DUST Search - Sentinels with light weapons. *laughs*

All Channels

General Discussions

Sentinels with light weapons. *laughs*

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Vapor Forseti Nyain Chan General Tso's Alliance 645	Posted - 2014.06.30 19:37:00 - [1] - Quote Should Sentinels be restricted to only heavy weapons in their heavy weapons slot? Commandos are the only heavy suits that should be able to wield light weapons IMHO. It's their specialty. Discuss. pâ¬péñpâòpâ½pü«tÄïpü½pü¬péïpÇé --pâ¬pâùpâ¬pâ+pâ¬péñpâ¬pâ+ `NyainChan Forever`
Seymour KrelbornX Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 241	Posted - 2014.06.30 19:45:00 - [2] - Quote this topic was thoroughly discussed and laughed off the front page months ago....where were you?
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 4902	Posted - 2014.06.30 19:46:00 - [3] - Quote Perhaps when the Scrambler Lance and Plasma Mortar are released. What's that? They aren't going to be??? Well then GTFO RIP Stinky Sleeve. RIP Dust514. See you on Destiny. PSN: GSDSteVB
One Eyed King Land of the BIind 2207	Posted - 2014.06.30 19:48:00 - [4] - Quote What if there were a penalty of some kind? Reduction to light weapon range OR Reduction to reload etc. I wanted to make the OR stand out because I would be careful not to add too many restrictions, if one small one doesn't create a significant enough sacrifice, then another small penalty can be added. I think there should be battlefield variety, but I think there should be a little sacrifice without it being so significant to render the variations completely useless. This is how a minja feels
Lynn Beck EnvyUs. 1975	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:04:00 - [5] - Quote Then remove their sidearms, because the only reasoning you could possibly have for no LW is 'their fingers are too sausage-like, and thus can't hold them.' General John Ripper -BAM! I'm Emeril Lagasse. This message was approved by the 'Nobody Loved You' Foundation
vlad stoich Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 175	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:10:00 - [6] - Quote Lynn Beck wrote: Then remove their sidearms, because the only reasoning you could possibly have for no LW is 'their fingers are too sausage-like, and thus can't hold them.' Then by your logic let my scout run around with a forge gun.
Tectonic Fusion 1812	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:16:00 - [7] - Quote vlad stoich wrote: Lynn Beck wrote: Then remove their sidearms, because the only reasoning you could possibly have for no LW is 'their fingers are too sausage-like, and thus can't hold them.' Then by your logic let my scout run around with a forge gun. The scout doesn't have an exoskeleton to hold it.
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2944	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:17:00 - [8] - Quote Everytime I see a prototype sentinel with +1000 EHP and a SB-39 Rail Rifle. I laugh, the fact that they have to go to these extremes just shows how scrubby they are, then when I kill them I laugh even more, because all their scrubbieness still can't save them from skill. My suit's a bit rusty, but that could just as easily be me! Monkey Mac - Swinging from the Rooftops Forum Warrior Lvl2
Atiim Fooly Cooly. 10047	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:24:00 - [9] - Quote I'm indifferent to the idea. It should be noted however, that as long as a Sentinel is capable of carrying a long range weapon (such as a Scrambler or Rail Rifle), the argument about Sentinels being out-ranged by nearly everything is invalid. Taking Care of The Pilot Infestation in North American Skirmish -HAND
vlad stoich Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 175	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:31:00 - [10] - Quote Tectonic Fusion wrote: vlad stoich wrote: Lynn Beck wrote: Then remove their sidearms, because the only reasoning you could possibly have for no LW is 'their fingers are too sausage-like, and thus can't hold them.' Then by your logic let my scout run around with a forge gun. The scout doesn't have an exoskeleton to hold it. Then my logi can carry it with nanohives. Thanks

Onesimus Tarsus Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire 2191	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:33:00 - [11] - Quote Tectonic Fusion wrote: vlad stoich wrote: Lynn Beck wrote: Then remove their sidearms, because the only reasoning you could possibly have for no LW is 'their fingers are too sausage-like, and thus can't hold them.' Then by your logic let my scout run around with a forge gun. The scout doesn't have an exoskeleton to hold it. If there's one thing I want in my sci-fi FPS, it's rock-solid realism. K/D(r) WP/D(r) matchmaking fixes the whole game. Period. Seriously. Think about it.
Cat Merc Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 10587	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:34:00 - [12] - Quote Atiim wrote: I'm indifferent to the idea. It should be noted however, that as long as a Sentinel is capable of carrying a long range weapon (such as a Scrambler or Rail Rifle), the argument about Sentinels being out-ranged by nearly everything is invalid. Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
lunatis orrak Battlefield Brawlers 31	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:36:00 - [13] - Quote Onesimus Tarsus wrote: Tectonic Fusion wrote: vlad stoich wrote: Lynn Beck wrote: Then remove their sidearms, because the only reasoning you could possibly have for no LW is 'their fingers are too sausage-like, and thus can't hold them.' Then by your logic let my scout run around with a forge gun. The scout doesn't have an exoskeleton to hold it. If there's one thing I want in my sci-fi FPS, it's rock-solid realism. Lol CHUBBY CHASER FOR LIFE `!BEWARE MY FAT BULLDOGS! The leash is not for your protection`
Denchlad 7 The Last of DusT. General Tso's Alliance 325	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:36:00 - [14] - Quote Atiim wrote: I'm indifferent to the idea. It should be noted however, that as long as a Sentinel is capable of carrying a long range weapon (such as a Scrambler or Rail Rifle), the argument about Sentinels being out-ranged by nearly everything is invalid. I will be the only player to Prototype every single god damn weapon before Dust dies. 5 to go.
Heimdallr69 Nyain San 2666	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:37:00 - [15] - Quote Chunky Munkey wrote: Perhaps when the Scrambler Lance and Plasma Mortar are released. What's that? They aren't going to be??? Well then GTFO I think my assault should be able to use an hmg. Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
Eruditus 920 Prodigy Ops 194	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:42:00 - [16] - Quote Seymour KrelbornX wrote: this topic was thoroughly discussed and laughed off the front page months ago....where were you? As if once a topic is ever broached all other forum goers are forbidden to discuss said topic whether they were aware of it or not. Seymour, are you a bully in real life? I always thought better of you. Dominion over others is given not taken. Nothing has power over you but your own fear.
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2945	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:43:00 - [17] - Quote Atiim wrote: I'm indifferent to the idea. It should be noted however, that as long as a Sentinel is capable of carrying a long range weapon (such as a Scrambler or Rail Rifle), the argument about Sentinels being out-ranged by nearly everything is invalid. You can't outrange a suit, but you can outrange the HMG My suit's a bit rusty, but that could just as easily be me! Monkey Mac - Swinging from the Rooftops Forum Warrior Lvl2
The dark cloud The Rainbow Effect 3367	Posted - 2014.06.30 20:55:00 - [18] - Quote Heavys with light weapons are scrubs with terrible aim. To be honest i prefer a scrub with a light weapon then a scrub with a spray and pray machine where he just has to hold the trigger and aim in my general direction. Cause those guys are usually easy kills.
ACT1ON BASTARD Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 16	Posted - 2014.06.30 21:02:00 - [19] - Quote Vapor Forseti wrote: Should Sentinels be restricted to only heavy weapons in their heavy weapons slot? Commandos are the only heavy suits that should be able to wield light weapons IMHO. It's their specialty. Discuss. Noones complaining about it and theyre super easy to kill anyways.Why take away variety from this game?,look what it did to tanking it made it bland and unintresting.
vlad stoich Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 178	Posted - 2014.06.30 21:09:00 - [20] - Quote Heimdallr69 wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Perhaps when the Scrambler Lance and Plasma Mortar are released. What's that? They aren't going to be??? Well then GTFO I think my assault should be able to use an hmg. Absolutely with a cloak.

Cody Sietz SVER True Blood Dirt Nap Squad. 3444	Posted - 2014.06.30 21:11:00 - [21] - Quote CCP agrees with you and will be restricting the heavy to heavy only weapons. "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire
Onesimus Tarsus Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire 2194	Posted - 2014.06.30 21:12:00 - [22] - Quote vlad stoich wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Perhaps when the Scrambler Lance and Plasma Mortar are released. What's that? They aren't going to be??? Well then GTFO I think my assault should be able to use an hmg. Absolutely with a cloak. Heck, cloak the HAVs and LAVs and ADSes too! K/D(r) WP/D(r) matchmaking fixes the whole game. Period. Seriously. Think about it.
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 849	Posted - 2014.06.30 21:19:00 - [23] - Quote Tectonic Fusion wrote: vlad stoich wrote: Lynn Beck wrote: Then remove their sidearms, because the only reasoning you could possibly have for no LW is 'their fingers are too sausage-like, and thus can't hold them.' Then by your logic let my scout run around with a forge gun. The scout doesn't have an exoskeleton to hold it. Not to mention the gun weighs more than the scout. http://youtu.be/dtXupQg77SU Dust to Dust, theme
vlad stoich Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 178	Posted - 2014.06.30 21:20:00 - [24] - Quote Onesimus Tarsus wrote: vlad stoich wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Perhaps when the Scrambler Lance and Plasma Mortar are released. What's that? They aren't going to be??? Well then GTFO I think my assault should be able to use an hmg. Absolutely with a cloak. Heck, cloak the HAVs and LAVs and ADSes too! Whoa whoa whoa tiger, don't go giving them any ideas. Could you imagine the tears? Could you imagine seeing it happen? Drives right past you cloaked but still shows up on passives? Then railguns you like a shotgunner.
Sarus Rambo Direct Action Resources 169	Posted - 2014.06.30 21:26:00 - [25] - Quote The biggest thing that needs to happen to all heavy suits is to make their turning speed extremely slow. That is the real big problem with heavy suits in general. Max out the turning speed at something like 1/3 the turning speed of a medium frame. Heavies should be monsters. They way they should work is if you get in front of them, you die, but if you are to the side and behind them, they are vulnerable. This sums up 100% of the forum posts after Fanfest 2014.
Vapor Forseti Nyain Chan General Tso's Alliance 651	Posted - 2014.06.30 21:29:00 - [26] - Quote Seymour KrelbornX wrote: this topic was thoroughly discussed and laughed off the front page months ago....where were you? Not here. pâ¬péñpâòpâ½pü«tÄïpü½pü¬péïpÇé --pâ¬pâùpâ¬pâ+pâ¬péñpâ¬pâ+ `NyainChan Forever`
Vapor Forseti Nyain Chan General Tso's Alliance 652	Posted - 2014.06.30 21:51:00 - [27] - Quote Atiim wrote: I'm indifferent to the idea. It should be noted however, that as long as a Sentinel is capable of carrying a long range weapon (such as a Scrambler or Rail Rifle), the argument about Sentinels being out-ranged by nearly everything is invalid. .. This is actually a very good point you bring up. Also, thanks for not being defensive. +1 pâ¬péñpâòpâ½pü«tÄïpü½pü¬péïpÇé --pâ¬pâùpâ¬pâ+pâ¬péñpâ¬pâ+ `NyainChan Forever`
DUST Fiend Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 14514	Posted - 2014.06.30 21:56:00 - [28] - Quote Hmmm Should I fit my HMG, my HMG, the HMG, or maybe the HMG today? I'm trying to break out of the mold so I think I might go with an HMG, but I guess if I wanted to change things up I could try the HMG or maybe even the HMG if I'm feeling frisky. I could just be a rebel though and fit the HMG Decisions decisions.
Bojo The Mighty Spaceman Drug Cartel-Uno 3932	Posted - 2014.06.30 23:00:00 - [29] - Quote I could care less about sentinels with light weapons. The game is supposed to be about freedom of choices so let them. I'm not resting in peace but rather wandering as a zombie in vengeance of no good reason
axINVICTUSxa DETHDEALERS RISE of LEGION 151	Posted - 2014.06.30 23:20:00 - [30] - Quote One Eyed King wrote: What if there were a penalty of some kind? Reduction to light weapon range OR Reduction to reload etc. I wanted to make the OR stand out because I would be careful not to add too many restrictions, if one small one doesn't create a significant enough sacrifice, then another small penalty can be added. I think there should be battlefield variety, but I think there should be a little sacrifice without it being so significant to render the variations completely useless. Exactly my opinion. Marginal thinking, not extreme fixes. That only leads to QQ, if you slowly lower stats of anything, just so minor that players hardly notice, eventually you can take away big stats and make them small after a number of "releases and fixes" Wherever the Wind (Aero) might take me, may it ever be True, for the way of the Commando is noble and right.



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.