Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
jin foxdale
Jedi Slime.
110
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:23:00 -
[31] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Nova Knife wrote:All I ask is that Ironwolf kindly shut up and stop attempting diplomacy or trying to 'make people feel better'.
You suck at it, and all you do is offend people on both sides and make bad situations worse.
Thanks.
:P Diplomacy is a tool to make people feel good. I had no such intentions.
get a room. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
10684
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:25:00 -
[32] - Quote
jin foxdale wrote:
get a room.
He's far too handsome for the likes of me, I'm sorry it cannot be done.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier Specialist
Current Theme \\= Advanced Scrambler Rifle =// Unlocked
|
jin foxdale
Jedi Slime.
110
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:28:00 -
[33] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:jin foxdale wrote:
get a room.
He's far too handsome for the likes of me, I'm sorry it cannot be done.
then get a Thunderdome. |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1341
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:30:00 -
[34] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:All I ask is that Ironwolf kindly shut up and stop attempting diplomacy or trying to 'make people feel better'.
You suck at it, and all you do is offend people on both sides and make bad situations worse.
Thanks.
I think IWS does a pretty good job of things. Why all the hate?
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
jin foxdale
Jedi Slime.
111
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:34:00 -
[35] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Nova Knife wrote:All I ask is that Ironwolf kindly shut up and stop attempting diplomacy or trying to 'make people feel better'.
You suck at it, and all you do is offend people on both sides and make bad situations worse.
Thanks.
I think IWS does a pretty good job of things. Why all the hate?
Some of the venom IWS gets is obscene, I'm always impressed the way it seems to roll off of him.
EDIT: I'm not classing what you said as "venom", Nova Knife. I meant in general. |
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
2160
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:39:00 -
[36] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Saving the community from itself.
This in and of itself is joke-worthy.
IWS, you are a man of many talents, but basic social and conversational skills are not among them. You started this thread with the intent to 'troll', but like so many others on the forums having no conceptual understanding of what trolling truly is and merely make yourself out to look like an idiot while enraging both those who oppose and support your point.
As a council, we're supposed to hold ourselves to a higher standard. This is not to say that we're better than anyone else, but we're /expected/ to maintain a certain air of humility and civility. While we are not forbidden to troll or be rude, it is extremely poor taste to do so, especially regarding such a 'hot button' issue when people are legitimately upset about CCP handling an issue in a poor fashion. Especially when considering that many people (even if they are mistaken) value the word of the CPM as if it was something relayed to them by CCP or that a 'troll post' is what the CPM is relaying to CCP on the behalf the of the players.
The BPO "Issue" is a very real one, and while some people (xLuca, I'm looking at you) need to seriously tone down their posting and stop making new threads.... IWS you need to kindly shut up and take your poor attitude elsewhere. I fully believe that removing BPO's is the right call. However I believe that CCP handled this very poorly and strongly cautioned them beforehand that a simple refund would provoke an aggressive response because the perceived value of the purchase needs to be preserved.
At the very least, CCP will not touch -any- other BPO's in people's inventories without coming up with a solid plan to preserve the value of the purchase.
As my Addendum to the initial quote : IWS, if you think you're saving the community from itself... I suppose it is my job to save the community (and CCP) from you.
|
ACE OF JOKERS
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
218
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:41:00 -
[37] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:BPO whiners are extremely obsessively selective of 'violated terms.'
By their logic:
SP Refunds are against Consumer laws as well especially if any of them have been boosted and spent into vehicles or previously before infantry. These are skill point you work just to spend into specific vehicle skills are no longer going to the game as of 1.7.
You should be demanding your real money you paid into boosters for to buy those 'powerups' then compensation for time spent acquiring the sp to buy that skill.
They should also be trying to sue over downtime every day if they have a passive or active booster that runs through that duration.
Hell by their logic;
Software Updates are against Consumer laws as well, because its not what they paid for.
Which would just make about every console game in existence illegal to own because nearly all of them do the quick first time startup download after you put the disk in these days.
You know what i find funny?
How CCP disappoints their Player base/Costumers over and over again and then makes fun of them. Very pro... |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1878
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:48:00 -
[38] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:BPO whiners are extremely obsessively selective of 'violated terms.'
By their logic:
SP Refunds are against Consumer laws as well especially if any of them have been boosted and spent into vehicles or previously before infantry. These are skill point you work just to spend into specific vehicle skills are no longer going to the game as of 1.7.
You should be demanding your real money you paid into boosters for to buy those 'powerups' then compensation for time spent acquiring the sp to buy that skill.
They should also be trying to sue over downtime every day if they have a passive or active booster that runs through that duration.
Hell by their logic;
Software Updates are against Consumer laws as well, because its not what they paid for. Seems strange to me. CCP is taking away modules, even giving you aur for them, which is what you used to buy them in the first place. Most of these things were useless, trash items. So you drive around in a milita tank bpo, which is kinda bullshit anyways, but you pop in seconds to swarms, so cool. But for items that really held no huge advantage in battle, the hate seems a bit much. They imbalance the game. Tanking is one of the most expensive roles. Yet if I had me a bpo tank, I could drive them all day without a care for losing them. And I could rack up some wp off turrets and be making bank. So while actually somewhat useless, they can be used to rack up quick WP, not to mention games lacking in AV. Everyone loves the idea, nothing is free, until they start taking your free stuff away. BPO's were a bad decision on CCP's part and I can't help but feel these people crying bloody murder, have a point. They would expect you to give them new BPOs for the new modules to use. Which seems fair. Yet still, I see these sort of things bad overall for a universe that is all about Nothing being free. And I think a lot of this may be due to the state of dust, a lot of people are unhappy. Now you are taking their BPOs from them. Now they are super unhappy customers, who feel cheated. They don't want aur, nothing on the market compares to those bpos. It's your customers getting the short end of the stick. Overall it is necessary, but I don't know if aur really cuts it. Maybe some unique suits or something eh. Or add some customization options for buy on the market. Aur is no doubt useless to the people who own these bpos.
This post was missed but it's a good observation.
Both sides of the fence are tired. The natives are restless. With that comes conflict and confusion.
I really would like to add to your opinion but I don't really feel like typing novels. |
4447
Resolution XIII
837
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:49:00 -
[39] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Saving the community from itself.
This in and of itself is joke-worthy. IWS, you are a man of many talents, but basic social and conversational skills are not among them. You started this thread with the intent to 'troll', but like so many others on the forums having no conceptual understanding of what trolling truly is and merely make yourself out to look like an idiot while enraging both those who oppose and support your point. As a council, we're supposed to hold ourselves to a higher standard. This is not to say that we're better than anyone else, but we're /expected/ to maintain a certain air of humility and civility. While we are not forbidden to troll or be rude, it is extremely poor taste to do so, especially regarding such a 'hot button' issue when people are legitimately upset about CCP handling an issue in a poor fashion. Especially when considering that many people (even if they are mistaken) value the word of the CPM as if it was something relayed to them by CCP or that a 'troll post' is what the CPM is relaying to CCP on the behalf the of the players. The BPO "Issue" is a very real one, and while some people (xLuca, I'm looking at you) need to seriously tone down their posting and stop making new threads.... IWS you need to kindly shut up and take your poor attitude elsewhere. I fully believe that removing BPO's is the right call. However I believe that CCP handled this very poorly and strongly cautioned them beforehand that a simple refund would provoke an aggressive response because the perceived value of the purchase needs to be preserved. At the very least, CCP will not touch -any- other BPO's in people's inventories without coming up with a solid plan to preserve the value of the purchase. As my Addendum to the initial quote : IWS, if you think you're saving the community from itself... I suppose it is my job to save the community (and CCP) from you.
This is all IWS had to do...
Creep, Radiohead.
|
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1878
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:54:00 -
[40] - Quote
Uh really, that discussion should be in house. That is the respectable and proper way of business. You don't go against members of your own kind in front of people. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
10696
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 01:06:00 -
[41] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:
This in and of itself is joke-worthy.
IWS, you are a man of many talents, but basic social and conversational skills are not among them. You started this thread with the intent to 'troll', but like so many others on the forums having no conceptual understanding of what trolling truly is and merely make yourself out to look like an idiot while enraging both those who oppose and support your point.
As a council, we're supposed to hold ourselves to a higher standard. This is not to say that we're better than anyone else, but we're /expected/ to maintain a certain air of humility and civility. While we are not forbidden to troll or be rude, it is extremely poor taste to do so, especially regarding such a 'hot button' issue when people are legitimately upset about CCP handling an issue in a poor fashion. Especially when considering that many people (even if they are mistaken) value the word of the CPM as if it was something relayed to them by CCP or that a 'troll post' is what the CPM is relaying to CCP on the behalf the of the players.
The BPO "Issue" is a very real one, and while some people (xLuca, I'm looking at you) need to seriously tone down their posting and stop making new threads.... IWS you need to kindly shut up and take your poor attitude elsewhere. I fully believe that removing BPO's is the right call. However I believe that CCP handled this very poorly and strongly cautioned them beforehand that a simple refund would provoke an aggressive response because the perceived value of the purchase needs to be preserved.
At the very least, CCP will not touch -any- other BPO's in people's inventories without coming up with a solid plan to preserve the value of the purchase.
As my Addendum to the initial quote : IWS, if you think you're saving the community from itself... I suppose it is my job to save the community (and CCP) from you.
... I was going to say something but realized it wouldn't have been diplomatic at all and it was something not to be said in front of the kids.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier Specialist
Current Theme \\= Advanced Scrambler Rifle =// Unlocked
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
10696
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 01:08:00 -
[42] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:BPO whiners are extremely obsessively selective of 'violated terms.'
By their logic:
SP Refunds are against Consumer laws as well especially if any of them have been boosted and spent into vehicles or previously before infantry. These are skill point you work just to spend into specific vehicle skills are no longer going to the game as of 1.7.
You should be demanding your real money you paid into boosters for to buy those 'powerups' then compensation for time spent acquiring the sp to buy that skill.
They should also be trying to sue over downtime every day if they have a passive or active booster that runs through that duration.
Hell by their logic;
Software Updates are against Consumer laws as well, because its not what they paid for. Seems strange to me. CCP is taking away modules, even giving you aur for them, which is what you used to buy them in the first place. Most of these things were useless, trash items. So you drive around in a milita tank bpo, which is kinda bullshit anyways, but you pop in seconds to swarms, so cool. But for items that really held no huge advantage in battle, the hate seems a bit much. They imbalance the game. Tanking is one of the most expensive roles. Yet if I had me a bpo tank, I could drive them all day without a care for losing them. And I could rack up some wp off turrets and be making bank. So while actually somewhat useless, they can be used to rack up quick WP, not to mention games lacking in AV. Everyone loves the idea, nothing is free, until they start taking your free stuff away. BPO's were a bad decision on CCP's part and I can't help but feel these people crying bloody murder, have a point. They would expect you to give them new BPOs for the new modules to use. Which seems fair. Yet still, I see these sort of things bad overall for a universe that is all about Nothing being free. And I think a lot of this may be due to the state of dust, a lot of people are unhappy. Now you are taking their BPOs from them. Now they are super unhappy customers, who feel cheated. They don't want aur, nothing on the market compares to those bpos. It's your customers getting the short end of the stick. Overall it is necessary, but I don't know if aur really cuts it. Maybe some unique suits or something eh. Or add some customization options for buy on the market. Aur is no doubt useless to the people who own these bpos.
Thank you for you level headed reply. This is quite usable and will put it to good use when/if possible..
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier Specialist
Current Theme \\= Advanced Scrambler Rifle =// Unlocked
|
4447
Resolution XIII
837
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 01:23:00 -
[43] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Nova Knife wrote:
This in and of itself is joke-worthy.
IWS, you are a man of many talents, but basic social and conversational skills are not among them. You started this thread with the intent to 'troll', but like so many others on the forums having no conceptual understanding of what trolling truly is and merely make yourself out to look like an idiot while enraging both those who oppose and support your point.
As a council, we're supposed to hold ourselves to a higher standard. This is not to say that we're better than anyone else, but we're /expected/ to maintain a certain air of humility and civility. While we are not forbidden to troll or be rude, it is extremely poor taste to do so, especially regarding such a 'hot button' issue when people are legitimately upset about CCP handling an issue in a poor fashion. Especially when considering that many people (even if they are mistaken) value the word of the CPM as if it was something relayed to them by CCP or that a 'troll post' is what the CPM is relaying to CCP on the behalf the of the players.
The BPO "Issue" is a very real one, and while some people (xLuca, I'm looking at you) need to seriously tone down their posting and stop making new threads.... IWS you need to kindly shut up and take your poor attitude elsewhere. I fully believe that removing BPO's is the right call. However I believe that CCP handled this very poorly and strongly cautioned them beforehand that a simple refund would provoke an aggressive response because the perceived value of the purchase needs to be preserved.
At the very least, CCP will not touch -any- other BPO's in people's inventories without coming up with a solid plan to preserve the value of the purchase.
As my Addendum to the initial quote : IWS, if you think you're saving the community from itself... I suppose it is my job to save the community (and CCP) from you.
... I was going to say something but realized it wouldn't have been diplomatic at all and it was something not to be said in front of the kids.
IWS, You sound like jenza
Creep, Radiohead.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
10700
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 01:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
4447 wrote:IWS, You sound like jenza
/me Shrugs shoulders
oh well? I guess I'll have to settle being Nova Knifes and Jenza's alt then.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier Specialist
Current Theme \\= Advanced Scrambler Rifle =// Unlocked
|
Mikey Ducati
Xer Cloud Consortium
59
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 01:32:00 -
[45] - Quote
Bro hugs!! |
4447
Resolution XIII
837
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 01:34:00 -
[46] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:4447 wrote:IWS, You sound like jenza /me Shrugs shoulders oh well? I guess I'll have to settle being Nova Knifes and Jenza's alt then.
I'm sorry, i shouldn't said that
Creep, Radiohead.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
10700
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 01:36:00 -
[47] - Quote
4447 wrote:I'm sorry, i shouldn't said that
What cruel punishment have you beset upon me?!
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier Specialist
Current Theme \\= Advanced Scrambler Rifle =// Unlocked
|
David Spd
Caldari State
104
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 02:15:00 -
[48] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Saving the community from itself.
This in and of itself is joke-worthy. IWS, you are a man of many talents, but basic social and conversational skills are not among them. You started this thread with the intent to 'troll', but like so many others on the forums having no conceptual understanding of what trolling truly is and merely make yourself out to look like an idiot while enraging both those who oppose and support your point. As a council, we're supposed to hold ourselves to a higher standard. This is not to say that we're better than anyone else, but we're /expected/ to maintain a certain air of humility and civility. While we are not forbidden to troll or be rude, it is extremely poor taste to do so, especially regarding such a 'hot button' issue when people are legitimately upset about CCP handling an issue in a poor fashion. Especially when considering that many people (even if they are mistaken) value the word of the CPM as if it was something relayed to them by CCP or that a 'troll post' is what the CPM is relaying to CCP on the behalf the of the players. The BPO "Issue" is a very real one, and while some people (xLuca, I'm looking at you) need to seriously tone down their posting and stop making new threads.... IWS you need to kindly shut up and take your poor attitude elsewhere. I fully believe that removing BPO's is the right call. However I believe that CCP handled this very poorly and strongly cautioned them beforehand that a simple refund would provoke an aggressive response because the perceived value of the purchase needs to be preserved. At the very least, CCP will not touch -any- other BPO's in people's inventories without coming up with a solid plan to preserve the value of the purchase. As my Addendum to the initial quote : IWS, if you think you're saving the community from itself... I suppose it is my job to save the community (and CCP) from you.
You know if you're supposed to hold yourselves to a higher standard then maybe you shouldn't be pushing your petty judgements and arguments on IWS in public forums where everybody can see it.
If IWS says something wrong or crosses a line let him know in private, and if he does something truly stupid the matter will handle itself with other people and/or CCP themselves telling him to stop. If talking to him in private doesn't make him stop then guess what; it's not your problem. I don't believe IWS's demeanor is your problem anyway.
I'm not necessarily defending IWS but I do think that constantly ragging on him "in front of the kids" isn't going to win you any supporters either Nova Knife. You're just dragging down both of your reps when you do things like this.
--> I'm a closed beta vet; I just don't post often <--
"Other people just complicate my life." ~Solid Snake
|
Argent Mordred
DUST University Ivy League
25
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 03:25:00 -
[49] - Quote
David Spd wrote:You know if you're supposed to hold yourselves to a higher standard then maybe you shouldn't be pushing your petty judgements and arguments on IWS in public forums where everybody can see it.
If IWS says something wrong or crosses a line let him know in private, and if he does something truly stupid the matter will handle itself with other people and/or CCP themselves telling him to stop. If talking to him in private doesn't make him stop then guess what; it's not your problem. I don't believe IWS's demeanor is your problem anyway.
I'm not necessarily defending him but I do think that constantly ragging on him "in front of the kids" isn't going to win you any supporters either Nova Knife. You're just dragging down both of your reps when you do things like this.
I continue to search for CPM posts and find things like this coming from you Nova Knife. In all honesty I've forgotten what you DO other than squabble with IWS while he passively dismisses you. Don't you have more productive things to do as CPM other than "correct" IWS all the time and bicker with him?
This could have been handled better, but I think maybe the point was to indicate that CPM doesn't unanimously agree on this issue or at least how to handle it. Also, while they are ambassadors for CCP, they don't always speak for CCP. |
ReGnYuM
UnReaL.
1355
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 03:38:00 -
[50] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:BPO whiners are extremely obsessively selective of 'violated terms.'
By their logic:
SP Refunds are against Consumer laws as well especially if any of them have been boosted and spent into vehicles or previously before infantry. These are skill point you work just to spend into specific vehicle skills are no longer going to the game as of 1.7.
You should be demanding your real money you paid into boosters for to buy those 'powerups' then compensation for time spent acquiring the sp to buy that skill.
They should also be trying to sue over downtime every day if they have a passive or active booster that runs through that duration.
Hell by their logic;
Software Updates are against Consumer laws as well, because its not what they paid for.
Which would just make about every console game in existence illegal to own because nearly all of them do the quick first time startup download after you put the disk in these days.
I think the problem dude is that a Community Manager distinctively said that BPO's already purchased would not be removed.
Then a couple weeks later, CCP states that some BPO's purchased will be removed and refunded AUR.
You cannot say that kind of **** without expecting a PR $hitstorm.
If you never heard of ReGnYuM, you're neither Good or Relevant in Dust 514.
KDR>ALL
Sig Move: Figure 8 of Death
|
|
Second Cerberus
Tested In Production
54
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 03:39:00 -
[51] - Quote
Who said the CPM always need to be in agreement?
This community certainly isn't.
In hindsight, almost any situation could be handled better, but Nova has the same right to post as anyone.
He presented his opinion the same as IWS.
Not discussing this topic or any other "in front of the kids" can't hide how dysfunctional the CCP/Community relationship is. |
ReGnYuM
UnReaL.
1355
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 03:43:00 -
[52] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:All I ask is that Ironwolf kindly shut up and stop attempting diplomacy or trying to 'make people feel better'.
You suck at it, and all you do is offend people on both sides and make bad situations worse.
Thanks.
Ma Hero !
Name the Bar in T. and the first three rounds are on me
If you never heard of ReGnYuM, you're neither Good or Relevant in Dust 514.
KDR>ALL
Sig Move: Figure 8 of Death
|
Zekain K
Expert Intervention Caldari State
573
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 04:19:00 -
[53] - Quote
I dont care about these vehilce BPO's I used AUR to purchase them, and I'm getting the AUr back, its not that big of a deal to me.
Hell, you could even refund my favorite Raven suit. Why? because I have the covy suit. But the covy suit is where my line of tolerance lies. If I were to lose that suit, my blood raiders saga, my Exile, my dragonflies, my toxins, and covy sniper. I would become ultra pissed. I spent REAL money on those items, I couldn't care less on any of the other itemsin the packs. To me, those BPOs were solely worth the packs price. I would have bought the Vet pack if it just contained the BPOs, the boosters, and BPC weapons were just sprinkles.
If I started to lose those items, I would start spamming Sony for a refund for all 8 of the merc packs that I bought, and that vet pack too. Along with filing hundreds of complaints to sony about CCP abusing their customers.
DO NOT TAKE MY PACK BPO'S.
CALDARI MASTER RACE
|
David Spd
Caldari State
105
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 04:26:00 -
[54] - Quote
Argent Mordred wrote:David Spd wrote:You know if you're supposed to hold yourselves to a higher standard then maybe you shouldn't be pushing your petty judgements and arguments on IWS in public forums where everybody can see it.
If IWS says something wrong or crosses a line let him know in private, and if he does something truly stupid the matter will handle itself with other people and/or CCP themselves telling him to stop. If talking to him in private doesn't make him stop then guess what; it's not your problem. I don't believe IWS's demeanor is your problem anyway.
I'm not necessarily defending him but I do think that constantly ragging on him "in front of the kids" isn't going to win you any supporters either Nova Knife. You're just dragging down both of your reps when you do things like this.
I continue to search for CPM posts and find things like this coming from you Nova Knife. In all honesty I've forgotten what you DO other than squabble with IWS while he passively dismisses you. Don't you have more productive things to do as CPM other than "correct" IWS all the time and bicker with him? This could have been handled better, but I think maybe the point was to indicate that CPM doesn't unanimously agree on this issue or at least how to handle it. Also, while they are ambassadors for CCP, they don't always speak for CCP.
I know they don't agree. The only thing they all actually agree on is they don't always agree (paradox but true).
It's just the arguing and bickering allll the timmmme....
--> I'm a closed beta vet; I just don't post often <--
"Other people just complicate my life." ~Solid Snake
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
10714
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 04:35:00 -
[55] - Quote
ReGnYuM wrote:
I think the problem dude is that a Community Manager distinctively said that BPO's already purchased would not be removed.
Then a couple weeks later, CCP states that some BPO's purchased will be removed and refunded AUR.
You cannot say that kind of **** without expecting a PR $hitstorm.
I know the feeling it's probably why there won't be a blue post in the subject.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier Specialist
Current Theme \\= Advanced Scrambler Rifle =// Unlocked
|
ReGnYuM
UnReaL.
1356
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 05:35:00 -
[56] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:ReGnYuM wrote:
I think the problem dude is that a Community Manager distinctively said that BPO's already purchased would not be removed.
Then a couple weeks later, CCP states that some BPO's purchased will be removed and refunded AUR.
You cannot say that kind of **** without expecting a PR $hitstorm.
I know the feeling it's probably why there won't be a blue post in the subject.
Hey man your good guy, anybody who has met you in RL or talked to you for extended period time, knows you only have the best interest for Dust 514.
As for the BPO thingy, I agree they need to be removed. In a player driven economy a free unlimited substance has no place.
However, this situation was not handled well, and these kind of threads only add fuel to the fire.
If you never heard of ReGnYuM, you're neither Good or Relevant in Dust 514.
KDR>ALL
Sig Move: Figure 8 of Death
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
10725
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 05:48:00 -
[57] - Quote
ReGnYuM wrote:
I know the feeling it's probably why there won't be a blue post in the subject.
Hey man your good guy, anybody who has met you in RL or talked to you for extended period time, knows you only have the best interest for Dust 514.
As for the BPO thingy, I agree they need to be removed. In a player driven economy a free unlimited substance has no place.
However, this situation was not handled well, and these kind of threads only add fuel to the fire.
[/quote]
I am not looking for a fire douser though. Looking for that pristine glass shard in the fire, the one that shines and looks pretty and got one of them in this thread. I don't know why people call it trolling its nearly the exact opposite. Fire is going to burn regardless the writing was on the wall from previous fires.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier Specialist
Current Theme \\= Advanced Scrambler Rifle =// Unlocked
|
Tank Missile
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
50
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 05:56:00 -
[58] - Quote
Like ReG already said, CCP said they wouldn't remove them, then they decided to remove them, that is the problem.
"History is written by the victor-" Blah, blah blah, let's go shoot some stuff!
|
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
387
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 06:18:00 -
[59] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:BPO whiners are extremely obsessively selective of 'violated terms.'
By their logic:
SP Refunds are against Consumer laws as well especially if any of them have been boosted and spent into vehicles or previously before infantry. These are skill point you work just to spend into specific vehicle skills are no longer going to the game as of 1.7.
You should be demanding your real money you paid into boosters for to buy those 'powerups' then compensation for time spent acquiring the sp to buy that skill.
They should also be trying to sue over downtime every day if they have a passive or active booster that runs through that duration.
Hell by their logic;
Software Updates are against Consumer laws as well, because its not what they paid for.
Which would just make about every console game in existence illegal to own because nearly all of them do the quick first time startup download after you put the disk in these days. Right so you think its fine for someone to pay for a product then for it to just magically disappear? |
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
387
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 06:25:00 -
[60] - Quote
What i really wonder is why not just keep bpo's in the game as they said they would and if the iteam is pulled out just re-create the bpo to represent the new iteam? Or is the real problem that ccp is just too dammed lazy? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |