Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:02:00 -
[31] - Quote
Regis Mk V wrote:tribal wyvern wrote:Schazla wrote:I am trying to convince them if they play as a team and get better gear and PTFO you would like the game. Idiots won't even listen. Don't hate the game, hate the player. I havn't touched bf3 since I started playing dust a year ago, bf3 just doesn't do it for me anymore. Dust is what bf3 SHOULD have been, frostbite 2 is just eye candy, it means nothing if the gameplay is not there. Are you really saying that Dust has better gameplay than BF3? Are you dumb or just plain stupid?!
Blinded by rampant fanboyism perhaps.
If Dust had the same core game-play as BF3 (with it's own flavour) it'd be unstoppable.
|
Andrea Auroras
Celtic Anarchy
7
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:08:00 -
[32] - Quote
Groza Tragediya wrote:Battlefield players are use to relying on reaction time and only a slight variance in firepower to win a fire fight.
In this game you dont have to have reflexes nor mental acuity to win (as we can see with MANY of the "best" players) its more of an equipment war. You have higher armor so even though that player aims better and hits you more, you win because you can take more damage.
Battlefield players would eat dusties alive if the field were even and everyone was forced to wear the same outfitting. Thankfully for all of you MMO players its an equipment thing so you dont have to be good, just farm isk and be better equipped. The way dust works.
Erm wtf are you talking about. I regulary own heavys in my scout/assault fit, not though more ehp but though skill. Also IT'S AN OPEN BETA GAME AND IT'S FREE FFS!! Most of you whiners think that this is the finished product. IT ISN'T! not by far.
Really, if your that annoyed with it, go back to BF3/COD. I'm sure the 100's of -ú or $ will be worth it. |
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:15:00 -
[33] - Quote
For all you bleating sheep who think Dust is the perfect game, do yourselves a favour.
Just for a minute, ONE minute, be objective. I implore you, I'm not denying that you can have fun with Dust.
Look up a HD video of BF3, Planetside 2, Tribes Ascend or any other top level shooter on YouTube.
Listen to the sound - listen to how much it adds to the atmosphere.
Look at the graphics - smooth frame-rate = responsive controls.
Look at the level of polish the game engine has in general. How professional things look, how cohesive an experience it all is.
That's the level that Dust has to get to. It's not there right now. It's as simple as that. That's why your buddies are trashing it. Because they are used to polish and quality.
Dust should probably still be in closed beta in its current state. |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
67
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:21:00 -
[34] - Quote
Andrea Auroras wrote:Groza Tragediya wrote:Battlefield players are use to relying on reaction time and only a slight variance in firepower to win a fire fight.
In this game you dont have to have reflexes nor mental acuity to win (as we can see with MANY of the "best" players) its more of an equipment war. You have higher armor so even though that player aims better and hits you more, you win because you can take more damage.
Battlefield players would eat dusties alive if the field were even and everyone was forced to wear the same outfitting. Thankfully for all of you MMO players its an equipment thing so you dont have to be good, just farm isk and be better equipped. The way dust works. Erm wtf are you talking about. I regulary own heavys in my scout/assault fit, not though more ehp but though skill. Also IT'S AN OPEN BETA GAME AND IT'S FREE FFS!! Most of you whiners think that this is the finished product. IT ISN'T! not by far. Really, if your that annoyed with it, go back to BF3/COD. I'm sure the 100's of -ú or $ will be worth it.
You're right, it is a beta, which is exactly why us "whiners" continue to bring up the issues with the game (because we want it to be better) which others ignore because they believe Dust is currently great, which it isn't. Dust is not currently on par with shooters like BF. Once everyone recognizes that and stops bickering, then maybe we can work together to make it better than those other games. |
Regis Mk V
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
109
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:21:00 -
[35] - Quote
Beast Beastlington wrote:Regis Mk V wrote:tribal wyvern wrote:Schazla wrote:I am trying to convince them if they play as a team and get better gear and PTFO you would like the game. Idiots won't even listen. Don't hate the game, hate the player. I havn't touched bf3 since I started playing dust a year ago, bf3 just doesn't do it for me anymore. Dust is what bf3 SHOULD have been, frostbite 2 is just eye candy, it means nothing if the gameplay is not there. Are you really saying that Dust has better gameplay than BF3? Are you dumb or just plain stupid?! Blinded by rampant fanboyism perhaps. If Dust had the same core game-play as BF3 (with it's own flavour) it'd be unstoppable. agreed. |
Razekial Flameclaw
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
19
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:23:00 -
[36] - Quote
I wonder how many people bashing the game that are used to polished games rememebr when 8 bit sprites were the pinnacle of good graphics
games wont always be for everybody |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
67
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:23:00 -
[37] - Quote
Beast Beastlington wrote:For all you bleating sheep who think Dust is the perfect game, do yourselves a favour.
Just for a minute, ONE minute, be objective. I implore you, I'm not denying that you can have fun with Dust.
Look up a HD video of BF3, Planetside 2, Tribes Ascend or any other top level shooter on YouTube.
Listen to the sound - listen to how much it adds to the atmosphere.
Look at the graphics - smooth frame-rate = responsive controls.
Look at the level of polish the game engine has in general. How professional things look, how cohesive an experience it all is.
That's the level that Dust has to get to. It's not there right now. It's as simple as that. That's why your buddies are trashing it. Because they are used to polish and quality.
Dust should probably still be in closed beta in its current state.
Yes, this is exactly the point, and I can't agree with it enough. Dust needs to be improved. We who criticize it realize it's a beta, but that's the point, we're trying to make it better. |
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:26:00 -
[38] - Quote
The thing these hardcore wannabes don't seem to understand is that CCP would absolutely love this to have the accessibility of Halo, CoD and BF3.
They're trying to get it to that level as much as possible. I'd bet a kidney on it. |
Tetractys1234
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:26:00 -
[39] - Quote
Eve is not attempting to be WoW and Dust isn't attempting to be BF3 or COD.
They are totally different games and attract totally different players. If someone wanting a BF3 experience plays DUST, they are going to be disappointed. So what?
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
67
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:28:00 -
[40] - Quote
Tetractys1234 wrote:Eve is not attempting to be WoW and Dust isn't attempting to be BF3 or COD.
They are totally different games and attract totally different players. If someone wanting a BF3 experience plays DUST, they are going to be disappointed. So what?
The "this isn't BF" line isn't an excuse for bad controls/unbalanced weapons/terrible spawing/etc. |
|
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:29:00 -
[41] - Quote
Razekial Flameclaw wrote:I wonder how many people bashing the game that are used to polished games rememebr when 8 bit sprites were the pinnacle of good graphics
games wont always be for everybody
That's an absurd and pointless comparison. That was then, this is now. Now, shooters are expected to meet a certain criteria, that is why we have a host of also-rans with empty servers.
Brink, Section 8, Crysis 2, MOH.
That's just 4 games in the last year or so. There's more. All of those games have more technical polish that Dust currently does.
It's not a private club. If you think it doesn't need to make money to survive, you are loopy.
|
Regis Mk V
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
109
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:31:00 -
[42] - Quote
Beast Beastlington wrote:For all you bleating sheep who think Dust is the perfect game, do yourselves a favour.
Just for a minute, ONE minute, be objective. I implore you, I'm not denying that you can have fun with Dust.
Look up a HD video of BF3, Planetside 2, Tribes Ascend or any other top level shooter on YouTube.
Listen to the sound - listen to how much it adds to the atmosphere.
Look at the graphics - smooth frame-rate = responsive controls.
Look at the level of polish the game engine has in general. How professional things look, how cohesive an experience it all is.
That's the level that Dust has to get to. It's not there right now. It's as simple as that. That's why your buddies are trashing it. Because they are used to polish and quality.
Dust should probably still be in closed beta in its current state.
^^^ This.
Dust should still be in closed beta they have been developing it for how many years now? I remember watching alpha footage back in 2010. While the game is slightly better for an open beta it's not where it should be. |
Razekial Flameclaw
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
19
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:40:00 -
[43] - Quote
Beast Beastlington wrote:Razekial Flameclaw wrote:I wonder how many people bashing the game that are used to polished games rememebr when 8 bit sprites were the pinnacle of good graphics
games wont always be for everybody That's an absurd and pointless comparison. That was then, this is now. Now, shooters are expected to meet a certain criteria, that is why we have a host of also-rans with empty servers. Brink, Section 8, Crysis 2, MOH. That's just 4 games in the last year or so. There's more. All of those games have more technical polish that Dust currently does. It's not a private club. If you think it doesn't need to make money to survive, you are loopy.
Its a generalisation, personal experience of some people I have encountered. (edit) the expecatation then about the sprites and the expectation of good 3d graphics and physics engine remains the same on a base level.
Section 8 *could* have been awesome, the drop mechanic was fantastic.
I'm not saying Dust doesnt require work, it does - there are a whole list of things that need fixing and implementing etc etc.
I actually wrote in a post that didnt get posted thanks to a forum bug at how bad the beta for Tribes:Ascend was, which has had a big turn around since launch and HiRez just keep going - hopefully this is a path that CCP will follow with Dust |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:42:00 -
[44] - Quote
Beast Beastlington wrote:Razekial Flameclaw wrote:I wonder how many people bashing the game that are used to polished games rememebr when 8 bit sprites were the pinnacle of good graphics
games wont always be for everybody That's an absurd and pointless comparison. That was then, this is now. Now, shooters are expected to meet a certain criteria, that is why we have a host of also-rans with empty servers. Brink, Section 8, Crysis 2, MOH. That's just 4 games in the last year or so. There's more. All of those games have more technical polish that Dust currently does. It's not a private club. If you think it doesn't need to make money to survive, you are loopy. You never saw Brink in the first week after release, or worse - a review copy before the day-one patch.
IT. WASN'T. READY.
It certainly didn't have the level of polish DUST already has - and that lasted until AFTER release. DUST is still in beta. There are some things where "it's a beta" doesn't cut it, but this is an area where it's relevant.
Is DUST ready for release? No. Is it ready for open beta? Yes.
Personally, I find DUST more enjoyable than Battlefield 3. I'm not saying it's as polished. I'm not saying it's ready for release. I'm not saying that the current state of DUST is better than (or even as good as) BF3. But I still enjoy it more. Different games - sometimes even different games in the same genre - appeal to different people. |
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:43:00 -
[45] - Quote
Section 8 was a lot of fun. It's a real shame that game died off so quickly. I think it would have been the perfect template for Dust. It was tactical, futuristic and as you said, had a brilliant spawn mechanic.
Some betas are rough, some are very polished. Hawken for instance (in open beta) is very polished at the moment.
I wish CCP would communicate more often. It's so vague as to what the plan is, or where Dust is headed. |
Razekial Flameclaw
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
19
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:47:00 -
[46] - Quote
Beast Beastlington wrote:Section 8 was a lot of fun. It's a real shame that game died off so quickly. I think it would have been the perfect template for Dust. It was tactical, futuristic and as you said, had a brilliant spawn mechanic.
Some betas are rough, some are very polished. Hawken for instance (in open beta) is very polished at the moment.
I wish CCP would communicate more often. It's so vague as to what the plan is, or where Dust is headed.
Heh, we agree on something then! I had S8 on pre order for weeks, there was nothing more satisfying than dropping and causing havoc, even better dropkilling someone - that was satisfying.
Hawken is very polished indeed, shame it cripples my PC and we all know CCP have never been the best of communicators.
Dust suits a particular crowd, it wont suit every body. |
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:51:00 -
[47] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Beast Beastlington wrote:Razekial Flameclaw wrote:I wonder how many people bashing the game that are used to polished games rememebr when 8 bit sprites were the pinnacle of good graphics
games wont always be for everybody That's an absurd and pointless comparison. That was then, this is now. Now, shooters are expected to meet a certain criteria, that is why we have a host of also-rans with empty servers. Brink, Section 8, Crysis 2, MOH. That's just 4 games in the last year or so. There's more. All of those games have more technical polish that Dust currently does. It's not a private club. If you think it doesn't need to make money to survive, you are loopy. You never saw Brink in the first week after release, or worse - a review copy before the day-one patch. IT. WASN'T. READY. It certainly didn't have the level of polish DUST already has - and that lasted until AFTER release. DUST is still in beta. There are some things where "it's a beta" doesn't cut it, but this is an area where it's relevant. Is DUST ready for release? No. Is it ready for open beta? Yes. Personally, I find DUST more enjoyable than Battlefield 3. I'm not saying it's as polished. I'm not saying it's ready for release. I'm not saying that the current state of DUST is better than (or even as good as) BF3. But I still enjoy it more. Different games - sometimes even different games in the same genre - appeal to different people.
I did see it and it was a disaster. Thus, the servers are empty. That's my point. CCP are playing a dangerous game here. Open beta or not, FPS are very flaky these days. They jump from game to game quickly and if it doesn't reach expectations, then it's dead. |
Razekial Flameclaw
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
19
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 12:58:00 -
[48] - Quote
Beast Beastlington wrote:[
I did see it and it was a disaster. Thus, the servers are empty. That's my point. CCP are playing a dangerous game here. Open beta or not, FPS are very flaky these days. They jump from game to game quickly and if it doesn't reach expectations, then it's dead.
We shall see, i remember the CoD:WaW beta *shudders*
tbh there is at least a 6 month development period beore release, alot cna change in 6 months we just need to wait and see, i'll probably still be here in that 6 months, this game ticks alot of boxes for me, just wish that more people played as a team :D |
Andrea Auroras
Celtic Anarchy
7
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:00:00 -
[49] - Quote
Beast Beastlington wrote:For all you bleating sheep who think Dust is the perfect game, do yourselves a favour.
Just for a minute, ONE minute, be objective. I implore you, I'm not denying that you can have fun with Dust.
Look up a HD video of BF3, Planetside 2, Tribes Ascend or any other top level shooter on YouTube.
Listen to the sound - listen to how much it adds to the atmosphere.
Look at the graphics - smooth frame-rate = responsive controls.
Look at the level of polish the game engine has in general. How professional things look, how cohesive an experience it all is.
That's the level that Dust has to get to. It's not there right now. It's as simple as that. That's why your buddies are trashing it. Because they are used to polish and quality.
Dust should probably still be in closed beta in its current state.
so your compairing those finished games to dust? and also those vids are taken from PC's on max gfx. if dust was on the PC it'd prob have gfx of that quality. but alas it aint. Suck it up ffs. The sound is being worked on, EVERYTHING is being worked on.
Please get some sense, WE ARE HERE TO BETA TEST THE F-ING GAME!! Use feedback, give the devs your views. \don't *****, be constructive. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:06:00 -
[50] - Quote
Groza Tragediya wrote:Battlefield players are use to relying on reaction time and only a slight variance in firepower to win a fire fight.
In this game you dont have to have reflexes nor mental acuity to win (as we can see with MANY of the "best" players) its more of an equipment war. You have higher armor so even though that player aims better and hits you more, you win because you can take more damage.
Battlefield players would eat dusties alive if the field were even and everyone was forced to wear the same outfitting. Thankfully for all of you MMO players its an equipment thing so you dont have to be good, just farm isk and be better equipped. The way dust works.
LOL seeing as gear doesnt give u a big advantage like before ur wrong unless its a militia/standard vs proto fight
so yea buddy nice try but skill actually plays the biggest role in the game not gear
and tbqh ive seen many bf players come on dust and get wrecked and the biggest complaint from those peeps are usually the amount of shots it takes to drop someone. BF isnt a strafe shooter its a positional, twitch shooter so its usually a 1st-see-wins-gunfight sorta deal. U'd be surprised how many players suck at trackin a strafing target
now if u said KZ/Resistance/Halo players id fully agree with u because those games arent just all position/twitch based but require gun skill and strafing skill
The one advantage id say BF players have is vehicles and incorporating vehicles into proper teamplay since BF clan matches give u the closet thing to a DUST corp battle atm........just for them to get used to the vehicle controls. |
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:07:00 -
[51] - Quote
Regis Mk V wrote:Beast Beastlington wrote:For all you bleating sheep who think Dust is the perfect game, do yourselves a favour.
Just for a minute, ONE minute, be objective. I implore you, I'm not denying that you can have fun with Dust.
Look up a HD video of BF3, Planetside 2, Tribes Ascend or any other top level shooter on YouTube.
Listen to the sound - listen to how much it adds to the atmosphere.
Look at the graphics - smooth frame-rate = responsive controls.
Look at the level of polish the game engine has in general. How professional things look, how cohesive an experience it all is.
That's the level that Dust has to get to. It's not there right now. It's as simple as that. That's why your buddies are trashing it. Because they are used to polish and quality.
Dust should probably still be in closed beta in its current state. ^^^ This. Dust should still be in closed beta they have been developing it for how many years now? I remember watching alpha footage back in 2010. While the game is slightly better for an open beta it's not where it should be.
they had to start over regis different engine |
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:08:00 -
[52] - Quote
Andrea Auroras wrote:Beast Beastlington wrote:For all you bleating sheep who think Dust is the perfect game, do yourselves a favour.
Just for a minute, ONE minute, be objective. I implore you, I'm not denying that you can have fun with Dust.
Look up a HD video of BF3, Planetside 2, Tribes Ascend or any other top level shooter on YouTube.
Listen to the sound - listen to how much it adds to the atmosphere.
Look at the graphics - smooth frame-rate = responsive controls.
Look at the level of polish the game engine has in general. How professional things look, how cohesive an experience it all is.
That's the level that Dust has to get to. It's not there right now. It's as simple as that. That's why your buddies are trashing it. Because they are used to polish and quality.
Dust should probably still be in closed beta in its current state. so your compairing those finished games to dust? and also those vids are taken from PC's on max gfx. if dust was on the PC it'd prob have gfx of that quality. but alas it aint. Suck it up ffs. The sound is being worked on, EVERYTHING is being worked on. Please get some sense, WE ARE HERE TO BETA TEST THE F-ING GAME!! Use feedback, give the devs your views. \don't *****, be constructive.
It's like discussing something with a cardboard box.
You don't get it, do you? I understand that it's a work in progress, Joe Gamer who plays a few shooters here and there doesn't care. He wants it to be as good as his favorite shooter NOW. If it isn't he won't try it again.
That's the point of this thread. We're discussing why people think Dust is a third rate, crappy shooter. Those are the reasons. It's because people expect a certain level of polish and Dust doesn't have it.
If you can't see the constructive criticism in that alone for CCP, there's nothing I can do to help you.
|
Lord Crases
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
19
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:16:00 -
[53] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:Andrea Auroras wrote:Groza Tragediya wrote:Battlefield players are use to relying on reaction time and only a slight variance in firepower to win a fire fight.
In this game you dont have to have reflexes nor mental acuity to win (as we can see with MANY of the "best" players) its more of an equipment war. You have higher armor so even though that player aims better and hits you more, you win because you can take more damage.
Battlefield players would eat dusties alive if the field were even and everyone was forced to wear the same outfitting. Thankfully for all of you MMO players its an equipment thing so you dont have to be good, just farm isk and be better equipped. The way dust works. Erm wtf are you talking about. I regulary own heavys in my scout/assault fit, not though more ehp but though skill. Also IT'S AN OPEN BETA GAME AND IT'S FREE FFS!! Most of you whiners think that this is the finished product. IT ISN'T! not by far. Really, if your that annoyed with it, go back to BF3/COD. I'm sure the 100's of -ú or $ will be worth it. You're right, it is a beta, which is exactly why us "whiners" continue to bring up the issues with the game (because we want it to be better) which others ignore because they believe Dust is currently great, which it isn't. Dust is not currently on par with shooters like BF. Once everyone recognizes that and stops bickering, then maybe we can work together to make it better than those other games.
Agreed, if more people compared Dust 514's finished aspects with known aspects then maybe just maybe logic would reign supreme.
Until that day everyone will continue to compare the entirety that is the unfinished project of dust with the completeness of every other game.
though I can promise you none of those self same people would ever make it as contractors or anyone else whose job is to look at something that needs to be built and say.
"This is going to be great!" |
Imp Smash
On The Brink
51
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:18:00 -
[54] - Quote
You gotta admit- fully destructible env is pretty amazing. I like dust because of its Rpg elements. I like bf3 cause of its realism elements. I like both because of their tactical elements.
I think other players just were hoping it'd be like bf and are disappointed its not. |
Nstomper
Th3-ReSiStAnCe-SEC.0
205
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:25:00 -
[55] - Quote
From reading the battle log it sounds to me like those idiots talk about dust like this is a full version of the game but what they dont understand that this is a true beta, they are used too betas being a early versions of full games and thats coming from a console beta player that has played many console betas |
Kleanur Guy
SyNergy Gaming
154
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:27:00 -
[56] - Quote
Also for the sound complainers:
Quote:Hi, CCP Earworm, sound programmer for Dust, here.
Later this week we're content streaming a lot of new sounds, affecting everything from the music to the explosions to the firing sounds of many different weapons. These changes are a big step to finishing the sound and setting the mood we want.
The LAR is one sound that we've constantly iterated on since it's the bread and butter of the dust battlefield. We've gone through a ton of versions to find the right fit for the LAR, and the new version coming in this week (along with all the sweeping changes in overall sound) takes into account what you guys have been talking about here.
Thanks for all the comments!
And if the graphics are constantly updating in EVE, I would assume the same for Dust. |
Andrea Auroras
Celtic Anarchy
7
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:30:00 -
[57] - Quote
Beast Beastlington wrote:Andrea Auroras wrote:Beast Beastlington wrote:For all you bleating sheep who think Dust is the perfect game, do yourselves a favour.
Just for a minute, ONE minute, be objective. I implore you, I'm not denying that you can have fun with Dust.
Look up a HD video of BF3, Planetside 2, Tribes Ascend or any other top level shooter on YouTube.
Listen to the sound - listen to how much it adds to the atmosphere.
Look at the graphics - smooth frame-rate = responsive controls.
Look at the level of polish the game engine has in general. How professional things look, how cohesive an experience it all is.
That's the level that Dust has to get to. It's not there right now. It's as simple as that. That's why your buddies are trashing it. Because they are used to polish and quality.
Dust should probably still be in closed beta in its current state. so your compairing those finished games to dust? and also those vids are taken from PC's on max gfx. if dust was on the PC it'd prob have gfx of that quality. but alas it aint. Suck it up ffs. The sound is being worked on, EVERYTHING is being worked on. Please get some sense, WE ARE HERE TO BETA TEST THE F-ING GAME!! Use feedback, give the devs your views. \don't *****, be constructive. It's like discussing something with a cardboard box. You don't get it, do you? I understand that it's a work in progress, Joe Gamer who plays a few shooters here and there doesn't care. He wants it to be as good as his favorite shooter NOW. If it isn't he won't try it again. That's the point of this thread. We're discussing why people think Dust is a third rate, crappy shooter. Those are the reasons. It's because people expect a certain level of polish and Dust doesn't have it. If you can't see the constructive criticism in that alone for CCP, there's nothing I can do to help you.
lol i dont need your help nor did i ask for it. i was giving you a reason to play and maybe along the way your input will make this game great. Just coming here with the "it;s crap so why bother" line is couter-productive. CCP actually listen to the player base. You try going to EA with your suggestions on how the game could be better lol wake up. Ok so its not polished and theres a ton of work to be done but thou our efforts it WILL BE BETTER! |
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
317
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:40:00 -
[58] - Quote
General Tiberius1 wrote:Sylvana Nightwind wrote:So what, they will keep on playing BF3 and then wait for BF4 and then BF5 and pay money for all the DLC they shove their throat while we get full free game with free expansions and free everything forever. :) Leave them be, ignorance is bliss. im sorry, BF3 was awesome....in the begining...ok, i see your point
I am glad I got rid of BF3 before they got most of their DLCs.......or that stupid crossbow. |
Arramakaian Eka
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
363
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 13:55:00 -
[59] - Quote
Very valid concern raised about the **** poor frame rate. It's only going to get worse with added vegetation, unless CCP has an ace up their sleeve when it comes to Unreal optimization. |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
404
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 14:06:00 -
[60] - Quote
Moejoe Omnipotent wrote:So now you people are saying that the new players' dislike of this game is their own fault. Not the game's fault...not the developer's fault...but their own fault because they...failed to force themselves to enjoy the game?...
Are you guys for real? Like, does this sort of logic even exist outside of the internet? You do have a point, but the situation we're looking at here is bad PR about DUST, a large part of which is based on total ignorance.
There are many valid reasons to criticize DUST, however, when peeps are so friggin' dense that they don't realize you can modify your dropsuit fittings or train skills and then publicly trash the product then yes there is a problem, and peeps who care about the success of DUST should be out there fighting the mouthbreathers when they can. And if you read some of those reviews, from individuals AND the press, it's obvious that they spent an hour or two with the game, failed the intelligence test, and are now out there spewing their gems of wisdom to the world.
Personally, i don't give a kittenfart, because i think that the success of DUST is virtually guaranteed at this point(yes, we all, Devs and testers, have a kittenload of work to do still), and I don't want the mouthbreathers anywhere near this game - there's lots of FPSs out there for them already.
Is it their fault? I dunno, but I sure as hell don't want them. Maybe they've got friends who will hold their hand and explain the game to them some day and they'll come back into New Eden so the rest of us can prey on them.
EDIT: Here's a perfect example. Guys like Washlee will make DUST a success through word of mouth and a willingness to interpret the game for other peeps: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=503704#post503704
Not me though, i'm a judgemental bastard and just want to eat their livers. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |