More like Forum Warriors not wanting to apply fair gameplay. I tried, obviously community don't give a damn.

So, fuk it.

I cannot take you seriously when you say rail rifles are harder to use then scramblers lmao if you cant point ,shoot, forget then you shouldn't open your mouth on balancing a weapon that requires you to adjust your aim in between shots.

my little brother who has no real fps experience went 11/3 with a rail rifle...why? Not because of his incredible skills, but because automatic weapons are easy to use. There is no argument you could put together that would prove otherwise.

also when you talk about dps you fail to take into account that it's with 100% accuracy. If you are seriously saying that it is easier to land more shots with a tac rifle then with any other weapon you need to get gud. When you complain about the damage you should think about the fire mechanics of the weapon in question. Would it make sense to have a semi auto weapon with the same damage output as an automatic weapon? Who in their right mind would pick a semi auto that does less or as much damage as an automatic one? who would trouble themselves with timing shots or spamming the trigger when you could just point, shoot , forget.

Isn't it simple to negate the drawbacks of all the other weapons to? What happens when you can't negate those drawbacks from those weapons.....oh wait nothing. You aren't left nearly immobilized or defenseless and you don't take any damage from them.

For someone who's trying to argue the weapon is OP, you won't even acknowledge any of it drawbacks like they don't exist lmao your answer to the overheat problem is "Don't over heat". Yea let me just never overheat and do charge shots for days since apparently the weapon is capable of doing so

I would love to see you post a game against real competition where you do not overheat once, since it's not even a factor for you then this shouldn't be a problem.

HMG, locus grenade.

There is more to combat than just burst dps. Rail rifles and combat rifles are both highly dangerous for armour tankers.

Yes the scrambler rifle can output a very large amount of burst dps. However, it's many drawbacks balance the weapon.

The recent changes to shields have produced an influx of shield tanking suits, however the scrambler rifle remains firmly the least popular of the main battle rifles.

Why do you guys reach so hard to make points? "HMG, locus grenade"?? HMG is supposed to wreck all...you can' t compare the HMG to other rifles in the game. And the locu suggestion is a desperate attempt because flux grendade wrecks shields much more than a locus does to armor.

You want to know why the scr rifle is used as much because the armor tanking is still superior to shield tanking. So, people tank armor..even on shield suits. It is rare to see a gallente with 300 shields but it is commonplace to find caldari with 400 armor. Imagine if everyone was using shields? Do you think people will still be using RR? No, they would all be using scr but the scr is so "effective" that they'd have to try something else other than shield tanking.

More like Forum Warriors not wanting to apply fair gameplay. I tried, obviously community don't give a damn.

So, fuk it.