Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Harpyja
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1802
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 16:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
If Scouts are outperforming other suits, how about limiting them to sidearms only (and making the shotgun a sidearm)?
It'd make sense: Heavies - heavy weapons Mediums - light weapons Lights (or just Scouts) - sidearms
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
1270
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 17:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sure! But while you're at it, also limit:
* Tanks to Rail Turrets * Dropships to Transport * HMGs to 10 meters * Logis to Reppers
This way, Scouts won't be alone when they walk out on Dust.
Personally, I like Rattati's approach a 'bit more than yours. But what do I know?
Shoot scout with yes...
- Ripley Riley
|
Forever ETC
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
494
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 18:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Only if they can dual wield them. Magsec on my left and Scrambler Pistol on my right.
Lock me Bro. I DARE YOU!!!
For PS News Join This Channel
|
Spartan MK420
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
461
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 18:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
-5
I love my shotgun, and others love their plc. XD
Support Balancing scouts
|
Harpyja
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1803
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 18:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
Forever ETC wrote:Only if they can dual wield them. Magsec on my left and Scrambler Pistol on my right. They still keep their two weapon slots, so yes you can
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
3182
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 18:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
No we had this discussion aswell for logis when they where the commonly used thing. And every 1 admitts that it is stupid as hell. And i do like to use Av weapons as a scout which allows me to sneak up to tanks without getting murdered. |
TheEnd762
Sver true blood Dirt Nap Squad.
498
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 18:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Not unless they make the Sniper Rifle a sidearm as well. |
Gemini Cuspid
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
76
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 20:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:If Scouts are outperforming other suits, how about limiting them to sidearms only (and making the shotgun a sidearm)?
It'd make sense: Heavies - heavy weapons Mediums - light weapons Lights (or just Scouts) - sidearms It's not a question of the weapon itself but the accumulation of how the scout bonuses in conjunction with specific equipment and the inability of CCP to address cloak bugs that creates the overall overpopulation of scouts. If you can make a scout outperform what an assault suit does with bigger advantages in being undetectable, then that's the problem area.
Add to it that nerfs on active scanners doesn't really do much to help you avoid them either and even if they weren't nerf you can pretty much assure yourself of 100% being invisible to scanners once your cloak is active.
And there in lays the problem: any fix to this particular issue itself means addressing tons of equipment and suits and CCP really sucks at balancing stuff in this game. I haven't really seen them "balance" anything in good, comfortable direction. |
Vicious Minotaur
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
854
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 20:52:00 -
[9] - Quote
If scouts are outperforming other suits, I'd say the onus is on those "other suits."
I am a minotaur.
|
HOWDIDHEKILLME
Dying to Reload
167
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 21:18:00 -
[10] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Sure! But while you're at it, also limit:
* Tanks to Rail Turrets * Dropships to Transport * HMGs to 10 meters * Logis to Reppers
This way, Scouts won't be alone when they walk out on Dust.
I like Rattati's current approach a 'bit more than yours. Scouts are getting nerfed, plenty enough as is. Is it not yet time to sh*t on other classes?
Edit: Don't you drive a Tank? :: facepalm ::
True... shouldn't tanks have to switch to a anti infantry weapon? Rails not good against infantry? Try killing a tank with an assault rifle. And if I jump on a tank a couple times why doesn't it get road killed?
Lonewolf till I die
|
|
JP Acuna
Pendejitos Zero-Day
174
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 01:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
I'd be ok with this, but the Shotgun should remain a light weapon.
This would mean:
1.- The scout playstyle will be for scouting, eWar, squad intel, etc... as it always should have been. 2.- The Shotgun becomes a viable weapon for assaults and commandos (this way being more balanced. It would also make sense then to fit profile dampeners and kincats in medium suits instead of tanking modules, more variety). 3.- Assault suits are interesting again.
I love my scout, but i've been thinking a lot about this. I'd be happy doing scouty stuff instead of slaying people and denying the assault role completely.
+1 |
BLOOD Ruler
The Lionheart Coalition
297
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 01:42:00 -
[12] - Quote
I'm a scout and all I use is nova knives and assault-breach pistol
All eyes on me till you drop dead in your Blood mmmm yummy
|
castba
Penguin's March
459
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 01:46:00 -
[13] - Quote
Tankers giving suggestions to balance infantry. This can only make the game better! |
Harpyja
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1809
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 02:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
castba wrote:Tankers giving suggestions to balance infantry. This can only make the game better! I'm not just a tanker. Yes I'm only specialized into vehicles on this character, but I also have an alt specialized into Amarr assault, on which I've been spending the majority of my time as I cannot stand the vehicle imbalances anymore.
My opinion on infantry balance is valid.
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
castba
Penguin's March
460
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 02:15:00 -
[15] - Quote
Everyone's opinion is valid. One's no more than the next. I guess it just depends whether you can rally enough like minded people or influence the powers that be (or both).
I don't agree although I do see the logic in your point. I would be concerned with shot guns as a sidearm though |
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
965
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 10:00:00 -
[16] - Quote
JP Acuna wrote:I'd be ok with this, but the Shotgun should remain a light weapon.
This would mean:
1.- The scout playstyle will be for scouting, eWar, squad intel, etc... as it always should have been. 2.- The Shotgun becomes a viable weapon for assaults and commandos (this way being more balanced. It would also make sense then to fit profile dampeners and kincats in medium suits instead of tanking modules, more variety). 3.- Assault suits are interesting again.
I love my scout, but i've been thinking a lot about this. I'd be happy doing scouty stuff instead of slaying people and denying the assault role completely.
+1
Its juts scouts CAN'T scout CCP removed the ability to actually scout from scouts. Well maybe apart the glitched Cal scout ut this seems to be a bug.
As CCP removed shared Team view they also removed the ability to scout for your team/squad. Also scanners are more useful for scouting than scouts more range and more precision especially on the gal logi.
To make things worse using a scanner rewards you with WP passive scouting don't. How are scouts supposed to gain WP?
Honestly what needs to go is the scanprofile reduction on Cloaks (I wonder why it was ever there if CCP wanted scouts to be invisible OR unscannable) and that's it mostly.
Maybe change the scanrange bonus on the gal scout to something else. Also IMHO the overpopulation of scouts is a myth. Sure there are more scouts but there are even more heavies out there and even lots of assaults and logis.
Just because a scout kills you (btw still the best way to earn WP as scout ) it does not mean there are huge problems with them...
There is a strong feeling that brick tanked scouts should go funny enough that this is only true for armor tanked scouts a scout with 500 Hp (or more) in shields with 50 Hp/s regen seems ok .
IMHO even brick tanked scouts are ok they are easy targets. and they are not faster with more Hp than their assault counterparts...plus you have to consider that CCP never rebalanced assault suits to match the current balance pass... |
MINA Longstrike
818
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 10:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:JP Acuna wrote:I'd be ok with this, but the Shotgun should remain a light weapon.
This would mean:
1.- The scout playstyle will be for scouting, eWar, squad intel, etc... as it always should have been. 2.- The Shotgun becomes a viable weapon for assaults and commandos (this way being more balanced. It would also make sense then to fit profile dampeners and kincats in medium suits instead of tanking modules, more variety). 3.- Assault suits are interesting again.
I love my scout, but i've been thinking a lot about this. I'd be happy doing scouty stuff instead of slaying people and denying the assault role completely.
+1 Its juts scouts CAN'T scout CCP removed the ability to actually scout from scouts. Well maybe apart the glitched Cal scout ut this seems to be a bug. As CCP removed shared Team view they also removed the ability to scout for your team/squad. Also scanners are more useful for scouting than scouts more range and more precision especially on the gal logi. To make things worse using a scanner rewards you with WP passive scouting don't. How are scouts supposed to gain WP? Honestly what needs to go is the scanprofile reduction on Cloaks (I wonder why it was ever there if CCP wanted scouts to be invisible OR unscannable) and that's it mostly. Maybe change the scanrange bonus on the gal scout to something else. Also IMHO the overpopulation of scouts is a myth. Sure there are more scouts but there are even more heavies out there and even lots of assaults and logis. Just because a scout kills you (btw still the best way to earn WP as scout ) it does not mean there are huge problems with them... There is a strong feeling that brick tanked scouts should go funny enough that this is only true for armor tanked scouts a scout with 500 Hp (or more) in shields with 50 Hp/s regen seems ok . IMHO even brick tanked scouts are ok they are easy targets. and they are not faster with more Hp than their assault counterparts...plus you have to consider that CCP never rebalanced assault suits to match the current balance pass...
Overpopulation of scouts is *not* a myth, I have had plenty of games in the last few weeks where I have ran into teams where 8+ people were using scout suits with shotguns or assault combat rifles and remote explosives. It is so insanely easy it isn't even funny, it's near impossible to deal with because it's very easy to lose track of one scout (and they'll *always* have the choice of when to re-engage you because EWAR is ****ing awful for non-light suits) or while you're attempted to deal with one another runs up and shoots you in the back.
The cloak is not a defensive tool this can be demonstrated brilliantly here and here. It is infact a very, very powerful offensive tool which other suits have limited to *NO* ability to deal with and when combined with the fact that scouts can grab HP totals compareable to the best that medium frames have to offer while being faster and stealthier and *still* having their choice of equipment the problem is exacerbated.
Have you tried playing solo in a skirmish or domination match while 5+ scouts are running around? You are useless unless you yourself are also a scout (preferably a gallente or caldari scout).
Scouts are broken, largely because EWAR is broken and the playerbase of dust loves doing things that are oriented towards outright destroying the experience for other players.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
Assassin Khul
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 11:13:00 -
[18] - Quote
JP Acuna wrote:I'd be ok with this, but the Shotgun should remain a light weapon.
This would mean:
1.- The scout playstyle will be for scouting, eWar, squad intel, etc... as it always should have been. 2.- The Shotgun becomes a viable weapon for assaults and commandos (this way being more balanced. It would also make sense then to fit profile dampeners and kincats in medium suits instead of tanking modules, more variety). 3.- Assault suits are interesting again.
I love my scout, but i've been thinking a lot about this. I'd be happy doing scouty stuff instead of slaying people and denying the assault role completely.
+1 No heavies with shotgun.
Hate Caldari,Heavies and tanks,with dropships.Love speed kills and Deaths.If I see a heavy I will knife it
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
965
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 11:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Korvin Lomont wrote:JP Acuna wrote:I'd be ok with this, but the Shotgun should remain a light weapon.
This would mean:
1.- The scout playstyle will be for scouting, eWar, squad intel, etc... as it always should have been. 2.- The Shotgun becomes a viable weapon for assaults and commandos (this way being more balanced. It would also make sense then to fit profile dampeners and kincats in medium suits instead of tanking modules, more variety). 3.- Assault suits are interesting again.
I love my scout, but i've been thinking a lot about this. I'd be happy doing scouty stuff instead of slaying people and denying the assault role completely.
+1 Its juts scouts CAN'T scout CCP removed the ability to actually scout from scouts. Well maybe apart the glitched Cal scout ut this seems to be a bug. As CCP removed shared Team view they also removed the ability to scout for your team/squad. Also scanners are more useful for scouting than scouts more range and more precision especially on the gal logi. To make things worse using a scanner rewards you with WP passive scouting don't. How are scouts supposed to gain WP? Honestly what needs to go is the scanprofile reduction on Cloaks (I wonder why it was ever there if CCP wanted scouts to be invisible OR unscannable) and that's it mostly. Maybe change the scanrange bonus on the gal scout to something else. Also IMHO the overpopulation of scouts is a myth. Sure there are more scouts but there are even more heavies out there and even lots of assaults and logis. Just because a scout kills you (btw still the best way to earn WP as scout ) it does not mean there are huge problems with them... There is a strong feeling that brick tanked scouts should go funny enough that this is only true for armor tanked scouts a scout with 500 Hp (or more) in shields with 50 Hp/s regen seems ok . IMHO even brick tanked scouts are ok they are easy targets. and they are not faster with more Hp than their assault counterparts...plus you have to consider that CCP never rebalanced assault suits to match the current balance pass... Overpopulation of scouts is *not* a myth, I have had plenty of games in the last few weeks where I have ran into teams where 8+ people were using scout suits with shotguns or assault combat rifles and remote explosives. It is so insanely easy it isn't even funny, it's near impossible to deal with because it's very easy to lose track of one scout (and they'll *always* have the choice of when to re-engage you because EWAR is ****ing awful for non-light suits) or while you're attempted to deal with one another runs up and shoots you in the back. The cloak is not a defensive tool this can be demonstrated brilliantly here and here. It is infact a very, very powerful offensive tool which other suits have limited to *NO* ability to deal with and when combined with the fact that scouts can grab HP totals compareable to the best that medium frames have to offer while being faster and stealthier and *still* having their choice of equipment the problem is exacerbated. As Judge demonstrates in the first mover video you can play like a ****ing idiot and still be met with success because cloaking is blatantly overpowered (those are my words, not his), now imagine what happens when you play like a competent player with a squad of friends doing the same? Have you tried playing solo in a skirmish or domination match while 5+ scouts are running around? You are useless unless you yourself are also a scout (preferably a gallente or caldari scout). Scouts are broken, largely because EWAR is broken, the sheer amount of buffs that scouts got as a whole and because the playerbase of dust loves doing things that are oriented towards outright destroying the experience for other players.
Hmm may be I am just lucky to be thrown in matches with 8 + heavies plus logis behind them . |
MINA Longstrike
818
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 11:33:00 -
[20] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:Hmm may be I am just lucky to be thrown in matches with 8 + heavies plus logis behind them .
I've gotten a few of those, and honestly they're preferable to the scout crap - at least you can see who and where to shoot, they're not exactly hiding from you.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
1310
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 12:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
You guys are beating a dead Scout. We're already getting nerf hammered; no further action needed.
Hotfix Alpha will unbunch lots of panties (ours included). Scouts don't want to be FoTM; we want balance.
Which begs the question, what do Tankers want? Harpyja?
Shoot scout with yes...
- Ripley Riley
|
Harpyja
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1814
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 13:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:You guys are beating a dead Scout. We're already getting nerf hammered; no further action needed.
Hotfix Alpha will unbunch lots of panties (ours included). Scouts don't want to be FoTM; we want balance.
Which begs the question, what do Tankers want? Harpyja? I do not speak on behalf of every tanker. I also want balance.
First of all, I want SP investment to be meaningful and to require SP investment to be able to make an OK-decent fit. Someone with 0 SP shouldn't be able to destroy any tank out there just as quickly as someone with 10+ million SP. It has now become "whoever has more damage from their railgun and shoots first wins."
Second, armor reps need to become active. Passive reps are stupid as they can give a lot more passive tank than a shield tank. Which also brings up triple rep Maddies. They get a constant 500 hp/s with maxed skills while I only get 168hp/s that is completely unaffected by skills and modules* and interrupted by any AV (even locus grenades stop my regen). I have to pull out when swarms start hitting me while they can sit there and absorb it.
Third, large railguns and blasters need damage nerfs.
Fourth, damage mods need to revert to a low passive 10% module.
And fifth, there needs to be a proper tier system. A MLT/STD module should not be as effective as a PRO module (which goes back to #1 asking for SP investment to be worthwhile and required for better fits)
Also, swarms need higher speed.
*A lot of our modules were taken away in 1.7 for the first balance pass, and it seems like we won't get them back for a long time, if ever. Right now I can only fit ammo units in my lows because those are the only meaningful things I can fit. While armor vehicles get to choose from scanners, fuel injectors, damage mods, and mCRUs.
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
1311
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 14:52:00 -
[23] - Quote
Harpyja wrote: I do not speak on behalf of every tanker. I also want balance.
You want balance!? Clearly, you do not speak on behalf of most tankers :-)
Seriously though, Scouts are in for a big hit. We very well may end up broken. Again.
Regardless, the FoTM crowd will soon be scrambling for a new suit.
Shoot scout with yes...
- Ripley Riley
|
Cross Atu
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2222
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 16:16:00 -
[24] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:If Scouts are outperforming other suits, how about limiting them to sidearms only (and making the shotgun a sidearm)?
It'd make sense: Heavies - heavy weapons Mediums - light weapons Lights (or just Scouts) - sidearms
I'm a firm believer in diplomacy and conversation, so if you'd care to elaborate more deeply on why your idea promotes actual game balance please do so and I'll be happen to listen.
That being said I have a general request of both the OP and the rest of the forums; Can we stop all of the "sidearm only will fix it" talk? It's not an effective idea for Logi, it's not an effective idea for scouts, and while yes it would be more viable if you indeed pushed the Shotty into the sidearm slot that's not only very limiting to possible light frame builds but it's also going to make assault suits into a LW + Shotgun and if we're really going to have them overlap that way with the commando let's just do it outright not through the back door.
Adipem Nothi wrote:Sure! But while you're at it, also limit:
* Tanks to Rail Turrets * Dropships to Transport * HMGs to 10 meters * Logis to Reppers
This way, Scouts won't be alone when they walk out on Dust. Effective, well except maybe for the first point, because that's pretty much where HAVs are already if we're addressing the PC meta Still, point well made.
Adipem Nothi wrote: I like Rattati's current approach a 'bit more than yours. Scouts are getting nerfed plenty enough as is. Is it not yet time to sh*t on other classes?
I agree about Rattati's work and further it'd be great if the cycle of "nerf the front runner" were exchanged for some role focus, wouldn't it?
/at thread: We have hotfix Alpha deploying in a matter of hours let's give that a couple of weeks to see what effects it has and then come back to the table. Will more balance be needed somewhere in the game after Alpha? Of course. But we can more effectively provide that feedback after we see where things stand post deployment.
0.02 ISK Cross
Cross Atu for CPM1- An emergent candidate
|
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
3187
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 16:20:00 -
[25] - Quote
lol about making the shotgun a heavy weapon. Ok go ahead and use a shotgun on a heavy suit and tell me how it is working out for ya. The last time i saw heavys with shotguns they went something like 1-15. |
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
1322
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 16:29:00 -
[26] - Quote
Cross Atu for CPM!
Shoot scout with yes...
- Ripley Riley
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
13963
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 18:16:00 -
[27] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:You guys are beating a dead Scout. We're already getting nerf hammered; no further action needed.
The 'nerfhammer' really isn't that bad...
But this sidearm crap? What the hell.
We had all this bitching about the logis and I'd hoped that everyone had realised how bloody awful the idea was by now.
You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
Cross Atu for CPM1
|
Scheneighnay McBob
T.R.I.A.D Ushra'Khan
5142
|
Posted - 2014.06.03 21:20:00 -
[28] - Quote
Possibly on a future, e-war oriented T2 or T3 child of the scout, but not on scouts.
péñpâ¦pé+pâìpââpâêpü«tÄﵺÿpüïpéÅpüäpüä
|
|
CCP Rattati
C C P C C P Alliance
2069
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 05:09:00 -
[29] - Quote
I think the inherent strength of DUST 514 is the fitting freedom and I don't like hardcoding these choices. However, because it is hard to create weapons for classes like the Assault, without making them equally good for Scouts or Commandos.
In fact, I have been advocating that we allow almost all choices across weapons and roles, but with limitations and penalties. Maybe not the extremes of HMG wielding Scouts, but a 25% fitting penalty across roles, or something like that. Sure, the sentinel can use the CR but it's made for smaller frames and it's not optimized for the bulky heavy. Same could go for a lot of things, for example Rifles in the hands of Logis, they should excel at support weapons but maybe not rifles and then incur a penalty. You can fit them, but your choice will be at the expense of your Logi efficiency and that may cause you to think it over, and just use the Assault for assaulting.
These are still just my thoughts on the topic, and we are not doing any of this imminently.
"As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"
|
|
Toby Flenderson
research lab
542
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 05:19:00 -
[30] - Quote
This wouldn't even affect me. I have 3/4 of the scout suits and not one of my scout fittings use a primary. You don't need primary weapons to do well with a scout. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |