Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Well i think every 1 wants to know what happend on both sides and what where the key factors to actually win a corperation match. Well the imperfects had a sagaris with a railgun and 2 dropships supporting the ground units, while we had the first two matches missile tanks combined with dropships. Now due to the public opinion missile tanks would dominate i tell you they dont do at such a large scale battle. The thing is railguns are extreme effective at taking out other vehicles. The imperfects had basically this battleplan: infantry/dropships are attacking B and the objective the furthest away from their main spawn area and trying to engage other dropships. In the mean time their railgun tank gets in position to take down other dropships/tanks. When they accomplished that their AV infantry gets into position to support their railgun tank against incoming dropships who might could flank him and these guys dont use swarm launchers. As we tried to make a push with dropships and got some infantry at a objective they allmost instantly getting pinned down from enemy dropships.
basically they had the exact same gameplan as we had the only difference was that their tank was very good specced into large railguns. Which was even capable in shoting down my dropship that had over 4400HP on the shields in just 1 single hit. The first match we pushed the imperfects very hard and they only won by clone depletion, but you have to consider that we had 2 objectives in our hands, 50% on our armor left while the imperfects had only 2 ticks on their armor left over with 1 objective. The second match we got pushed very hard and couldnt do anything cause we didnt adjusted our tactic enough. On the third match we where aible to hold ground and changed our missile tanks for railguns and did much better. We shot plenty off their dropships from the sky but wherent aible to get a second objective cause we didnt had pilots who are capabe in flying dropships (i was in a railgun tank and took out Aldin Kan's sagaris and shot down dropships). Well the team with the better specialisation won and in this case it where the imperfects. Skillwise i would say we are on allmost the same lvl but the team with the better arsenal won. |
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2242
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vehicles for the win, no need to spec into infantry. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Well, this game seems to be heavily dependent on vehicles...making infantry or just simply shooting, seem obsolete. Especially when you can just call in vehicle after vehicle. |
El Brineth
BetaMax.
12
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Thanks for the update
+1 |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
742
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Well, this game seems to be heavily dependent on vehicles...making infantry or just simply shooting, seem obsolete. Especially when you can just call in vehicle after vehicle.
Infantry were much needed in the fight tbh, Vehicles were a major part but with the Infantry AV (Forge Guns) fighting on the ground and Infantry moving in on them and killing them off, and then the Forge Gunners actually needing defense. There were also a couple of Snipers (That were doing their jobs correctly) on either side iirc. Vehicles are just one part of the battle, a big part, but only one part. |
Sha Kharn Clone
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1087
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
Well I'm specing back into being a tank scrub again next wipe.
Well maybe not hmm will see. |
Richard Sebire
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
So now that the tournament is over (most of us weren't in it, and all these posts about it, are all to show off if you ask me.) When do we get the next build? |
Sha Kharn Clone
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1087
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
Get on IRC and ask |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
742
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:29:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sha Kharn Clone wrote:Get on IRC and ask Sha you peasant, only peasants ask. Demand, it'll do much better. |
Sha Kharn Clone
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1087
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
I'm not cool enuf for IRC tho |
|
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
208
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:34:00 -
[11] - Quote
Sha Kharn Clone wrote:Get on IRC and ask Aren't the forums ment to be the primary source of information ... just asking ! |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
742
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
Sha Kharn Clone wrote:I'm not cool enuf for IRC tho This is what a PR guy is for ^_^ |
Sha Kharn Clone
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1087
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:Sha Kharn Clone wrote:Get on IRC and ask Aren't the forums ment to be the primary source of information ... just asking !
Well I think they should be but many a thread has been locked away over such suggestions.
ANyway dark was just giving a little report of how he saw the battle thats all.
I wouldnt have shared anything tbh but thats just me. |
Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
294
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
@HowThatTaste
Actually vehicles where not for the win on the last battle our Infantry held the top of the leader board.
We only ran 3 vehicles and brought in a 4th aka tank when ever SI decided to try to get to tank heavy. Vehicles did not win us the match Yes they played a very key roll. But our infantry played just as important. ROFL tried to spam tanks and it got them no where. If you concentrate to much on vehicler gameplay it actually looses you the match
SI Was expecting a little to much out of there tanks I think. And hoping on there snipers killing our forges so they could run the tanks over us. It was a very solid tatic but in the end our infantry is set up of very very solid gun game people. With out that there is no taking objectives or holding them.
So there was alot more then just vehicles.
Vehicles are pretty well balanced. If we nerfed vehicles much more I think tourney and corp v corp matches would be a bore. It is excitement. Dropships did not dominate the game play at all in corp matches because if you got a good corp they are a very very easy thing to shoot down. I think it is just pub matches are effected badly by vehicle gameplay because randoms have trouble working together to take down tougher and smarter vehicle players.
I think anyone who played corp matches would agree that tanks/dropships/infantry all are needed and all played a very equal roll. And vehicle spamming will not win the game.
As Dark cloud said we had skills put in the right place and our vehicle users where very good at what they do. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:44:00 -
[15] - Quote
no need to hide the tactics anymore cause the tourny is over. And it has a high price to call in vehicle after vehicle. Alot off SI guys have put alot off ISK into the corp wallet to rebalance the strenght off our corperation. And to be honest we wouldnt have come this far without support from the vehicles. Its a mix out off vehicles and infantry both is needed to succeed at this game. If i had to cut it down to 1 word then it would be this: TEAMWORK
Another thing is that i want to thank my CEO for supporting me with enough ISK to keep the vehicles rolling. |
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2242
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 00:52:00 -
[16] - Quote
Caeli SineDeo wrote:@HowThatTaste
Actually vehicles where not for the win on the last battle our Infantry held the top of the leader board.
We only ran 3 vehicles and brought in a 4th aka tank when ever SI decided to try to get to tank heavy. Vehicles did not win us the match Yes they played a very key roll. But our infantry played just as important. ROFL tried to spam tanks and it got them no where. If you concentrate to much on vehicler gameplay it actually looses you the match
SI Was expecting a little to much out of there tanks I think. And hoping on there snipers killing our forges so they could run the tanks over us. It was a very solid tatic but in the end our infantry is set up of very very solid gun game people. With out that there is no taking objectives or holding them.
So there was alot more then just vehicles.
Vehicles are pretty well balanced. If we nerfed vehicles much more I think tourney and corp v corp matches would be a bore. It is excitement. Dropships did not dominate the game play at all in corp matches because if you got a good corp they are a very very easy thing to shoot down. I think it is just pub matches are effected badly by vehicle gameplay because randoms have trouble working together to take down tougher and smarter vehicle players.
I think anyone who played corp matches would agree that tanks/dropships/infantry all are needed and all played a very equal roll. And vehicle spamming will not win the game.
As Dark cloud said we had skills put in the right place and our vehicle users where very good at what they do.
Just curious if vehicles were not important why did you call in 4 of them? 4 vehicles on any team in a match is some serious hardware. Not including LAVs. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:12:00 -
[17] - Quote
their railgun tank was the counter to our dropships. 1 hit= destroyed. And the dropships simply hammered the infantry after that they proceeded with the infantry to take objectives. They wouldnt had won by just pure infantry game on their side. Every 1 who doesnt deploy vehicles in a serious corp match is a idiot. |
Pranekt Tyrvoth
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
177
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:15:00 -
[18] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:their railgun tank was the counter to our dropships. 1 hit= destroyed. And the dropships simply hammered the infantry after that they proceeded with the infantry to take objectives. They wouldnt had won by just pure infantry game on their side. Every 1 who doesnt deploy vehicles in a serious corp match is a idiot.
Not the friendliest way of saying it but the most accurate. When it boils down to it, not utilizing vehicles [properly] against an opponent that does is asking to be crushed. |
Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
294
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:16:00 -
[19] - Quote
we actually ran 3 about 90 percent of the time. Yes we would bring in a fourth every once in awhile because SI would be running 4-5 tanks at a time.
Vehicles do not win the match. They contribute but you need more then just vehicles to win. So yes they are important. But they are not OP or the I win button. SI and ROFL both ran heavy on the vehicles yet aka having up to 6 vehicles out at a time while we where running 3 yet we won. And SI and ROFL both have some of the best tank players in the game.
As these guys said it above me yes not using vehicles in corp matches is asking to get destroyed. Dust is not just another FPS. It is ment to be tactical. Only thing that sucks is this hurts pub matches but when you get corp v corp matches it enhances them. |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
208
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:18:00 -
[20] - Quote
Sha Kharn Clone wrote:Needless Sacermendor wrote:Sha Kharn Clone wrote:Get on IRC and ask Aren't the forums ment to be the primary source of information ... just asking ! Well I think they should be but many a thread has been locked away over such suggestions. ANyway dark was just giving a little report of how he saw the battle thats all. I wouldnt have shared anything tbh but thats just me. Wasn't aware threads got locked over it ... just always seemed a bit counter-productive to me that the majority of information is fed through second hand from the IRC when they have the ears of the majority here on the forums.
I know they have to be careful cos people will winge and whine and scrutinise the meaning of every word they say, there's little can be done about that, but my case in point is this info about the next patch not including a wipe being quoted from CCP Wolfman ... is this true or has it been misquoted or made up or has CCP Wolfman made a mistake or what ... who knows until it happens and everyone says 'well they did say'
I do appreciate they are being a LOT better more recently by giving us these weekly updates and such ... I just don't trust this (usually truthful) information that comes second hand from the IRC.
ANYWAY I'VE SAID MY BIT IN RESPONSE TO SHA ... PLEASE DON'T CONTINUE THIS OFF TOPIC.
Cheers for the post-mortem Dark ... sounds like a good fair fight, hopefully the next tournament can be streamed on EveTV for all to see :-) we'd all appreciate that! |
|
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1032
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:22:00 -
[21] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Well i think every 1 wants to know what happend on both sides and what where the key factors to actually win a corperation match. Well the imperfects had a sagaris with a railgun and 2 dropships supporting the ground units, while we had the first two matches missile tanks combined with dropships. Now due to the public opinion missile tanks would dominate i tell you they dont do at such a large scale battle. The thing is railguns are extreme effective at taking out other vehicles. The imperfects had basically this battleplan: infantry/dropships are attacking B and the objective the furthest away from their main spawn area and trying to engage other dropships. In the mean time their railgun tank gets in position to take down other dropships/tanks. When they accomplished that their AV infantry gets into position to support their railgun tank against incoming dropships who might could flank him and these guys dont use swarm launchers. As we tried to make a push with dropships and got some infantry at a objective they allmost instantly getting pinned down from enemy dropships.
basically they had the exact same gameplan as we had the only difference was that their tank was very good specced into large railguns. Which was even capable in shoting down my dropship that had over 4400HP on the shields in just 1 single hit. The first match we pushed the imperfects very hard and they only won by clone depletion, but you have to consider that we had 2 objectives in our hands, 50% on our armor left while the imperfects had only 2 ticks on their armor left over with 1 objective. The second match we got pushed very hard and couldnt do anything cause we didnt adjusted our tactic enough. On the third match we where aible to hold ground and changed our missile tanks for railguns and did much better. We shot plenty off their dropships from the sky but wherent aible to get a second objective cause we didnt had pilots who are capabe in flying dropships (i was in a railgun tank and took out Aldin Kan's sagaris and shot down dropships). Well the team with the better specialisation won and in this case it where the imperfects. Skillwise i would say we are on allmost the same lvl but the team with the better arsenal won.
You give a bunch of match information just so you can say you are as good as the imperfects you just didn't win because [enter excuse here]
We have a lot of respect for SI and how you played in the finals, but you dark cloud, need to learn how to lose. |
Pranekt Tyrvoth
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
177
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:24:00 -
[22] - Quote
Ultimately I think all three teams in question ran vehicles in the strongest way they could, but Imperfects simply used them more effectively. It's among the lessons learned and it was a good experience at high level play in Dust 514. Some portions of the fighting weren't as intense or exciting due to vehicle intervention, but overall no one is questioning gun-game here, the teams that made it to the end have enough of it to warrant them being there.
I enjoy fighting the Imperfects because I know I'll get a solid fight, I enjoy fighting Seraphim [when we get a chance to] as your guys know how to use vehicles effectively, and I'm sure both teams have had similar experiences fighting ROFL.
:) Hopefully there's another tournament in the near future and we can try our luck again. Congrats to Imp and SI. |
Tiel Syysch
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
633
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:34:00 -
[23] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Well the team with the better specialisation won and in this case it where the imperfects. Skillwise i would say we are on allmost the same lvl but the team with the better arsenal won.
I think it came down to coordination, personally, not the arsenal. Not to say you guys weren't coordinated, but the 2nd and 3rd game we were in full-on serious mode after that insanely close 1st match. Hell, your missile tanks would one or two shot my armor tanks if a full volley landed, but that didn't stop me from blowing up more tanks than I lost because of having constant, reliable voice comms about where the enemy vehicles were.
The first game was kinda sloppy on direction, but we play very well together as a team. It all came down to coordination and team cohesion. If anything, voice comms won us the tournament. You can only be so good and so well fit, but if you don't have the experience playing together that you can rely on people being in certain locations doing certain things, and trust them to call out the appropriate threats, you're not going to do as well as a team that does. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:56:00 -
[24] - Quote
Bottom line was Alldin's build/strategy was the most obvious reason you won IMHO. Our infantry were atleast as good as Imperfects while on EU servers. Bad things happened to us on NA. But we had no counter to Alldin's tank until the 3rd game. His build almost perfectly counters us. I'm not making excuses, just pointing out how vital Alldin's role is.
All in all, great games with an alarming amount of ISK spent by all. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:56:00 -
[25] - Quote
Tiel Syysch wrote: I think it came down to coordination, personally, not the arsenal. Not to say you guys weren't coordinated, but the 2nd and 3rd game we were in full-on serious mode after that insanely close 1st match. Hell, your missile tanks would one or two shot my armor tanks if a full volley landed, but that didn't stop me from blowing up more tanks than I lost because of having constant, reliable voice comms about where the enemy vehicles were.
The first game was kinda sloppy on direction, but we play very well together as a team. It all came down to coordination and team cohesion. If anything, voice comms won us the tournament. You can only be so good and so well fit, but if you don't have the experience playing together that you can rely on people being in certain locations doing certain things, and trust them to call out the appropriate threats, you're not going to do as well as a team that does.
Sure our missile tanks where good against armor but not against aldin kan in his sagaris railgun tank. He was the main reason why you had controll over the airspace. And with that you had the upper hand. It was just a better strategy to rely on the railgun tank to deal with other vehicles from distance. And to be honest it was a very smart move.
Free Beers wrote: You give a bunch of match information just so you can say you are as good as the imperfects you just didn't win because [enter excuse here]
We have a lot of respect for SI and how you played in the finals, but you dark cloud, need to learn how to lose.
Where did i denied our loss? Havent insulted you guys (yet). I even give rep to you for using vehicles at such a advanced lvl. And still you moan about it. Sounds more like a bad winner from my perspective. And i think you are just mad that i gave detailed information about tactics out for free. Well we learned from our defeat what needs to be improved and if theres another tourny prepare for a even harder fight. I would even suspect that you had a rat placed into our corp to sniff out our tactic and adjust it allmost perfectly. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1058
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:09:00 -
[26] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Well, this game seems to be heavily dependent on vehicles...making infantry or just simply shooting, seem obsolete. Especially when you can just call in vehicle after vehicle. The problem right now is we don't see enough structures- just open areas where vehicles dominate.
How many times have you seen vehicles doing well in one of the center structure variations of skim junction? |
Lavirac JR
DUST University Ivy League
129
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:18:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Well, this game seems to be heavily dependent on vehicles...making infantry or just simply shooting, seem obsolete. Especially when you can just call in vehicle after vehicle. Infantry were much needed in the fight tbh, Vehicles were a major part but with the Infantry AV (Forge Guns) fighting on the ground and Infantry moving in on them and killing them off, and then the Forge Gunners actually needing defense. There were also a couple of Snipers (That were doing their jobs correctly) on either side iirc. Vehicles are just one part of the battle, a big part, but only one part.
I'd love to know the exact makeup of each team to be honest, how many players in each role. |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1032
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:26:00 -
[28] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Tiel Syysch wrote: I think it came down to coordination, personally, not the arsenal. Not to say you guys weren't coordinated, but the 2nd and 3rd game we were in full-on serious mode after that insanely close 1st match. Hell, your missile tanks would one or two shot my armor tanks if a full volley landed, but that didn't stop me from blowing up more tanks than I lost because of having constant, reliable voice comms about where the enemy vehicles were.
The first game was kinda sloppy on direction, but we play very well together as a team. It all came down to coordination and team cohesion. If anything, voice comms won us the tournament. You can only be so good and so well fit, but if you don't have the experience playing together that you can rely on people being in certain locations doing certain things, and trust them to call out the appropriate threats, you're not going to do as well as a team that does.
Sure our missile tanks where good against armor but not against aldin kan in his sagaris railgun tank. He was the main reason why you had controll over the airspace. And with that you had the upper hand. It was just a better strategy to rely on the railgun tank to deal with other vehicles from distance. And to be honest it was a very smart move. Free Beers wrote: You give a bunch of match information just so you can say you are as good as the imperfects you just didn't win because [enter excuse here]
We have a lot of respect for SI and how you played in the finals, but you dark cloud, need to learn how to lose.
Where did i denied our loss? Havent insulted you guys (yet). I even give rep to you for using vehicles at such a advanced lvl. And still you moan about it. Sounds more like a bad winner from my perspective. And i think you are just mad that i gave detailed information about tactics out for free. Well we learned from our defeat what needs to be improved and if theres another tourny prepare for a even harder fight. I would even suspect that you had a rat placed into our corp to sniff out our tactic and adjust it allmost perfectly.
Our tatics have been the same through out the tourny, nothing has really changed. So by all means give out all the info you want. What does it matter now?
Your tatics were really predictable though, no need for spies.
Yes, you did make an excuse by saying you only lost because we were more specialized. Understanding whats needed on the battlefield, gun skill, organization, tatics, fits, communication, adpatability all matter in this game and contributed to us winning. Picking one thing and saying thats why we won dimishes all the other aspects of our game.
Best do lessons learned and what can make you a better corp internally. You are starting to sound like a sore loser.
|
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:27:00 -
[29] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Tiel Syysch wrote: I think it came down to coordination, personally, not the arsenal. Not to say you guys weren't coordinated, but the 2nd and 3rd game we were in full-on serious mode after that insanely close 1st match. Hell, your missile tanks would one or two shot my armor tanks if a full volley landed, but that didn't stop me from blowing up more tanks than I lost because of having constant, reliable voice comms about where the enemy vehicles were.
The first game was kinda sloppy on direction, but we play very well together as a team. It all came down to coordination and team cohesion. If anything, voice comms won us the tournament. You can only be so good and so well fit, but if you don't have the experience playing together that you can rely on people being in certain locations doing certain things, and trust them to call out the appropriate threats, you're not going to do as well as a team that does.
Sure our missile tanks where good against armor but not against aldin kan in his sagaris railgun tank. He was the main reason why you had controll over the airspace. And with that you had the upper hand. It was just a better strategy to rely on the railgun tank to deal with other vehicles from distance. And to be honest it was a very smart move. Free Beers wrote: You give a bunch of match information just so you can say you are as good as the imperfects you just didn't win because [enter excuse here]
We have a lot of respect for SI and how you played in the finals, but you dark cloud, need to learn how to lose.
Where did i denied our loss? Havent insulted you guys (yet). I even give rep to you for using vehicles at such a advanced lvl. And still you moan about it. Sounds more like a bad winner from my perspective. And i think you are just mad that i gave detailed information about tactics out for free. Well we learned from our defeat what needs to be improved and if theres another tourny prepare for a even harder fight. I would even suspect that you had a rat placed into our corp to sniff out our tactic and adjust it allmost perfectly.
I have mad respect for SI! But when it comes to you the dark cloud, you just a sore loser. All you had to say was GG and leave it at that. But nooooooooo you just have to add your .02 cents.
Why would we even need a spy? Why bother? We didn't even care for your tactics. Our first game was so close only because we had a terrible start to the game, anything that could go wrong went wrong for us. We as a team pull together to pull off a last second win. In allthe matches we played throughout the tourney with the exact same tactic. The same one through every single game. As you could tell from the third game we executed our game play how we should of during the first game. We did nothing special but communicate and react to the situation given to us. |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2047
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:31:00 -
[30] - Quote
Beers it doesn't really matter, just let it go.
Dark Cloud, I'm sorry you weren't prepared, I look forward to our next fight.
That is all |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |