|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
254
   |
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
MrShooter01 wrote:Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Yes op is absolutely right My missile tank should have a 10 meter splash radius and do 1000 splash damage per missile As an occasional tank driver I know whats best for you foot plebs. You input is not necessary or desired, and is wrong anyways. also swarms should not lock onto my vehicles because lockons take 0 skill and I totally would not be whining about them if they were dumbfire and killed me anyways like forges (which should also be nerfed) If you do not have 20m+ sp in vehicle skills your opinion is irrelevant and you deserve to be stomped by me
And you Sir Scrub should stop crying for the only things that can kill a tank to be nerfed, as if just because youhave a tank yur not supposed to be killed.
Scrubs STFU OR GTFO |
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
254
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:If I wanted to die I'd name my character Soulja and accept a 1v1 from my self.
Because I'm going to win. You have convinced me you have never faced a particle cannon before. I've been in more PCs than you have pubs. I've 3 v 1 tankers from top corps and drove away with my turret smoking. I had 1v6 tanks in a dom and ended the battle without my shields ever dropping Save e-peen stroking for the war room plz
keep dreaming, and 1v1 6 different times don't mean **** |
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
254
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote:Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Exactly, When dealing with tanks...Listen to the real tankers When dealing with ads...Listen to the real ads piilots When dealing with amarr logi... Listen to the real amarr logis When dealing with etc. ...Listen to the real etc. players
And if tankers had there way they would become completely unable to be destroyed and AV weapons would not exist. How ******** are you really? Were you the window licker on the short bus?
When CCP listened to tankers we had crap for AV and tank that couldn't be destroyed by AV weapons. You Sir Scrub need to use your brain for more then a cushion to sit on. |
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F
General Tso's Alliance
255
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 20:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
See the biggest problem is that tanker seem to think that only another tank should kill them and that any kind of AV weapon should either not exist or be so useless that an entire 16 man team using AV can't kill them, and infantry believes that tanks should die to a single FG or swarm round.
When in the reality of Dust tanks should not be indestructable but at the same time not be so weak that a pebble can destroy them. AV weapons should be strong enough that 2 proto FG should be enough to destroy a tank if they can score a few shot direct on it. Yes i said proto, not advanced or standard unless there is more then 2 of them .
When CCP listened to tankers, tanks became next to impossible to kill with AV and when CCP listened to infantry AV wa so strong that a single FG could kill anything. Right now tanks and AV have a very nice balance about them, they are strong enough to survive a sogle FG or swarm and escape but weak enough that 2 Proto FG or Swarms can destroy it.
Don't listen to the butt hurt tankers that believe the only thing to destroy a tank is another tank, yes that is viable but since we have AV weapons they should be able play a role as well. |
|
|
| |
|