Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
emm kay
Binary Mercs Canis Eliminatus Operatives
105
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 01:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
The concept is simple. You post what you want I add it to the list below also wanted: format:
modifiers G£û|number| :number of times posted Gë¢ :Confirmed!!!!! Gèù :Confirmed not going ot be in the game. +ö :Dev post on this
--
You called, sir?
|
emm kay
Binary Mercs Canis Eliminatus Operatives
105
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 01:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
List:
- Compass HUD G£û1, Gë¢, +ö
--
You called, sir?
|
emm kay
Binary Mercs Canis Eliminatus Operatives
105
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 01:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
(reserved)
--
You called, sir?
|
emm kay
Binary Mercs Canis Eliminatus Operatives
105
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 01:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
(reserved) *you may post now*
--
You called, sir?
|
Jonny D Buelle
Mors Effera
161
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 04:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
PVE
PvPvE (NPCS that fight with you)
Commanding NPCs
Open World
Open Stations
Ability to Gank people in Open world
CONCORD
Edit: Cookies and Quafe!
Come Join the War
|
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1396
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 11:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
PvE Proper NPE Experience (Including Tutorials, VR, etc) Higher level of customisation (E.g. Corp emblems on gear) More varied weapon types and purposes (Things like Flash bangs, smoke grenades) Different ammo types for weapons (Maybe I'd like a flux mass driver?) Overhaul on both vehicle design and functionality Improved UI with interaction. Open World system
Brb, sister needs the TV
|
emm kay
Binary Mercs Canis Eliminatus Operatives
107
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 18:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
updated with items posted above. feel free to re-post suggestions! I want to know everything you want in Legion!
--
You called, sir?
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
10517
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 20:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
I'd settle for an Amarrian HAV.
"You are weak Ouryon....weakness serves not the Empire. I shall teach you strength."
-Yurius of the Brutor to Ouryon
|
God Hates Lags
The Last of DusT. General Tso's Alliance
1232
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 21:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
-PS4 port -PS4 port -PS4 port -PS4 port -PS4 port -PS4 port -PS4 port -PS4 port -PS4 port -PS4 port -PS4 port -PS4 port
"Look what I destroyed in two days"
Wolfica stole my signature
|
501st Headstrong
G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance
229
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 21:48:00 -
[10] - Quote
Digging that Flux Mass Driver Idea Full Racial Parity Ability to fight on one socket and go over to the other, making fight far larger and dynamic/ FW 3.0 FW 3.0 Making EVE LEGION WITH EVE INTEGRATION in mind
Specs that won't make me have to buy a 1000 dollar computer...And no it can't be 999.99
From the Clone Wars I came. Here, I am a man among tamed beasts, and a god...among men.- 501st Headstrong.
|
|
Kincate
DUST University Ivy League
68
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 22:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
Skirmish 1.0 or something like it.
1st Legionhaire
|
emm kay
Binary Mercs Canis Eliminatus Operatives
109
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 23:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
updated and sorted list with most common at top
--
You called, sir?
|
Zohar Colichemarde
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
59
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 23:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
Team deploy
I <3 Laser Rocks.
|
emm kay
Binary Mercs Canis Eliminatus Operatives
110
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:13:00 -
[14] - Quote
Zohar Colichemarde wrote:Team deploy Thanks, I updated with your wish
--
You called, sir?
|
ALEX Lovey
Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 02:17:00 -
[15] - Quote
emm kay wrote:Zohar Colichemarde wrote:Team deploy Thanks, I updated with your wish How about exploring the station and mining ruins off planet? |
Games Haven
Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic
190
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 02:49:00 -
[16] - Quote
The struggle is real.
The struggle is real.
|
Godin Thekiller
shadows of 514
2585
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 03:06:00 -
[17] - Quote
Kincate wrote:Skirmish 1.0 or something like it.
screw gamemodes
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
8761
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 03:09:00 -
[18] - Quote
I wish to be able to be a specialized trader because the marketeer in me wants to profit off of the backs of Legionaries. XD
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
Godin Thekiller
shadows of 514
2585
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 03:17:00 -
[19] - Quote
Manufacturing
drones
my T II HAV's and LAV's back and improved
my T II turrets back and improved
pilot suit (confirmed, but still want it)
mining and mining vehicles
random **** in eve (like my spiced wine, or mindflood) not to be useless
the hundreds of my slaves to actually be useful
a city hub on the planet, as well as WIS
LAA's, MAV's, and speeders to get into the game
Amarr and Winmatar vehicles and their turrets to get into the game
medium turrets
improved movement (such as being able to use climbing equipment, vaulting, actual climbing in and out of vehicles, etc.)
improved environments (forests, ocean and floating cities, etc), and better interaction with it (being able to open doors, or even destroying them)
New installations to incite more teamwork between infantry and vehicles (a barrier that as AV resistance, but not turret resistance, bridges, etc.)
more interaction between immortals of different types (open world OB's, contract system that can be used for combat, (sending out a quick contract to all Caps in the system for a needed OB, etc.), or even being able to use special agents to do missions with mercs (or NPC soldiers that you bring).
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Dagger-Two
Tharumec
279
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 04:42:00 -
[20] - Quote
Racial Variants for more types of weapons to fit lore (Gallente and Caldari projectile weapons, Caldari and Amarr Plasma weapons, Gallente and Minmatar rail weapons, etc) + more weapon models even within weapon meta-levels to increase immersion (say, a 'Combat Rifle' having a different model than an 'Assault Combat Rifle')
More AV Missile weaponry, and improving Swarm functionality
Ammunition types for most light weapons
Plasma weapons having range characteristics changed so the bolts disappear after a set (short) range, with optimal sitting at around 30m, falloff another 30m max (bolt loses damage in this range), and after that the bolt just disappears (again, in keeping with how plasma weapons work in lore) Edit: Ranges of course would be a bit longer on heavier weapons, and shorter on lighter weapons. 30/30m was just an example.
Make plasma weapons devastatingly powerful to compensate for very short ranges.
Drastically increase range of any weapon firing a solid projectile. (Seeing 100m being called 'long range' in a large-map shooter game makes me sad)
More vehicles, both in categories and race (goes without saying I think)
Differing vehicle models between roles (not just one hull)
Race-specific turret models for vehicles, at least for that races more common heavy weaponry. (Eg: a blaster on a caldari tank will have a different model than on a gallente tank, though it's the same blaster. Same goes for rail turrets. If you put a Projectile turret on a caldari tank, though, it'll keep a Minmatar model with altered colours to match the tank)
Racial HUD's that are simple but elegant
Re-imagined sounds to help gameplay immersion
Smart RDV's
Commander with ability to drop installations: no turret installations when map begins
Restriction to light/medium suits when operating dropships or tanks
Higher ceiling for maps, for more tactical use of dropships
Large varied maps with equally varied game-modes.
I could really go on....
Playing since 1st batch of closed beta keys.
|
|
Godin Thekiller
shadows of 514
2586
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 05:06:00 -
[21] - Quote
Dagger-Two wrote:Racial Variants for more types of weapons to fit lore (Gallente and Caldari projectile weapons, Caldari and Amarr Plasma weapons, Gallente and Minmatar rail weapons, etc) + more weapon models even within weapon meta-levels to increase immersion (say, a 'Combat Rifle' having a different model than an 'Assault Combat Rifle')
More AV Missile weaponry, and improving Swarm functionality
Ammunition types for most light weapons
Plasma weapons having range characteristics changed so the bolts disappear after a set (short) range, with optimal sitting at around 30m, falloff another 30m max (bolt loses damage in this range), and after that the bolt just disappears (again, in keeping with how plasma weapons work in lore) Edit: Ranges of course would be a bit longer on heavier weapons, and shorter on lighter weapons. 30/30m was just an example.
Make plasma weapons devastatingly powerful to compensate for very short ranges.
Edit: Make the plasma cannon function like a blaster. No awkward lobbing ball of plasma, just a hypersonic bolt with relatively short range
Drastically increase range of any weapon firing a solid projectile. (Seeing 100m being called 'long range' in a large-map shooter game makes me sad)
More vehicles, both in categories and race (goes without saying I think)
Differing vehicle models between roles (not just one hull)
Race-specific turret models for vehicles, at least for that races more common heavy weaponry. (Eg: a blaster on a caldari tank will have a different model than on a gallente tank, though it's the same blaster. Same goes for rail turrets. If you put a Projectile turret on a caldari tank, though, it'll keep a Minmatar model with altered colours to match the tank)
Racial HUD's that are simple but elegant
Re-imagined sounds to help gameplay immersion
Smart RDV's
Commander with ability to drop installations: no turret installations when match begins, delay before dropping installations, ability to only drop installations within certain range of control points or specific structures like friendly CRU's
Restriction to light/medium suits when operating dropships or tanks
Higher ceiling for maps, for more tactical use of dropships
Large varied maps with equally varied game-modes.
I could really go on....
1: That makes 0 sense.
2: Why more lock on stuff? Swarms are enough scrubbery.
3: Most? Why most? Why can't it be all?
4: concept I like
5: It sounds like you want to extremely buff them. No.
6: PLC is fine how it is.
7: Hell no.
8: Obviously . They should be useful however, or not broken as a general concept (bomber DS).
9: Fine with that
10: Caldari don't really use blasters much, nor do they make them, so why would they have their own? Also, Why would it be binded to the hull type? Wouldn't it be for whoever made the actual turret?
11: fine with that
12: Fine with that. Some of the sounds are horrible in dust tbh........
13: Jesus yes. Hell, T I RDV that allows us to fly it down would be nice.
14: Concept overall is nice, but the range thing shouldn't be based off of a installation that does something imo. Should be a control tower or something, and provides power to the installations in the near vicinity.
15: Hell no. Better way to go about that is having actual enter exit models for vehicles, and having heavies do it slower.
16: You want to hover higher?
17: maps imply gamemodes, and gamemodes are bad.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Dagger-Two
Tharumec
279
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 05:44:00 -
[22] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:
10: Caldari don't really use blasters much, nor do they make them, so why would they have their own? Also, Why would it be binded to the hull type? Wouldn't it be for whoever made the actual turret?
Ugh.
Yes, Godin. Yes they do.
This is why you think idea no. 1 makes no sense; because you don't understand EVE lore with regards to weaponry, especially personal weaponry.
EVERYONE uses bullets.
Space combat aside, none of the empires restrict themselves to one type of weapon. Not only is there lore to back this up, believing otherwise is ridiculous.
The Gallente invented magnetic weaponry, both Blasters and Railguns. the Caldari adopted both, as well as maintaining their love for missiles. Space combat does not mirror what fighting is like on the ground, though.
Every single empire has used, and still uses, conventional projectile small-arms. They are the most cost effective and easily manufactured firearms available, while still being very lethal thanks to modern materials and technologies. This is Canon, pure and simple.
That being said, even in EVE it is common to see railgun fit gallente ships, or blaster fit caldari ones, and I'm taking NPC's, not just players.
It is completely rational to expect that personal weaponry, regardless of empire, would fit tactical roles. If a certain type of weapon fit a tactical role better than another, it would absolutely be favored. Why would a Caldari soldier breaching a room have a railgun? Why not have a plasma weapon that has far more stopping power at the appropriate range you will be engaging? What if there are other people, and rail rounds might overpenetrate and kill someone? Plasma bolts vent the moment they hit something, so no danger of that.
Do you then think that a Caldari unit would go buy Gallente weapons just to fill that role? Hell no, they have all the same technology to make their own.
Are you getting what I'm saying?
Playing since 1st batch of closed beta keys.
|
Godin Thekiller
shadows of 514
2586
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 05:50:00 -
[23] - Quote
Dagger-Two wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:
10: Caldari don't really use blasters much, nor do they make them, so why would they have their own? Also, Why would it be binded to the hull type? Wouldn't it be for whoever made the actual turret?
Ugh. Yes, Godin. Yes they do. This is why you think idea no. 1 makes no sense; because you don't understand EVE lore with regards to weaponry, especially personal weaponry. EVERYONE uses bullets. Space combat aside, none of the empires restrict themselves to one type of weapon. Not only is there lore to back this up, believing otherwise is ridiculous. The Gallente invented magnetic weaponry, both Blasters and Railguns. the Caldari adopted both, as well as maintaining their love for missiles. Space combat does not mirror what fighting is like on the ground, though. Every single empire has used, and still uses, conventional projectile small-arms. They are the most cost effective and easily manufactured firearms available, while still being very lethal thanks to modern materials and technologies. This is Canon, pure and simple. That being said, even in EVE it is common to see railgun fit gallente ships, or blaster fit caldari ones, and I'm taking NPC's, not just players. It is completely rational to expect that personal weaponry, regardless of empire, would fit tactical roles. If a certain type of weapon fit a tactical role better than another, it would absolutely be favored. Why would a Caldari soldier breaching a room have a railgun? Why not have a plasma weapon that has far more stopping power at the appropriate range you will be engaging? What if there are other people, and rail rounds might overpenetrate and kill someone? Plasma bolts vent the moment they hit something, so no danger of that. Do you then think that a Caldari unit would go buy Gallente weapons just to fill that role? Hell no, they have all the same technology to make their own. Are you getting what I'm saying?
Then if that's the case, where are the Caldari Navy Blasters? Also, there's not a single Caldari named Turret or weapon that is blaster based.
You clearly know nothing.
Also, I said that they use them, just not as much as rails.
and blasters don't use bullets, they use charges of whatever, which is superheated to a plasma form then shot.
Insult me as you please, but actually use logic when insulting me. Thanks.
EDIT: Oh, and about that part of they using the enemy's tech, that actually happens. Like a lot Even irl. They adjust it for their needs, but it's not like it was made by them.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Dagger-Two
Tharumec
279
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 05:54:00 -
[24] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Dagger-Two wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:
10: Caldari don't really use blasters much, nor do they make them, so why would they have their own? Also, Why would it be binded to the hull type? Wouldn't it be for whoever made the actual turret?
Ugh. Yes, Godin. Yes they do. This is why you think idea no. 1 makes no sense; because you don't understand EVE lore with regards to weaponry, especially personal weaponry. EVERYONE uses bullets. Space combat aside, none of the empires restrict themselves to one type of weapon. Not only is there lore to back this up, believing otherwise is ridiculous. The Gallente invented magnetic weaponry, both Blasters and Railguns. the Caldari adopted both, as well as maintaining their love for missiles. Space combat does not mirror what fighting is like on the ground, though. Every single empire has used, and still uses, conventional projectile small-arms. They are the most cost effective and easily manufactured firearms available, while still being very lethal thanks to modern materials and technologies. This is Canon, pure and simple. That being said, even in EVE it is common to see railgun fit gallente ships, or blaster fit caldari ones, and I'm taking NPC's, not just players. It is completely rational to expect that personal weaponry, regardless of empire, would fit tactical roles. If a certain type of weapon fit a tactical role better than another, it would absolutely be favored. Why would a Caldari soldier breaching a room have a railgun? Why not have a plasma weapon that has far more stopping power at the appropriate range you will be engaging? What if there are other people, and rail rounds might overpenetrate and kill someone? Plasma bolts vent the moment they hit something, so no danger of that. Do you then think that a Caldari unit would go buy Gallente weapons just to fill that role? Hell no, they have all the same technology to make their own. Are you getting what I'm saying? Then if that's the case, where are the Caldari Navy Blasters? Also, there's not a single Caldari named Turret or weapon that is blaster based. You clearly know nothing. Also, I said that they use them, just not as much as rails. and blasters don't use bullets, they use charges of whatever, which is superheated to a plasma form then shot. Insult me as you please, but actually use logic when insulting me. Thanks.
Just because there is no Caldari Navy blaster on an LP store, does not invalidate lore.
I know blasters don't use bullets, that was just an attention grabber. The point still stands: on the ground, every race use bullet shooting rifles, amongst others.
i assure you that between my time in EVE, and having read through every chronicle, short story, and novella CCP has written, i know my fair share.
I wasn't trying to insult you, but if you can't see the logic that's your problem.
Playing since 1st batch of closed beta keys.
|
Godin Thekiller
shadows of 514
2586
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 05:57:00 -
[25] - Quote
Dagger-Two wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Dagger-Two wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:
10: Caldari don't really use blasters much, nor do they make them, so why would they have their own? Also, Why would it be binded to the hull type? Wouldn't it be for whoever made the actual turret?
Ugh. Yes, Godin. Yes they do. This is why you think idea no. 1 makes no sense; because you don't understand EVE lore with regards to weaponry, especially personal weaponry. EVERYONE uses bullets. Space combat aside, none of the empires restrict themselves to one type of weapon. Not only is there lore to back this up, believing otherwise is ridiculous. The Gallente invented magnetic weaponry, both Blasters and Railguns. the Caldari adopted both, as well as maintaining their love for missiles. Space combat does not mirror what fighting is like on the ground, though. Every single empire has used, and still uses, conventional projectile small-arms. They are the most cost effective and easily manufactured firearms available, while still being very lethal thanks to modern materials and technologies. This is Canon, pure and simple. That being said, even in EVE it is common to see railgun fit gallente ships, or blaster fit caldari ones, and I'm taking NPC's, not just players. It is completely rational to expect that personal weaponry, regardless of empire, would fit tactical roles. If a certain type of weapon fit a tactical role better than another, it would absolutely be favored. Why would a Caldari soldier breaching a room have a railgun? Why not have a plasma weapon that has far more stopping power at the appropriate range you will be engaging? What if there are other people, and rail rounds might overpenetrate and kill someone? Plasma bolts vent the moment they hit something, so no danger of that. Do you then think that a Caldari unit would go buy Gallente weapons just to fill that role? Hell no, they have all the same technology to make their own. Are you getting what I'm saying? Then if that's the case, where are the Caldari Navy Blasters? Also, there's not a single Caldari named Turret or weapon that is blaster based. You clearly know nothing. Also, I said that they use them, just not as much as rails. and blasters don't use bullets, they use charges of whatever, which is superheated to a plasma form then shot. Insult me as you please, but actually use logic when insulting me. Thanks. Just because there is no Caldari Navy blaster on an LP store, does not invalidate lore. I know blasters don't use bullets, that was just an attention grabber. The point still stands: on the ground, every race use bullet shooting rifles, amongst others. i assure you that between my time in EVE, and having read through every chronicle, short story, and novella CCP has written, i know my fair share. I wasn't trying to insult you, but if you can't see the logic that's your problem.
Your logic is that they do, when they in fact don't, otherwise they would show it, but they don't, ever. So therefore, I call bullshit.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Dagger-Two
Tharumec
279
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 06:22:00 -
[26] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Dagger-Two wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Dagger-Two wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:
10: Caldari don't really use blasters much, nor do they make them, so why would they have their own? Also, Why would it be binded to the hull type? Wouldn't it be for whoever made the actual turret?
Ugh. Yes, Godin. Yes they do. This is why you think idea no. 1 makes no sense; because you don't understand EVE lore with regards to weaponry, especially personal weaponry. EVERYONE uses bullets. Space combat aside, none of the empires restrict themselves to one type of weapon. Not only is there lore to back this up, believing otherwise is ridiculous. The Gallente invented magnetic weaponry, both Blasters and Railguns. the Caldari adopted both, as well as maintaining their love for missiles. Space combat does not mirror what fighting is like on the ground, though. Every single empire has used, and still uses, conventional projectile small-arms. They are the most cost effective and easily manufactured firearms available, while still being very lethal thanks to modern materials and technologies. This is Canon, pure and simple. That being said, even in EVE it is common to see railgun fit gallente ships, or blaster fit caldari ones, and I'm taking NPC's, not just players. It is completely rational to expect that personal weaponry, regardless of empire, would fit tactical roles. If a certain type of weapon fit a tactical role better than another, it would absolutely be favored. Why would a Caldari soldier breaching a room have a railgun? Why not have a plasma weapon that has far more stopping power at the appropriate range you will be engaging? What if there are other people, and rail rounds might overpenetrate and kill someone? Plasma bolts vent the moment they hit something, so no danger of that. Do you then think that a Caldari unit would go buy Gallente weapons just to fill that role? Hell no, they have all the same technology to make their own. Are you getting what I'm saying? Then if that's the case, where are the Caldari Navy Blasters? Also, there's not a single Caldari named Turret or weapon that is blaster based. You clearly know nothing. Also, I said that they use them, just not as much as rails. and blasters don't use bullets, they use charges of whatever, which is superheated to a plasma form then shot. Insult me as you please, but actually use logic when insulting me. Thanks. Just because there is no Caldari Navy blaster on an LP store, does not invalidate lore. I know blasters don't use bullets, that was just an attention grabber. The point still stands: on the ground, every race use bullet shooting rifles, amongst others. i assure you that between my time in EVE, and having read through every chronicle, short story, and novella CCP has written, i know my fair share. I wasn't trying to insult you, but if you can't see the logic that's your problem. Your logic is that they do, when they in fact don't, otherwise they would show it, but they don't, ever. So therefore, I call bullshit.
It physically pains me that you're making me stay up so I can give you examples how how wrong you are, but I'll get over it.
From the story 'Theodicy' : (Hint: The guards are Amarrian)
He ran through crowds of flashing knives and spilled blood; past men clutching at their Glaive-collars with one hand and bashing Amarrians with the other. With abdominal pain intensifying every step, he hurled himself into a lift and shut the door. The elevator began rocketing upwards amidst a hail of bullets. Guards filed into a second lift and gave chase.
Or from Templar One, when Vince is training with some weapons:
"Arrayed before him were plasma rifles, arc cannons, various explosives, and electronics, all of which he could explain the inner workings of in intimate detail, down to the smallest nuance"
And while, granted, it never says a MAKE for the plasma rifles, do you REALLY think they're Gallentean?
At an Imperial Armaments training facility?
Teaching a Templar of all things?
Playing since 1st batch of closed beta keys.
|
emm kay
Binary Mercs Canis Eliminatus Operatives
110
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 17:41:00 -
[27] - Quote
Dagger-Two wrote:
EVERYONE uses bullets.
Except the amarrians. They loves them some lasers
EDIT: I'm also taking to post to let people know that this thread is for suggestions. No matter how hard you argue, I will NOT take them off the list. If you have your own Ideas, post them here. Even if they have already been said. let's please rre-rail this thread.
--
You called, sir?
|
Spectre-M
The Generals
514
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 20:04:00 -
[28] - Quote
I'll take one of everything. I have a PC and ps4 but would love to see a port as well with proper kbm support. If valkery is on ps4, I see no reason they can't do the same for Legion.
|
Hecarim Van Hohen
1526
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 20:16:00 -
[29] - Quote
- More than two heavy weapons
"Let justice be done. Though the heavens fall."
|
Godin Thekiller
shadows of 514
2597
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 20:24:00 -
[30] - Quote
Dagger-Two wrote:
It physically pains me that you're making me stay up so I can give you examples how how wrong you are, but I'll get over it.
From the story 'Theodicy' : (Hint: The guards are Amarrian)
He ran through crowds of flashing knives and spilled blood; past men clutching at their Glaive-collars with one hand and bashing Amarrians with the other. With abdominal pain intensifying every step, he hurled himself into a lift and shut the door. The elevator began rocketing upwards amidst a hail of bullets. Guards filed into a second lift and gave chase.
Or from Templar One, when Vince is training with some weapons:
"Arrayed before him were plasma rifles, arc cannons, various explosives, and electronics, all of which he could explain the inner workings of in intimate detail, down to the smallest nuance"
And while, granted, it never says a MAKE for the plasma rifles, do you REALLY think they're Gallentean?
At an Imperial Armaments training facility?
Teaching a Templar of all things?
lol. I want you to think about all of that, and why it's so wrong..........
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |