It is strange why anyone would support bad customer policy, this only makes the game better for you if this change were to happen, I never understand the thought of those who dont support reimbursement, and they never explain, its funny how walmart can figure this out but a sophisticated multinational software design company cant.

Dude Im not talking about militia bpos, please go to a post where you are needed or required, your ignorance here is useless to your fanboying.

Well if comparing it to wal-mart you can't buy a laptop keep it around for 6 months see a cheaper and different model comes around then go back to wal-mart and say "I did not use this, so i want my money back"

CCP gives you warning before major updates or changes occur, if you had fused locus grenades sitting around for 3 months and then you see the update and say "hey I did not use these grenades although i had them for 3 months and it is your fault CCP so give me my money back."

If you are going to buy something and not use it for a few month it will change it is not fault of CCP's you are not using them during the time you deemed they were good.

Lol my fanboying? Tell me again how many times ccp has banned me from these very forums for abusing the devs. I have consistently called ccp out for a while now.

You need a reality and or diaper check. Ccp it's only taking away militia bpos for items that are no longer in the game and you will get you r aur back. Buy a booster.

Look fail troll my point here is simple, I want ccp to make a policy change, Im aware of the warnings, I know the policy, its not just about the 20 dollars in consumables, its about customers spending money with the confidence of the company support that allows for more customers, more spending, and therefore a better game. Very simple for even a cheapskate like my self can understand it.

Alternatively just read the EULA and see that they reserve the right to change, modify or outright remove any aspect of the game if it benefits a larger purpose (like every other game).

BPO's are nasty for the economy. You shouldn't be surprised that they're being removed when there were players saying that they should have never existed even in Beta.

Jesus dude your slow, IM NOT TALKING ABOUT MILITIA BPOS, can you really not see that, im talking about items I have, that were changed after my purchase with no reimbursement offered, please tell me you see it this time? What in the hell are you reading and why do you keep talking about militia bpos when Im talking about a policy change?

You mean balancing? That happens. Get over it or I will tell your mother to hide her credit card.

Alright then...

How about the concept of an every changing universe and commitment.

CCP has had this stance for a very long time if you are going to skill into something you are committing to you with all the benefits and consequences. Including the purchases you make, lets take Flaylocks for example they were extremely good so powerful they were killing everything because of the high damage and massive blast radius. So people skilled into these things, CCP came out and said they were going to patch it so it will bring it back down to par with the other sidearms. I do not support reimbursement because if you skilled into it and purchased it as a weapon you should be committed to it. I do not like the idea of people using FOTM weapons getting reimbursed then going off to buy the next FOTM. If you are skilling and purchasing something you should know you are committing to it through the good and bad times.

You mean balancing? That happens. Get over it or I will tell your mother to hide her credit card.

Ok again your talking about skilling into something, I am refering to aur items, and a refund for these items when they are taken or changed, you dont even need sp to purchase std aur items, my point still stands policy change on aur items, fotm argument does not apply.

Ok again your talking about skilling into something, I am refering to aur items, and a refund for these items when they are taken or changed, you dont even need sp to purchase std aur items, my point still stands policy change on aur items, fotm argument does not apply.

Nope im fine with balancing, just want aur reimbursement when it happens, see still simple.

No, what you are attempting to do is promote discord in potential future purchases of Aurum due the fact that you can't handle that your attempt to stockpile OP items backfired on you when CCP changed them. I agree that some more work needs to be done informing people of how it works but to much mollycoddling removes this from being a New Eden game.

What they need to have is to make sure that any changes that will happen will have a minimum of 1 months notice given so players can use what they have without buying more. It's then up to each player whether they want to take the risk of stockpiling.

And another thing, are you that much of a gimp that you used Viktor's FPS skills as a basis for whether his argument was good or not. Any credibility you have is now gone.

Ah I do see, you want AUR items to remain OP.

This is what you get for spending AUR on consumables and BPO's. AUR is really only good for the boosters.

Again we want to change the policy, and yes I did terrible players having a say is a terrible idea, my opinion so take it how you want. My credibility comes from my gun not scrubs.

Again we want to change the policy, and yes I did terrible players having a say is a terrible idea, my opinion so take it how you want. My credibility comes from my gun not scrubs.

For me people who are totally bad at a thing should have the least opinion about how such a thing should work. Thats just my opinion, lol you can like it or not.

VVVVV


Burn CCP Burn

Because ccp taking away militia bpos is just as bad as buying and selling humans at auction like cattle.

Yeh, yeh, dance around the subject. Again, what does a person's FPS skills have to do with this policy change arguement, a totally different subject to FPS skills?

Thats my answer, im terrible at flying jets, so my opinion on how jets should be flown is useless? You seeing it now?

Thats my answer, im terrible at flying jets, so my opinion on how jets should be flown is useless? You seeing it now?

Right and because you "think" you have good gun game that makes you an expert in reimbursement policies...

I see nothing wrong with that.

You really are as thick as you come across. Do ya think the majority of people on the board of management for an airline have been or are pilots? How many space rocket designers are astronauts? You seeing it now? Really, you're beyond being a fool!

Thats true those people are very dependent on the people doing the flying.