|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
288
   |
Posted - 2013.01.17 09:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
If ANYBODY shoots/throws/hacks ANYTHING, they should be visible on the radar for ALL players for a certain period of time. Snipers, close range AR players, grenade throwers, whatever... Yet this is not the case. Somehow a player can lob bullets at me in close range without showing up on the radar. May I ask... WHY?!?!?!?!?
CCP, you excel so much at failing core gameplay of a FPS game. Get this shyte right already. If some douche lobs bullets at me, then automatically they need to be revealed on the radar TO EVERYBODY regardless of what crap they are using on their suit or how far away they are.
This games garbage radar system will be its undoing... I can deal with the ******** squad radar Intel only, but at least show the players on the other team who fire at me on my radar.
Either way, any player who shoots, hacks or does anything significant needs to be revealed on the radar for every player in that match. I don't give a **** what crap they have on their suits, this is basic FPS 101 gameplay. I fully expect myself to be 100% revealed whenever I throw a grenade or fire a shot, and that is HOW IT SHOULD BE. |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
288
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 11:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:why?
I don't mind the way it is, with how easy it is to be revealed by any random guy's line of sight its hard enough to be stealthy as it is.
Random guys of sight??? You mean ONE player on your -- SQUAD????
That is all that matters currently, a player on your squad, other than that a player is invisible no matter what they do.
Plus depending on what they have equipped on their suit, you, and every other person you play with, will never see them regardless if they shoot at you or otherwise.
|
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
288
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 11:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
DJINN Marauder wrote:Shooting yes. I don't believe throwing grenades or hacking should make you show up on the radar though.
Hacking is disputed... by throwing nades? Nope, a player needs to be revealed to the ENTIRE other team if they throw a nade or shoot. All part of the risk of revealing yourself by interacting with the enemy via lethal force.
This is FPS gameplay 101, no excuses for it not being implemented.
|
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
288
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 11:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
Guinevere Bravo wrote:Wanna see more on the map? Upgrade your precision scanning. Where theres a will, theres a way. Try and work things out on your own rather running here and crying about it.
Only noobs defend crap FPS core gameplay in Dust. Take your lips off of CCP's ring-doughnut and focus on making this a better game, please...
|
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
288
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 11:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kamiya Musume wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:DJINN Marauder wrote:Shooting yes. I don't believe throwing grenades or hacking should make you show up on the radar though. Hacking is disputed... by throwing nades? Nope, a player needs to be revealed to the ENTIRE other team if they throw a nade or shoot. All part of the risk of revealing yourself by interacting with the enemy via lethal force. This is FPS gameplay 101, no excuses for it not being implemented. yes, yes. Because *you know everything* stop forcing your opinions on everyone, because that is all they are; OPINIONS.
Yup, which explains every other online developer who didn't listen to me and failed miserably. Take a look at Starhawk, all of them (forum morons included) were against me like you all are... heh, take a look at that games sales ... LOL. SH has been out for almost a year now and it's sales are beyond pathetic, no doubt Lightbox is being shutdown after that failure... 
All because they didn't listen to a player like myself who actually knows how online games are supposed to work.
Joke about my opinions, but truth is just an opinion to an idiot... but that doesn't make it less of a fact. |
|
|
| |
|