DUST Search - Here is the lie about heavies.

All Channels

General Discussions

Here is the lie about heavies.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Hyper Metal Sonic Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2014.08.01 18:14:00 - [1] - Quote People say your an idiot for fighting them up close because that is what they are supposed to do. Problem is, most points are in enclosed spaces so you can either confront them and be an idiot or wait for them to come out in the open which they will never do unless they are in an hav. A.K.A. give up the point. A lot of you say to just out range them and you know what? That hmg reaches pretty damn far. Not just the assault hmg because it seems like barely anyone even uses it the normal one reaches so gd far who would. Rail rifles will beat them from max range but let's be realistic, heavies guard enclosed points.They aren't really out in the open and if they are they are close to cover. Maybe make a bigger difference between the assault and normal hmg so that they have to choose more between damage and range? The point of my rambling is that i know people don't like things nerfed but maybe at LEAST adjust the range on the hmg. Leave the damage alone, leave the ludicrous amounts of hp alone but the range on top of all that is too much. They are monsters at every aspect of the match. I'm not a heavy hater, they are fun to play i will admit, but how fast i am dying in any other suit to them from long range is just crazy and then i look at the kill screen and see even if i had double my hp i still wouldn't have done enough damage to kill them. Please for the love of god at least admit they need to be toned down.
MassiveNine Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 872	Posted - 2014.08.01 18:19:00 - [2] - Quote In chromosome the HMG could slay you from 50 meters with ease, and that was before you maxed out the sharpshooter skill in which case I could tickle your booty from 100m! The HMG is FINE. I can kill you from 50 meters now but you'd probably have been standing still. It's at a point where I can scare you away from that range or make you hide while I try to get closer. Official DUST514 LAV Mechanic
Himiko Kuronaga Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 4612	Posted - 2014.08.01 18:25:00 - [3] - Quote HMG is fine. You are not meant to fight at the point psuedo-aggressively. It's purpose is to keep you from doing exactly what you're complaining you should be able to do. Deal with it.
Rusty Shallows Caldari State 1987	Posted - 2014.08.01 18:31:00 - [4] - Quote So you want a range nerf? Have no fear they are nerfing the boundless range. Personally I'm viewing it as a standardization of the weapon class. If this improves certain game performance issues this will be icing on the cake. Forums > Game: So here is a cookie and a Like. Please keep posting. Bwahahahahahahahahahaha! >>> GòÜ(GÇóGîéGÇó)Gò¥ >>>
Thumb Green The Valyrian Guard 1190	Posted - 2014.08.01 18:41:00 - [5] - Quote There's a lot of objectives that you can fire into from a safe distance / position. And the range of the HMG is counter balanced by the bullet dispersion it has. If you're getting killed by it at more than 40 meters you're either not moving much, already low on health, or one of the most common ways: someone else is shooting at you too and the HMG just got the last hit in. MassiveNine wrote: In chromosome the HMG could slay you from 50 meters with ease, and that was before you maxed out the sharpshooter skill in which case I could tickle your booty from 100m! The HMG is FINE. I can kill you from 50 meters now but you'd probably have been standing still. It's at a point where I can scare you away from that range or make you hide while I try to get closer. If they could keep the center of the reticle directly on you because back then it had the precision of the laser rifle; which made it a horrible weapon for CQC. Kill Scotty
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 3205	Posted - 2014.08.01 18:54:00 - [6] - Quote No no no, I think you have us misunderstood. You are an idiot if you go to capture a point from a sentinel with a HMG and you've got an Assault Rifle. However if you Null Cannon is suffering from a Heavy Infestation (eh? eh?) Here a number of things you can try. Mass Driver Plasma Cannon Grenades Small Missile Turret Large Missile Turret Nova Knives (been having alot of fun with these recently) Shotgun Breach Shotgun Remote Explosives Forge Gun All of these will work against a heavy, some will even work against a heavy with a logi tethered to him. The problem is, and probably always will be, is that expect to get killed by a specific fit, in a specific location and then expect that they can use the same fit again in the same situation and somehow magically win the second time round. They call me the Monkey - I like to jump off sh** and piss RE's all over your tank! Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior Lvl 3
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution 15551	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:00:00 - [7] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: No no no, I think you have us misunderstood. You are an idiot if you go to capture a point from a sentinel with a HMG and you've got an Assault Rifle. However if you Null Cannon is suffering from a Heavy Infestation (eh? eh?) Here a number of things you can try. Mass Driver Plasma Cannon Grenades Small Missile Turret Large Missile Turret Nova Knives (been having alot of fun with these recently) Shotgun Breach Shotgun Remote Explosives Forge Gun All of these will work against a heavy, some will even work against a heavy with a logi tethered to him. The problem is, and probably always will be, is that expect to get killed by a specific fit, in a specific location and then expect that they can use the same fit again in the same situation and somehow magically win the second time round. I'm not going to say anything about whether the HMG is fine or not but half of your solutions are completely stupid. Have you even used a breach shotgun recently? You realise that grenades have been nerfed multiple times from their glory days and sentinels have a 25% blast resistance? Mass drivers are relatively ineffective for the same reason. It'd take 4 direct hits from a core locus to take out a single high tier heavy. If it's a weaker grenade a lot, lot more. You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 3205	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:06:00 - [8] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: No no no, I think you have us misunderstood. You are an idiot if you go to capture a point from a sentinel with a HMG and you've got an Assault Rifle. However if you Null Cannon is suffering from a Heavy Infestation (eh? eh?) Here a number of things you can try. Mass Driver Plasma Cannon Grenades Small Missile Turret Large Missile Turret Nova Knives (been having alot of fun with these recently) Shotgun Breach Shotgun Remote Explosives Forge Gun All of these will work against a heavy, some will even work against a heavy with a logi tethered to him. The problem is, and probably always will be, is that expect to get killed by a specific fit, in a specific location and then expect that they can use the same fit again in the same situation and somehow magically win the second time round. I'm not going to say anything about whether the HMG is fine or not but half of your solutions are completely stupid. Have you even used a breach shotgun recently? You realise that grenades have been nerfed multiple times from their glory days and sentinels have a 25% blast resistance? Mass drivers are relatively ineffective for the same reason. It'd take 4 direct hits from a core locus to take out a single high tier heavy. If it's a weaker grenade a lot, lot more. Yes I have used a breach shotgun recently, admitally they aren't as good as they could be, but I still collected my fair share of Sentinel scalps with them. Mass Drivers are still incredibly efficent against heavies, whatmwith being so slow, direct hits aren't difficult. Grenades work best as a terror weapon, lob one in amd watch as they crawl out the woodwork. They call me the Monkey - I like to jump off sh** and piss RE's all over your tank! Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior Lvl 3
TOOMANY NAMES ALREADYTAKEn Going for the gold 37	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:08:00 - [9] - Quote RE's are the best Heavy repellant. Shotgunner for life.
Cody Sietz SVER True Blood Dark Taboo 3758	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:17:00 - [10] - Quote Himiko Kuronaga wrote: HMG is fine. You are not meant to fight at the point psuedo-aggressively. It's purpose is to keep you from doing exactly what you're complaining you should be able to do. Deal with it. So dealing 600 dmg from 40 meters is fine? "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire

Michael Arck 5071	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:21:00 - [11] - Quote You dont fight them in closets either. Plus there is a sprint option. You guys continually make excuses for poor gameplay and your willingness to not succeed in battle no matter how steep the hill appears to be. If you adjust the range of the HMG then its no longer a HMG. Its a pea shooter. But whatever, if you get your wish, whatever kills you next you'll whine about it. You just want to play without using your brains and will to win. This isnt a nursey game. Archistrategos *Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain*
Rusty Shallows Caldari State 1987	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:25:00 - [12] - Quote Thumb Green wrote: snip MassiveNine wrote: In chromosome the HMG could slay you from 50 meters with ease, and that was before you maxed out the sharpshooter skill in which case I could tickle your booty from 100m! The HMG is FINE. I can kill you from 50 meters now but you'd probably have been standing still. It's at a point where I can scare you away from that range or make you hide while I try to get closer. If they could keep the center of the reticle directly on you because back then it had the precision of the laser rifle; which made it a horrible weapon for CQC. Not to forget that Assault Rifles with Light Weapon Sharpshooer were like full auto sniper rifles with a terrible scope for the range. All the sweeter with a 1x cheaper SP investment. Forums > Game: So here is a cookie and a Like. Please keep posting. Bwahahahahahahahahahaha! >>> GòÜ(GÇóGîéGÇó)Gò¥ >>>
Himiko Kuronaga Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 4614	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:28:00 - [13] - Quote Cody Sietz wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: HMG is fine. You are not meant to fight at the point psuedo-aggressively. It's purpose is to keep you from doing exactly what you're complaining you should be able to do. Deal with it. So dealing 600 dmg from 40 meters is fine? Guess what? HMG ain't doing 600 damage as fast as you're doing 600 damage from 40 meters. Cause the HMG is missing by default. A lot. git gud.
calvin b Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1825	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:30:00 - [14] - Quote The problem is you along with most of the Dust community has not been around long enough to know what a true heavy is. I was one in closed Beta and if you think the heavy of this day is terrible you have not seen anything. In closed Beta I was able to crush an oncoming LAV with my HMG and then turn and kill up to 3 people before I was surrounded. My average was 7-8 kills before I was succumbed to damage, now I am lucky to survive a SG. The heavy in dust now is a far cry from what it once was. The heavy is point defense or was, now it has been nerfed to make people such as yourself from wetting your pants and crying for a nerf. The heavy was meant to be killed by another heavy or by group effort, solo efforts was laughed at, now it is too common. So please before your rattle on how heavies are OP take it from someone who has been here for near two years, the heavy that is now is nowhere near the heavy of the past. I miss that heavy for the battles where intense and you could always separate the good heavy from the bad heavy. Closed Beta Vet and gave up on assault back to Heavy full time. Remove cloaks balance scouts.
RayRay James Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 334	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:42:00 - [15] - Quote Cody Sietz wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: HMG is fine. You are not meant to fight at the point psuedo-aggressively. It's purpose is to keep you from doing exactly what you're complaining you should be able to do. Deal with it. So dealing 600 dmg from 40 meters is fine? I'll make you a deal I'll get in an ADV heavy (I don't have sentinel) with an ADV HMG. You Stand 40 Meters away. We'll both jump, when the 2nd person hits the ground, we both start shooting..... We'll settle this once and for all.
Vitharr Foebane Terminal Courtesy Proficiency V. 1713	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:43:00 - [16] - Quote calvin b wrote: The problem is you along with most of the Dust community has not been around long enough to know what a true heavy is. I was one in closed Beta and if you think the heavy of this day is terrible you have not seen anything. In closed Beta I was able to crush an oncoming LAV with my HMG and then turn and kill up to 3 people before I was surrounded. My average was 7-8 kills before I was succumbed to damage, now I am lucky to survive a SG. The heavy in dust now is a far cry from what it once was. The heavy is point defense or was, now it has been nerfed to make people such as yourself from wetting your pants and crying for a nerf. The heavy was meant to be killed by another heavy or by group effort, solo efforts was laughed at, now it is too common. So please before your rattle on how heavies are OP take it from someone who has been here for near two years, the heavy that is now is nowhere near the heavy of the past. I miss that heavy for the battles where intense and you could always separate the good heavy from the bad heavy. QFT Amarr: Assault V, Scout V, Sentinel V, Commando IV, Logistics IV I place my faith in my God, my Empress, and my Laz0r
RayRay James Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 334	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:43:00 - [17] - Quote calvin b wrote: The problem is you along with most of the Dust community has not been around long enough to know what a true heavy is. I was one in closed Beta and if you think the heavy of this day is terrible you have not seen anything. In closed Beta I was able to crush an oncoming LAV with my HMG and then turn and kill up to 3 people before I was surrounded. My average was 7-8 kills before I was succumbed to damage, now I am lucky to survive a SG. The heavy in dust now is a far cry from what it once was. The heavy is point defense or was, now it has been nerfed to make people such as yourself from wetting your pants and crying for a nerf. The heavy was meant to be killed by another heavy or by group effort, solo efforts was laughed at, now it is too common. So please before your rattle on how heavies are OP take it from someone who has been here for near two years, the heavy that is now is nowhere near the heavy of the past. I miss that heavy for the battles where intense and you could always separate the good heavy from the bad heavy. Calvin, I have about a 50/50 agree/disagree ratio going with your posts... this one took it to 51/49 agree have a like
calvin b Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1828	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:44:00 - [18] - Quote RayRay James wrote: calvin b wrote: The problem is you along with most of the Dust community has not been around long enough to know what a true heavy is. I was one in closed Beta and if you think the heavy of this day is terrible you have not seen anything. In closed Beta I was able to crush an oncoming LAV with my HMG and then turn and kill up to 3 people before I was surrounded. My average was 7-8 kills before I was succumbed to damage, now I am lucky to survive a SG. The heavy in dust now is a far cry from what it once was. The heavy is point defense or was, now it has been nerfed to make people such as yourself from wetting your pants and crying for a nerf. The heavy was meant to be killed by another heavy or by group effort, solo efforts was laughed at, now it is too common. So please before your rattle on how heavies are OP take it from someone who has been here for near two years, the heavy that is now is nowhere near the heavy of the past. I miss that heavy for the battles where intense and you could always separate the good heavy from the bad heavy. Calvin, I have about a 50/50 agree/disagree ratio going with your posts... this one took it to 51/49 agree have a like So what didnt you like. I wrote the truth. Closed Beta Vet and gave up on assault back to Heavy full time. Remove cloaks balance scouts.
headbust SVER True Blood Dark Taboo 113	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:46:00 - [19] - Quote Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: HMG is fine. You are not meant to fight at the point psuedo-aggressively. It's purpose is to keep you from doing exactly what you're complaining you should be able to do. Deal with it. So dealing 600 dmg from 40 meters is fine? Guess what? HMG ain't doing 600 damage as fast as you're doing 600 damage from 40 meters. Cause the HMG is missing by default. A lot. git gud. someone sounds a wee bit butt hurt. the problem with u heavys is there r so freaking many of you in a match now because of the boring cqc maps we have now especially the map with the supply under ground. we may be able to deal 600 damage quicker but most of u got 2-3 times that in hp so quit whining like a 9 year old i dont even know who u r must not play to much. either that or ur not that good and i dont have any probs killing so ur not worth remembering ill go with that 1. a scout = once you turn your back on me you'll never be able to look back
RayRay James Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 334	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:47:00 - [20] - Quote calvin b wrote: RayRay James wrote: calvin b wrote: The problem is you along with most of the Dust community has not been around long enough to know what a true heavy is. I was one in closed Beta and if you think the heavy of this day is terrible you have not seen anything. In closed Beta I was able to crush an oncoming LAV with my HMG and then turn and kill up to 3 people before I was surrounded. My average was 7-8 kills before I was succumbed to damage, now I am lucky to survive a SG. The heavy in dust now is a far cry from what it once was. The heavy is point defense or was, now it has been nerfed to make people such as yourself from wetting your pants and crying for a nerf. The heavy was meant to be killed by another heavy or by group effort, solo efforts was laughed at, now it is too common. So please before your rattle on how heavies are OP take it from someone who has been here for near two years, the heavy that is now is nowhere near the heavy of the past. I miss that heavy for the battles where intense and you could always separate the good heavy from the bad heavy. Calvin, I have about a 50/50 agree/disagree ratio going with your posts... this one took it to 51/49 agree have a like So what didnt you like. I wrote the truth. No, this one i liked. Some of your other posts i don't agree with

RayRay James Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 334	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:48:00 - [21] - Quote headbust wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: HMG is fine. You are not meant to fight at the point psuedo-aggressively. It's purpose is to keep you from doing exactly what you're complaining you should be able to do. Deal with it. So dealing 600 dmg from 40 meters is fine? Guess what? HMG ain't doing 600 damage as fast as you're doing 600 damage from 40 meters. Cause the HMG is missing by default. A lot. git gud. someone sounds a wee bit butt hurt. the problem with u heavys is there r so freaking many of you in a match now because of the boring cqc maps we have now especially the map with the supply under ground. we may be able to deal 600 damage quicker but most of u got 2-3 times that in hp so quit whining like a 9 year old i dont even know who u r must not play to much. either that or ur not that good and i dont have any probs killing so ur not worth remembering ill go with that 1. It always seems to be the SEVR guys complaining, especially about heavies. Can you guys just use the tools CCP gave you and kill them instead of complaining on the forums constantly? Heavies aren't the problem, your inability to react to them (and the subsequent bitching) is the problem
Cass Caul 224	Posted - 2014.08.01 19:50:00 - [22] - Quote HMG (currently, not post-Charlie) needs faster heat build up. It won't change anything for experienced HMG users but will stop the terrible players that rely on spray-and-pray aspects of it. Assault HMG, on the other hand, is not fine. It is under-performing. I don't think the Burst needs to change, but I thought I saw they were going to do that. My favorite way to take out heavies in an enclosed area, though, is with an Allotek Plasma Cannon. Second favorite way is standard scout-shotgun but that's nothing special. exploit null cannon hit-detection fuckery and run around inside it letting the null cannon walls absorb enemy fire. If you can't keep up, shut up. Math is easy, you're just stupid. The Empress of Alts
Cody Sietz SVER True Blood Dark Taboo 3758	Posted - 2014.08.01 20:11:00 - [23] - Quote RayRay James wrote: headbust wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: HMG is fine. You are not meant to fight at the point psuedo-aggressively. It's purpose is to keep you from doing exactly what you're complaining you should be able to do. Deal with it. So dealing 600 dmg from 40 meters is fine? Guess what? HMG ain't doing 600 damage as fast as you're doing 600 damage from 40 meters. Cause the HMG is missing by default. A lot. git gud. someone sounds a wee bit butt hurt. the problem with u heavys is there r so freaking many of you in a match now because of the boring cqc maps we have now especially the map with the supply under ground. we may be able to deal 600 damage quicker but most of u got 2-3 times that in hp so quit whining like a 9 year old i dont even know who u r must not play to much. either that or ur not that good and i dont have any probs killing so ur not worth remembering ill go with that 1. It always seems to be the SEVR guys complaining, especially about heavies. Can you guys just use the tools CCP gave you and kill them instead of complaining on the forums constantly? Heavies aren't the problem, your inability to react to them (and the subsequent bitching) is the problem We had REs and they got nerfed. Heavy QQ is best QQ. "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire
Orion Vahid Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 271	Posted - 2014.08.01 20:14:00 - [24] - Quote RayRay James wrote: headbust wrote: [quote=Himiko Kuronaga][quote=Cody Sietz][quote=Himiko Kuronaga]HMG is fine. You are not meant to fight at the point psuedo-aggressively. It's purpose is to keep you from doing exactly what you're complaining you should be able to do. Heavies aren't the problem, your inability to react to them (and the subsequent bitching) is the problem We had REs and they got nerfed. Heavy QQ is best QQ. You are the only one crying here buddy.
RYN0CER0S Rise Of Old Dudes 767	Posted - 2014.08.01 20:17:00 - [25] - Quote Nerf the Range. They'll still be HP stacked and covering up that objective. Now, you'll just have to wait til you get within smelling distance of a Null Cannon before you die. Big whoop. Why can't anyone here wait for an Assault buff to see where Heavies need to be? Now we're buffing Assaults and nerfing Heavies/HMGs at the same time. That's the same bullshit that happened with that 1.7 patch. Vehicles got buffed, AV got nerfed - without consideration of how the 2 would interact post-fix. Thanks, Idiots. Now when you're all in your super Assaults there won't be anyone to protect you from Cloaked SGs/CRs. GG. Who farted?
RayRay James Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 334	Posted - 2014.08.01 20:18:00 - [26] - Quote Cody Sietz wrote: We had REs and they got nerfed. REs still work against heavies, even the basics Cody Sietz wrote: Heavy QQ is best QQ. Not really, your heavy QQ is pathetic and baseless
Cody Sietz SVER True Blood Dark Taboo 3759	Posted - 2014.08.01 20:20:00 - [27] - Quote RayRay James wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: We had REs and they got nerfed. REs still work against heavies, even the basics Cody Sietz wrote: Heavy QQ is best QQ. Not really, your heavy QQ is pathetic and baseless Baseless? Really? So heavy QQ got REs and cloaks nerfed, yet we can't get a simple balance for a weapon and suit that's been buffed countless times(even when they didn't need it) "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire
Hyper Metal Sonic Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation 4	Posted - 2014.08.01 20:33:00 - [28] - Quote RYN0CER0S wrote: Nerf the Range. They'll still be HP stacked and covering up that objective. Now, you'll just have to wait til you get within smelling distance of a Null Cannon before you die. Big whoop. Why can't anyone here wait for an Assault buff to see where Heavies need to be? Now we're buffing Assaults and nerfing Heavies/HMGs at the same time. That's the same bullshit that happened with that 1.7 patch. Vehicles got buffed, AV got nerfed - without consideration of how the 2 would interact post-fix. Thanks, Idiots. Now when you're all in your super Assaults there won't be anyone to protect you from Cloaked SGs/CRs. GG. The game is already completely focused on scouts and heavies. They are the only suits atm that can really counter each other. Also, how can you say a range nerf wouldn't help? It would at least mean they have to stick solely to their roles and keep defending that point rather than roam away from it and reach out with their hmg. They are "sentinels" after all, that's why i suggested the range reduction vs any damage or hp reduction. Like i said before, i like heavies myself but they are too much right now. And like you said "they will still be hp stacked and covering that objective" (still doing their job) just from a less oppressive range. How are assaults being buffed exactly btw? Are they supposed to now counter heavies too because it was my understanding they were supposed to counter scouts and now it just seems like everyone is expecting them to come and put every class in it's rightful place.
Cass Caul 227	Posted - 2014.08.01 20:36:00 - [29] - Quote RYN0CER0S wrote: Nerf the Range. If the range is too short we just end up where were were at 1.7, every sentinel has a light weapon because it becomes more effective to run that instead. If you can't keep up, shut up. Math is easy, you're just stupid. The Empress of Alts
Cody Sietz SVER True Blood Dark Taboo 3759	Posted - 2014.08.01 20:42:00 - [30] - Quote Cass Caul wrote: RYN0CER0S wrote: Nerf the Range. If the range is too short we just end up where were were at 1.7, every sentinel has a light weapon because it becomes more effective to run that instead. We had heavies using light weapons before they fixed the dispersion on it and buffed it. Also before they nerfed all rifles. So yeah, if heavies wanna use CR/RRs(like we already still see) that's fine by me. "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.