So we all know that there are certain groups that just decrease public contract games for everyone:

Nyan San
1 up
Lord British
etc...

I propose that those CORPs get hit with the tryhard tag.

This tag would have one function; any squad composed of these corps would have to wait for a public contract with another tryhard tagged group opposing them.

Bam, I just made your game way more enjoyable for 99% of your userbase CCP.

Dumb suggestion is dumb...



... and unrealistic. This is not how coding works.

Dumb suggestion is dumb...



... and unrealistic. This is not how coding works.

It is very possible to assign a string labeled "tryhard" to a player.

In fact, CCP already has code for assigning titles to characters (DEV, GM, CPM, ISD). While they could make another, I'm 100% sure that they won't make a "try-hard" tag just for others to avoid them, that's what matchmaking is for.

So we all know that there are certain groups that just decrease public contract games for everyone:

Nyan San
1 up
Lord British
Moton Labe
etc...

I propose that those CORPs get hit with the tryhard tag.

This tag would have one function; any squad composed of these corps would have to wait for a public contract with another tryhard tagged group opposing them.

Bam, I just made your game way more enjoyable for 99% of your userbase CCP.

if (tryhardmatch=true)
{
join tryhardmatch
}
else
{
create tryhardmatch
};

done.

So we all know that there are certain groups that just decrease public contract games for everyone:

Nyan San
1 up
Lord British
Moton Labe
etc...

I propose that those CORPs get hit with the tryhard tag.

This tag would have one function; any squad composed of these corps would have to wait for a public contract with another tryhard tagged group opposing them.

Bam, I just made your game way more enjoyable for 99% of your userbase CCP.

So we all know that there are certain groups that just decrease public contract games for everyone:

Nyan San
1 up
Lord British
Moton Labe
etc...

I propose that those CORPs get hit with the tryhard tag.

This tag would have one function; any squad composed of these corps would have to wait for a public contract with another tryhard tagged group opposing them.

Bam, I just made your game way more enjoyable for 99% of your userbase CCP.

Wouldn't it be glorious though? God the amount of tears from the likes of duna (definitely an individual requiring the tryhard tag) and pretty much all of nyan san would just be glorious.

99% of the playerbase would like it and retention would go up.

Dumb suggestion is dumb...



... and unrealistic. This is not how coding works.

So we all know that there are certain groups that just decrease public contract games for everyone:

Nyan San
1 up
Lord British
Moton Labe
etc...

I propose that those CORPs get hit with the tryhard tag.

This tag would have one function; any squad composed of these corps would have to wait for a public contract with another tryhard tagged group opposing them.

Bam, I just made your game way more enjoyable for 99% of your userbase CCP.

Does this anyway all I run into nyain San lord British and 1 up..always ends up an enjoyable fight

So we all know that there are certain groups that just decrease public contract games for everyone:

Nyan San
1 up
Lord British
Moton Labe
etc...

I propose that those CORPs get hit with the tryhard tag.

This tag would have one function; any squad composed of these corps would have to wait for a public contract with another tryhard tagged group opposing them.

Bam, I just made your game way more enjoyable for 99% of your userbase CCP.

It is very possible to assign a string labeled "tryhard" to a player.

In fact, CCP already has code for assigning titles to characters (DEV, GM, CPM, ISD). While they could make another, I'm 100% sure that they won't make a "try-hard" tag just for others to avoid them, that's what matchmaking is for.

not all of the players from the "tryhard" corporations are able to play on the same competitive level as the rest of the corp. many are newer players that want to learn from them, so they most likely still get crushed when playing against a tryhard opponent.

On average we have 3-4 players on. Now what part of this is fair?

About as fair as the rest of the damage the misbegotten filth that you are has caused

Huh?

I've ran into more than a few protostomper squads. The best thing I can say is bring you "A" game and make them fight on your terms, not theirs. Is is hard, yes? Is it frustrating, absolutely. Is there a reason to label these players? No... I have ran with a small squad of "ok" players (myself included in this) and stomped the daylights out of the other team. Why? Organization and tactics.

I never understood this notion of trying too hard, I always thought the problem was an imbalance of the two teams? i.e 6 man proto organised squad vs 'that guy' blueberries?

Try hards? that's how you see it. I like facing a good team, as long as both teams are balanced.

The battles when I have a full squad of my corp vs one of the corps you've stated are usually fun, although laggy at times.

Just a wild guess but I think OP likes smashing MLT frames and backs out of matches where he finds a squad of 3+ of the same corp on the other team..

I don't understand how "trying hard" can ever be a bad thing. Don't you want your enemy to fight back? Don't you want a challenge? What crybaby decided that doing your best was a bad thing?

Don't get me wrong I don't want stomps either. I'm one of the players who vocally promotes the idea of using lower tier suits when we are winning. The goal for both sides should always be active, competitive battles. Either side dominating is boring.

start a tryhard thread..

Nyan San
1 up
Lord British
Molon Labe
G0DS among men

and so on..

GAM? lol Who gets beat up by those bums?

Don't do that, OP.
Calling someone a "tryhard" is a juvenile way of responding when another player is better than you.
Why not get to know some of those "tryhards"?
You might make friends, and learn a thing or two.

I've met and played with really cool players in this game from old school corps like TeamPlayers and the Imperfects.
It was great going into matches with Sleepy Zan, and chatting and talking about different sniper tactics and methods of approach for Scout Snipers. (This is back in the day when actually being a Scout was hard and imbalanced, whether you ran a shotgun, sniper, AR, or NK.)
It was cool doing old school "corp battles" with the Imperfects and learning and developing different kinds of tactics. From coordinated crossfires, to the established zones of control they were used in. Often our tactics would work, and we would win, and ALWAYS the Imperfects would adapt with a tactic of their own, and come back with a win. I absolutely miss playing with those guys.

Even today, you got great people that are great players. Someone earlier put that "tryhard" tag on even duna.
duna is a great player, and his corp has some cool people in it as well. His english isn't the best, but that doesn't matter. Just as soon as you shoot him or he shoot you, he would invite you to squad to play a few matches. Him and his crew are simply just incredibly cool people to hang out with.


All this "tryhard" nonsense is just not necessary.
Maybe these people aren't "trying hard", they're just playing smart; therefore forcing you to try hard.
Maybe they just hung out with each other long enough to understand that a squad isn't comprised of a bunch of random green dots running around without direction.
Maybe they understand that out of their squad, 3 of them--with decent enough aim worth the slightest damn-- can set up 3-way crossfire killing perimeter that is effective enough to lock down a whole segment of the map. Which is why you only FEEL like you're getting ganked.
Maybe they know how to take a sniper and 2 ground units, and lock nearly an entire enemy team within an objective.

Maybe... I'm wasting my time, and you're still going to convince yourself that the people that actually make this game worth playing, are the ones breaking it.


EDIT: More people came to mind. There are cool people in Nyain as well, that I squaded up with a few times that actually were trying to help new players. Giving them the basics on how to manage their isk, etc. Don't act like corps that enjoy the game are breaking anything. We need more like them. It's a great loss that so many good people, have stopped playing Dust, including folks from my own.

Here's a useful tip..

Avoid playing on Wednesdays and ThursdThat seems to be when all the really really good players are online.

I usually do pretty well on most other days of the week. But man oh man I get my hind end handed to me on Wednesdays and Thursdays. That doesn't stop me from playing though.

How about fridays?

Perhaps I worded this wrong.

There are still plenty of really good players and squads the rest of the week. But I've noticed that most of the proto stompers are on Wednesday and Thursday. Things usually calm down quite a bit by Friday. I'm not saying that you won't run into proto stompers during any other day of the week. Things may change once 1.9 comes out. My guess is tha@t it all just depends on the content released.

Ahem.

if (tryhardmatch=true)
{
join tryhardmatch
}
else
{
create tryhardmatch
};

done.

I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean.

I'd wear such a tag with pride.

Most non-idiots would attribute it to being in a group that tries to win in the game that they are playing. I'm sure the OP got a trophy for getting last place throughout his childhood. The realization that losing is losing has impacted him more than most.

I must admit, Facing Molon Labe is where I got most of my interesting battles (besides facing Fa)

Label me and our corp if you want. I will wear it proudly.

I try -- very hard -- to win every match. I demand the same from everyone who runs with me in a squad.

What would you have us do, not try? Redline snipe? Intentionally lose?

If you go up against me, you know one thing for sure, I'm coming for you -- win or lose -- and I'm not going to let up. You might be better than me, you might kill me over and over and over again, but you'll never get me to quit....and if everyone acted like me, the rounds would be much more competitive for all of us.

And if that makes me a "tryhard' or whatever else you want to call it, so be it.

its the battlecry they give from the redline.

Ahem.

Out of all the corporations that he listed, yours is the only one that I have not faced. I'm sure I would cuss a whole lot, but it would be fun!!!

Nyan San
1 up
Lord British
Moton Labe

It is very possible to assign a string labeled "tryhard" to a player.

In fact, CCP already has code for assigning titles to characters (DEV, GM, CPM, ISD). While they could make another, I'm 100% sure that they won't make a "try-hard" tag just for others to avoid them, that's what matchmaking is for.

if (tryhardmatch=true)
{
join tryhardmatch
}
else
{
create tryhardmatch
};

done.

Makes me wanna see a match with nothing but try hard tags now, for some reason.