Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1731
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 20:54:00 -
[31] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Oh snap! Do swarms! Do swarms with math! Hurry!
There really isn't a point to work out the math on swarm damage, IICR, they aren't correctly applying damage.
I keep waiting for a hotfix for it... but the hotfix never comes
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
Matticus Monk
Ordus Trismegistus
1674
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 20:55:00 -
[32] - Quote
^ why quit while you're behind when you can dig that grave a few feet deeper.
I ignore tanks. Unless I feel like laying down some kung-fu JLA/V....
Double posting like a Kaiser.
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
391
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 20:57:00 -
[33] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Amazing Pothead is a One Percenter (see Tanker Survey). Anyone want to take a stab at where Taki and Spkr go? I suppose you go to the 0% no brain at all? Do you realize what you just said? (Now we know which bin you go in). I realize perfectly. Pretty sure you don't so I'll give you a hint ... it has something to do with 0%. Don't strain that mind, Tanker. Let it go if you must. I'll also give you a hint, it also has something to do with 0%.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
9497
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:02:00 -
[34] - Quote
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:If a single av specialist can't kill a single tanker.... Then why would the av specialist ever exist. The tanker is superior in every way, having better av than the av'er while having the best anti infantry in the game as well compared to the pathetic anti infantry of the av'er.
You could say that cost would be a good reason to use an av fit over a tank. This is untrue for 2 reasons- 1. Obviously a proto av weapon, the only ones worth a single damn, are more expensive than tanks... 2. And more importantly since 1. Is likely to change, cost does not matter for us. Even if everyone had 10 mil isk we still wouldn't care about cost if we wanted to kill something. We'd just use the best option avaiable like always.
THIS. Is the reason av is completely broken. Because every AVer is sitting in a tank. Because you can't be selfish and say"well it should take 3 people to take me out! Because I spent 500k isk on this!" Because when you do that, there's no reason those 3 people won't do the exact same thing you're doing. If you can't deal with the fact that there is role SPECIFICALLY MADE to beat ONLY your role, and think it should take 3 or more of these guys WHOSE ONLY ROLE is to kill YOU, then perhaps you shouldn't be playing online games. You're probably better off playing a single player game, where entire campaigns of enemies can't kill you.
Now then, since av is broken, back to sitting in my tank. Exploiting the idiocy of the forums influence on CCP 1 unlucky merc in front of a blaster at a time.
I had a Kaalakiota forge gunner solo my Soma.... I was taking almost 1600 damage per swarm volley from a Min Commando with s Swarm Launcher.
AV is still punchy, still very viable..... what makes AV not viable is a meta that dictates and allows an HAV to rep 300+ armour a second constantly without a down time.
Current AV values would have been great against a 1.6 tanking model.
"Get thine Swag out of my face! Next you'll be writing #YOLOswagforJamyl in all your posts!"
-Dagger Two
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
239
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:02:00 -
[35] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote: I'll give you a hint ...
Have you considered a career with Red Star?
Bang?
|
Virtual Riot
Rebels New Republic INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
342
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:02:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Oh snap! Do swarms! Do swarms with math! Hurry! There really isn't a point to work out the math on swarm damage, IICR, they aren't correctly applying damage. I keep waiting for a hotfix for it... but the hotfix never comes
Yeahhh, this
I mean I could make a post on it, but swarms don't even work correctly, so it wouldn't really be a true representation. :(
Fixing FGs > all
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
391
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:03:00 -
[37] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Amazing Pothead is a One Percenter (see Tanker Survey). Anyone want to take a stab at where Taki and Spkr go? I suppose you go to the 0% no brain at all? Let me spell it out for you. You said he was 0% in the no brain category. That puts him at 100% full brain. That puts you in the 100% doesn't know how to get his idea across category. If you are going to make silly comments and attack people, you should at least take the time to do it right and say what you mean. I'm actually not attacking anyone, I let them do it for themselves. But I don't find it funny how he was directly attacking 2 people. But I guess whateva, have a nice day, or something.
PS. Oh please do tell me how I avoided your argument and insult because reasons.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
6730
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:05:00 -
[38] - Quote
Virtual Riot wrote:Ripley Riley wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Oh snap! Do swarms! Do swarms with math! Hurry! There really isn't a point to work out the math on swarm damage, IICR, they aren't correctly applying damage. I keep waiting for a hotfix for it... but the hotfix never comes Yeahhh, this I mean I could make a post on it, but swarms don't even work correctly, so it wouldn't really be a true representation. :( To my knowledge, Swarm Launchers were only applying damage incorrectly to Dropships, which has been fixed for everything but the Gorgon, Grimsnes, and Incubus.
#LivingLikeLarry
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
391
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:05:00 -
[39] - Quote
Matticus Monk wrote:One Eyed King wrote:
If you are going to make silly comments and attack people, you should at least take the time to do it right and say what you mean.
^ why quit while you're behind when you can dig that hole a few feet deeper? I ignore tanks. Unless I feel like laying down some kung-fu JLA/V.... I know it was directed at me but man that was funny! Have my like, sir!
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
391
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:08:00 -
[40] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote: I'll give you a hint ...
Have you considered a career with Red Star? Big blue donut is so much better cause I have no gungame...
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
|
Hecarim Van Hohen
Bullet Cluster Lokun Listamenn
998
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:12:00 -
[41] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:AV can still hack an objective, and a red dot can't pick up their forge or swarm. Awfully hard to hack points if you can't make it past the HAV's alive
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:A proto FG is not more expenisve than a fully fitted tank - 57k is not more than 70k for example
I think you forgot to add the price of the suit that carries the said proto FG making it (in most cases anyways) more expensive than your ~70k HAV (which is impervious to small arms fire, moves faster than any suit and has the most EHP in the game while dishing out the most dps and has what, 2-3 soft counters and 2 hard counters?)
Please forgive me my tanker overlords for uttering these blasphemous words, have mercy
"Now I am become Dev, the locker of threads."
-CCP Logibro
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
391
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
Hecarim Van Hohen wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:AV can still hack an objective, and a red dot can't pick up their forge or swarm. Awfully hard to hack points if you can't make it past the HAV's alive Takahiro Kashuken wrote:A proto FG is not more expenisve than a fully fitted tank - 57k is not more than 70k for example
I think you forgot to add the price of the suit that carries the said proto FG making it (in most cases anyways) more expensive than your ~70k HAV (which is impervious to small arms fire, moves faster than any suit and has the most EHP in the game while dishing out the most dps and has what, 2-3 soft counters and 2 hard counters?) Please forgive me my tanker overlords for uttering these blasphemous words, have mercy You are forgiven but think about the weaknesses that we have, oh, right, from infantry viewpoint we have no weaknesses. Well, umm, right, we don't, that's why we never die, that's why I have X kills and 0 deaths. I'm immortal, I'm a god! Edit: also my tank can go anywhere I want, you are not safe!
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
Nothing Certain
Bioshock Rejects
481
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:20:00 -
[43] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:So im a proto heavy in 2 suits - Caldari/Gallente With proto FG - Love the breach, has the ability to 1 shot all unhardened vehicles So the tank is better that me in certain ways - Its faster than me unless i use a LAV, it can cause more damage than me with a rail because its a large rail unless i use breach, its has better resistances to infantry and damage with lolhardeners A proto FG is not more expenisve than a fully fitted tank - 57k is not more than 70k for example AV is broken because vehicles are broken, CCP doesnt know where it want to go tbh This is the only answer, with it brings more skills/mods/vehicles/AV weapons/variety/playstyles Part 1: Engineering & CapacitorsPart 2: Armor & ShieldPart 3: Modules & SkillsPart 4: VehiclesPart 5: Overview
The only tank capable of being one shotted by a forge is an unhardeneded Sica with no plate and no extender. This requires a proto Breach Forge, level 5, prof. 5, and the shot must hit the tanks fuel cell. This is the only tank and only scenario that can be one shotted by a forge. Prof.4 and it doesn't work, Soma and it doesn't work, miss the fuel cells, not even close. Get your facts correct.
Because, that's why.
|
Henchmen21
Planet Express LLC
925
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:21:00 -
[44] - Quote
Large blasters are the problem, using one makes you the problem. You have a problem with infantry AV and have to tank use a rail and solve the problem. Don't exacerbate it.
Your game f'ing sucks, but I'll still play it.... damn you!
Henchmen21: Infantry
Gotyougood Ufkr: Vehicles
|
Virtual Riot
Rebels New Republic INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
342
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:21:00 -
[45] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Virtual Riot wrote:Ripley Riley wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Oh snap! Do swarms! Do swarms with math! Hurry! There really isn't a point to work out the math on swarm damage, IICR, they aren't correctly applying damage. I keep waiting for a hotfix for it... but the hotfix never comes Yeahhh, this I mean I could make a post on it, but swarms don't even work correctly, so it wouldn't really be a true representation. :( To my knowledge, Swarm Launchers were only applying damage incorrectly to Dropships, which has been fixed for everything but the Gorgon, Grimsnes, and Incubus.
Really? huh, well maybe I will do it, but I have a question for you sir, with the forge gun vs maddy post I did it on a heavy Ck.0
should I do it on a suit with 5 high slots for the SL vs maddy post? or same suit
Fixing FGs > all
|
Matticus Monk
Ordus Trismegistus
1676
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:23:00 -
[46] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:Matticus Monk wrote:One Eyed King wrote:
If you are going to make silly comments and attack people, you should at least take the time to do it right and say what you mean.
^ why quit while you're behind when you can dig that hole a few feet deeper? I ignore tanks. Unless I feel like laying down some kung-fu JLA/V.... I know it was directed at me but man that was funny! Have my like, sir!
LOL!
All in all, mercs having a good time on the 514ums.
Double posting like a Kaiser.
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
392
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:28:00 -
[47] - Quote
Virtual Riot wrote:Atiim wrote:Virtual Riot wrote:Ripley Riley wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Oh snap! Do swarms! Do swarms with math! Hurry! There really isn't a point to work out the math on swarm damage, IICR, they aren't correctly applying damage. I keep waiting for a hotfix for it... but the hotfix never comes Yeahhh, this I mean I could make a post on it, but swarms don't even work correctly, so it wouldn't really be a true representation. :( To my knowledge, Swarm Launchers were only applying damage incorrectly to Dropships, which has been fixed for everything but the Gorgon, Grimsnes, and Incubus. Really? huh, well maybe I will do it, but I have a question for you sir, with the forge gun vs maddy post I did it on a heavy Ck.0 should I do it on a suit with 5 high slots for the SL vs maddy post? or same suit Didn't ask me but my 0.02 ISK goes to proto minmando.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
MarasdF Loron
Fatal Absolution Dirt Nap Squad.
392
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:33:00 -
[48] - Quote
Matticus Monk wrote:MarasdF Loron wrote:Matticus Monk wrote:One Eyed King wrote:
If you are going to make silly comments and attack people, you should at least take the time to do it right and say what you mean.
^ why quit while you're behind when you can dig that hole a few feet deeper? I ignore tanks. Unless I feel like laying down some kung-fu JLA/V.... I know it was directed at me but man that was funny! Have my like, sir! LOL! All in all, mercs having a good time on the 514ums. I always come here to enjoy the 514ums when I cannot enjoy the game for one reason or the other, but all in all, if I ever say something that seems quite bitter/serious that is not concerning bugs, it should be taken with a grain of salt. I come here for laughs, not to rage, it's funny tho to get people into making very srs arguments, but it's even funnier when they are not that serious, just like yours.
R.I.P. Pre-1.7 Vehicles & AV, you will be missed.
|
Hecarim Van Hohen
Bullet Cluster Lokun Listamenn
999
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:39:00 -
[49] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote:Hecarim Van Hohen wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:AV can still hack an objective, and a red dot can't pick up their forge or swarm. Awfully hard to hack points if you can't make it past the HAV's alive Takahiro Kashuken wrote:A proto FG is not more expenisve than a fully fitted tank - 57k is not more than 70k for example
I think you forgot to add the price of the suit that carries the said proto FG making it (in most cases anyways) more expensive than your ~70k HAV (which is impervious to small arms fire, moves faster than any suit and has the most EHP in the game while dishing out the most dps and has what, 2-3 soft counters and 2 hard counters?) Please forgive me my tanker overlords for uttering these blasphemous words, have mercy You are forgiven but think about the weaknesses that we have, oh, right, from infantry viewpoint we have no weaknesses. Well, umm, right, we don't, that's why we never die, that's why I have X kills and 0 deaths. I'm immortal, I'm a god! Edit: also my tank can go anywhere I want, you are not safe! Thank you o benevolent one for your immeasurable mercy and wisdom, you truly are great and as powerful as the tales say.
Besides RE's and FG's we (the puny, filthy and wretched infantry) really don't have tools to combat HAV's besides hiding Tanks do die, rarely but they do (might just be a local rumor going about) I could probably count areas that are safe from vehicles with fingers on my hands and I wouldn't even have to use them all
I will now retire from this discussion and do my ritual self flagellation to atone for my sins
"Now I am become Dev, the locker of threads."
-CCP Logibro
|
Sylwester Dziewiecki
Interregnum.
273
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:40:00 -
[50] - Quote
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:If a single av specialist can't kill a single tanker.... "then he need a friend to kill a tank with him" I thought, and stopped reading (seriously).
I'm here since may 2012, my EVE alter ego is Nosum Hseebnrido.
|
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
244
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:53:00 -
[51] - Quote
Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote:THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:If a single av specialist can't kill a single tanker.... "then he need a friend to kill a tank with him" I thought, and stopped reading (seriously). 2 vs 1 - Poor Odds 3 vs 1 - Fair Odds 4 vs 1 - Good Odds
PSA: Red Star is Recruiting folks who are OK with this.
Bang?
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
9498
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:55:00 -
[52] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote:THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:If a single av specialist can't kill a single tanker.... "then he need a friend to kill a tank with him" I thought, and stopped reading (seriously). 2 vs 1 - Poor Odds 3 vs 1 - Fair Odds 4 vs 1 - Good Odds
If those are your odd then you are bad AVers.
A corpie player solo most of the time and he racks up HAV kill counts by playing smart.
"Get thine Swag out of my face! Next you'll be writing #YOLOswagforJamyl in all your posts!"
-Dagger Two
|
Operative 1171 Aajli
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
1865
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 21:56:00 -
[53] - Quote
MAVs, LAVs, MTACs. Soon plenty of reasons to be AV without invalidating an HAV which should be at the top of the food chain.
The blaster is the problem for infantry. The rail is just OP. Nerf them and we're good.
Brick tanking a scout suit since April 2013!
|
Harpyja
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1584
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:03:00 -
[54] - Quote
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:If a single av specialist can't kill a single tanker.... Then why would the av specialist ever exist. The tanker is superior in every way, having better av than the av'er while having the best anti infantry in the game as well compared to the pathetic anti infantry of the av'er.
You could say that cost would be a good reason to use an av fit over a tank. This is untrue for 2 reasons- 1. Obviously a proto av weapon, the only ones worth a single damn, are more expensive than tanks... 2. And more importantly since 1. Is likely to change, cost does not matter for us. Even if everyone had 10 mil isk we still wouldn't care about cost if we wanted to kill something. We'd just use the best option avaiable like always.
THIS. Is the reason av is completely broken. Because every AVer is sitting in a tank. Because you can't be selfish and say"well it should take 3 people to take me out! Because I spent 500k isk on this!" Because when you do that, there's no reason those 3 people won't do the exact same thing you're doing. If you can't deal with the fact that there is role SPECIFICALLY MADE to beat ONLY your role, and think it should take 3 or more of these guys WHOSE ONLY ROLE is to kill YOU, then perhaps you shouldn't be playing online games. You're probably better off playing a single player game, where entire campaigns of enemies can't kill you.
Now then, since av is broken, back to sitting in my tank. Exploiting the idiocy of the forums influence on CCP 1 unlucky merc in front of a blaster at a time. Look at all of this filth. My tank costs 560k... much more than your proto AV suit. You also only need a proto AV weapon... everything else on that suit is a luxury except for damage mods, which don't inflate the price.
One good forge gunner can solo a tank. Perhaps you're just not good enough?
Anyways, you want to know the reason to skill into infantry AV as opposed to tanks? Well, you already have all of your dropsuit upgrades, so all you need is the AV weapon. As where for tanks, you have to start from 0 SP. It's better to just use all of your dropsuit upgrades and apply them to an infantry AV fitting.
There's one thing we agree with, and it's that militia vehicles and mods are too powerful for their cost, both ISK and SP. Nerf them into the ground, bring back tiers, and let only the dedicated tankers remain on the field that cost more than 5 times your suit. Now, there's no reason for infantry AVers to jump into Sicas because they will get destroyed if anything sneezes at them and skilling into a proper tank will cost more SP than grabbing a proto AV weapon.
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
Alpha 443-6732
General Tso's Alliance
463
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:05:00 -
[55] - Quote
and the triple rep dies effortlessly to my advanced large missile turret
counterplay, ladies and gentlemen
Or are you angry that infantry AV can't handle all situations the best AND be the cheapest at the same time?
Funny how it seems when you turn the situations around |
Pvt Numnutz
R 0 N 1 N
1104
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:07:00 -
[56] - Quote
Hmm interesting point. What about me though? I think it should take 2 skilled av to take down my tank. Why?
Because I use missile tanks, for me to get any effective infantry killing abilities I need at minimum 1 gunner on one of my rails. That means 2 people in my tank if I want good anti infantry then I need 2 gunners, so the equation shifts to 3 guys in a tank vs 2 guys anti vehicle. Seems fair to me. In fact the rail tank is pretty much the same against infantry, the only one that breaks this is a large blaster, however they aren't great against other vehicles.
From my understanding light av is meant as a deterrent to give infantry enough time to get to a location or withdrawal or hide etc. In groups it kills, but solo can help friendly vehicles fight enemy vehicles. Team work? |
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
246
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:11:00 -
[57] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote:THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:If a single av specialist can't kill a single tanker.... "then he need a friend to kill a tank with him" I thought, and stopped reading (seriously). 2 vs 1 - Poor Odds 3 vs 1 - Fair Odds 4 vs 1 - Good Odds If those are your odd then you are bad AVers. A corpie player solo most of the time and he racks up HAV kill counts by playing smart.
Pardon the Alt.
I run Proto Nades and Proto Swarms on a 39.57M SP toon and have been PC active/eligible since 1.0. Pretty sure I've popped your can more than once, if that's any indication of "good".
I don't even try to pull AV anymore unless someone else is engaging armor with me. When I do AV solo, the very vehicles I swarm charge my position. Because AV is that bad.
You and I both know the only serious threat to a Pilot's safety is one another, a serious f*ckup, a lucky JLAV, or a 3+ man effort to take you out. Its bullsh*t and its about d*mn time CCP takes off the training wheels.
Bang?
|
Lynn Beck
Wake N' Bake Inc Top Men.
1159
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:19:00 -
[58] - Quote
My AV does one thing better than a tank, better than remote explosives.
I can deny the entire surrounding AREA to a tank/derpie solo.
If he sits about to try and kill a few more, he dies.
If i want to kill him usin AV, then i need to either outsmart him, or bring friends.
General John Ripper is my 2nd best friend!
|
Guilbert 515
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
30
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:30:00 -
[59] - Quote
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:If a single av specialist can't kill a single tanker.... Then why would the av specialist ever exist. The tanker is superior in every way, having better av than the av'er while having the best anti infantry in the game as well compared to the pathetic anti infantry of the av'er.
You could say that cost would be a good reason to use an av fit over a tank. This is untrue for 2 reasons- 1. Obviously a proto av weapon, the only ones worth a single damn, are more expensive than tanks... 2. And more importantly since 1. Is likely to change, cost does not matter for us. Even if everyone had 10 mil isk we still wouldn't care about cost if we wanted to kill something. We'd just use the best option avaiable like always.
THIS. Is the reason av is completely broken. Because every AVer is sitting in a tank. Because you can't be selfish and say"well it should take 3 people to take me out! Because I spent 500k isk on this!" Because when you do that, there's no reason those 3 people won't do the exact same thing you're doing. If you can't deal with the fact that there is role SPECIFICALLY MADE to beat ONLY your role, and think it should take 3 or more of these guys WHOSE ONLY ROLE is to kill YOU, then perhaps you shouldn't be playing online games. You're probably better off playing a single player game, where entire campaigns of enemies can't kill you.
Now then, since av is broken, back to sitting in my tank. Exploiting the idiocy of the forums influence on CCP 1 unlucky merc in front of a blaster at a time.
Talking about roles to play Since introduction of the new Commando suits, AVing tanks has become much more exciting and challenging. I enjoy the way it is right now. In pubs you might fail to av, if you run without a mixed squad and you rely on the blue to have proper fittings. But in squad tanks are not a big of a disaster as in 1.7. In PC AVing has also become much more entertaining. If you consider tanks a treat make sure to spec into commando and carry a swarm along your prime. Even if im the only AV around my commando does manage to make sure the tank retreats. That is when i run in proto gear.
The only valuable critic i read out of your post is that tanks dont cost a thing. Which is quiet true. For the damage and treat the tank does at the moment in skilled hands its way to cheap. The other point is that militia tanks are not much easier to kill than an advance model. Also basic and advance AV are pretty useless since you cant even make a basic LAV shiver.
Nonetheless I wouldnt consider tanks OP anymore, but a proper threat. Id rather have CCP look into making the basic AV and advance a bit more useful and look into the cost of tanks.
"Please fix drop uplink spam"
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
9500
|
Posted - 2014.04.14 22:36:00 -
[60] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:True Adamance wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote:THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:If a single av specialist can't kill a single tanker.... "then he need a friend to kill a tank with him" I thought, and stopped reading (seriously). 2 vs 1 - Poor Odds 3 vs 1 - Fair Odds 4 vs 1 - Good Odds If those are your odd then you are bad AVers. A corpie player solo most of the time and he racks up HAV kill counts by playing smart. Pardon the Alt. I run Proto Nades and Proto Swarms on a 39.57M SP toon and have been PC active/eligible since 1.0. Pretty sure I've popped your can more than once, if that's any indication of "good". I don't even try to pull AV anymore unless someone else is engaging armor with me. When I do AV solo, the very vehicles I swarm charge my position. Because AV is that bad. You and I both know the only serious threat to a Pilot's safety is one another, a serious f*ckup, a lucky JLAV, or a 3+ man effort to take you out. Its bullsh*t and its about d*mn time CCP takes off the training wheels.
SP doesn't make you a good AVer.
Swarms are not strictly speaking that bad..... I went up against a very canny swarmer yesterday who picked an entrench position with access to sight over a very open area, they coupled that with proxies by the gates to the compound.... I could not approach, and could not move across the open ground without having very potent swarm fire placed on me.
THAT is good AVing. Shutting down and limiting the movement of HAV. Killing and HAV is the eventual goal of course but winning trumps kills every time
"Get thine Swag out of my face! Next you'll be writing #YOLOswagforJamyl in all your posts!"
-Dagger Two
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |