Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
CPL Bloodstone
Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance
254
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 18:20:00 -
[61] - Quote
CUBS UNbanned Alt wrote:so much troll.. now for the facts. Cap Acq is a class act (maybe a little too public with some things), same with Neanderthals( who have since gone in different directions, but both came up around the same time). I sold Cap Acq AND Neanderthals their first districts, gave them insight to the PC world and they grew from there. Quite proud tbh of where they are now from where they started,and I continue to watch their growth and maturing in this game. QG was directly involved with both from the start, providing that alliance backing and aid in a way only QG could do. now that QG isn't really the day-to-day face of the organization, as well as time goes by and things often change, 1 way or another, its not surprising to see Cap Acq leaving. at the same time, RA has become The Walmart of dust, everyone's welcome, constantly rolling back prices, and their headquarters are located in Arkansas... this is not a knock on Cap Acq. fact of the matter is you cant roll solo in Molden Heath. Of course they probably shoulda had a good long talk with DDB and the 'support' they get night in night out. DDB hasn't yet learned they are solely used for their EVE support and aside from that 0 fhuks given about their livelihood... sorry DDB, I really am, and I can only assume Cap Acq will learn this soon enough as well. Nyain San just flocks to whoever keeps the heat off them at the time, and undoubtedly will move elsewhere in due time. such is the nature of the beast Shephard is a standup guy, and Im sure he will be looking at the state of things and wont hesitate to pull out when he gets a whiff of whats really going on. just be patient. people have to learn for themselves
Woman are like bacon, They Smell , look, taste good and slowly kills men.
|
Texas Killionaire
Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance
38
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 18:23:00 -
[62] - Quote
... We are flattered this was created for us! ... Thank you Cubs. ... The dudes in STB leadership that we had the most contact with were/are awesome and always helped us when they could, or when we asked for it. ... We always try to field our own guys in our own PCs. We've had ringers from almost every corp out there and from time to time they were at the bottom of the list. Not a knock to them, but we just figured why not have our own players down there instead of ringers. ... If you see us in pubs, chances are we aren't wearing proto gear. $hit$ expensive. ... A lot of us started playing around the same time and have been with the corp for over 8 months. How many of you can say that? ... There will be a time when you say '#%*! Cap Acq is attacking.'
If you're not ready to lose, you're not ready to win.
Jello Biafra = God
AQUPI
|
Shepherd Grey
Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance
36
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 19:06:00 -
[63] - Quote
Ok, let's see if I can line these all up correctly. 1. OP - history lesson? when I pulled you out of D-Uni, you had talent. Where did you take it? only the most notorious district-locking corp out there. When you point fingers of bandwagon, look at the 3 pointed back at you. You aren't leadership, PD leaders hardly inquired as to CAP's opinions on any matters etc., therefore we owe our considerations to no one.
2. Our withdrawal from alliance was a reflection on the direction it was taking: simple as that. We stuck around through two wars with alliance, lost everything TWICE - thus proving we stand by those around us, no matter the cost. You're oblivious to the price my guys have paid defending platforms and deals we weren't privy to. Fusion, how much has mL lost for pd ever?
3. Leaving had absolutely NOTHING to do with ringers or help from anyone. I don't blame STB/ML not ringing for losing our land, I didn't ask them for help nor did I want it. When NS attacked everything we owned, we brought 16 CAP to every match and fought valiantly. When we could have abandoned PD to keep our land and save ourselves, we stood by our brothers in arms for one last hurrah. Tex and I didn't form this corp to ring out; if the men play, they deserve to compete.
4. We did, in fact, go independent. I sorely can attest that Cubs is right. Versing 8+ ringers defending four WarRavens locked districts that we sniped a week ago, we realized that 120 isn't enough clones when elite ringers have zero integrity in earning paychecks they don't need anyway. Without resolving to utilize the dirty tactics 70% of MH landholders do to keep their land, which we will never do, we found it difficult to progress alone given MH's current state-of-affairs.
5. We entered RA to squad/fight alongside people my guys enjoy playing with, as was the original case with PD (Sax Rage). Our time at PD was thoroughly enjoyed, as clearly stated in the withdrawal letter, and no malicious intent was behind it. Our relations with many individual alliance members remains constant, as does the friendships built between CAP's guys and theirs.
In the end, it's all about the guys and what it is THEY seek to fulfill out of this game. We leaders are merely facilitators, illustrating the group's opinion and exercising it fully without injecting selfish pursuit or gain. My men have fought without a paycheck from locked districts since we formed, and I wouldn't rather be surrounded by anyone else. We don't seek to gain elitist players by taking land and locking it, barring the community from genuinely enjoying this game for what it is. Rather, we men & women at CAP have forged a team as well as a family and hope to defend a MH free of exploits. Those among you wishing the same from your corp, voice it. When CCP fixes these farming fools, we'll see who has the talent then
All other questions, comments, inquiries can be directly funneled into their nearest receptacle. All dry cleaning, please forward to OP.
Regards, SG
|
EuroTraining
Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 19:28:00 -
[64] - Quote
No more questions. |
ER-Bullitt
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
888
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 19:31:00 -
[65] - Quote
The following comment is mine alone and does not, in any way, reflect the thoughts or opinions of ML or PD
What CPL and Shepard wrote are both completely opposite regarding your decision to leave, I do find it funny that you try to bash Fusion and ML as being the "most notorious district locking corp out there". What measurments are you using to determine who is the "most notorious"?
History lesson, ML didn't start locking ANYTHING until it was made obvious and admitted to by Cubs himself that he was locking up his districts I believe during the FEC vs EoN "war".... So its OK for you to purchase your districts from the original OG triple OG gangster district locker himself (and I know districts were locked the first week of PC, but who remembers that anyway lol)... but yet you have the balls to thumb your nose at a corp like ML for simply learning from the best and following suit?
Since the very first district was "locked".. I have still seen first hand ML lose everything, every last district to the likes of OH and/or AE. We eventually get back into the fight.. and while yes most districts remain locked now... its just the current state of PC. Is it right? No. Do I condone it, hell no. Is everyone doing it? well yeah.. even the alliance you just joined. Would I abandon my corp over it, definetley not. To each his own tho...
Your post comes off like you are some high and mighty holier than thou corp when, in fact, you are quintessential band wagoners in a time when this game desperately needs less bandwagon, blue donut bullshit.
I wish you the best of luck, got no love loss for CA, don't really know anything about you all... but these posts by you guys are kinda hogwash and it would be in your best interest to not try and drag ML's name through the mud on your way to "relevant land". Fusion made this thread on his own accord... this was not a "Molon Labe. feels a certain way about CA".. it was one guys opinion, just leave it at that. |
CPL Bloodstone
Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance
257
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 19:51:00 -
[66] - Quote
ER-Bullitt wrote:The following comment is mine alone and does not, in any way, reflect the thoughts or opinions of ML or PD
What CPL and Shepard wrote are both completely opposite regarding your decision to leave, I do find it funny that you try to bash Fusion and ML as being the "most notorious district locking corp out there". What measurments are you using to determine who is the "most notorious"?
History lesson, ML didn't start locking ANYTHING until it was made obvious and admitted to by Cubs himself that he was locking up his districts I believe during the FEC vs EoN "war".... So its OK for you to purchase your districts from the original OG triple OG gangster district locker himself (and I know districts were locked the first week of PC, but who remembers that anyway lol)... but yet you have the balls to thumb your nose at a corp like ML for simply learning from the best and following suit?
Since the very first district was "locked".. I have still seen first hand ML lose everything, every last district to the likes of OH and/or AE. We eventually get back into the fight.. and while yes most districts remain locked now... its just the current state of PC. Is it right? No. Do I condone it, hell no. Is everyone doing it? well yeah.. even the alliance you just joined. Would I abandon my corp over it, definetley not. To each his own tho...
Your post comes off like you are some high and mighty holier than thou corp when, in fact, you are quintessential band wagoners in a time when this game desperately needs less bandwagon, blue donut bullshit.
I wish you the best of luck, got no love loss for CA, don't really know anything about you all... but these posts by you guys are kinda hogwash and it would be in your best interest to not try and drag ML's name through the mud on your way to "relevant land". Fusion made this thread on his own accord... this was not a "Molon Labe. feels a certain way about CA".. it was one guys opinion, just leave it at that.
As i said earlier, my statement was merely a perception on my part. Not the pure facts. That was stated by Shep. Also know, none of us have any ill will towards PD or its corp. Including myself. My issue's are with a few individuals not a particular corp. With that, im signing off this topic o/
Woman are like bacon, They Smell , look, taste good and slowly kills men.
|
Texas Killionaire
Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 19:53:00 -
[67] - Quote
This interview is over! Get that camera out of my face!!
If you're not ready to lose, you're not ready to win.
Jello Biafra = God
AQUPI
|
XEROO COOL
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
476
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:10:00 -
[68] - Quote
Texas Killionaire wrote:This interview is over! Get that camera out of my face!! F it... we'll do it live
Everyone has a plan until you punch em in the face!
(Gò»°Gûí°n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+
Xeroo.Cool on Skype.
|
Long Evity
1412
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:19:00 -
[69] - Quote
Shepherd Grey wrote:Ok, let's see if I can line these all up correctly. 1. OP - history lesson? when I pulled you out of D-Uni, you had talent. Where did you take it? only the most notorious district-locking corp out there. When you point fingers of bandwagon, look at the 3 pointed back at you. You aren't leadership, PD leaders hardly inquired as to CAP's opinions on any matters etc., therefore we owe our considerations to no one. 2. Our withdrawal from alliance was a reflection on the direction it was taking: simple as that. We stuck around through two wars with alliance, lost everything TWICE - thus proving we stand by those around us, no matter the cost. You're oblivious to the price my guys have paid defending platforms and deals we weren't privy to. Fusion, how much has mL lost for pd ever? 3. Leaving had absolutely NOTHING to do with ringers or help from anyone. I don't blame STB/ML not ringing for losing our land, I didn't ask them for help nor did I want it. When NS attacked everything we owned, we brought 16 CAP to every match and fought valiantly. When we could have abandoned PD to keep our land and save ourselves, we stood by our brothers in arms for one last hurrah. Tex and I didn't form this corp to ring out; if the men play, they deserve to compete. 4. We did, in fact, go independent. I sorely can attest that Cubs is right. Versing 8+ ringers defending four WarRavens locked districts that we sniped a week ago, we realized that 120 isn't enough clones when elite ringers have zero integrity in earning paychecks they don't need anyway. Without resolving to utilize the dirty tactics 70% of MH landholders do to keep their land, which we will never do, we found it difficult to progress alone given MH's current state-of-affairs. 5. We entered RA to squad/fight alongside people my guys enjoy playing with, as was the original case with PD (Sax Rage). Our time at PD was thoroughly enjoyed, as clearly stated in the withdrawal letter, and no malicious intent was behind it. Our relations with many individual alliance members remains constant, as does the friendships built between CAP's guys and theirs. In the end, it's all about the guys and what it is THEY seek to fulfill out of this game. We leaders are merely facilitators, illustrating the group's opinion and exercising it fully without injecting selfish pursuit or gain. My men have fought without a paycheck from locked districts since we formed, and I wouldn't rather be surrounded by anyone else. We don't seek to gain elitist players by taking land and locking it, barring the community from genuinely enjoying this game for what it is. Rather, we men & women at CAP have forged a team as well as a family and hope to defend a MH free of exploits. Those among you wishing the same from your corp, voice it. When CCP fixes these farming fools, we'll see who has the talent then All other questions, comments, inquiries can be directly funneled into their nearest receptacle. All dry cleaning, please forward to OP. Regards, SG All respect for CAP restored. Great post. o7
I am not who you think I am, only but just a dream.
|
CUBS UNbanned Alt
206
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:23:00 -
[70] - Quote
Shepherd Grey wrote: 4. We did, in fact, go independent. I sorely can attest that Cubs is right. Versing 8+ ringers defending four WarRavens locked districts that we sniped a week ago, we realized that 120 isn't enough clones when elite ringers have zero integrity in earning paychecks they don't need anyway. Without resolving to utilize the dirty tactics 70% of MH landholders do to keep their land, which we will never do, we found it difficult to progress alone given MH's current state-of-affairs.
you realize these jabs just bounce off my extremely thick and non-Canadian skin right?
I have plenty of integrity. I don't take bribes from the other side to leave a battle ive already been paid to play, or to 'tank' my effort because the other side offered to pay me to do so.
I even seem to recall a meeting you and I had recently, where you specifically asked if I was hired by the other side for the match later that evening. I said no, I was available at the time as you approached me first. you declined, the other side approached me later, and I was on the other side... nothing personal, just business.
I respect you not using 'ringers' but you need to get over yourself. Its as much a part of the game as the dreaded 'protobears' in pubs.
seriously, consider your options here. I stay a mercenary and my guys are only paid by those asking for help, and business is good.
I go the other route, and all of a sudden your wife, kids, pets, and even Rampages blow-up doll are homeless or living in a 1974 chevy station wagon.
I think most prefer me staying a neutral merc, except apparently you of course
Don't drink the koolaid... Rampage made it from scratch and didn't wash his hands
|
|
Sentient Archon
1516
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:26:00 -
[71] - Quote
CUBS UNbanned Alt wrote: using 'ringers' .... Its as much a part of the game as the dreaded 'protobears' in pubs
^This
The only troll to successfully troll CCP.
|
Fusion Commander
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
76
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:41:00 -
[72] - Quote
Shepherd Grey wrote:Ok, let's see if I can line these all up correctly. 1. OP - history lesson? when I pulled you out of D-Uni, you had talent. Where did you take it? only the most notorious district-locking corp out there. When you point fingers of bandwagon, look at the 3 pointed back at you. You aren't leadership, PD leaders hardly inquired as to CAP's opinions on any matters etc., therefore we owe our considerations to no one. 2. Our withdrawal from alliance was a reflection on the direction it was taking: simple as that. We stuck around through two wars with alliance, lost everything TWICE - thus proving we stand by those around us, no matter the cost. You're oblivious to the price my guys have paid defending platforms and deals we weren't privy to. Fusion, how much has mL lost for pd ever? 3. Leaving had absolutely NOTHING to do with ringers or help from anyone. I don't blame STB/ML not ringing for losing our land, I didn't ask them for help nor did I want it. When NS attacked everything we owned, we brought 16 CAP to every match and fought valiantly. When we could have abandoned PD to keep our land and save ourselves, we stood by our brothers in arms for one last hurrah. Tex and I didn't form this corp to ring out; if the men play, they deserve to compete. 4. We did, in fact, go independent. I sorely can attest that Cubs is right. Versing 8+ ringers defending four WarRavens locked districts that we sniped a week ago, we realized that 120 isn't enough clones when elite ringers have zero integrity in earning paychecks they don't need anyway. Without resolving to utilize the dirty tactics 70% of MH landholders do to keep their land, which we will never do, we found it difficult to progress alone given MH's current state-of-affairs. 5. We entered RA to squad/fight alongside people my guys enjoy playing with, as was the original case with PD (Sax Rage). Our time at PD was thoroughly enjoyed, as clearly stated in the withdrawal letter, and no malicious intent was behind it. Our relations with many individual alliance members remains constant, as does the friendships built between CAP's guys and theirs. In the end, it's all about the guys and what it is THEY seek to fulfill out of this game. We leaders are merely facilitators, illustrating the group's opinion and exercising it fully without injecting selfish pursuit or gain. My men have fought without a paycheck from locked districts since we formed, and I wouldn't rather be surrounded by anyone else. We don't seek to gain elitist players by taking land and locking it, barring the community from genuinely enjoying this game for what it is. Rather, we men & women at CAP have forged a team as well as a family and hope to defend a MH free of exploits. Those among you wishing the same from your corp, voice it. When CCP fixes these farming fools, we'll see who has the talent then All other questions, comments, inquiries can be directly funneled into their nearest receptacle. All dry cleaning, please forward to OP. Regards, SG
What does me going to ML have to do with any of what's being talked about here, is this your form of an insult? When I left D-Uni and went to ML I had no idea who they were or what they did just that my freinds and I were all encouraged by a freind to move for a change we had been in D-Uni for long enough and when I got on most of my freinds moved and without hesitation I applied. I had no involvement in the district locking that was going on and I dispise it. And your right I'm not leadership nor ever want to be. I am speaking for what I think I am speaking for no one but myself
I haven't experience much lose when it comes to districts (in ML) from not involving or from locking the districts. Losing your districts doesn't mean it's the end of the world just to me you just try harder next time. |
Fusion Commander
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
76
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:44:00 -
[73] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:CUBS UNbanned Alt wrote: using 'ringers' .... Its as much a part of the game as the dreaded 'protobears' in pubs ^This
I second that |
XEROO COOL
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
476
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:50:00 -
[74] - Quote
CUBS UNbanned Alt wrote:Shepherd Grey wrote: 4. We did, in fact, go independent. I sorely can attest that Cubs is right. Versing 8+ ringers defending four WarRavens locked districts that we sniped a week ago, we realized that 120 isn't enough clones when elite ringers have zero integrity in earning paychecks they don't need anyway. Without resolving to utilize the dirty tactics 70% of MH landholders do to keep their land, which we will never do, we found it difficult to progress alone given MH's current state-of-affairs.
I go the other route, and all of a sudden your wife, kids, pets, and even Rampages blow-up doll are homeless or living in a 1974 chevy station wagon. HAHAHAHAAHA takes breath... HAHAHAHAAHAH +1
Everyone has a plan until you punch em in the face!
(Gò»°Gûí°n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+
Xeroo.Cool on Skype.
|
Derrith Erador
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
796
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 21:52:00 -
[75] - Quote
Shepherd Grey wrote:Ok, let's see if I can line these all up correctly. 1. OP - history lesson? when I pulled you out of D-Uni, you had talent. Where did you take it? only the most notorious district-locking corp out there. When you point fingers of bandwagon, look at the 3 pointed back at you. You aren't leadership, PD leaders hardly inquired as to CAP's opinions on any matters etc., therefore we owe our considerations to no one. 2. Our withdrawal from alliance was a reflection on the direction it was taking: simple as that. We stuck around through two wars with alliance, lost everything TWICE - thus proving we stand by those around us, no matter the cost. You're oblivious to the price my guys have paid defending platforms and deals we weren't privy to. Fusion, how much has mL lost for pd ever? 3. Leaving had absolutely NOTHING to do with ringers or help from anyone. I don't blame STB/ML not ringing for losing our land, I didn't ask them for help nor did I want it. When NS attacked everything we owned, we brought 16 CAP to every match and fought valiantly. When we could have abandoned PD to keep our land and save ourselves, we stood by our brothers in arms for one last hurrah. Tex and I didn't form this corp to ring out; if the men play, they deserve to compete. 4. We did, in fact, go independent. I sorely can attest that Cubs is right. Versing 8+ ringers defending four WarRavens locked districts that we sniped a week ago, we realized that 120 isn't enough clones when elite ringers have zero integrity in earning paychecks they don't need anyway. Without resolving to utilize the dirty tactics 70% of MH landholders do to keep their land, which we will never do, we found it difficult to progress alone given MH's current state-of-affairs. 5. We entered RA to squad/fight alongside people my guys enjoy playing with, as was the original case with PD (Sax Rage). Our time at PD was thoroughly enjoyed, as clearly stated in the withdrawal letter, and no malicious intent was behind it. Our relations with many individual alliance members remains constant, as does the friendships built between CAP's guys and theirs. In the end, it's all about the guys and what it is THEY seek to fulfill out of this game. We leaders are merely facilitators, illustrating the group's opinion and exercising it fully without injecting selfish pursuit or gain. My men have fought without a paycheck from locked districts since we formed, and I wouldn't rather be surrounded by anyone else. We don't seek to gain elitist players by taking land and locking it, barring the community from genuinely enjoying this game for what it is. Rather, we men & women at CAP have forged a team as well as a family and hope to defend a MH free of exploits. Those among you wishing the same from your corp, voice it. When CCP fixes these farming fools, we'll see who has the talent then All other questions, comments, inquiries can be directly funneled into their nearest receptacle. All dry cleaning, please forward to OP. Regards, SG TL;DR version 1) LOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL you suck Fusion! U MAD U MAD U MAD U MAD!!!
My own personal questions: 2)Where the heck is Vin Vicious. We're currently 4-4 and I want to tdome him!
3)On a serious note, have you ever noticed you come across as preachy?
4)Fair warning, I've noticed you never posting any pro anime vids! your time in RA won't last if you don't get on that!
beatin' slaves and whippin' knaves All in a days work for an Amarrican!
|
Shiyou Hidiyoshi
41
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 23:17:00 -
[76] - Quote
Shepherd Grey wrote:Ok, let's see if I can line these all up correctly. 1. OP - history lesson? when I pulled you out of D-Uni, you had talent. Where did you take it? only the most notorious district-locking corp out there. When you point fingers of bandwagon, look at the 3 pointed back at you. You aren't leadership, PD leaders hardly inquired as to CAP's opinions on any matters etc., therefore we owe our considerations to no one. 2. Our withdrawal from alliance was a reflection on the direction it was taking: simple as that. We stuck around through two wars with alliance, lost everything TWICE - thus proving we stand by those around us, no matter the cost. You're oblivious to the price my guys have paid defending platforms and deals we weren't privy to. Fusion, how much has mL lost for pd ever? 3. Leaving had absolutely NOTHING to do with ringers or help from anyone. I don't blame STB/ML not ringing for losing our land, I didn't ask them for help nor did I want it. When NS attacked everything we owned, we brought 16 CAP to every match and fought valiantly. When we could have abandoned PD to keep our land and save ourselves, we stood by our brothers in arms for one last hurrah. Tex and I didn't form this corp to ring out; if the men play, they deserve to compete. 4. We did, in fact, go independent. I sorely can attest that Cubs is right. Versing 8+ ringers defending four WarRavens locked districts that we sniped a week ago, we realized that 120 isn't enough clones when elite ringers have zero integrity in earning paychecks they don't need anyway. Without resolving to utilize the dirty tactics 70% of MH landholders do to keep their land, which we will never do, we found it difficult to progress alone given MH's current state-of-affairs. 5. We entered RA to squad/fight alongside people my guys enjoy playing with, as was the original case with PD (Sax Rage). Our time at PD was thoroughly enjoyed, as clearly stated in the withdrawal letter, and no malicious intent was behind it. Our relations with many individual alliance members remains constant, as does the friendships built between CAP's guys and theirs. In the end, it's all about the guys and what it is THEY seek to fulfill out of this game. We leaders are merely facilitators, illustrating the group's opinion and exercising it fully without injecting selfish pursuit or gain. My men have fought without a paycheck from locked districts since we formed, and I wouldn't rather be surrounded by anyone else. We don't seek to gain elitist players by taking land and locking it, barring the community from genuinely enjoying this game for what it is. Rather, we men & women at CAP have forged a team as well as a family and hope to defend a MH free of exploits. Those among you wishing the same from your corp, voice it. When CCP fixes these farming fools, we'll see who has the talent then All other questions, comments, inquiries can be directly funneled into their nearest receptacle. All dry cleaning, please forward to OP. Regards, SG I remember seeing you guys build up and grow many months ago from certain players in my local chat inviting me to your public chat. I didn't really know anything about you guys but when MadMatt told me that you were going to fight ringer free and say **** that district locking crap, you got my respect. Also, what you said about leaders merely being facilitators made me respect you even more. So many leaders don't say things like that.
Will awoky woky Rampage in PC for Chucky Cheese tokens. I finally reached 1Mil isk guys! C C P corp is a scruby corp. :P
|
ragewardog
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
106
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 23:40:00 -
[77] - Quote
lol |
ReGnYuM
Escrow Removal and Acquisition
2012
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 01:10:00 -
[78] - Quote
CA LLC =
There is no chance of me winning this game, therefore I am going to hide in the hills with RR and sniper rifles
LAMFO
Official Imperfect Title: Supreme Leader of the Endless Sunset
I Slay, for thy Empress
Do you even PC... Brah
|
Texas Killionaire
Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance
45
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 01:39:00 -
[79] - Quote
ReGnYuM wrote:CA LLC =
There is no chance of me winning this game, therefore I am going to hide in the hills with RR and sniper rifles
LAMFO
I guess that works. We're trying to snipe off these locked districts with clone packs. Then we'll get uplinks down, swarm the point, capture it then guard it with HMGs. Melting faces all the while. Sounds like a plan ChanningTakeYum. Lulz
If you're not ready to lose, you're not ready to win.
Jello Biafra = God
AQUPI
|
Bloodthirsty Heathen
Talledos Inc
33
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 02:50:00 -
[80] - Quote
CUBS UNbanned Alt wrote: using 'ringers' .... Its as much a part of the game as the dreaded 'protobears' in pubs
Have any of you watched the CCP Dust 514 Introductory Video, it says right there .. "You might find yourself fighting for ideals, or for money, or simply because is what you are good at",
It's just like the religious people who debate me and have never read their fuckiing 'holy books'.
Idiots.
|
|
iliel
Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 03:44:00 -
[81] - Quote
The way I see it is: ringing is fine; there is an upside and downside to ringing - - that is, getting players who may be /are individually better than your corp's members, but who are generally not as familiar with your corp's team strategies. I respect Cubs and others (even Regnyum). I think they're damn good players and do nothing wrong when it comes to 'playing the game.'
District locking, on the other hand, is an in-game exploit. While ML may not have been the first district lockers (I'm not familiar with Dust 'history'), they did district lock at a time when it was implemented as a way to avoid attacks and to accumulate Isk. That is, they exploited the system to make personal profits without risk. (I would contrast this with RA, who have now locked their districts to encourage CCP to fix (i.e., remove) this exploit of PC from the game.)
While I wish ringers did not ring for corps who district lock - - especially for the defense (when the corp has more than three times the number of clones as the attacker), I at the same time don't blame ringers for going where the Isk is. That is only natural in a game with mercenaries.
As for why CA left PD, I don't know the 'official' reason, since I'm not in CA's 'management'. However, I do know a personal reason for me to encourage CA's 'managemnt' to leave and have nothing to do with PD or its members was that during the 'war' with RA, a war which CA neither initiated nor formally endorsed (since neither ML nor STB asked CA what we thought about the groundds for the war...), there was a point in time when CA had several PC battles with NS,. Now, two of these took place at the same time. So, as you might expect, CA needed some people to help. Logically (I think logically...), we asked who we thought were at the time our 'allies' to help. Now, not only did almost no one help (two of Dethdealers' and two Poison Roses' members did help), but almost no one responded. That is, STB, ML, Thid Day, Rising Suns said absolutely nothing in alliance chat in response to our request to help with the battle. They didn't say 'hey, we're not helping because X.' So CA sent 8 people into a battle against 16 NS...
From my perspective, it seemed that someone in the alliance told everyone except CA not to help CA. This follows from the fact that CA refused to help STB when they were in a PC against AE. The reason for this was that CA's CEO (Shepherd) was not present at the time STB asked for help. Before that, Shepherd had told us not to ring against AE. Indeed, AE had been a supportful friend of CA in this game for several months. So to help fight them because of something going on with STB - - something which, I should note, STB felt was not for CA to know - - this appeared silly. But either way, no member of CA was willing to contradict what our CEO told us. And since no one from STB or ML had discussed the 'war' with Shepherd, he never had a chance to reconsider his position about AE (a point which is not to imply he would have changed his mind). So, as we told STB, we could not ring against AE. And, because of this, it seems, STB (and ML) did not want to help CA with NS.
But I'm not upset by the fact that almost no one in our past alliance helped. Chances are we would've lost either way. (I mean, really, how much help could a corp/alliance who needs a non-alliance corp to do all their work for them be.) Rather, I'm upset that no one said they wouldn't help and why. I think it's silly to play a game with a group of people who don't have enough common courtesy to simply explain when they will or will not help with what some might consider was at one time the most competitive aspect of the game.
So, for me, leaving STB was about being independent to discover who in this game actually is respectful enough to play the game fairly (i.e., not lock districts to profit wihout risk), tell us when they can and cannot help, and show some general respect for us as other players of this game. RA was an obvious choice. And I'm glad we applied and that they've accepted us.
For me, all this is simple and doesn't really warrant such an 'explanation.' But if you want to point the finger at supposed hypocrites, I'd suggest pointing it at those who say they're the best, who say they have integrity and are game players, etc., but yet exploit the game, lock their districts, talk about how small corps 'have to' lock them (even though they are in the top three largest corps in the game), claim not to be elitists, yet for whatever reason think having more isk is a good thing... I mean doesn't it determine who are the better players? I'd point it at those who criticize other corps for not having the best players and yet who ring an ENTIRE TEAM of another corp in order to win their battles.
Let me just say that those to whom I'm referring here are not intended to be wholly not identifiable. |
Long Evity
1419
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 04:18:00 -
[82] - Quote
iliel wrote: For me, all this is simple and doesn't really warrant such an 'explanation.' But if you want to point the finger at supposed hypocrites, I'd suggest pointing it at those who say they're the best, who say they have integrity and are game players, etc., but yet exploit the game, lock their districts, talk about how small corps 'have to' lock them (even though they are in the top three largest corps in the game), claim not to be elitists, yet for whatever reason think having more isk is a good thing... I mean doesn't it determine who are the better players? I'd point it at those who criticize other corps for not having the best players and yet who ring an ENTIRE TEAM of another corp in order to win their battles.
Let me just say that those to whom I'm referring here are not intended to be wholly not identifiable.
It's hard to say who you're talking about when you say, "They're in top three largest..."
It's either STB, AE, DDB, NS, ML, or PX1. I wonder which :O
Because if being hypocrites about morality is an issue - you just joined the worst of them all - AE. So I'm guessing, that's who it is. But that makes no sense?? You just joined them!?
Gah - I'm so confused. :)
I am not who you think I am, only but just a dream.
|
DJINN Kujo
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
923
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 11:01:00 -
[83] - Quote
To set the record straight for everyone - AE is not the only corp in RA.
AE. though has continued close relations with Shepherd Grey from Capital Acquisitions LLC. Nyain San had attacked all their districts and offered them their land if they left PD. They essentially told Nyain to suck it and stayed for the fights and took the loss for their alliance.
Their nobility is strong, I actually haven't even been on to welcome them and they have been in for a few days now, sigh *work*. So some of you are right about them being on different playing ground and that's fine. But a promise to Capital Acquisitions I personally made to them was that I would help them succeed, which I know is going to cause a lot of questions. As in, will AE. be helping them take land? Answer is no. - For a long time, a lot of veteran corporations have told me to help a lesser experienced corporation out, well that's what my goal is with Capital Acquisitions. Although my own activity is shaky, I will still render any resources I have at my personal disposal to help them. No, not ISK either. Just fundamentals of PC and the competitive roots this game has in opposing points of view.
Ancient Exiles, CEO
Your failure to plan ahead does not constitute an emergency on my end.
|
iliel
Capital Acquisitions LLC Renegade Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 11:11:00 -
[84] - Quote
Long Evity wrote:iliel wrote: For me, all this is simple and doesn't really warrant such an 'explanation.' But if you want to point the finger at supposed hypocrites, I'd suggest pointing it at those who say they're the best, who say they have integrity and are game players, etc., but yet exploit the game, lock their districts, talk about how small corps 'have to' lock them (even though they are in the top three largest corps in the game), claim not to be elitists, yet for whatever reason think having more isk is a good thing... I mean doesn't it determine who are the better players? I'd point it at those who criticize other corps for not having the best players and yet who ring an ENTIRE TEAM of another corp in order to win their battles.
Let me just say that those to whom I'm referring here are not intended to be wholly not identifiable.
It's hard to say who you're talking about when you say, "They're in top three largest..." It's either STB, AE, DDB, NS, ML, or PX1. I wonder which :O Because if being hypocrites about morality is an issue - you just joined the worst of them all - AE. So I'm guessing, that's who it is. But that makes no sense?? You just joined them!? Gah - I'm so confused. :)
You might want to double check how many members are in each corp . . . The following might help: http://evemaps.dotlan.net/districts/alliances.
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
2401
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 11:31:00 -
[85] - Quote
CPL Bloodstone wrote:tl:dr We do what we want when we want and dont care what you think. If it benefits us, it benefits us regardless of your opinion.
(True) part of the reason CA left PD was because it was a stipulation of mine that if i was to join the leadership of CA that they leave PD. Lucky for me, it was already in the process =).
(My perception) I believe that CA rarely received assistance from PD corps and it was all about STB and kinda about ML. Capital aquisition has really grown over time and does very well on their own but sometimes due to timers and what not, you just need assistance. That is were PD fell thru the cracks.
(reason for joining RA)
We had all intentions of remaining solo for an undecided amount of time. Just so happens that thru fun matches and such with RA corps, that it was brought up about us joining RA. Each corp within RA can stand on its own without help. How much greater if you takes those corps and put them into an Alliance to make each corp stronger. That is what we truely get from it. I believe its a good fit not only for us but also for RA. Plus its really nice to know if we get into a pinch, we have awesome teams that will back us up. I do not have any information regarding prices if any on our alliance members ringing.
I like this response .....
"We joined the bandwagon...so what?"
You have to respect that :D
weRideNDie2getha since 2010
|
excillon
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
205
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 11:33:00 -
[86] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:CPL Bloodstone wrote:tl:dr We do what we want when we want and dont care what you think. If it benefits us, it benefits us regardless of your opinion.
(True) part of the reason CA left PD was because it was a stipulation of mine that if i was to join the leadership of CA that they leave PD. Lucky for me, it was already in the process =).
(My perception) I believe that CA rarely received assistance from PD corps and it was all about STB and kinda about ML. Capital aquisition has really grown over time and does very well on their own but sometimes due to timers and what not, you just need assistance. That is were PD fell thru the cracks.
(reason for joining RA)
We had all intentions of remaining solo for an undecided amount of time. Just so happens that thru fun matches and such with RA corps, that it was brought up about us joining RA. Each corp within RA can stand on its own without help. How much greater if you takes those corps and put them into an Alliance to make each corp stronger. That is what we truely get from it. I believe its a good fit not only for us but also for RA. Plus its really nice to know if we get into a pinch, we have awesome teams that will back us up. I do not have any information regarding prices if any on our alliance members ringing. I like this response ..... "We joined the bandwagon...so what?" You have to respect that :D
lol...you got that too?
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
360
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 11:59:00 -
[87] - Quote
Sorry to see you guys go, CA. Always had fun squadding with you. Best of luck....Leadfoot |
CUBS UNbanned Alt
209
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 15:04:00 -
[88] - Quote
DJINN Kujo wrote:To set the record straight for everyone - AE is not the only corp in RA.
AE. though has continued close relations with Shepherd Grey from Capital Acquisitions LLC. Nyain San had attacked all their districts and offered them their land if they left PD. They essentially told Nyain to suck it and stayed for the fights and took the loss for their alliance.
Their nobility is strong, I actually haven't even been on to welcome them and they have been in for a few days now, sigh *work*. So some of you are right about them being on different playing ground and that's fine. But a promise to Capital Acquisitions I personally made to them was that I would help them succeed, which I know is going to cause a lot of questions. As in, will AE. be helping them take land? Answer is no. - For a long time, a lot of veteran corporations have told me to help a lesser experienced corporation out, well that's what my goal is with Capital Acquisitions. Although my own activity is shaky, I will still render any resources I have at my personal disposal to help them. No, not ISK either. Just fundamentals of PC and the competitive roots this game has in opposing points of view.
wont play their matches...check shepherd wont let u play their matches....check
ahhh i get it now. give em some land so they dont have to qq about clone packs, and keep supplying them when they run out, at a cost of course.
good business model wish i woulda thought of it.
bottom line good PR for an alliance in need of such. good move
and tbh having Cap Acq to help your alliance is way more of an asset. they dont back down and turtle up :P
Bowser FTW
Don't drink the koolaid... Rampage made it from scratch and didn't wash his hands
|
Long Evity
1422
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 16:04:00 -
[89] - Quote
iliel wrote:Long Evity wrote:iliel wrote: For me, all this is simple and doesn't really warrant such an 'explanation.' But if you want to point the finger at supposed hypocrites, I'd suggest pointing it at those who say they're the best, who say they have integrity and are game players, etc., but yet exploit the game, lock their districts, talk about how small corps 'have to' lock them (even though they are in the top three largest corps in the game), claim not to be elitists, yet for whatever reason think having more isk is a good thing... I mean doesn't it determine who are the better players? I'd point it at those who criticize other corps for not having the best players and yet who ring an ENTIRE TEAM of another corp in order to win their battles.
Let me just say that those to whom I'm referring here are not intended to be wholly not identifiable.
It's hard to say who you're talking about when you say, "They're in top three largest..." It's either STB, AE, DDB, NS, ML, or PX1. I wonder which :O Because if being hypocrites about morality is an issue - you just joined the worst of them all - AE. So I'm guessing, that's who it is. But that makes no sense?? You just joined them!? Gah - I'm so confused. :) You might want to double check how many members are in each corp . . . The following might help: http://evemaps.dotlan.net/districts/alliances. If the link worked - it might of helped. But I highly doubt he's referring to largest as being the most populated. I take insinuations where they exist - but his words are easily mis-contruded to mean almost anyone, though he wants the person he's insulting to understand it's him.
We all know he's pointing to Cubs - but for the reasons he mentioned for disliking cubs, morale issues mostly, AE is even worse off with. The only recently took morale high ground with district locking - AND THAT'S IT. I hope LLC thought things through, because a lot of the posts here imply that Capital Inq has no ******* clue about anything outside of there group.
Lol, oh well. If cap wants to chill with the glitch to winners that's there call. :3
I am not who you think I am, only but just a dream.
|
Long Evity
1422
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 16:07:00 -
[90] - Quote
DJINN Kujo wrote:To set the record straight for everyone - AE is not the only corp in RA.
AE. though has continued close relations with Shepherd Grey from Capital Acquisitions LLC. Nyain San had attacked all their districts and offered them their land if they left PD. They essentially told Nyain to suck it and stayed for the fights and took the loss for their alliance.
Their nobility is strong, I actually haven't even been on to welcome them and they have been in for a few days now, sigh *work*. So some of you are right about them being on different playing ground and that's fine. But a promise to Capital Acquisitions I personally made to them was that I would help them succeed, which I know is going to cause a lot of questions. As in, will AE. be helping them take land? Answer is no. - For a long time, a lot of veteran corporations have told me to help a lesser experienced corporation out, well that's what my goal is with Capital Acquisitions. Although my own activity is shaky, I will still render any resources I have at my personal disposal to help them. No, not ISK either. Just fundamentals of PC and the competitive roots this game has in opposing points of view. You're acting like Capital Aq isn't an already established corp - they don't need to be piggy backed or held hands - they barely needs ringers and there wallet isn't empty. IF anything they said here is true - AE won't be doing anything to help them at all other then giving them a good time in there alliance. So which is it - are you buddies - or are they your pet project?
I am not who you think I am, only but just a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |