|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
RayRay James
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
334
   |
Posted - 2014.08.01 19:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:HMG is fine. You are not meant to fight at the point psuedo-aggressively. It's purpose is to keep you from doing exactly what you're complaining you should be able to do.
Deal with it. So dealing 600 dmg from 40 meters is fine?
I'll make you a deal
I'll get in an ADV heavy (I don't have sentinel) with an ADV HMG. You Stand 40 Meters away. We'll both jump, when the 2nd person hits the ground, we both start shooting.....
We'll settle this once and for all. |
RayRay James
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
334
|
Posted - 2014.08.01 19:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
calvin b wrote:The problem is you along with most of the Dust community has not been around long enough to know what a true heavy is. I was one in closed Beta and if you think the heavy of this day is terrible you have not seen anything. In closed Beta I was able to crush an oncoming LAV with my HMG and then turn and kill up to 3 people before I was surrounded. My average was 7-8 kills before I was succumbed to damage, now I am lucky to survive a SG  . The heavy in dust now is a far cry from what it once was. The heavy is point defense or was, now it has been nerfed to make people such as yourself from wetting your pants and crying for a nerf. The heavy was meant to be killed by another heavy or by group effort, solo efforts was laughed at, now it is too common. So please before your rattle on how heavies are OP take it from someone who has been here for near two years, the heavy that is now is nowhere near the heavy of the past. I miss that heavy for the battles where intense and you could always separate the good heavy from the bad heavy.
Calvin, I have about a 50/50 agree/disagree ratio going with your posts...
this one took it to 51/49 agree
have a like |
RayRay James
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
334
|
Posted - 2014.08.01 19:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
calvin b wrote:RayRay James wrote:calvin b wrote:The problem is you along with most of the Dust community has not been around long enough to know what a true heavy is. I was one in closed Beta and if you think the heavy of this day is terrible you have not seen anything. In closed Beta I was able to crush an oncoming LAV with my HMG and then turn and kill up to 3 people before I was surrounded. My average was 7-8 kills before I was succumbed to damage, now I am lucky to survive a SG . The heavy in dust now is a far cry from what it once was. The heavy is point defense or was, now it has been nerfed to make people such as yourself from wetting your pants and crying for a nerf. The heavy was meant to be killed by another heavy or by group effort, solo efforts was laughed at, now it is too common. So please before your rattle on how heavies are OP take it from someone who has been here for near two years, the heavy that is now is nowhere near the heavy of the past. I miss that heavy for the battles where intense and you could always separate the good heavy from the bad heavy. Calvin, I have about a 50/50 agree/disagree ratio going with your posts... this one took it to 51/49 agree have a like So what didnt you like. I wrote the truth.
No, this one i liked.
Some of your other posts i don't agree with |
RayRay James
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
334
|
Posted - 2014.08.01 19:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
headbust wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Cody Sietz wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:HMG is fine. You are not meant to fight at the point psuedo-aggressively. It's purpose is to keep you from doing exactly what you're complaining you should be able to do.
Deal with it. So dealing 600 dmg from 40 meters is fine? Guess what? HMG ain't doing 600 damage as fast as you're doing 600 damage from 40 meters. Cause the HMG is missing by default. A lot. git gud. someone sounds a wee bit butt hurt. the problem with u heavys is there r so freaking many of you in a match now because of the boring cqc maps we have now especially the map with the supply under ground. we may be able to deal 600 damage quicker but most of u got 2-3 times that in hp so quit whining like a 9 year old i dont even know who u r must not play to much. either that or ur not that good and i dont have any probs killing so ur not worth remembering ill go with that 1.
It always seems to be the SEVR guys complaining, especially about heavies.
Can you guys just use the tools CCP gave you and kill them instead of complaining on the forums constantly?
Heavies aren't the problem, your inability to react to them (and the subsequent bitching) is the problem |
RayRay James
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
334
|
Posted - 2014.08.01 20:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:We had REs and they got nerfed.
REs still work against heavies, even the basics
Cody Sietz wrote:Heavy QQ is best QQ.
Not really, your heavy QQ is pathetic and baseless
|
|
|
| |
|