Neither its all about ISK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The title says it all. My friend and I have been going back and forth about which is more important. Obviously they both have a role in the game. If you see someone with 50,000 WP but 25 Kills and 3 Deaths, you know they are boosting. Personally I believe WP are more important than your K/D ratio. WP reflect how much of a team player you are. (this is assuming you are not boosting) If you are running around, hacking objectives, reviving/healing people, giving them ammo, and killing when you get the chance, your going to end up with a kitten ton of WP. This shows that you are trying to win the match by helping your team. My friend (who I'm not going to name for the sake of saving him hate mail) believes that your K/D ratio represents the same thing, that being how much you help your team. He is a tank driver (now some people know who he is) and focuses on killing as many people as he can. I told him that doing so is great if your defending an objective, but he refuted my point by stating he is aggressive with his tank and moves in to clear out an objective. Both roles are needed in a match otherwise you wouldn't be able to win. We have, in the friendliest way possible, called each other point-whores(me) and kill-whores(him). So I turn to all of you to hear your opinion. Which is more important in a match, brute force or teamwork? Discuss.

You act like we have a search button

WP/D ratio.

Nothing is more important then the tears of my enemies.

Both are important. You need someone to clear the way so your team can provide support, hack stuff, and blow up vehicles. Neither become important unless your lacking whatever support is required, or lacking firepower.

what they need to do is introduce something i like to call a "meta score" basically it gives you a dividend out of a 100, and based off how well you do in each of the games major stats (K/D WP/D W/L) you rank between 1 and 100. If someone has a meta score of 100, then that means there an all around god at the game. The standard that the "meta score" would be using would have to be set by CCP at some number, but in my opinion if someone has a 3 to 1 KD, 200 to 1 WP/D, and a 2 to 1 W/L then they should have a reasonably high meta score, if not a 100. Of course those stats are up to debate but its whatever. Also, in case you guys didn't know this idea is a complete knock off of the system they have in place in Battlefield bad company 2.

In addition to this system they could even add an option where it devides into 3 smaller meta scores that show specifically how good someone is out a 100 in each specific stat.

IE: someone might have a 5.0 K/D giving them a 100 in that, but they also might only have 100 WP/D and a 1.0 W/L thus giving them the respective meta scores of 100, 50, and 50 (based off my standard) which would therefore give them a total meta score of around 67 - 70