Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
577
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 18:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
Identifying the Problem
Tanks need to be fixed before they go implementing a infantry patch. Makes no sense to do all this infantry work, when infantry are struggling (namely ambush) to deal with tanks, or I should say, the sheer number of tanks. This problem has nothing to do with the strength of AV or the strength of tanks.
I think that this problem is rather specific. In ambush, having 6 tanks on one side, basically means a win.
Though, as I have been doing a lot of domination of late, the same can apply to that mode as well. Map dependent of course.
And of course skirmish, tanks can have a large impact, but at least infantry generally has a place to go, and plenty of room to frolic.
Tanks have always been somewhat of a problem in ambush, though pre 1.7 they were very easy to deal with. Now though, they are nearly impossible for anything but a forge gun or tank, and even then it can be a struggle. One tank, not an issue, though 6 tanks and you are going to have a bad time, mkay.
From my personal experience, a lot of this is due to milita tanks. Very rarely do I ever blow up an actual gunnlogi or maddie. Milta tanks are incredibly cheap, and very powerful. Because of this, it is very easy to spam. Given the new resistances and reps, these things can also be impossible for any infantry AV, especially when you have enemy AI running around.
But, there is a trend going around atm. Did you know, that tanking pre 1.7 actually wasn't that awful at one time. While I did get blown up quite often starting out, I was able to survive much longer until swarms came along. See in the beginning, a LOT of people were just starting out. Then a triple SP event came around, and guess what happened. Everyone and their mothers speced into swarm launchers, thus the tanker QQ got thick and heavy. People figured out, hey, swarm launchers murder tanks, thus more swarms were on the field.
Guess what we just had (hint hint, a triple SP event)
What I'm noticing, are a lot more STD tanks on the field. So even if they were to do something with milita, tanks will still be a problem. It will shift from MLT tanks to STD tanks.
Adjust cost on MLT tanks to better reflect their power (they are very similar in power to their STD couterpart) cost needs to certainly increase. This WILL stop the spam. But still, I think the focus will simply shift to the STD tanks. You think MLT tanks are bad, try an SP invested tank.
The solutions
What I would like to see, is an overall price hike on tanks in general.
Say a fit for a pro tank is a Mil.
A MLT fit should be at 400 to 500K
So tanks in general will cost you half a mil to a mil to run per game. Given their power, this is totally fair.
Add WP for tank damage, make it appealing to run AV against a tank.
Next, WP for tank damage needs to be implemented. What this does, is make it very appealing to actually attempt AV against a tank. So one tank rolls up, and over half the team switches to AV, that tank WILL die, AV will get a good chunk for the effort, and tanks will still require multiple people to take them out.
Everyone's happier.
And of course, tanks need to be FINISHED ALREADY. I've already put out my idea's on tank fixes but for the mean time, what I stated here should happen with the 1.8 release. No buffing of AV, or nerfing of tanks. Things are in a better spot than you think with tank balance, the problem though is the ease at which people can run tanks, which results in the "TANK SPAM" and the cries to nerf tanks.
Rather than doing something stupidly drastic ( again ) make these small changes so you can actually focus on balancing the numbers. Fix the actual problems not the skewed misinterpretations of people less familiar with tanks!
TL;DR
Nuff Said
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2547
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 18:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
lolambush - Cant nerf vehicles because of 1 mode
Tanks are balanced in PC
Generally anything can be OP in pubs
If tanks are in a much better place for a competitve mode then what happens when you nerf tanks for pub games? are they still balanced for the competitive gamemode?
We dont have proto hulls, only mods and turrets, we need adv/proto hulls
WP for dmg is getting added in 1.8 i think
Intelligence is OP
|
buzzzzzzz killllllllll
TRA1LBLAZERS
291
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 18:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush - Cant nerf vehicles because of 1 mode
Tanks are balanced in PC
Generally anything can be OP in pubs
If tanks are in a much better place for a competitve mode then what happens when you nerf tanks for pub games? are they still balanced for the competitive gamemode?
We dont have proto hulls, only mods and turrets, we need adv/proto hulls
WP for dmg is getting added in 1.8 i think
taka, they are getting nerfed no matter what, u cant save ur precious win machines |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1825
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 18:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP fixed tanks already. Infantry forced them to. Why aren't you happy with what you forced on them?
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
579
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 18:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush - Cant nerf vehicles because of 1 mode
Tanks are balanced in PC
Generally anything can be OP in pubs
If tanks are in a much better place for a competitve mode then what happens when you nerf tanks for pub games? are they still balanced for the competitive gamemode?
We dont have proto hulls, only mods and turrets, we need adv/proto hulls
WP for dmg is getting added in 1.8 i think
OMFG TAKA what is wrong with you. Did you EVEN READ THE FIRST PARAGRAPH.
I clearly stated that nerfing tanks or buffing AV isn't the answer.
Please READ WHAT IS SAID before responding.
Nuff Said
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
613
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 18:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush - Cant nerf vehicles because of 1 mode
Tanks are balanced in PC
Generally anything can be OP in pubs
If tanks are in a much better place for a competitve mode then what happens when you nerf tanks for pub games? are they still balanced for the competitive gamemode?
We dont have proto hulls, only mods and turrets, we need adv/proto hulls
WP for dmg is getting added in 1.8 i think
F--k your false dichotomy. A well balanced game is balanced both for casual and competitive play. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2552
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 19:29:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush - Cant nerf vehicles because of 1 mode
Tanks are balanced in PC
Generally anything can be OP in pubs
If tanks are in a much better place for a competitve mode then what happens when you nerf tanks for pub games? are they still balanced for the competitive gamemode?
We dont have proto hulls, only mods and turrets, we need adv/proto hulls
WP for dmg is getting added in 1.8 i think OMFG TAKA what is wrong with you. Did you EVEN READ THE FIRST PARAGRAPH. I clearly stated that nerfing tanks or buffing AV isn't the answer. Please READ WHAT IS SAID before responding.
Generally i assume that you are crying about tanks, most tanks threads are QQ and wanting a nerf but the point still stands anyway
We dont have adv tanks let alone proto so cost wise 750k for std because proto tanks will be 2mil+ if we ever get them
Intelligence is OP
|
Delta 749
Kestrel Reconnaissance
2540
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 19:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
Or you know, replace the large blaster turret with a large plasma cannon type turret
I'll start my own war, with hookers, and blackjack!
In fact forget the war and the blackjack.
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
580
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 19:35:00 -
[9] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Or you know, replace the large blaster turret with a large plasma cannon type turret
I've made numerous posts on that subject, I'll be sure to link my turret thread as well if anyone is interested. This though is a start, as 1.8 is shaping up to be very infantry focused.
Nuff Said
|
Kitt 514
True North.
105
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 19:47:00 -
[10] - Quote
As much as I hate the reality of it... militia tanks are what me and my friends use as a counter to tanks.
Getting merc'd by tanks? The group of us call in a militia railgun tank each, and go to work. 3 railguns with damage mods makes short work of ANY tank. |
|
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising
2240
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 20:04:00 -
[11] - Quote
If tanks stay the same, but AV is not buffed then leave MLT tanks as they are or buff them to extreme levels.
Tanks are balanced, AV is far too weak. Buffing AV would mean less MLT tanks on the field.
"I do agree with you there though. shudders"
-Arkena Wyrnspire
|
steelRatt
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
9
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 20:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tank vs dropship/assault DS Tank wins (tho a ADS can kill a tank if lucky)
Tank vs infantry Tank wins (unless there is a few av in the mix)
Tank vs tank Tank wins
Dropship/assault vs infantry DS wins (unless there's a rail tank in the redline or a few forge gunners see you swarms not so much of a problem sorry swarm guys )
Are tanks OP for the cost and what they bring to a fight yes they are my proto forge suit cost close to 200K my ADS over 500k. That's more then a sica or a soma. We all no what problems there are in the game coz we all play it ccp no coz we all ***** about it.
Defeat dose not exist to them that are willing.
|
Godin Thekiller
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1703
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 20:34:00 -
[13] - Quote
steelRatt wrote:Tank vs dropship/assault DS Tank wins (tho a ADS can kill a tank if lucky)
Tank vs infantry Tank wins (unless there is a few av in the mix)
Tank vs tank Tank wins
Dropship/assault vs infantry DS wins (unless there's a rail tank in the redline or a few forge gunners see you swarms not so much of a problem sorry swarm guys )
Are tanks OP for the cost and what they bring to a fight yes they are my proto forge suit cost close to 200K my ADS over 500k. That's more then a sica or a soma. We all no what problems there are in the game coz we all play it ccp no coz we all ***** about it.
if a DS gets killed by a non-rail HAV, the pilot sucks. If infantry gets killed by a HAV, they either suck, was put in aposition where they would've been killed either way, or the pilot is just good. That last one is correct. ANd no, the price is fine, they just need adjustments.
'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever!
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
581
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 20:54:00 -
[14] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:If tanks stay the same, but AV is not buffed then leave MLT tanks as they are or buff them to extreme levels.
Tanks are balanced, AV is far too weak. Buffing AV would mean less MLT tanks on the field.
This also doesn't take into consideration dropships, or STD tanks. How much would that hurt tanks overall giving buffs across the board to AV?
Agreed that swarms need a few tweaks, but the other forms are ok. I personally pro tank, but I do have an AV fit with proto swarms. And I will say, it has killed quite a few MLT tanks. We really need to first identfy our problems here.
Is it that AV is to weak or are there simply too many tanks per match for AV to effectively deal with. I vote for the latter.
Adding in WP for tank damage too, would encourage more people to actually pull out AV and rack up some WP. I've had a match where at least 6 people were running proto swarms. Tanks quite literally crumbled before us. With SL of all things.
Get one tank kill, cost that player half a mil, he will really consider whether it's worth it or not to call in another.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
581
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 20:57:00 -
[15] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:steelRatt wrote:Tank vs dropship/assault DS Tank wins (tho a ADS can kill a tank if lucky)
Tank vs infantry Tank wins (unless there is a few av in the mix)
Tank vs tank Tank wins
Dropship/assault vs infantry DS wins (unless there's a rail tank in the redline or a few forge gunners see you swarms not so much of a problem sorry swarm guys )
Are tanks OP for the cost and what they bring to a fight yes they are my proto forge suit cost close to 200K my ADS over 500k. That's more then a sica or a soma. We all no what problems there are in the game coz we all play it ccp no coz we all ***** about it. if a DS gets killed by a non-rail HAV, the pilot sucks. If infantry gets killed by a HAV, they either suck, was put in aposition where they would've been killed either way, or the pilot is just good. That last one is correct. ANd no, the price is fine, they just need adjustments.
The price isn't fine, I think that is evident in any PUB match you play. Tanks 514 of late.
Nuff Said
|
steelRatt
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
9
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 21:38:00 -
[16] - Quote
One way to let the tanks stay as they are that would make DS pilots happy and I think the ground troops to is make the tiny maps we have biggerand remove redline. If the maps bigger ground troops get room to move and DS pilots can find places to hide tanks could stay as is and we would have to worries about 7 tanks on top of you. Then you could get av hunting party's just a thought
Defeat dose not exist to them that are willing.
|
Darken-Soul
BIG BAD W0LVES
695
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 21:42:00 -
[17] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush - Cant nerf vehicles because of 1 mode
Tanks are balanced in PC
Generally anything can be OP in pubs
If tanks are in a much better place for a competitve mode then what happens when you nerf tanks for pub games? are they still balanced for the competitive gamemode?
We dont have proto hulls, only mods and turrets, we need adv/proto hulls
WP for dmg is getting added in 1.8 i think
nobody plays PC. Not even the Heathens are playing.
Who wants some?
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
TRA1LBLAZERS
608
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 21:44:00 -
[18] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush - Cant nerf vehicles because of 1 mode
Tanks are balanced in PC
Generally anything can be OP in pubs
If tanks are in a much better place for a competitve mode then what happens when you nerf tanks for pub games? are they still balanced for the competitive gamemode?
We dont have proto hulls, only mods and turrets, we need adv/proto hulls
WP for dmg is getting added in 1.8 i think
Tankahiro, where is my public apology, after i proved you wrong about rail turrets oh so long ago? I still am anticipating it
Kills- Archduke Ferdinand
Balance!
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
4690
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 21:58:00 -
[19] - Quote
Last night I probably had one of the best GGs against you and your squad in a long time.
But where they he!l did you come from? I checked my mini-map and you weren't there, so I figured I could go ambush that Soma and out pops a Particle Cannon
[/threadjack]
Want to know how to make a strike-through?
[s[Example[/s]
Now go my Forum Warriors. Use this new weapon for glory!
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
4690
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 21:59:00 -
[20] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote: if a DS gets killed by a non-rail HAV, the pilot sucks. If infantry gets killed by a HAV, they either suck, was put in aposition where they would've been killed either way, or the pilot is just good. That last one is correct. ANd no, the price is fine, they just need adjustments.
So if that's the case, you recognize me as a skilled pilot?
And duna2002 is one of the best tankers in the game?
Want to know how to make a strike-through?
[s[Example[/s]
Now go my Forum Warriors. Use this new weapon for glory!
|
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
584
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 22:41:00 -
[21] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Last night I probably had one of the best GGs against you and your squad in a long time. But where they he!l did you come from? I checked my mini-map and you weren't there, so I figured I could go ambush that Soma and out pops a Particle Cannon [/threadjack]
Hah, situational awareness. I was actively tracking you from the fringes. I generally will find a nice high vantage point, jump out of my tank and scan around. In this way, you won't notice a big tank, and I know exactly where you are, where you are looking, and how to approach without you noticing. I pretty much HAVE to know where all tanks are on the field at all times, before I go looking for trouble. Ninja tank lol.
For all your tank QQ, you can def play tanks. You certainly kept me on my toes. New tankers don't understand that a good tanker, constantly moves. Otherwise you are askin to be ambushed!
It was def a GG, I rarely lose tanks, and usually only to the better tankers.
GG
Nuff Said
|
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution
1693
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 22:49:00 -
[22] - Quote
steelRatt wrote:Tank vs dropship/assault DS Tank wins (tho a ADS can kill a tank if lucky)
Tank vs infantry Tank wins (unless there is a few av in the mix)
Tank vs tank Tank wins
Dropship/assault vs infantry DS wins (unless there's a rail tank in the redline or a few forge gunners see you swarms not so much of a problem sorry swarm guys )
Are tanks OP for the cost and what they bring to a fight yes they are my proto forge suit cost close to 200K my ADS over 500k. That's more then a sica or a soma. We all no what problems there are in the game coz we all play it ccp no coz we all ***** about it. You have never met Sir Snugglz.
Tanker/Forum warrior lvl. 1
Math is OP (don't tell the politicians)/ logic+intelligence=OP
Prof. V scrub Q_Q
|
Bormir1r
WarRavens League of Infamy
60
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 23:18:00 -
[23] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote:Identifying the Problem Tanks need to be fixed before they go implementing a infantry patch. Makes no sense to do all this infantry work, when infantry are struggling (namely ambush) to deal with tanks, or I should say, the sheer number of tanks. This problem has nothing to do with the strength of AV or the strength of tanks. I think that this problem is rather specific. In ambush, having 6 tanks on one side, basically means a win.
Though, as I have been doing a lot of domination of late, the same can apply to that mode as well. Map dependent of course.
And of course skirmish, tanks can have a large impact, but at least infantry generally has a place to go, and plenty of room to frolic.
Tanks have always been somewhat of a problem in ambush, though pre 1.7 they were very easy to deal with. Now though, they are nearly impossible for anything but a forge gun or tank, and even then it can be a struggle. One tank, not an issue, though 6 tanks and you are going to have a bad time, mkay. From my personal experience, a lot of this is due to milita tanks. Very rarely do I ever blow up an actual gunnlogi or maddie. Milta tanks are incredibly cheap, and very powerful. Because of this, it is very easy to spam. Given the new resistances and reps, these things can also be impossible for any infantry AV, especially when you have enemy AI running around. But, there is a trend going around atm. Did you know, that tanking pre 1.7 actually wasn't that awful at one time. While I did get blown up quite often starting out, I was able to survive much longer until swarms came along. See in the beginning, a LOT of people were just starting out. Then a triple SP event came around, and guess what happened. Everyone and their mothers speced into swarm launchers, thus the tanker QQ got thick and heavy. People figured out, hey, swarm launchers murder tanks, thus more swarms were on the field. Guess what we just had (hint hint, a triple SP event) What I'm noticing, are a lot more STD tanks on the field. So even if they were to do something with milita, tanks will still be a problem. It will shift from MLT tanks to STD tanks. Adjust cost on MLT tanks to better reflect their power (they are very similar in power to their STD couterpart) cost needs to certainly increase. This WILL stop the spam. But still, I think the focus will simply shift to the STD tanks. You think MLT tanks are bad, try an SP invested tank.
The solutions What I would like to see, is an overall price hike on tanks in general. Say a fit for a pro tank is a Mil.
A MLT fit should be at 400 to 500K
So tanks in general will cost you half a mil to a mil to run per game. Given their power, this is totally fair. Add WP for tank damage, make it appealing to run AV against a tank.
Next, WP for tank damage needs to be implemented. What this does, is make it very appealing to actually attempt AV against a tank. So one tank rolls up, and over half the team switches to AV, that tank WILL die, AV will get a good chunk for the effort, and tanks will still require multiple people to take them out. Everyone's happier. And of course, tanks need to be FINISHED ALREADY. I've already put out my idea's on tank fixes but for the mean time, what I stated here should happen with the 1.8 release. No buffing of AV, or nerfing of tanks. Things are in a better spot than you think with tank balance, the problem though is the ease at which people can run tanks, which results in the "TANK SPAM" and the cries to nerf tanks. Rather than doing something stupidly drastic ( again ) make these small changes so you can actually focus on balancing the numbers. Fix the actual problems not the skewed misinterpretations of people less familiar with tanks! TL;DR
I would feel better if AVs were buffed *slightly* (not to pre-1.7 specs) but half of the gap between the damage of the pre and post-1.7 AVs should be gone. Essentially 1.8 AVs should be (pre 1.7 damage - post 1.7 damage)/2 + post 1.7 damage. Then AVs would be more viable against tanks, but other than that I agree that increasing the prices of tanks is an excellent idea, especially for militia. Care to mention any solutions to the dropship?
Minja. We run and hide. And then we kill you.
|
Sir Snugglz
Red Star. EoN.
403
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 23:20:00 -
[24] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush - Cant nerf vehicles because of 1 mode
Tanks are balanced in PC
Generally anything can be OP in pubs
If tanks are in a much better place for a competitve mode then what happens when you nerf tanks for pub games? are they still balanced for the competitive gamemode?
We dont have proto hulls, only mods and turrets, we need adv/proto hulls
WP for dmg is getting added in 1.8 i think
They are also balanced in skirmish and domination... thought the redline needs to be fixed in dom.
-Luck is just one of my skills
Just because I make flying look easy doesn't mean it is
|
BAD FURRY
SVER True Blood General Tso's Alliance
506
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 23:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote:Identifying the Problem Tanks need to be fixed before they go implementing a infantry patch. Makes no sense to do all this infantry work, when infantry are struggling (namely ambush) to deal with tanks, or I should say, the sheer number of tanks. This problem has nothing to do with the strength of AV or the strength of tanks. I think that this problem is rather specific. In ambush, having 6 tanks on one side, basically means a win.
Though, as I have been doing a lot of domination of late, the same can apply to that mode as well. Map dependent of course.
And of course skirmish, tanks can have a large impact, but at least infantry generally has a place to go, and plenty of room to frolic.
Tanks have always been somewhat of a problem in ambush, though pre 1.7 they were very easy to deal with. Now though, they are nearly impossible for anything but a forge gun or tank, and even then it can be a struggle. One tank, not an issue, though 6 tanks and you are going to have a bad time, mkay. From my personal experience, a lot of this is due to milita tanks. Very rarely do I ever blow up an actual gunnlogi or maddie. Milta tanks are incredibly cheap, and very powerful. Because of this, it is very easy to spam. Given the new resistances and reps, these things can also be impossible for any infantry AV, especially when you have enemy AI running around. But, there is a trend going around atm. Did you know, that tanking pre 1.7 actually wasn't that awful at one time. While I did get blown up quite often starting out, I was able to survive much longer until swarms came along. See in the beginning, a LOT of people were just starting out. Then a triple SP event came around, and guess what happened. Everyone and their mothers speced into swarm launchers, thus the tanker QQ got thick and heavy. People figured out, hey, swarm launchers murder tanks, thus more swarms were on the field. Guess what we just had (hint hint, a triple SP event) What I'm noticing, are a lot more STD tanks on the field. So even if they were to do something with milita, tanks will still be a problem. It will shift from MLT tanks to STD tanks. Adjust cost on MLT tanks to better reflect their power (they are very similar in power to their STD couterpart) cost needs to certainly increase. This WILL stop the spam. But still, I think the focus will simply shift to the STD tanks. You think MLT tanks are bad, try an SP invested tank.
The solutions What I would like to see, is an overall price hike on tanks in general. Say a fit for a pro tank is a Mil.
A MLT fit should be at 400 to 500K
So tanks in general will cost you half a mil to a mil to run per game. Given their power, this is totally fair. Add WP for tank damage, make it appealing to run AV against a tank.
Next, WP for tank damage needs to be implemented. What this does, is make it very appealing to actually attempt AV against a tank. So one tank rolls up, and over half the team switches to AV, that tank WILL die, AV will get a good chunk for the effort, and tanks will still require multiple people to take them out. Everyone's happier. And of course, tanks need to be FINISHED ALREADY. I've already put out my idea's on tank fixes but for the mean time, what I stated here should happen with the 1.8 release. No buffing of AV, or nerfing of tanks. Things are in a better spot than you think with tank balance, the problem though is the ease at which people can run tanks, which results in the "TANK SPAM" and the cries to nerf tanks. Rather than doing something stupidly drastic ( again ) make these small changes so you can actually focus on balancing the numbers. Fix the actual problems not the skewed misinterpretations of people less familiar with tanks! TL;DR
mmmmmmmm..... no.
Yes i am a Undead Hell Wolf ... nice to meat you!
|
Sir Snugglz
Red Star. EoN.
403
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 23:22:00 -
[26] - Quote
Benjamin Ciscko wrote:steelRatt wrote:Tank vs dropship/assault DS Tank wins (tho a ADS can kill a tank if lucky)
Tank vs infantry Tank wins (unless there is a few av in the mix)
Tank vs tank Tank wins
Dropship/assault vs infantry DS wins (unless there's a rail tank in the redline or a few forge gunners see you swarms not so much of a problem sorry swarm guys )
Are tanks OP for the cost and what they bring to a fight yes they are my proto forge suit cost close to 200K my ADS over 500k. That's more then a sica or a soma. We all no what problems there are in the game coz we all play it ccp no coz we all ***** about it. You have never met Sir Snugglz.
LMAO.
Snugglz vs tank Snugglz wins
Snugglz vs AV infantry Snugglz wins (Don't shoot me with that blue goo... Or I go ham on you)
-Luck is just one of my skills
Just because I make flying look easy doesn't mean it is
|
Monkey MAC
Rough Riders..
1975
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 23:29:00 -
[27] - Quote
Well it looks like I didn't get here before the tankers, but hey ho. The PRICE of tanks is not the problem, SPAM is not the problem.
If we put this infantry terms, ProtoSuits. Protosuits used to be a lot more expensive, did decrease the amount of Proto pubs? No, not really.
There are more than enough people who can now RUN A PROFIT with protosuits that they can be spammed, increasing the price will only serve to widen the gap between the HAV and HAV NOTS. If we made PROTO suits cost 3millon each, the like Nyan, TP, Eon, won't stop. If anything they will make more money.
Also 'TANK SPAM' is not really a problem. At most there can 12 tanks at a time. Which is about 37% of the total match population, now if you want you could say limit to 5 VEHICLES per team, which would make very little impact but might make some people feel better.
The real problem with Tanks is the tanks themselves, most importantly the power of them. Now for a good example of Vehicle vs Infantry balance, lets look at Titanfall.
Now you will notjce just how powerful the players Titan is, tearing through infantry like butter. But also notice how when the player comes across a titan he is capable of taking it down by himself, all it takes is a concentrated effort. This how it should be with DUST, a concentrated effort from ONE man should be enough to kill a tank. But the tank has the option of retreating earlier.
Multiple AV is used when you need rid of the tank fast, DEAD or ALIVE. But so long as 1 tank is more powerful or of more use to the team than an infantry player they will be unbalanced.
Spkr4thedead: Me > AV
This is why tanks are unbalanced
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl.
|
Hobo on Fire
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
179
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 23:45:00 -
[28] - Quote
BAD FURRY wrote: mmmmmmmm..... no.
I'm sure the OP thanks you for your thoughtful insight.
I was a dedicated swarm user for a long time, and I've been saying basically what the OP did since 1.7 dropped.
Tank on tank is actually pretty well balanced, and a single tank can still be defeated by AV if the infantry are well equipped and know what they're doing. The problem is the cost: A single decent AV fit costs as much as a militia tank, and you need multiple people shooting to have a chance if the tank driver is in any way competent. Calling in your own tank is a cheaper and more effective option.
Tanks should be the best option to counter other tanks, but not the only one. I wanted to simply double the price of HAV hulls (not weapons or modules) as I felt that would increase the price enough to discourage tank spam in pub matches, without making them so pricey as to only be viable in PC (like they were pre-1.7) 400-500k could be a high end price for a well fit militia tank, though I'd say a completely unfit soma/sica only needs to cost 100k - I can still solo those with swarms when I get the drop on them after all.
If I had my way, every Sica/Soma fitting would cost 50k more than it does now, 100k more for madrugers and gunnlogis. This would be the same regardless of fitting, as I would only be changing the cost of the hull.
I'd love to see WP for vehicle damage on top of this. I'd like swarms to get their range back too, (I was OK with the damage nerf) so they can actually be used against dropships, but that's a matter for another thread.
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2565
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 13:52:00 -
[29] - Quote
Sir Snugglz wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:lolambush - Cant nerf vehicles because of 1 mode
Tanks are balanced in PC
Generally anything can be OP in pubs
If tanks are in a much better place for a competitve mode then what happens when you nerf tanks for pub games? are they still balanced for the competitive gamemode?
We dont have proto hulls, only mods and turrets, we need adv/proto hulls
WP for dmg is getting added in 1.8 i think They are also balanced in skirmish and domination... thought the redline needs to be fixed in dom.
True
Push the redline and spawns back about 500m will do it like you said
Intelligence is OP
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
586
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 17:48:00 -
[30] - Quote
Hobo on Fire wrote:BAD FURRY wrote: mmmmmmmm..... no.
I'm sure the OP thanks you for your thoughtful insight. I was a dedicated swarm user for a long time, and I've been saying basically what the OP did since 1.7 dropped. Tank on tank is actually pretty well balanced, and a single tank can still be defeated by AV if the infantry are well equipped and know what they're doing. The problem is the cost: A single decent AV fit costs as much as a militia tank, and you need multiple people shooting to have a chance if the tank driver is in any way competent. Calling in your own tank is a cheaper and more effective option. Tanks should be the best option to counter other tanks, but not the only one. I wanted to simply double the price of HAV hulls (not weapons or modules) as I felt that would increase the price enough to discourage tank spam in pub matches, without making them so pricey as to only be viable in PC (like they were pre-1.7) 400-500k could be a high end price for a well fit militia tank, though I'd say a completely unfit soma/sica only needs to cost 100k - I can still solo those with swarms when I get the drop on them after all. If I had my way, every Sica/Soma fitting would cost 50k more than it does now, 100k more for madrugers and gunnlogis. This would be the same regardless of fitting, as I would only be changing the cost of the hull. I'd love to see WP for vehicle damage on top of this. I'd like swarms to get their range back too, (I was OK with the damage nerf) so they can actually be used against dropships, but that's a matter for another thread.
I have used tanks since May. I remember that god awful high price. But then, tanks were incredibly squishy, and one type in particular, was rather broken (gunnlogi). That meant, I needed to make one live at the very least, 3 to 5 matches, just to stay isk balanced.
Now though, it's certainly not hard to make one survive 3 - 5 matches. I would say the hardest part is being unable to counter tank spam once one side has spammed them. While I can take any MLT tank one on one, add another railgun or 3 with blasters, and you are going to have a rough time. I can still manage, it's just going to take me a long while.
The main imbalance with tanks lay in the sheer number called per game. Right now the details of what really needs to be fixed with tanks is muddied by the number of tanks out, not necessarily the ineffectiveness of AV or the OP ness of tanks.
100k, WAY too cheap. That's only 30k above the current price, while it would reduce spam, it would hardly be noticeable.
Right now, tankers are not tankers. There are no tactics, flanking, tracking, situational awareness, ect, for the majority of tankers out there. They just hop in and expect hardeners and damage mods to do all the work. And that's the other thing, the only MLT tanks that are EASY for AV are the Damage modded tanks.
If the Sica's out there focused on less gank and more tank, they would dominate the battlefield. Same with Soma's, but a double hardened Sica is arguably stronger than any Soma fit you can come up with. I can only imagine the AV qq from a Sica running double hardener and a blaster.
The price needs to better reflect the power. Given the staying power, or I should say potential power, not to mention immune to small arms fire, they need to cost more than a proto heavy forge gun setup, or at least as much as one.
But here's the thing, setting a high cost makes you VALUE that item that much more. If you really want to use tanks, then you need to learn how to effectively drive one, but you need something to drive you to it. Right now they are little more than I win buttons, disposable ones at that. Current costs only would have made sense pre 1.7, when MLT were more of a JOKE than anything else.
And if you think about it, 500K is roughly 2 -3 matches maybe 4. So let's say you can lose 1 per 3 games.
Current prices 70K, let say an average game (if you gain WP) is somewhere around 150k to 200k. So you can lose 2 per 1 game.
My suggested price 1 tank per 3 games.
I think this is a good way to look at it, as it really shows the spam issue. The idea here, is that you can't lose a tank in every single match, if you want to run one every match. But notice the current prices done up in the same fashion.
Current price 2 tanks per 1 game OR 3 to 4 tanks per 1 game
This is low balling it. If the tanker does decent with his tank, you are looking at a higher payout as well. I average 250 to 300k a match myself. So in my case, 3 to 4 tanks per 1 match if I ran MLT tanks. But everyone see's the problem right?
CURRENTLY YOU CAN RUN UP TO 4 TANKS A MATCH AND STILL MAINTAIN THE ISK TO PAY FOR THEM.
For something that is arguably worth MORE than any proto suit out there, the cost sure doesn't reflect.
Nuff Said
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |