Red line should = a force field can't shoot in or out but if you leave you cannot enter back in. And add vehicle nanohives and supply depots.

1. Take away the red line and make it a yellow line for a warning GÜá sign.
2. Equip the MCC with more turrets (the same ones that deal ludicrous amounts of damage to damage other MCC's) specifically for trespassers whether they be land/air
3. Equip the MCC with passive radial scans that ping trespassers therefore making them visible (on field) as long as they're behind enemy lines to decloak cloaking devices.
4. Watch trespassers red-lineing get targeted by the MCC guns and instantly get blown to poop piles.

No random exploding, legitimate "you crossed, you're screwed ".

It works and is immersive, which is a big bonus. It might be a bit more demanding of game resources, not sure.

In thinking about the 'redline problem' two thoughts that always come to mind are:

1) Do we really need to load that giant map into memory? Assuming that we still are, ofc, but it looks like it. We know the memory budget is tight, why not chop the map off at 200 m past the redline, just obscure it with some mist or something equivalent. If it gives us more frames it's justified imo.

2) How would New Eden corporations really write the contract for employing mercs? What features would we mercs insist on in the contracts? Besides immersion-for-free(There should be a reference document that mercs can actually read in their quarters or while hiding on the battlefield, as well as a 'Do you accept the terms of this Contract?' signoff button before every contract match(someday we'll have custom corporation contracts were we do the same thing for District Maintenance, harassment, auto-defense, etc.)), investing in re-thinking public contracts can prolly contribute to resolving some of our redline issues.

It's worth a second look for the immersion alone, but also for gameplay.

It works and is immersive, which is a big bonus. It might be a bit more demanding of game resources, not sure.

In thinking about the 'redline problem' two thoughts that always come to mind are:

1) Do we really need to load that giant map into memory? Assuming that we still are, ofc, but it looks like it. We know the memory budget is tight, why not chop the map off at 200 m past the redline, just obscure it with some mist or something equivalent. If it gives us more frames it's justified imo.

2) How would New Eden corporations really write the contract for employing mercs? What features would we mercs insist on in the contracts? Besides immersion-for-free(There should be a reference document that mercs can actually read in their quarters or while hiding on the battlefield, as well as a 'Do you accept the terms of this Contract?' signoff button before every contract match(someday we'll have custom corporation contracts were we do the same thing for District Maintenance, harassment, auto-defense, etc.)), investing in re-thinking public contracts can prolly contribute to resolving some of our redline issues.

It's worth a second look for the immersion alone, but also for gameplay.

The redline should be a concord sanctioned boundary, everything within is an active battlefield anything outside is protected by concord to prevent the deaths of lets say civilians. You kill anyone while within the redzone you get concorded just like in EVE. Nothing fancy just stick to the the already existing structure of how Concord works withing the New Edan universe.

Like a staging ground near the MCC :) Something like this was shown in the original DUST concept but without the force field. It supposedly was put there by the MCC commander - a role that is yet to appear in game and who also was also supposed to be responsible for placement of turrets to aid his team. Something else that could aid a struggling team :)

That's actually pretty cool, thanks for that. I would love for the warning to say "CONCORD is protecting the safety of civilians in this area"

And redline suicides would be "CONCORD kills"


This goes on the list!

Red line should = a force field can't shoot in or out but if you leave you cannot enter back in. And add vehicle nanohives and supply depots.

Move the redline back a few hundred meters so everyone has to come out and risk some ISK.

Move the redline back a few hundred meters so everyone has to come out and risk some ISK.

That's actually pretty cool, thanks for that. I would love for the warning to say "CONCORD is protecting the safety of civilians in this area"

And redline suicides would be "CONCORD kills"


This goes on the list!

That's actually pretty cool, thanks for that. I would love for the warning to say "CONCORD is protecting the safety of civilians in this area"

And redline suicides would be "CONCORD kills"


This goes on the list!

That's actually pretty cool, thanks for that. I would love for the warning to say "CONCORD is protecting the safety of civilians in this area"

And redline suicides would be "CONCORD kills"


This goes on the list!

Move the redline back a few hundred meters so everyone has to come out and risk some ISK.

If that is the case then wouldn't it be logical to also add some civilian buildings into the red line to make look like they are livable habitats ie. small department blocks on both sides?

That's actually pretty cool, thanks for that. I would love for the warning to say "CONCORD is protecting the safety of civilians in this area"

And redline suicides would be "CONCORD kills"


This goes on the list!

1. Take away the red line and make it a yellow line for a warning GÜá sign.
2. Equip the MCC with more turrets (the same ones that deal ludicrous amounts of damage to damage other MCC's) specifically for trespassers whether they be land/air
3. Equip the MCC with passive radial scans that ping trespassers therefore making them visible (on field) as long as they're behind enemy lines to decloak cloaking devices.
4. Watch trespassers red-lineing get targeted by the MCC guns and instantly get blown to poop piles.

No random exploding, legitimate "you crossed, you're screwed ".

That's actually pretty cool, thanks for that. I would love for the warning to say "CONCORD is protecting the safety of civilians in this area"

And redline suicides would be "CONCORD kills"


This goes on the list!