|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
4447
Resolution XIII
830
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 22:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
hackerzilla wrote:If it's just vehicle militia BPOs being removed, thats cool, but if it's dropsuit BPOs thats a problem...
Maybe you should look at a interview i watch about CCP on BPOGǪ
They said i quote " BPO are not working because they don't help the economy because players are not spending their ISK"
It's a joke because BPO are standard gear and everyone is advance or proto. I really don't get CCP logic, Or i do and they don't want player framing ISK because then players won't be spending real money on items.
Creep, Radiohead.
|
4447
Resolution XIII
830
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 23:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:BPO whiners are extremely obsessively selective of 'violated terms.'
By their logic:
SP Refunds are against Consumer laws as well especially if any of them have been boosted and spent into vehicles or previously before infantry. These are skill point you work just to spend into specific vehicle skills are no longer going to the game as of 1.7.
You should be demanding your real money you paid into boosters for to buy those 'powerups' then compensation for time spent acquiring the sp to buy that skill.
They should also be trying to sue over downtime every day if they have a passive or active booster that runs through that duration.
Hell by their logic;
Software Updates are against Consumer laws as well, because its not what they paid for.
Which would just make about every console game in existence illegal to own because nearly all of them do the quick first time startup download after you put the disk in these days.
I find it funny your a CPM, but defend CCP.
Creep, Radiohead.
|
4447
Resolution XIII
832
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 23:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:BPO whiners are extremely obsessively selective of 'violated terms.'
By their logic:
SP Refunds are against Consumer laws as well especially if any of them have been boosted and spent into vehicles or previously before infantry. These are skill point you work just to spend into specific vehicle skills are no longer going to the game as of 1.7.
You should be demanding your real money you paid into boosters for to buy those 'powerups' then compensation for time spent acquiring the sp to buy that skill.
They should also be trying to sue over downtime every day if they have a passive or active booster that runs through that duration.
Hell by their logic;
Software Updates are against Consumer laws as well, because its not what they paid for.
Which would just make about every console game in existence illegal to own because nearly all of them do the quick first time startup download after you put the disk in these days.
I also find it funny, That as your a CPM your job is to inform players of information and the right information.
Creep, Radiohead.
|
4447
Resolution XIII
832
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 23:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:4447 wrote: I find it funny your a CPM, but defend CCP.
Saving the community from itself.
saving the community Your dividing the community.
people are scared of losing their BPO and your calling them idiots. These players are not idiots, Just ill informed.
Creep, Radiohead.
|
4447
Resolution XIII
832
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 23:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
Necandi Brasil wrote:I find funny that we are expected to have the same opinions. I don't like CCP taking anything away from my inventory, I like BPO's and payed for them. Why can I be so wrong ?
CCP has said that BPO are not being taken away from peoples inventory.
Creep, Radiohead.
|
4447
Resolution XIII
837
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 00:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Saving the community from itself.
This in and of itself is joke-worthy. IWS, you are a man of many talents, but basic social and conversational skills are not among them. You started this thread with the intent to 'troll', but like so many others on the forums having no conceptual understanding of what trolling truly is and merely make yourself out to look like an idiot while enraging both those who oppose and support your point. As a council, we're supposed to hold ourselves to a higher standard. This is not to say that we're better than anyone else, but we're /expected/ to maintain a certain air of humility and civility. While we are not forbidden to troll or be rude, it is extremely poor taste to do so, especially regarding such a 'hot button' issue when people are legitimately upset about CCP handling an issue in a poor fashion. Especially when considering that many people (even if they are mistaken) value the word of the CPM as if it was something relayed to them by CCP or that a 'troll post' is what the CPM is relaying to CCP on the behalf the of the players. The BPO "Issue" is a very real one, and while some people (xLuca, I'm looking at you) need to seriously tone down their posting and stop making new threads.... IWS you need to kindly shut up and take your poor attitude elsewhere. I fully believe that removing BPO's is the right call. However I believe that CCP handled this very poorly and strongly cautioned them beforehand that a simple refund would provoke an aggressive response because the perceived value of the purchase needs to be preserved. At the very least, CCP will not touch -any- other BPO's in people's inventories without coming up with a solid plan to preserve the value of the purchase. As my Addendum to the initial quote : IWS, if you think you're saving the community from itself... I suppose it is my job to save the community (and CCP) from you.
This is all IWS had to do...
Creep, Radiohead.
|
4447
Resolution XIII
837
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 01:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Nova Knife wrote:
This in and of itself is joke-worthy.
IWS, you are a man of many talents, but basic social and conversational skills are not among them. You started this thread with the intent to 'troll', but like so many others on the forums having no conceptual understanding of what trolling truly is and merely make yourself out to look like an idiot while enraging both those who oppose and support your point.
As a council, we're supposed to hold ourselves to a higher standard. This is not to say that we're better than anyone else, but we're /expected/ to maintain a certain air of humility and civility. While we are not forbidden to troll or be rude, it is extremely poor taste to do so, especially regarding such a 'hot button' issue when people are legitimately upset about CCP handling an issue in a poor fashion. Especially when considering that many people (even if they are mistaken) value the word of the CPM as if it was something relayed to them by CCP or that a 'troll post' is what the CPM is relaying to CCP on the behalf the of the players.
The BPO "Issue" is a very real one, and while some people (xLuca, I'm looking at you) need to seriously tone down their posting and stop making new threads.... IWS you need to kindly shut up and take your poor attitude elsewhere. I fully believe that removing BPO's is the right call. However I believe that CCP handled this very poorly and strongly cautioned them beforehand that a simple refund would provoke an aggressive response because the perceived value of the purchase needs to be preserved.
At the very least, CCP will not touch -any- other BPO's in people's inventories without coming up with a solid plan to preserve the value of the purchase.
As my Addendum to the initial quote : IWS, if you think you're saving the community from itself... I suppose it is my job to save the community (and CCP) from you.
... I was going to say something but realized it wouldn't have been diplomatic at all and it was something not to be said in front of the kids.
IWS, You sound like jenza
Creep, Radiohead.
|
4447
Resolution XIII
837
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 01:34:00 -
[8] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:4447 wrote:IWS, You sound like jenza /me Shrugs shoulders oh well? I guess I'll have to settle being Nova Knifes and Jenza's alt then.
I'm sorry, i shouldn't said that
Creep, Radiohead.
|
|
|
|