Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
BattleCry1791
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
277
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 07:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Oh quit your whining already. Let's just face one simple fact
The Game is still in Beta. Scout and Heavy racial variants? Tanks? LAVs? Heavy guns? Dropships? Installations? Pilot Dropsuits? Player Market? When these things are all introduced, then and only then, can anyone consider the game "released". And I'd propose that 14 days after that happens, no more respecs should ever be discussed.
Until that happens, let's just be honest with ourselves. A lot of guys had quit playing this game because they spec'd into X, X got nerfed, and they didn't feel like grinding/AFKing to spec into something else. I have a clan full of such players. Well, that and a bunch of players that flat out don't trust CCP to do anything right.
However, the old adage of "one fix and 8 screw ups" per patch seems to have fallen by the wayside (Did all the Zipper guys get fired or does the new cruise director have it going on?).
As I come back to the game after the last couple of updates I've been very pleased with the changes I've seen. Biggest problem I'm seeing is the RR. The maps lend to that weapon SO well. Not sure how to fix that to be honest. Will adding more players for the 32 vs 32 help or hurt the problem? Time will tell. However I will say that it's not OP, but working as intended.
Back the $100 dollar (US) Respec.
Why not just allow for a respec as the game progresses? CCP, you'll make 20 grand the first day, and that's probably conservative. With the coming FOTM's that we have yet to see...why not give players the opportunity to respec just so long as they pay through the nose? I can tell you right now, I got two toons that I'd do it for. My main is so screwed up I can't play on him anymore (my heart is Minmatar, but my playstyle is actually Gallente Logi...18mil+ SP sunk in all the wrong places).
And what about all the tankers that abandoned the game that would like to come back but spec'd out of tanking and don't want to grind?
CCP offers AUR versions of plenty of gear to keep players competitive as they grind up their toons, but in reality, it's all about money and "micro transactions".
I know all you "purists" will come running to the thread with "NO REPECS...CHOICES HAVE CONSEQUENCES"...and if the game was anywhere near finished or "pure" itself, I'd be inclined to agree. But it's not. In order to make an informed choice, you have to know all the variables that go into making that choice. Since we can't peer into the future of the army of "SOON"s that are yet to be, it's time to give it up and ask yourself one question.
Do you want to have a playerbase? If yes, then just accept that this is still a F2P beta and player choice should trump all. |
Borne Velvalor
Endless Hatred
1122
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 08:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
You think that 200 players would pay $100 each for a respec?
Many suits I've worn, many burdens I've borne, for the oaths I've sworn.
Panda.
|
Syeven Reed
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
219
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 08:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
Eve has a neural remap, one free skill point (EDIT: Attribute remap) rearrange a year, why can't dusties have that for our SP?
EDIT: im generally against respecs as they enable people to choose, "flavor of the months". But with a harsh limit on them I dont have as much of a problem.
G˙é Syeven 514
|
BattleCry1791
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
279
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 08:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Borne Velvalor wrote:You think that 200 players would pay $100 each for a respec?
I said it, I'll stand by it. |
Alena Ventrallis
The Neutral Zone
360
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 08:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Syeven Reed wrote:Eve has a neural remap, one free skill point (EDIT: Attribute remap) rearrange a year, why can't dusties have that for our SP? That isn't the same thing.
That being said, a respec wouldn't be a bad thing. A lot of people skilled into things only for CCP to change how they worked. |
deezy dabest
Warpoint Sharx
136
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 08:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
If the game was not still in beta I would pay 100 for a respec, but knowing that placement would leave me with some measure of what I am already at (only the core skills are still useful), I would not.
This might be good for something in the future but right now it would be the same as putting 100 into a slot machine. |
StoneSmasher Drugga
Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic
27
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 08:26:00 -
[7] - Quote
Make it 10 or 15 bucks and we have a deal. 100 bucks is crazy.
There is no evil greater than hyperbole.
|
jerrmy12 kahoalii
Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic
182
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 08:41:00 -
[8] - Quote
StoneSmasher Drugga wrote:Make it 10 or 15 bucks and we have a deal. 100 bucks is crazy. 5 or 10 thousand aurum & we have i deal, i only have 10k
recuruit link
5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
963
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 08:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
CCP should allow respecs for 100,000 AUR.
The respec should also remove half of your SP permanently. |
jerrmy12 kahoalii
Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic
182
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 09:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:CCP should allow respecs for 100,000 AUR.
The respec should also remove half of your SP permanently. no one would buy it & that would remove the point of the respec. please get out
recuruit link
5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
|
|
Blind Nojoy
G I A N T General Tso's Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 09:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
I'm sure something along the lines of what we saw with the vehicle changes is coming for infantry.
When they add in the rest of the racial suits, and especially if they are changing the suit bonuses, which is the reason I chose Gallente in the first place (that and they are 'Murica). They will need to.
I would assume we get a SP refund for suits. I wouldn't expect full respecs. I personally think they SHOULD do a full respec when the game gets out of beta (zing). But I think that won't happen. SP refund will be it. Do yourselves a favor and put the SP into core skills this time so we don't have to hear about it on the forums please (directed at mindless BB's, not OP).
Should be interesting quite frankly, this next update...since "balance" to CCP means invincible vehicles and AV as powerful as my stream of p*ss after 8 beers. One can only logically assume my scout will be ultimate punching madrugars into orbit after they get "rebalanced" in a months time. |
calvin b
SCAVENGER'S DAUGHTER
1290
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 09:10:00 -
[12] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:CCP should allow respecs for 100,000 AUR.
The respec should also remove half of your SP permanently.
Are you out of your mind. If I accepted your idea I would lose over 15 million SP and would still have to pay. What the F*** did you take and please please never take it again.
TANK514 another sign of cancer in the game
|
Izlare Lenix
FREE AGENTS LP
52
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 09:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
Syeven Reed wrote:Eve has a neural remap, one free skill point (EDIT: Attribute remap) rearrange a year, why can't dusties have that for our SP?
EDIT: im generally against respecs as they enable people to choose, "flavor of the months". But with a harsh limit on them I dont have as much of a problem.
Remaps are nothing like a respec. Remaps control how you gain SP not how to redistribute the sp you have already used. Respecs are bad, end of story.
Also a side note. You gain SP twice as fast in Dust as you do in EVE, even faster with boosters. So those begging for respecs have no idea his easy dust players have it compared to EVE. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
1017
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 09:37:00 -
[14] - Quote
BattleCry1791 wrote:Oh quit your whining already. Let's just face one simple fact
The Game is still in Beta. Scout and Heavy racial variants? Tanks? LAVs? Heavy guns? Dropships? Installations? Pilot Dropsuits? Player Market? When these things are all introduced, then and only then, can anyone consider the game "released". And I'd propose that 14 days after that happens, no more respecs should ever be discussed.
Until that happens, let's just be honest with ourselves. A lot of guys had quit playing this game because they spec'd into X, X got nerfed, and they didn't feel like grinding/AFKing to spec into something else. I have a clan full of such players. Well, that and a bunch of players that flat out don't trust CCP to do anything right.
However, the old adage of "one fix and 8 screw ups" per patch seems to have fallen by the wayside (Did all the Zipper guys get fired or does the new cruise director have it going on?).
As I come back to the game after the last couple of updates I've been very pleased with the changes I've seen. Biggest problem I'm seeing is the RR. The maps lend to that weapon SO well. Not sure how to fix that to be honest. Will adding more players for the 32 vs 32 help or hurt the problem? Time will tell. However I will say that it's not OP, but working as intended.
Back the $100 dollar (US) Respec.
Why not just allow for a respec as the game progresses? CCP, you'll make 20 grand the first day, and that's probably conservative. With the coming FOTM's that we have yet to see...why not give players the opportunity to respec just so long as they pay through the nose? I can tell you right now, I got two toons that I'd do it for. My main is so screwed up I can't play on him anymore (my heart is Minmatar, but my playstyle is actually Gallente Logi...18mil+ SP sunk in all the wrong places).
And what about all the tankers that abandoned the game that would like to come back but spec'd out of tanking and don't want to grind?
CCP offers AUR versions of plenty of gear to keep players competitive as they grind up their toons, but in reality, it's all about money and "micro transactions".
I know all you "purists" will come running to the thread with "NO REPECS...CHOICES HAVE CONSEQUENCES"...and if the game was anywhere near finished or "pure" itself, I'd be inclined to agree. But it's not. In order to make an informed choice, you have to know all the variables that go into making that choice. Since we can't peer into the future of the army of "SOON"s that are yet to be, it's time to give it up and ask yourself one question.
Do you want to have a playerbase? If yes, then just accept that this is still a F2P beta and player choice should trump all. you are missing the point.
problem are not the nerfs but the constant core mechanic changes from the beginning of the "release" (lolrelease, lets be honest, this game is still beta). everyone talks about decisions and consequences but there are no real decisions. it is all lottery + consequences. player X skills into something, next patch the playstyle player X decided to go for got changed because CCP devs were again smoking something. the premise under which player X decided to spend SP was changed, thus his decision was made null and void in which case his decision was meaningless from the beginning on.
second problem, player Y wants to go for minmatar heavy with HMG. oh wait, there is not minmatar heavy... player Y has now the choice to suck it up and skill into amarr heavy or quit.
in short: CCP currently penalizes the players everytime he makes a decision.
Alena Ventrallis wrote:Syeven Reed wrote:Eve has a neural remap, one free skill point (EDIT: Attribute remap) rearrange a year, why can't dusties have that for our SP? That isn't the same thing. it isnt the same thing BUT in EVE you get alot of more passive SP and a a Neural Remap can speed it up if you are focusing on something specific. you can make skill plan and take a break from the game for a month, then come back and enjoy something completely with decent amounts of SP in it. you can also buy a new character in the character bazaar.
in dust, you have to play actively if you want to achieve something in a reasonable timeframe. |
Lorhak Gannarsein
859
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 09:37:00 -
[15] - Quote
Blind Nojoy wrote:I'm sure something along the lines of what we saw with the vehicle changes is coming for infantry.
When they add in the rest of the racial suits, and especially if they are changing the suit bonuses, which is the reason I chose Gallente in the first place (that and they are 'Murica). They will need to.
I would assume we get a SP refund for suits. I wouldn't expect full respecs. I personally think they SHOULD do a full respec when the game gets out of beta (zing). But I think that won't happen. SP refund will be it. Do yourselves a favor and put the SP into core skills this time so we don't have to hear about it on the forums please (directed at mindless BB's, not OP).
Should be interesting quite frankly, this next update...since "balance" to CCP means invincible vehicles and AV as powerful as my stream of p*ss after 8 beers. One can only logically assume my scout will be ultimate punching madrugars into orbit after they get "rebalanced" in a months time.
Wait.
You like having a bonus to shields on your GalAssault?
PRO tanker and proud.
Lentarr Legionary.
|
boba's fetta
Operation Clone Shield
136
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 09:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
i would never pay for a respec. but if others are willing to then im all for it. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
963
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 10:37:00 -
[17] - Quote
calvin b wrote:Rasatsu wrote:CCP should allow respecs for 100,000 AUR.
The respec should also remove half of your SP permanently. Are you out of your mind. If I accepted your idea I would lose over 15 million SP and would still have to pay . What the F*** did you take and please please never take it again. Seems like a fair tradeoff for people chasing FOTMs. |
Khan Hun
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 10:56:00 -
[18] - Quote
Rather than a respec, a system where you pay 5000 AUR and get a refund of 90% the SPs from one skill (and any that are closed of by unlearning it, would be cool.
E.g.
I unlearn assault rifles, and get 90% of the SPs I've invested into the whole branch back for a small fee. Seems fair to me, 90% means it'd not be worth FOTMing every week, generates some revenue and lets people tweak their skills without removing every choice they ever made. |
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1417
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 11:05:00 -
[19] - Quote
BattleCry1791 wrote:Oh quit your whining already. Let's just face one simple fact
The Game is still in Beta. Scout and Heavy racial variants? Tanks? LAVs? Heavy guns? Dropships? Installations? Pilot Dropsuits? Player Market? When these things are all introduced, then and only then, can anyone consider the game "released". And I'd propose that 14 days after that happens, no more respecs should ever be discussed.
No it isn't. It was officially released. Content will be added all the time. And there's no difference between entirely new Dropsuits or just racial variants. So, regarding this fact: No more respecs should ever be discussed. Thank you. |
Piraten Hovnoret
No Tax Scrubs
139
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 11:14:00 -
[20] - Quote
I agree I this one. I will pay some dollars to respec sond of my sp. I can live with the hole "live with it" thing if there was not removing svd adding stuff al the time leaving you with ussles skills that got nerfed throw the grownd .
Any way I am at a point where I may leave this game.
|
|
jenza aranda
BetaMax.
2446
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 11:51:00 -
[21] - Quote
oh look, this thread again....
Dust 514 101 // Dust 514 Wiki
|
Malkai Inos
Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State
1121
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 12:58:00 -
[22] - Quote
BattleCry1791 wrote:Oh quit your whining already.
Never seen someone answer and end his own thread in the very first line. Kudos for that, OP.
You can take a benign object, -you can take a cheeseburger and deconstruct it to its source...
|
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan
Murder Cakes Of Doom
1348
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 13:01:00 -
[23] - Quote
O_O i thought pfb was dead. is this a new begining.
BTW hows it been. o/
Main - BobThe843CakeMan
Ringing for PC for a price, msg for details.
Prices are based on who ur facing and how i feel.
|
Echo 1991
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
18
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 13:09:00 -
[24] - Quote
Personally, if they limit respecs to once a year i dont see a single problem with it. It may lead to people choosing the FOTM but their is the chance that it could get nerfed or something that is better is released, this will then lead to them having to wait to respec to use it or put the SP they are earning into that specific skill. Also Quote:No it isn't. It was officially released. Content will be added all the time. And there's no difference between entirely new Dropsuits or just racial variants. So, regarding this fact: No more respecs should ever be discussed. Thank you. there is a difference between new content and things being left unfinished, they haven't added the racial variants of the dropsuits or the pilot suits, this isnt new content as such but a variation of a current suit. (pilot suits are a scout variant i believe) |
BattleCry1791
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
279
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 13:18:00 -
[25] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:BattleCry1791 wrote:Oh quit your whining already. Let's just face one simple fact
The Game is still in Beta. Scout and Heavy racial variants? Tanks? LAVs? Heavy guns? Dropships? Installations? Pilot Dropsuits? Player Market? When these things are all introduced, then and only then, can anyone consider the game "released". And I'd propose that 14 days after that happens, no more respecs should ever be discussed. No it isn't. It was officially released. Content will be added all the time. And there's no difference between entirely new Dropsuits or just racial variants. So, regarding this fact: No more respecs should ever be discussed. Thank you.
I believe I told you to GTFO in my OP did I not? You Purists and your garbage dogma is akin to saying "Nope, the car was released. It has 3 tires, a 4th tire, lugnuts, axle, etc will all be added later." Point is, the game is FAR from complete.
Jack McReady, I am not wrong,
I tend to write in book form anyways, so for the interest of time, I tend to save a little ammo for responses, but now I don't have to since you already did it for me.
Bob, No, there is no official plan for PFB to return to DUST. I find myself kind of enjoying playing it as a Gallente Assault or a as a Heavy right now...I am not doing well tanking, I can tell you that. I still prefer the rail over the blaster and I can't hit infantry with it right now. Some of the guys passionately hate this game and I don't blame them. For some of us it's not just about the game play but what it did to the clan. Thanks for taking the time to drop in and say "Hi". "Hi" back at ya.
Back to the point.
People have bought $100 dollar packs for this game. There are some people that are literally sitting around ready to throw money at CCP. All they have to do is figure out ways to do it that won't break the game.
Now back to the QQ. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2028
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 13:28:00 -
[26] - Quote
I wanted to be a vehicle pilot
When it was 'released' we got a final respec
I skilled back into tanks, 20mil later i had fully fitted out the vehicle tree to how i like it, 6months later they turn the vehicle tree upside down and make it more expenisve SP wise by a factor of 3, my 20mil wouldnt cut it, instead for what i had then i would have needed 60mil but i only had 32mil
If i had a crystal ball i would have held onto all my SP after i maxed out the vehicle tree so the vehicle tree resuffle wouldnt have ****** me up
I got punished for skilling into a secondary role
So AUR respecs - im not against them, im just against bad ideas which also remove x% of SP from your total SP count if you choose the respec
They could do neural remaps like in EVE, once a year you get a respec, you can use it anytime but once its gone its gone
Intelligence is OP
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
3376
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 13:57:00 -
[27] - Quote
Izlare Lenix wrote:Syeven Reed wrote:Eve has a neural remap, one free skill point (EDIT: Attribute remap) rearrange a year, why can't dusties have that for our SP?
EDIT: im generally against respecs as they enable people to choose, "flavor of the months". But with a harsh limit on them I dont have as much of a problem. Remaps are nothing like a respec. Remaps control how you gain SP not how to redistribute the sp you have already used. Respecs are bad, end of story. Also a side note. You gain SP twice as fast in Dust as you do in EVE, even faster with boosters. So those begging for respecs have no idea his easy dust players have it compared to EVE. As an EvE pilot I can tell you now that skilling into things in EvE is far less stressful, and far more profitable for what you get for it.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 3
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
PLAYSTTION
GamersForChrist Orion Empire
15
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 14:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
There will most likely be a respec in the future cause CCPs gonna work with the skill tree and change a bunch of stuff. I think all that is needed right now is a weapons sp refund cause of the new guns and when the new suits come a drop suit sp refund
-Federal Marine-Open Beta Vet-
Let Caldari Prime Burn
|
Jersey-Devil
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
23
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 15:23:00 -
[29] - Quote
While I would really like a respec, I don't know if $100 should be the going price. I too have points spread around to try new items/weapons/suits, and yes I could grind to get more SP. A fresh start is, in my opinion, what's needed for some, to keep the game interesting/fun/competitive.
*Maybe a $25-50 fee that is usable once per account. *Maybe a skill degenerator of some sorts that cost the same as the passives (cannot be used at the same time as the passive booster). *Maybe a "memory wipe" of a skill tree for a fee that is usable once per month (we're clones to Pete's sake) *Maybe, just maybe, a free one will be issued once the game becomes whole and that will be the end of it.
As I have never played EVE, I can't compare the way/ways that SP are earned, and I can see the argument from EVE players and DUST vets who are against the respec (EVE apparently never received one). However, while in the same "universe", this is not EVE. I plan to continue grinding for SP, for I do think that no SP is wasted, it will be relevant at some point, it's just that after a lot of trial and error, and error, and error, I have found the play style that I enjoy the most, it only took me a year and a half, but I'm a slow learner.
To those who knew what they wanted to do from the jump and perfected their craft, I commend you. To those like me, under 15 mil SP that are spread wider than a *****'s legs, a respec might come in handy. That's just my opinion, and if your a *****, I didn't mean to offend |
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES
1030
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 15:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
Borne Velvalor wrote:You think that 200 players would pay $100 each for a respec?
I do
There was a time we fought good tankers. Now we just fight good tanks.
|
|
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
1673
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 15:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
$100? Are you ******* stupid? On this game? Seriously, **** you.
I already wasted enough money gaining that SP and then for some crybaby piece of **** to get my weapons nerfed because the server system is ****** and explosive damage was the only consistency through the lag (just one example)? Eat ****, mother ******.
It's still in beta. Until these fucktards can figure out the basics of their own ******* game, respecs shouldn't cost jack ****.
Mother ******* on here always act like CCP is in dire need of money, while CCP keeps opening and expanding new divisions.
$100? Yeah, **** that and **** you for even suggesting it. Have you ever had a Marketing class? Do that first, then post marketing suggestions.
Alyssa Milano.
|
MassiveNine
0uter.Heaven
691
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 15:36:00 -
[32] - Quote
There was an idea awhile back to add respec options at the cost of scaling SP. it went something like this:
first respec - 1 million SP cost second - 3 million third - 5 million etc....
This would greatly discourage FOTM chasing.
Official DUST514 LAV Mechanic
|
BattleCry1791
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
283
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 17:10:00 -
[33] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote:$100? Are you ******* stupid? On this game? Seriously, **** you.
I already wasted enough money gaining that SP and then for some crybaby piece of **** to get my weapons nerfed because the server system is ****** and explosive damage was the only consistency through the lag (just one example)? Eat ****, mother ******.
It's still in beta. Until these fucktards can figure out the basics of their own ******* game, respecs shouldn't cost jack ****.
Mother ******* on here always act like CCP is in dire need of money, while CCP keeps opening and expanding new divisions.
$100? Yeah, **** that and **** you for even suggesting it. Have you ever had a Marketing class? Do that first, then post marketing suggestions.
Wow, I think I struck a nerve. Lemme guess you work, or think you're good at Marketing? Well, bub, this ain't about marketing. This is about putting a price tag on a service that will both allow for the service, but discourage it at the same time. Do you know what takes to respec an account? I don't. It may be easy, or it may take setting every tree to zero manually. Who's doing it? How much time does it take and how much are they being paid? What other duties are they not performing to do this task and how much more strategic is that task to current projects?
I love "marketing guys". Too stupid to be an engineer and to much of an asshat to be in sales.
The $100 dollar (US) Price tag is designed to: 1) Give CCP a fiscal incentive to do it on a regular basis. They WILL NOT do it for free on the player's schedule, only when they feel the need to do so, and it's a major headache. 2) Make it so that only either the most serious of Dust players or those with plenty of discretionary income (like me). There was already one "I don't know if I'd pay that much for a respec". What that says is that the poster of that comment wants the respec, so now we're just haggling price. Again, the price should be discouraging, hence, the higher pricetag.
Also, do you know how much Money Dust has made? Is it Solvent? Is CCP taking money from EvE's profit line to invest in these other divisions? Are you their accountant? No? Oh, well in that case, **** you, you ******* ****.
For an "old guy" you sure do sound a lot like a member of the "Money for nuthin" free entitlement generation. Get a haircut, hippie.
|
Smooth Assassin
Stardust incorporation
495
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 17:21:00 -
[34] - Quote
Dollers? i live in england XD
Assassination is my thing.
|
Blind Nojoy
G I A N T General Tso's Alliance
71
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 18:03:00 -
[35] - Quote
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:Blind Nojoy wrote:I'm sure something along the lines of what we saw with the vehicle changes is coming for infantry.
When they add in the rest of the racial suits, and especially if they are changing the suit bonuses, which is the reason I chose Gallente in the first place (that and they are 'Murica). They will need to.
I would assume we get a SP refund for suits. I wouldn't expect full respecs. I personally think they SHOULD do a full respec when the game gets out of beta (zing). But I think that won't happen. SP refund will be it. Do yourselves a favor and put the SP into core skills this time so we don't have to hear about it on the forums please (directed at mindless BB's, not OP).
Should be interesting quite frankly, this next update...since "balance" to CCP means invincible vehicles and AV as powerful as my stream of p*ss after 8 beers. One can only logically assume my scout will be ultimate punching madrugars into orbit after they get "rebalanced" in a months time. Wait. You like having a bonus to shields on your GalAssault?
I did it all for the hybrid weapon CPU reduction. It was sexy. |
Alena Ventrallis
The Neutral Zone
368
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 18:19:00 -
[36] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:into amarr heavy or quit. in short: CCP currently penalizes the players everytime he makes a decision. the premise under which a player decided to spend SP changes nonstop, thus his decision was made null and void in which case his decision was meaningless from the beginning on. how about the devs facing the consequences of THEIR bad decisions and give a respec as compensation even once? Alena Ventrallis wrote:Syeven Reed wrote:Eve has a neural remap, one free skill point (EDIT: Attribute remap) rearrange a year, why can't dusties have that for our SP? That isn't the same thing. it isnt the same thing BUT in EVE you get alot of more passive SP and a a Neural Remap can speed it up if you are focusing on something specific. you can make skill plan and take a break from the game for a month, then come back and enjoy something completely new with good amounts of SP in it. you can also buy a new character in the character bazaar if you have the isk. in dust, you have to play actively if you want to achieve something in a reasonable timeframe.
I agree with you. Just pointing out they aren't the same thing.
Personally, I think we need to have Eve's methods of so gain with the skill queue and neural remaps, but Thats just me. |
Martyr Saboteur
Amarrtyrs
17
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 18:23:00 -
[37] - Quote
No. This has Pay 2 Win written all over it.
Situation:
A rich guy knows there will be a large number of HAVs in the next PC match, but doesn't have enough SP into AV to take them down of scare them away. But that isn't a problem because he is rich, and can just pay a measly $100 to get proto AV with proficiency V for the PC battle. He has just paid the developers to win.
Don't say someone wouldn't spent money like that even if they were rich, because they would. People have done things like this before in other games...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQTSTALLION... I AM THE STALLION
|
Blind Nojoy
G I A N T General Tso's Alliance
71
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 18:27:00 -
[38] - Quote
BattleCry1791 wrote:Rynoceros wrote:$100? Are you ******* stupid? On this game? Seriously, **** you.
I already wasted enough money gaining that SP and then for some crybaby piece of **** to get my weapons nerfed because the server system is ****** and explosive damage was the only consistency through the lag (just one example)? Eat ****, mother ******.
It's still in beta. Until these fucktards can figure out the basics of their own ******* game, respecs shouldn't cost jack ****.
Mother ******* on here always act like CCP is in dire need of money, while CCP keeps opening and expanding new divisions.
$100? Yeah, **** that and **** you for even suggesting it. Have you ever had a Marketing class? Do that first, then post marketing suggestions.
Wow, I think I struck a nerve. Lemme guess you work, or think you're good at Marketing? Well, bub, this ain't about marketing. This is about putting a price tag on a service that will both allow for the service, but discourage it at the same time. Do you know what takes to respec an account? I don't. It may be easy, or it may take setting every tree to zero manually. Who's doing it? How much time does it take and how much are they being paid? What other duties are they not performing to do this task and how much more strategic is that task to current projects? I love "marketing guys". Too stupid to be an engineer and to much of an asshat to be in sales. The $100 dollar (US) Price tag is designed to: 1) Give CCP a fiscal incentive to do it on a regular basis. They WILL NOT do it for free on the player's schedule, only when they feel the need to do so, and it's a major headache. 2) Make it so that only either the most serious of Dust players or those with plenty of discretionary income (like me). There was already one "I don't know if I'd pay that much for a respec". What that says is that the poster of that comment wants the respec, so now we're just haggling price. Again, the price should be discouraging, hence, the higher pricetag. Also, do you know how much Money Dust has made? Is it Solvent? Is CCP taking money from EvE's profit line to invest in these other divisions? Are you their accountant? No? Oh, well in that case, **** you, you ******* ****. For an "old guy" you sure do sound a lot like a member of the "Money for nuthin" free entitlement generation. Get a haircut, hippie.
Snap. Also, what's your stance on a skill refund? I really think that's gonna be their move, but TBH the best thing they could do right now is offer an optional FREE respec when all their base racial content is in place. You would probably see guys coming out of the woodwork for that.
After that, I think a yearly limitation on a $100 respec is fine. Gives you a safety valve in case you got drunk one night. Or put all your SP in commando.
You get all the purists with their panties/boxer briefs in a bunch, but with the way the nerf/buff hammer works around here and CCPs definition of balance, it's the only sane option. As for FOTM I think it would be discouraged because of said hammer and the price point. And this game is NOT Eve. We share the same universe but that is it. |
Blind Nojoy
G I A N T General Tso's Alliance
71
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 18:33:00 -
[39] - Quote
Martyr Saboteur wrote:No. This has Pay 2 Win written all over it.
Situation:
A rich guy knows there will be a large number of HAVs in the next PC match, but doesn't have enough SP into AV to take them down of scare them away. But that isn't a problem because he is rich, and can just pay a measly $100 to get proto AV with proficiency V for the PC battle. He has just paid the developers to win.
Don't say someone wouldn't spent money like that even if they were rich, because they would. People have done things like this before in other games...
If it were limited to once a year your wouldn't see this problem. Now this chucklehead is stuck with useless AV (because it is) for the next year. All because he wanted to win one laggy @ss PC battle. I'm fine with that. |
A'Real Fury
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
457
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 18:38:00 -
[40] - Quote
At this point I would prefer the Eve system for SP i.e. just passive gain but without the need to have skill queue, rather it just goes to unallocated.
The benefit of active play would be the SP we currently get after we cap.
I can not remember what eve passive SP is but I think it is somewhere in the 50k per 24 hour range.
You could even re-introduce attributes, and neural re-maps, for accelerated SP gain if you pre-assign your sp.
I think the Respec issue would be less of a problem if so much of it did not come from active play.
I would like a Respec but at this point I am not willing to pay for one. However, it could be limited to one every six months to a year, until all basic gear is introduced. |
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
3336
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:15:00 -
[41] - Quote
To everyone saying the game is still in beta:
Betas aren't when most of the development happens. Betas are simply to iron out all the major technical issues. So we are indeed out of beta.
We used to have a time machine
|
CaoticFox
Axis of Chaos
100
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 19:21:00 -
[42] - Quote
StoneSmasher Drugga wrote:Make it 10 or 15 bucks and we have a deal. 100 bucks is crazy. $20 minimum... $40 max... but $100... you just want to NOT give anyone a respect... and at 10-15 bucks... that's one twice a month on a McDonalds salary... |
Blind Nojoy
G I A N T General Tso's Alliance
71
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 21:33:00 -
[43] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:To everyone saying the game is still in beta:
Betas aren't when most of the development happens. Betas are simply to iron out all the major technical issues. So we are indeed out of beta.
Agree to disagree. Still PC lag. Still frame rate issues. Have you had any fatal errors lately? I have...
Is it better than it was a few months ago? Yeah,- but I would argue there are still a litany of issues, technical and core. |
Jersey-Devil
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
23
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 21:41:00 -
[44] - Quote
Ok, BETA might not be the "best" term for the game, how bout unfinished? Where are the 3 suites for each race? Why only 1 heavy suit to date? Why did it take so long to come out with racial rifles for all the races. We, the customers were pigeon-holed in a sense and not given the opportunity to potentially get what we wanted. Say I wanted to be a heavy, but I'm Caldari, the only heavy I can be is Ammar and use weaponry that isn't Ammar. At a minimum, once everything is introduced to the game, a respec is the least they should do. What's going to happen when the medium vehicles are introduced and the vehicle skills have to be reworked yet again......another respec for vehicle points only. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
1021
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 22:38:00 -
[45] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:To everyone saying the game is still in beta:
Betas aren't when most of the development happens. Betas are simply to iron out all the major technical issues. So we are indeed out of beta. actually this game is still alpha.
definition of beta is that it generally begins when the software is feature complete, aka all intended functionality of the final version, but is not yet final due to bugs, performance or stability issues.
we dont even have basic racial content. |
BattleCry1791
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
285
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 23:18:00 -
[46] - Quote
Martyr Saboteur wrote:No. This has Pay 2 Win written all over it.
Situation:
A rich guy knows there will be a large number of HAVs in the next PC match, but doesn't have enough SP into AV to take them down of scare them away. But that isn't a problem because he is rich, and can just pay a measly $100 to get proto AV with proficiency V for the PC battle. He has just paid the developers to win.
Don't say someone wouldn't spent money like that even if they were rich, because they would. People have done things like this before in other games...
If this is pay to win, then so is every AUR mod on the market. In fact, those are even more so. You can pay to up your damage, shields...ANYTHING.
What I'm talking about is redistributing the points you've actually earned (understand that "earned" can mean AFK farming but still...there was a controller involved).
So if you think this is pay to win, then so is the ENTIRE game. |
mollerz
Minja Scouts
1433
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 00:04:00 -
[47] - Quote
$100 for a respec?
Oh, this must be Hilmar P+¬tursson's alt.
Trying for a harder 2014 bottom line, Hilmar? |
BattleCry1791
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
285
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 00:22:00 -
[48] - Quote
mollerz wrote:$100 for a respec?
Oh, this must be Hilmar P+¬tursson's alt.
Trying for a harder 2014 bottom line, Hilmar?
Shhhhhhhhhhhh, the players are watching. |
Jungian
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
282
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 04:06:00 -
[49] - Quote
I've already paid some for "faster" skillpoints in this game. I only see it reasonable to be able to pay for a respec. |
Dericha
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 04:43:00 -
[50] - Quote
Perhaps someone mentioned this already, but the better reason than tweaks is the changes to Factional Warfare. Now choosing racially harmonious suits and weapons matter. It could be cost or PG/CPU involved. I hate the assault rifle, skilled into SRs, and now the Gallente/Minmatar, Caldari/Amarr lines matter.
Bankrupting a corp is the way you win PC so weapons at 10% of the cost are a real game-changer. |
|
Mobius Wyvern
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
4239
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 05:03:00 -
[51] - Quote
BattleCry1791 wrote:Oh quit your whining already. Let's just face one simple fact
The Game is still in Beta. Scout and Heavy racial variants? Tanks? LAVs? Heavy guns? Dropships? Installations? Pilot Dropsuits? Player Market? When these things are all introduced, then and only then, can anyone consider the game "released". And I'd propose that 14 days after that happens, no more respecs should ever be discussed.
Until that happens, let's just be honest with ourselves. A lot of guys had quit playing this game because they spec'd into X, X got nerfed, and they didn't feel like grinding/AFKing to spec into something else. I have a clan full of such players. Well, that and a bunch of players that flat out don't trust CCP to do anything right.
However, the old adage of "one fix and 8 screw ups" per patch seems to have fallen by the wayside (Did all the Zipper guys get fired or does the new cruise director have it going on?).
As I come back to the game after the last couple of updates I've been very pleased with the changes I've seen. Biggest problem I'm seeing is the RR. The maps lend to that weapon SO well. Not sure how to fix that to be honest. Will adding more players for the 32 vs 32 help or hurt the problem? Time will tell. However I will say that it's not OP, but working as intended.
Back the $100 dollar (US) Respec.
Why not just allow for a respec as the game progresses? CCP, you'll make 20 grand the first day, and that's probably conservative. With the coming FOTM's that we have yet to see...why not give players the opportunity to respec just so long as they pay through the nose? I can tell you right now, I got two toons that I'd do it for. My main is so screwed up I can't play on him anymore (my heart is Minmatar, but my playstyle is actually Gallente Logi...18mil+ SP sunk in all the wrong places).
And what about all the tankers that abandoned the game that would like to come back but spec'd out of tanking and don't want to grind?
CCP offers AUR versions of plenty of gear to keep players competitive as they grind up their toons, but in reality, it's all about money and "micro transactions".
I know all you "purists" will come running to the thread with "NO REPECS...CHOICES HAVE CONSEQUENCES"...and if the game was anywhere near finished or "pure" itself, I'd be inclined to agree. But it's not. In order to make an informed choice, you have to know all the variables that go into making that choice. Since we can't peer into the future of the army of "SOON"s that are yet to be, it's time to give it up and ask yourself one question.
Do you want to have a playerbase? If yes, then just accept that this is still a F2P beta and player choice should trump all. No, Player choice should not trump all.
Also, you want to give people with tons of money the ability to stomp on anyone who isn't willing to drop $100 to always get with the FotM build?
Great way to lose the entire playerbase.
Amidst the blue skies
A link from past to future
The sheltering wings of the protector
|
Piercing Serenity
Fatal Absolution
473
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 05:36:00 -
[52] - Quote
BattleCry1791 wrote:mollerz wrote:$100 for a respec?
Oh, this must be Hilmar P+¬tursson's alt.
Trying for a harder 2014 bottom line, Hilmar? Shhhhhhhhhhhh, the players are watching.
I think I laughed at about every post you wrote. All true to character Battle. Good to see you around
DUST 514 BETA VET
16.2M Lifetime SP
SH4T --> PFBHz --> PFB --> SH4T --> Fatal
|
CaoticFox
Axis of Chaos
106
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 05:37:00 -
[53] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:To everyone saying the game is still in beta:
Betas aren't when most of the development happens. Betas are simply to iron out all the major technical issues. So we are indeed out of beta. ur gonna think u have found a fan in me, but isnt this the 3rd STFU post ive made to a post of yours, in an hour? |
Piraten Hovnoret
No Tax Scrubs
144
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 06:40:00 -
[54] - Quote
CaoticFox wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:To everyone saying the game is still in beta:
Betas aren't when most of the development happens. Betas are simply to iron out all the major technical issues. So we are indeed out of beta. ur gonna think u have found a fan in me, but isnt this the 3rd STFU post ive made to a post of yours, in an hour?
So there is no major "technical issues" issues in this game? What game have you been playing?
No no wrong buy me
What version of Dust are you playing and where can I down load it ?
Or yeah
STFU |
BattleCry1791
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
286
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 15:11:00 -
[55] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote: No, Player choice should not trump all.
Also, you want to give people with tons of money the ability to stomp on anyone who isn't willing to drop $100 to always get with the FotM build?
Great way to lose the entire playerbase.
Now Mobius, I remember your name from the old days and with it comes the connotation of you being someone that generally has his act together. So I'll forgo the normal marginalizing of your post by calling you hotstuff, twinkie, sparky, skippy, or junior.
However, I feel the need to point something out. How does MORE player choice = LESS playerbase? And why does everyone seem to miss out on the fact that the people with tons of money have been doing exactly what you've been talking about since the beta?
Anyone remember the guys from RND that used nothing but AUR gear for the first three months? how many millions of dollars of ISK do you think that saved them; that eventually went into PC coffers?
Am I taking crazy pills? Three people in this thread have brought up P2W, yet NO ONE has challenged my assertion that the game is generally P2W due to the nature of AUR items.
Think of ALL the things you can buy with actual real world money in this game. Better tanks, rifles, damage mods, shields, you name it, you can buy ABOVE YOUR SP LEVEL. Hell I did it. When getting ready for PC I dropped money on some Boundless HMG's because I didn't have the SP for it (went for proto forges instead).
Because of the PC portion of this game there are going to be competitive players that will throw money at it in hopes of getting a win. FOTM has nothing to do with it. If you're holding 15 to 1 KDR's and paying a hundred bucks to respec then yes, you are a tryharding douche.
That's not going to cover the majority of the players that want a respec. The majority of the players will want a respec because they didn't know that they (and I really mean me) completely SUCK with a combat rifle. I mean suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck. I have a very with it clan member that spec'd into it as I was online and he goes "Hey, this thing isn't full auto?" He didn't read the fine print. Yes he's a moron for doing so, but if he has the cheddar (I often wonder if the Euro guys have hard times following my posts since I use so many US pop culture references?) then he gets to pay for his mistake, YET STILL ENJOY THE GAME AND THUS HE KEEPS PLAYING AND THAT KEEPS THE PLAYERBASE.
Why is this such a hard concept to grasp? This is easy.
And lastly, since this hasn't been brought up in the thread in a while, the pay for respec's wouldn't be forever. Once all the suits, huns, tanks, dropships, and the possibly the player market (Thale's for sale....get yer fresh hot Thale's for sale) I would insert a 14 day grace period and after that, no more respecs...ever. But while the game is still in flux, the PLAYERS....you know, they guys that make the game fiscally sustainable, should be able to flux with it, Marty (sorry, couldn't resist...flux...capacitor...Marty McFly....get it?).
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |