Armor & Heavy Weapons.
A big issue i am seeing in a good number of games is when one side gets signifigantly ahead of the other side, Maxed out veterans on the losing side who don't need SP and ISK as much either stop playing or drop out of the game... ...which leaves only the newer players on the losing side who need all the SP & ISK they can get who are now forced to take on the dominating team whose veterans have ALL switched to Heavy Armor & Weapons... ...and NOW those newbies aren't even getting ANY kills because they are getting 1-shot killed the second they poke their head out.
Also, its going to be hard to hold the attention of New Players as the game is now when those newbies log in with their starter Assault builds and realize their assault rifles arent doing ANY Damage to the veteran players Heavy Armor! |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
394
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 06:31:00 -
[27] - Quote
Presti71 wrote:There better be a character reset at Full Release if they expect to get any NEW players! This game is still in Beta and long away from full release and its already one of the most newbie unfriendly games i have seen in a while.
The gap between new players and Veterans is growing everyday and is directly affecting Battle victory where some games basically come down to which side has the most veteran players with Heavy Armor & Heavy Weapons.
A big issue i am seeing in a good number of games is when one side gets signifigantly ahead of the other side, Maxed out veterans on the losing side who don't need SP and ISK as much either stop playing or drop out of the game... ...which leaves only the newer players on the losing side who need all the SP & ISK they can get who are now forced to take on the dominating team whose veterans have ALL switched to Heavy Armor & Weapons... ...and NOW those newbies aren't even getting ANY kills because they are getting 1-shot killed the second they poke their head out.
Also, its going to be hard to hold the attention of New Players as the game is now when those newbies log in with their starter Assault builds and realize their assault rifles arent doing ANY Damage to the veteran players Heavy Armor! Possibly, but there's not going to be a reset so those noobs are just going to have to get used to it. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
383
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 06:35:00 -
[28] - Quote
Presti71 wrote:There better be a character reset at Full Release if they expect to get any NEW players! This game is still in Beta and long away from full release and its already one of the most newbie unfriendly games i have seen in a while.
The gap between new players and Veterans is growing everyday and is directly affecting Battle victory where some games basically come down to which side has the most veteran players with Heavy Armor & Heavy Weapons.
A big issue i am seeing in a good number of games is when one side gets signifigantly ahead of the other side, Maxed out veterans on the losing side who don't need SP and ISK as much either stop playing or drop out of the game... ...which leaves only the newer players on the losing side who need all the SP & ISK they can get who are now forced to take on the dominating team whose veterans have ALL switched to Heavy Armor & Weapons... ...and NOW those newbies aren't even getting ANY kills because they are getting 1-shot killed the second they poke their head out.
Also, its going to be hard to hold the attention of New Players as the game is now when those newbies log in with their starter Assault builds and realize their assault rifles arent doing ANY Damage to the veteran players Heavy Armor! So what stops a guy who joins on release from stomping a guy who joined a year later? Nothing, like in Eve, there will always be those who have an advantage simply because they have played longer. There is also nothing stoping people from grinding SP right now, it is an open beta.
What CCP needs to do is give all the "leet" players something to do, aside from pubstomping. |
Presti71
Valor Tactical Operations
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 06:47:00 -
[29] - Quote
um...no the noobs won't have to get used to it! They can just stop playing and tell all their friends who haven't tried it yet NOT to play the game because its Bullshit!
I hear you Sloth, however... 1. Don't use Eve as an example as its well known as one of the most non-newbie friendly MMO's on the market. period. Every MMO/Game website that re-reviews/covers EVE mentions this early on and i have friends who are long time EVE Fanboys who warn me how brutal it is for new players coming in now.
2. You sound like you are saying that there is no reason for anyone to start new on full release since the beta is available now and i agree however as a responsible game company, CCP has to try and get new players upon Full release.
3.It's not individual disparity thats the issue so much but the makeup of the entire team. Like i said, i have seen many pub game come down solely to which side had more veterans with Heavy Armor winning and the side with more noobs like me losing! :)
4. A whole seperate issue in pub games is the number of people who quit playing or drop out of the game the minute their team starts losing. It is happening WAY too much and makes the game NO fun for the remaining players on the losing side. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
383
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 06:58:00 -
[30] - Quote
Presti71 wrote: 3.It's not individual disparity thats the issue so much but the makeup of the entire team. Like i said, i have seen many pub game come down solely to which side had more veterans with Heavy Armor winning and the side with more noobs like me losing! :)
4. A whole seperate issue in pub games is the number of people who quit playing or drop out of the game the minute their team starts losing. It is happening WAY too much and makes the game NO fun for the remaining players on the losing side.
4. I know those feels.
3. Veterans yeah, but heavies aren't really a problem. I've only been playing for like a month and kept getting owned by heavies so I decided to skill into heavies and HMGs myself, lets just say it wasn't as easy as I had hoped it would be. The big issue with heavies is that most people fight them like they would fight any other class, that simply wont work, but once you figure out their weaknesses, fighting one 1 on 1 becomes rather simple. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |