DUST Search - Radar is so unbelievably screwed up...

All Channels

General Discussions

Radar is so unbelievably screwed up...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 288	Posted - 2013.01.17 09:42:00 - [1] - Quote If ANYBODY shoots/throws/hacks ANYTHING, they should be visible on the radar for ALL players for a certain period of time. Snipers, close range AR players, grenade throwers, whatever... Yet this is not the case. Somehow a player can lob bullets at me in close range without showing up on the radar. May I ask... WHY?!?!?!?!? CCP, you excel so much at failing core gameplay of a FPS game. Get this shyte right already. If some douche lobs bullets at me, then automatically they need to be revealed on the radar TO EVERYBODY regardless of what crap they are using on their suit or how far away they are. This games garbage radar system will be its undoing... I can deal with the ****** squad radar Intel only, but at least show the players on the other team who fire at me on my radar. Either way, any player who shoots, hacks or does anything significant needs to be revealed on the radar for every player in that match. I don't give a what crap they have on their suits, this is basic FPS 101 gameplay. I fully expect myself to be 100% revealed whenever I throw a grenade or fire a shot, and that is HOW IT SHOULD BE.**
Sleepy Zan Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 2046	Posted - 2013.01.17 09:46:00 - [2] - Quote why? I don't mind the way it is, with how easy it is to be revealed by any random guy's line of sight its hard enough to be stealthy as it is.
Noraa Anderson Nox Aeterna Security 184	Posted - 2013.01.17 09:48:00 - [3] - Quote Sleepy Zan wrote: why? He got shotted by a stealth specced.
DJINN Marauder Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 254	Posted - 2013.01.17 09:49:00 - [4] - Quote Shooting yes. I don't believe throwing grenades or hacking should make you show up on the radar though.
crazy space 2100046106 ZionTCD Legacy Rising 879	Posted - 2013.01.17 09:49:00 - [5] - Quote Well yes the sound should give them away. Even if for sniper it's just a quick blip. Would give a reason to fit the radar extender if shooting gave you away on the map. Plus it could open the doors for silence weapons. Using a knife would be more effective as more pings would be on the map, making your weapon fair that you can sneak up on him without showing up on the map. Maybe different weapons are louder for a forge gun leaves a long mark on the minimap. Also some kind of tagging weapon please.
Tech Ohm Eaven L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising 401	Posted - 2013.01.17 10:16:00 - [6] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: If ANYBODY shoots/throws/hacks ANYTHING, they should be visible on the radar for ALL players for a certain period of time. Snipers, close range AR players, grenade throwers, whatever... Yet this is not the case. Somehow a player can lob bullets at me in close range without showing up on the radar. May I ask... WHY?!?!?!?!? CCP, you excel so much at failing core gameplay of a FPS game. Get this shyte right already. If some douche lobs bullets at me, then automatically they need to be revealed on the radar TO EVERYBODY regardless of what crap they are using on their suit or how far away they are. This games garbage radar system will be its undoing... I can deal with the ****** squad radar Intel only, but at least show the players on the other team who fire at me on my radar. Either way, any player who shoots, hacks or does anything significant needs to be revealed on the radar for every player in that match. I don't give a what crap they have on their suits, this is basic FPS 101 gameplay. I fully expect myself to be 100% revealed whenever I throw a grenade or fire a shot, and that is HOW IT SHOULD BE.** YOU= whine,whine,whine,whine. YOU whined about heavys, you whined about HMG, you whined about PISTOLS!!???? and now you whine about minimaps?? With all due respect but shut up!!!
Guinevere Bravo SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 140	Posted - 2013.01.17 10:26:00 - [7] - Quote Wanna see more on the map? Upgrade your precision scanning. Where theres a will, theres a way. Try and work things out on your own rather running here and crying about it.
Tech Ohm Eaven L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising 401	Posted - 2013.01.17 10:37:00 - [8] - Quote Guinevere Bravo wrote: Wanna see more on the map? Upgrade your precision scanning. Where theres a will, theres a way. Try and work things out on your own rather running here and crying about it. Agreed and +1
Hunter Junko WARRIORS 1NC 45	Posted - 2013.01.17 10:40:00 - [9] - Quote https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=51652&find=unread created a thread in the suggestion thread about this, might help, might not, your choice. Safe Hunting
Kamiya Musume Suffer Inc. 63	Posted - 2013.01.17 10:59:00 - [10] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: If ANYBODY shoots/throws/hacks ANYTHING, they should be visible on the radar for ALL players for a certain period of time. Snipers, close range AR players, grenade throwers, whatever... Yet this is not the case. Somehow a player can lob bullets at me in close range without showing up on the radar. May I ask... WHY?!?!?!?!? CCP, you excel so much at failing core gameplay of a FPS game. Get this shyte right already. If some douche lobs bullets at me, then automatically they need to be revealed on the radar TO EVERYBODY regardless of what crap they are using on their suit or how far away they are. This games garbage radar system will be its undoing... I can deal with the ****** squad radar Intel only, but at least show the players on the other team who fire at me on my radar. Either way, any player who shoots, hacks or does anything significant needs to be revealed on the radar for every player in that match. I don't give a what crap they have on their suits, this is basic FPS 101 gameplay. I fully expect myself to be 100% revealed whenever I throw a grenade or fire a shot, and that is HOW IT SHOULD BE.** get over it. you do not know "how it should be".

Umbat Boki Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic 157	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:02:00 - [11] - Quote There is scanning and signature mechanics to decide if player should appear on a radar.
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 288	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:06:00 - [12] - Quote Sleepy Zan wrote: why? I don't mind the way it is, with how easy it is to be revealed by any random guy's line of sight its hard enough to be stealthy as it is. Random guys of sight??? You mean ONE player on *your* -- SQUAD???? That is all that matters currently, a player on your squad, other than that a player is invisible no matter what they do. Plus depending on what they have equipped on their suit, you, and every other person you play with, will never see them regardless if they shoot at you or otherwise.
Takahiro Kashuken Intara Direct Action Caldari State 102	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:07:00 - [13] - Quote Id would rarther have the radar show buildings and roads and installations instead of this circle and occasional red dot it just feels a bit lazy Make it a skill or whatever i would love a more detailed radar
Vyzion Eyri The Southern Legion 155	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:07:00 - [14] - Quote I thought the scanner was limited deliberately so everyone can't see everyone so then there was a reason to actually talk to your team members over the integrated voice communication system.
Yay Adski Imperfects Negative-Feedback 133	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:09:00 - [15] - Quote We need ghost up in this *****
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 288	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:11:00 - [16] - Quote DJINN Marauder wrote: Shooting yes. I don't believe throwing grenades or hacking should make you show up on the radar though. Hacking is disputed... by throwing nades? Nope, a player needs to be revealed to the ENTIRE other team if they throw a nade or shoot. All part of the risk of revealing yourself by interacting with the enemy via lethal force. This is FPS gameplay 101, no excuses for it not being implemented.
Kamiya Musume Suffer Inc. 63	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:16:00 - [17] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: DJINN Marauder wrote: Shooting yes. I don't believe throwing grenades or hacking should make you show up on the radar though. Hacking is disputed... by throwing nades? Nope, a player needs to be revealed to the ENTIRE other team if they throw a nade or shoot. All part of the risk of revealing yourself by interacting with the enemy via lethal force. This is FPS gameplay 101, no excuses for it not being implemented. yes, yes. Because you know everything stop forcing your opinions on everyone, because that is all they are; OPINIONS.
Tectonious Falcon The Southern Legion 395	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:17:00 - [18] - Quote When people shoot at me, they appear on my radar. I run a heavy suit and I see scout guys running up behind on my mini map when they get to close. Not sure what game your playing.
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 288	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:20:00 - [19] - Quote Guinevere Bravo wrote: Wanna see more on the map? Upgrade your precision scanning. Where theres a will, theres a way. Try and work things out on your own rather running here and crying about it. Only noobs defend crap FPS core gameplay in Dust. Take your lips off of CCP's ring-doughnut and focus on making this a better game, please...
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 288	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:33:00 - [20] - Quote Kamiya Musume wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: DJINN Marauder wrote: Shooting yes. I don't believe throwing grenades or hacking should make you show up on the radar though. Hacking is disputed... by throwing nades? Nope, a player needs to be revealed to the ENTIRE other team if they throw a nade or shoot. All part of the risk of revealing yourself by interacting with the enemy via lethal force. This is FPS gameplay 101, no excuses for it not being implemented. yes, yes. Because you know everything stop forcing your opinions on everyone, because that is all they are; OPINIONS. Yup, which explains every other online developer who didn't listen to me and failed miserably. Take a look at Starhawk, all of them (forum morons included) were against me like you all are... heh, take a look at that games sales ... LOL. SH has been out for almost a year now and it's sales are beyond pathetic, no doubt Lightbox is being shutdown after that failure... All because they didn't listen to a player like myself who actually knows how online games are supposed to work. Joke about my opinions, but truth is just an opinion to an idiot... but that doesn't make it less of a fact.

Yagihige Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 172	Posted - 2013.01.17 11:36:00 - [21] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: Yup, which explains every other online developer who didn't listen to me and failed miserably. You're so important.
steadyhand amarr Imperfects Negative-Feedback 338	Posted - 2013.01.17 12:26:00 - [22] - Quote Because the big red letters saying enemy is hacking the cru all the points that start to blink while being hacked is not enough??? Dude everything just asked for is allready in game. Stop the qq and admit maybe u dieing was your own dam fault
arimal lavaren L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising 186	Posted - 2013.01.17 12:33:00 - [23] - Quote Sony's lack of marketing for new IP is what hurt Starhawks sales, which is other wise a brilliant and fun multiplayer game. It's still receiving updates and is about the only other shooter I play these days.
Beren Hurin OMNI Endeavors 183	Posted - 2013.01.17 12:35:00 - [24] - Quote Yep. Radar is important. I'm not completely sure on the math of how radar works, but I know the scan profile of a scout is smaller than an assault, logi, or heavy's precision are initially. This means, that unless the suit is right beside you or you are looking at them, you wont see them on the map. Also the scan distance of a scout is 25m while others are 15m. This means that if they are not in your direct field of vision then you can bet they use that 10+ meters to find the best way to shoot you. You can however talk to your friends who may not be immediately nearby and have them lookout for you. If they do see a red visually that wouldn't normally show up for you, then it will appear on the map. Additionally you could run with a sensor boosted scout which would help with detection. Also knowing what blues are looking like they are doing on the minimap is important. Blueberries that are facing the same direction and strafing are shooting most likely. Paying attention to the direction people are going is key as well. This lets you know if they see you or not, as it is possible for someone to show up on your map but them not see you.
polarzus ZionTCD Legacy Rising 19	Posted - 2013.01.17 12:38:00 - [25] - Quote http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lu9fjbAc991r5gpzmo1_500.gif There are so many different games in the world because there isn't only ONE right way...
Kamiya Musume Suffer Inc. 63	Posted - 2013.01.17 12:58:00 - [26] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: Kamiya Musume wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: DJINN Marauder wrote: Shooting yes. I don't believe throwing grenades or hacking should make you show up on the radar though. Hacking is disputed... by throwing nades? Nope, a player needs to be revealed to the ENTIRE other team if they throw a nade or shoot. All part of the risk of revealing yourself by interacting with the enemy via lethal force. This is FPS gameplay 101, no excuses for it not being implemented. yes, yes. Because you know everything stop forcing your opinions on everyone, because that is all they are; OPINIONS. Yup, which explains every other online developer who didn't listen to me and failed miserably. Take a look at Starhawk, all of them (forum morons included) were against me like you all are... heh, take a look at that games sales ... LOL. SH has been out for almost a year now and it's sales are beyond pathetic, no doubt Lightbox is being shutdown after that failure... All because they didn't listen to a player like myself who actually knows how online games are supposed to work. Joke about my opinions, but truth is just an opinion to an idiot... but that doesn't make it less of a fact. what? who are you? where did you find your "Truth"? can you prove it? did you breastfeed until you were 11 or something, because you have an overinflated sense of self worth. Are you a game developer? How much experience do you have in the software engineering industry? why can't I find you at the top of every leaderboard for every game if you are so knowledgeable and skilled? is your "Truth" like the Pope's "truth"? cos that stuff is lies y'know. TL:DR? Go Away. The world revolves around the sun, not you!
Needless Sacermendor Red Fox Brigade 208	Posted - 2013.01.17 13:15:00 - [27] - Quote OP forgot to put a TL,DR ... I'll add it for him ... Stealth is OP ... whine, grumble, QQ.
Firestorm Zulu Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 158	Posted - 2013.01.17 13:29:00 - [28] - Quote FPS 101: any person shooting should be revealed on minimap, unless they are using a silencer.
Noraa Anderson Nox Aeterna Security 184	Posted - 2013.01.17 13:32:00 - [29] - Quote Firestorm Zulu wrote: FPS 101: any person shooting should be revealed on minimap, unless they are using a silencer. I don't disagree with this fundamental but I don't think it should cover Grenade throwing or Hacking.
Sergeant Wiznowski Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 38	Posted - 2013.01.17 14:03:00 - [30] - Quote Audiospotting and 3D spotting is just bad in any FPS. You should be able to locate enemy based on shot sound direction not wallhacks. IMO Dust radar is ok, LAV and HAVs should show more but that's all.

SCAT mania Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 76	Posted - 2013.01.17 14:26:00 - [31] - Quote think the map is grand.. get to higher ground if u cant see peeps. would like to see all of the cardinals on there though. would be alot easier for shouting out to squads wheres what.
Crm234 Wraith Shadow Guards 166	Posted - 2013.01.17 14:53:00 - [32] - Quote I had a hard time with the radar before I discovered long range scanning skill lvl 3. I dont understand this idea from CCP to make every FPS mechanic look like crap to a new player because that is how were going to make them stay. The 1950`s radar really it out dated in FPS games and the only one that gets away with it is Alien vs Predator for the movie feel. We have a huge Spaceship in the air i think we have a picture of the map that can show all the thin walls and buildings. I still dont like how the radar and red arrow will display someone that is on the other side of the map versus someone that is right next to me shooting. With all the profile dampeners , they really need to put in a footstep sounds as well
Beren Hurin OMNI Endeavors 183	Posted - 2013.01.17 15:14:00 - [33] - Quote Also, in eve there is this idea of 'black ops' warfare and signal tanking. They are two different concepts, but I think the paradigm is effective here. With black ops you get a tactical advantage by having a suprise factor in finding your enemy unprepared for a sudden attack after you uncloak, throw on damage fast, and then re-cloak. With signal tanking, the idea is a little different, but instead of building a philosophy of having modules that increase your HP so that you don't have to modify incoming DPS, you mitigate the DPS through a combination of tactical avoidance and technical avoidance. I think the sensor/radar system is similar. The smaller your profile the less likely someone in the vicinity will find you, before you find them. The sooner you see the enemy the better. And two people using this ability would be more than 2x effective if you utilize effective flanking. The scan radius of the scout suit has to be the biggest advantage of its stats. And running around as a scout with assaults will make you a force multiplier for them while they protect.
Ner'Zul Nexhawk Talos Incorporated 153	Posted - 2013.01.17 15:22:00 - [34] - Quote Yagihige wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: Yup, which explains every other online developer who didn't listen to me and failed miserably. You're so important. I believe we may have an answer to this: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=51598&find=unread. Or we may not. Anyways: @DJINN leukoplast But, honestly, what if I skill my my Dropsuit signature to 5 and slap prototype Profile Dampeners, I think my tag is not supposed to be seen even when an enemy looks directly at me. (Haven't really tried them, please correct me if I'm wrong.) And now, say, I put on that fit and encounter three snipers on the hill. I kill one with a shotgun. What you're saying is that I should appear on the radar and blow my cover off, even for one second? So much for my stealth skills and modules! Now those snipers will probably organize an aware defense, and I might be unsuccessful.I don't believe, sir, that this is the point of stealth. Moreover, if you are clever and can put together a kill message, disappearance of on of blue dots near you, and a possible shotgun sound, you might figure out a mole by yourself. But show myself to everyone on the map? No thank you. But wait, maybe there are skills and modules only for stealth in literarily every FPS? Then I might be proven wrong by your argument. In all seriousness, if you think you are smarter than CCP's entire team of developers, then go ahead and apply to work for them. From what I've seen, you shouldn't have trouble getting picked and imposing your opinions on them. This would certainly make it better for every beta tester over here. Because right now, what I hear from you sounds like, sorry, adolescent raging.
Kazeno Rannaa Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 145	Posted - 2013.01.17 15:46:00 - [35] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: Kamiya Musume wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: DJINN Marauder wrote: Shooting yes. I don't believe throwing grenades or hacking should make you show up on the radar though. Hacking is disputed... by throwing nades? Nope, a player needs to be revealed to the ENTIRE other team if they throw a nade or shoot. All part of the risk of revealing yourself by interacting with the enemy via lethal force. This is FPS gameplay 101, no excuses for it not being implemented. yes, yes. Because you know everything stop forcing your opinions on everyone, because that is all they are; OPINIONS. Yup, which explains every other online developer who didn't listen to me and failed miserably. Take a look at Starhawk, all of them (forum morons included) were against me like you all are... heh, take a look at that games sales ... LOL. SH has been out for almost a year now and it's sales are beyond pathetic, no doubt Lightbox is being shutdown after that failure... All because they didn't listen to a player like myself who actually knows how online games are supposed to work. Joke about my opinions, but truth is just an opinion to an idiot... but that doesn't make it less of a fact. One, you should take it down a few notches there, and this is coming from someone who knows. As for the fact that every time someone fires they should appear on the radar, I am going to say NO! The current mechanics play to the skills that are currently available to the player to dabble in and make choices about. The mechanic you seem to be so fond of is something from COD, MOH, BF style games, which THIS ONE IS OBVIOUSLY NOT! Another fact of matter, and a point of consideration, is the fact that this game is focused on team tactics and communication, not a single, lone-wolf rambo running in and saving the world ( please refer back to the BF3, COD, MOH reference). In a game that will have cloaking, a greater ability for stealth (e.g, the profile dampening, profile mechanics, profile signatures, scan precision) and demands team work and communication your demands seem to be an attempt to insert game mechanics that you are familiar with from OTHER games, but they have no place in THIS game. Again, and this is a caveat, I can not say this enough that this is NOT BF3, COD, MOH, or any of those other games. This is not to say that some of the mechanics are not flawed or broken. There are many that require a ton of TLC. Hit mechanics, telemetry data transference, lag issues, continuous memory bleeds or improper purges. There are many. But to say that another games' mechanics are superior because it worked for THAT incarnation of THAT kind of game, I find a bit narrow in sight. The scope of this game, along with its mechanics, will change as the focus of the game. More to Come
Jeremiad R Doomprofit Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 58	Posted - 2013.01.17 16:08:00 - [36] - Quote Firestorm Zulu wrote: FPS 101: any person shooting should be revealed on minimap, unless they are using a silencer. Dust 514 101: Dust is not like every other FPS
Manawind Arcanium Bragian Order Amarr Empire 12	Posted - 2013.01.17 16:31:00 - [37] - Quote In the eve universe the four races use different kinds of sensors. The Amarr use radar, where you signal is based on size and shape. The Minmatar use ladar, where multiple beams of a specific frequency scan in rapid sweeps to find the size and distance of an object. The Gallente use Gravimetric, that looks for nearby collections of mass. Finally, the Caldari use Magnometric, that looks for sources and disturbances in magnetic fields. None of these sensor types are effected by someone shooting their guns. The types that would pickup shooting would be photonic and acoustic sensors. Shooting should not reveal you on the map, because it does not change the main attributes of your dropsuit.
DTOracle Universal Allies Inc. 95	Posted - 2013.01.17 16:40:00 - [38] - Quote I can agree that if someone is in close range to you & is shooting you, they should appear on YOUR mini map. Not the entire teams, & not from any range. But you have to consider that the radar is tracking the enemies electronic signature, not there physical present like real radar or sonar. So sound & movement should not actually make a difference. I suggest investing some SP into profile analysis, if this really bothers you.
James-5955 Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION 151	Posted - 2013.01.17 16:41:00 - [39] - Quote Eh, in my opinion it's fine the way it is. The radar is already great at picking up enemies, I seem to have a hard time flanking players who pay attention to the radar because I swear all it takes for me to pop up on one is being looked at by another enemy on these open maps. Hacking I def. disagree with, nades, eh, I disagree with as well. Shooting yes, but I thought that already did make you show.
xprotoman23 Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 1452	Posted - 2013.01.17 16:42:00 - [40] - Quote The game needs active spotting similar to BF3.

Manawind Arcanium Bragian Order Amarr Empire 12	Posted - 2013.01.17 16:48:00 - [41] - Quote to expand on my earlier post. your suit does have both photonic and acoustic sensors. Photonic: I see an enemy so he should be on the map. You're right he should be and you can mark enemies on the field just by staring at them. Acoustic: The enemy shot his gun so he should be on my map. Well, no. Just because your suit can hear it does not mean that it know: who it is, where they, nor what way they are facing.
Sandromin Hes Sand Mercenary Corps Inc. 204	Posted - 2013.01.17 16:49:00 - [42] - Quote lol OP is a **got. Commence the Spiderman Thread. clap* pssst
TEXA5 HiTM4N ROGUE SPADES 49	Posted - 2013.01.17 17:03:00 - [43] - Quote I think hes messing around. there is no way is crying because someone shot him and they didn't appear on the mini map, if he is i hope hes around 10-11 years old. also how hard is it to hear where the bullets are coming from?
Shadow Katana The Royal Assassin's 5	Posted - 2013.01.17 17:07:00 - [44] - Quote Lol u guys make scout look good but really they're not, wish they get fix, they get spotted to easy, I have dropsuit lv 5 which gives u 25% of radar stealth I also have lv 5 damper which is another 25% of stealth so with 50% of stealth and running with a scout u think you"ll be inv but no but even a heavy which has the worse radar stats knows im near him trying to knife him -_-
Beren Hurin OMNI Endeavors 183	Posted - 2013.01.17 18:18:00 - [45] - Quote Shadow Katana wrote: Lol u guys make scout look good but really they're not, wish they get fix, they get spotted to easy, I have dropsuit lv 5 which gives u 25% of radar stealth I also have lv 5 damper which is another 25% of stealth so with 50% of stealth and running with a scout u think you"ll be inv but no but even a heavy which has the worse radar stats knows im near him trying to knife him -_- I don't use knives, but Nova implies explosive damage which probably means shields resist them fairly well. Going through a heavies shield then all the armor could be tough. You problem probably isn't your sensor profile.
Nomed Deeps The Exemplars 91	Posted - 2013.01.17 19:57:00 - [46] - Quote If there is this much discussion over radar, I can't wait until cloaking is implemented. BTW, I requested the PS Vita be used to stream full match map while in-game (would could be implemented via cross-play and would be great) but did not get one response.
Shadow Katana The Royal Assassin's 5	Posted - 2013.01.18 22:04:00 - [47] - Quote Beren Hurin wrote: Shadow Katana wrote: Lol u guys make scout look good but really they're not, wish they get fix, they get spotted to easy, I have dropsuit lv 5 which gives u 25% of radar stealth I also have lv 5 damper which is another 25% of stealth so with 50% of stealth and running with a scout u think you"ll be inv but no but even a heavy which has the worse radar stats knows im near him trying to knife him -_- I don't use knives, but Nova implies explosive damage which probably means shields resist them fairly well. Going through a heavies shield then all the armor could be tough. You problem probably isn't your sensor profile. heavys are easy to kill with knife all u need is 1 charge and a melee thats with a lv 2 nova knife it just no matter how many dampers u equip they will always see u if you get too close...
fahrenheitM Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION 212	Posted - 2013.01.18 22:16:00 - [48] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: Guinevere Bravo wrote: Wanna see more on the map? Upgrade your precision scanning. Where theres a will, theres a way. Try and work things out on your own rather running here and crying about it. Only noobs defend crap FPS core gameplay in Dust. Take your lips off of CCP's ring-doughnut and focus on making this a better game, please... I think CCP is smart enough to not listen to your drivel, at this point.
rebecca watson Universal Allies Inc. 41	Posted - 2013.01.19 03:01:00 - [49] - Quote My only beef with the radar is for vehicles. I mean damn, a dropship or tank should be the very first thing to show up on the map, unless they actually have stealth mods or are a stealth variant. Lol i can literally hear the tank or dropship, super loud, but it's not even on the radar!! A dropship, up in the air! Com'on radar, work for me!! As for dropsuits, working as intended =)
Skihids Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising 968	Posted - 2013.01.19 03:10:00 - [50] - Quote I'm fine with needing eyes on something for it to appear, but I see one oversight. What about the MCC? I mean, shouldn't that thing be bristling with sensors? Shouldn't anything within line of sight of that monster glow brightly on the tac-net?

V Shadow DUST University Ivy League 34	Posted - 2013.01.19 03:41:00 - [51] - Quote you know I once played an FPS with no radar.... shocking I know. only thing I would like is for there to be a mini map to look at so I don't have to load the big one all the time, and get killed in what I thought was a nice hidden hidey hole.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.