DUST Search - Tank 514

All Channels

General Discussions

Tank 514

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 359	Posted - 2013.10.25 19:53:00 - [1] - Quote Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want
chase rowland The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 47	Posted - 2013.10.25 19:55:00 - [2] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want you know spamming posts wont get you any attention. your last one just got you humiliated
Vos Nuwem ZionTCD Public Disorder. 37	Posted - 2013.10.25 19:55:00 - [3] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Looks like someone lost his marbles...
chase rowland The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 47	Posted - 2013.10.25 19:56:00 - [4] - Quote Vos Nuwem wrote: Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Looks like someone lost his marbles... hes just a scrub spamming posts till he gets some attention. in a way, yea hes crazy.
ABadMutha13 Nihil-Obstat Mercs General Tso's Alliance 57	Posted - 2013.10.25 19:57:00 - [5] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Short bus get you home early today?
Void Echo Blades of Dust 1948	Posted - 2013.10.25 19:58:00 - [6] - Quote walks into room .....your that desperate huh? walks out of room
Gunmouse 0uter.Heaven 88	Posted - 2013.10.25 19:59:00 - [7] - Quote chase rowland wrote: Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want you know spamming posts wont get you any attention. your last one just got you humiliated Running a tank against my Plasma cannon AV fit will get you humiliated.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 359	Posted - 2013.10.25 20:06:00 - [8] - Quote chase rowland wrote: Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want you know spamming posts wont get you any attention. your last one just got you humiliated Yep, the creation of two threads is definitely spam
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 359	Posted - 2013.10.25 20:08:00 - [9] - Quote Void Echo wrote: walks into room .....your that desperate huh? walks out of room (oh look, his alt liked his post LOL) nah, i don't use alts to like my post Gunmouse liked it sry
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 359	Posted - 2013.10.25 20:09:00 - [10] - Quote Gunmouse wrote: chase rowland wrote: Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want you know spamming posts wont get you any attention. your last one just got you humiliated Running a tank against my Plasma cannon AV fit will get you humiliated. Oh yeah I forgot about you, PLCs should be nerfed too!

Void Echo Blades of Dust 1949	Posted - 2013.10.25 20:12:00 - [11] - Quote Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: walks into room .....your that desperate huh? walks out of room (oh look, his alt liked his post LOL) nah, i don't use alts to like my post Gunmouse liked it sry its funny how 100% of these wishes you posted are nothing of what we want... talk about stupidity.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 359	Posted - 2013.10.25 20:15:00 - [12] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: walks into room .....your that desperate huh? walks out of room (oh look, his alt liked his post LOL) nah, i don't use alts to like my post Gunmouse liked it sry its funny how 100% of these wishes you posted are nothing of what we want... talk about stupidity. You want the quotes, fine I'll be back with them in 20 minutes
Smooth Assassin Stardust incorporation 256	Posted - 2013.10.25 20:18:00 - [13] - Quote Take a breather.
Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact Cult of War 659	Posted - 2013.10.25 20:20:00 - [14] - Quote Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: walks into room .....your that desperate huh? walks out of room (oh look, his alt liked his post LOL) nah, i don't use alts to like my post Gunmouse liked it sry its funny how 100% of these wishes you posted are nothing of what we want... talk about stupidity. You want the quotes, fine I'll be back with them in 20 minutes You are trying to hard...
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 7246	Posted - 2013.10.25 20:27:00 - [15] - Quote ABadMutha13 wrote: Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Short bus get you home early today? You totally ambushed my tank last night after I killed yours, if it weren't for your swarm buddy I just might have escaped, but you just kind of ninja'd up behind me at ramming speed
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 361	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:03:00 - [16] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: Atiim wrote: [quote=DUST Fiend]AV is supposed to be buffer damage to assist your allied armor in taking out enemy tanks. Sorry that you want to camp on a tower spamming the right trigger thinking you're good. [quote=CharCharOdell] It wasn't that hard to make a turn run away in chrome. Me and my bro used to case them around with mlt swrm launchers. They couldn't kill the good tankers but it was pretty hilarious watching guys like Mr Zitro run fro. Two newberries using free suits. One guy should never be able to solo a tank under any circumstances. Two should make a tanker run away, and three should kill him. Killing a tank shouldn't be easy. Idc how our kdr suffers BC u only have a toxin SMG and u can't aim with AA. Or u could use the lolmando.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 361	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:04:00 - [17] - Quote 3 AV to kill a tank? ONE TANK? 6 people for 2 Tanks ? 9 people for 3 tanks? 12 people for 4 tanks? 15 people for 5 tanks? That adds up quickly. In fact I while back I actually made a thread about this. That's not good reasoning. Why should you be able to solo infantry? Because you are in a tank? You should be weak and succeptable to AV because it's AV. THAT'S IT DOING IT'S JOB! You clearly want tanks to be OP and without any AV resistance whatsoever. Good attempt at trying to "balance " this issue[/quote] ahem....: 3 people for one tank. 3 people take down a single tank. the same 3 people take down 2 more tanks. the same 3 people take down 4 more tanks. the same 3 people take down a full squad of tanks. honestly the only way youd need more than 3 people dealing with us is if your too damn ******** to go after more than one target. when youv destroyed one already... are you too tired to run after you kill one of us off that you need another 3 people to take your place? your making it seem like AV are too damn stupid to destroy multiple targets (which I can say for 95% of the community, that's true).[/quote]
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 361	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:06:00 - [18] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: This? Again? But here is a simple question, why should 1 man in a tank, require more than 1 man with av to neutrilize? Answers that aren't valid: I have invested Money and SP So did the guy using Proto AV Its a tank Against anti-tank weaponry It doesn't fit the rock paper scissors style of this game Of course it does Infantry < Tank < AV < Infantry Its supposed to be highly armoured So is the heavy Our weapons are useless The new ones coming soon look pretty damn good to me I can't fufill my role if I can't stay on the frontline of course you can, tanks are infantry close support, not muderous juggernauts Why cant the best counter to a tank be another tank? Investing less than 2mil for lolswarms is not an investment when it takes at least 8mil for the basic tank and costs 10times more at least, at least investing in the FG is more of an investement because of the suit Its a tank, meaning its supposed to be the most heavily armored thing on the battlefield, yet it get solo'd frequently because lolbasic vehicle vs proto AV The heavy is not that highly armored, also a scout or medium suit using swarms is not highly armored at all so that goes out the window completely as they bunny hop the map Our weapons are useless, blaster hit detection is poor, railguns have less damage and splash than a FG while costing 10times more in ISK, missiles barely hit infantry half the time unless you get a direct hit and cant kill with splash while the MD can
TechMechMeds Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc. 922	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:16:00 - [19] - Quote Tanks are getting slots nerfed to that of their mlt counterparts concerning slot layout.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 361	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:17:00 - [20] - Quote TechMechMeds wrote: Tanks are getting slots nerfed to that of their mlt counterparts concerning slot layout. Yes, Commander Tzu told me about this. BUT SOME PEOPLE WANT AV NERFED EVEN FURTHER!

Tebu Gan Dem Durrty Boyz Public Disorder. 179	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:17:00 - [21] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread. Have you seen what they are doing to tanks??
pegasis prime BIG BAD W0LVES 1209	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:20:00 - [22] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread. Wow you went the full ret@rd ...... Facepalm...... You never go the full ret@rd .
Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact Cult of War 666	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:21:00 - [23] - Quote Atiim wrote: 3 AV to kill a tank? ONE TANK? 6 people for 2 Tanks ? 9 people for 3 tanks? 12 people for 4 tanks? 15 people for 5 tanks? That adds up quickly. In fact I while back I actually made a thread about this. That's not good reasoning. Not good reasoning.... So from what i see you saying here you are assuming after a group of 3 people kill one tank they can no longer kill anymore tanks and are required to bring in another group of 3 people to kill another tank.... You know swarm launchers do not have a predetermined kill limit to where after one tank they can no long kill tanks... You can keep killing as many tanks as you would like with just 3 people you know, you don't need 15 people to kill 5 tanks. The same 3 people can kill all the tanks while the rest of your teams captures objectives...
Void Echo Blades of Dust 1951	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:23:00 - [24] - Quote Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: 3 AV to kill a tank? ONE TANK? 6 people for 2 Tanks ? 9 people for 3 tanks? 12 people for 4 tanks? 15 people for 5 tanks? That adds up quickly. In fact I while back I actually made a thread about this. That's not good reasoning. Why should you be able to solo infantry? Because you are in a tank? You should be weak and succeptable to AV because it's AV. THAT'S IT DOING IT'S JOB! You clearly want tanks to be OP and without any AV resistance whatsoever. Good attempt at trying to "balance " this issue ahem....: 3 people for one tank. 3 people take down a single tank. the same 3 people take down 2 more tanks. the same 3 people take down 4 more tanks. the same 3 people take down a full squad of tanks. honestly the only way youd need more than 3 people dealing with us is if your too damn ******** to go after more than one target. when youv destroyed one already... are you too tired to run after you kill one of us off that you need another 3 people to take your place? your making it seem like AV are too damn stupid to destroy multiple targets (which I can say for 95% of the community, that's true). that quote actually debunks you completely
Void Echo Blades of Dust 1951	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:25:00 - [25] - Quote Atiim wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Tanks are getting slots nerfed to that of their mlt counterparts concerning slot layout. Yes, Commander Tzu told me about this. BUT SOME PEOPLE WANT AV NERFED EVEN FURTHER! AV has NEVER been nerfed before, all AV has gotten were buff after buff... its the tanks that have gotten nerfed every ******* build. and if they do get nerfed further than tanks do this time, there might actually be balance because then tanking would actually be a viable class for once.
Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact Cult of War 666	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:26:00 - [26] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Tanks are getting slots nerfed to that of their mlt counterparts concerning slot layout. Yes, Commander Tzu told me about this. BUT SOME PEOPLE WANT AV NERFED EVEN FURTHER! AV has NEVER been nerfed before, all AV has gotten were buff after buff... its the tanks that have gotten nerfed every ******* build. and if they do get nerfed further than tanks do this time, there might actually be balance because then tanking would actually be a viable class for once. Well they never been nerfed before because they started out being complete shlt and tanks started out as super OP weapons of destruction....
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 2128	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:27:00 - [27] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Tanks are getting slots nerfed to that of their mlt counterparts concerning slot layout. Yes, Commander Tzu told me about this. BUT SOME PEOPLE WANT AV NERFED EVEN FURTHER! AV has NEVER been nerfed before, all AV has gotten were buff after buff... its the tanks that have gotten nerfed every ******* build. and if they do get nerfed further than tanks do this time, there might actually be balance because then tanking would actually be a viable class for once. My swarms got nerfed when I couldn't dumbfire them anymore . Also I'm pretty sure the only AV weapon that hasn't been nerfed before is the forge gun.
Thumb Green Novashift 487	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:32:00 - [28] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: walks into room .....your that desperate huh? walks out of room (oh look, his alt liked his post LOL) nah, i don't use alts to like my post Gunmouse liked it sry its funny how 100% of these wishes you posted are nothing of what we want... talk about stupidity. More like 50% is what tankers have said publicly and the other 50% was their motivation for saying the first 50%.
gbghg L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder. 3760	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:33:00 - [29] - Quote It is a rare sight indeed, even on these forums, to see a thread so full of fail. OP, please just stop, i'm feeling embarrassed for you.
Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact Cult of War 666	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:37:00 - [30] - Quote OP you are in a abuse relationship with the entire forum, please stop making threads because people(Me) will come here and beat you over the head with a logic bat until you learn.

Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 2128	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:38:00 - [31] - Quote Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: OP you are in a abuse relationship with the entire forum, please stop making threads because people(Me) will come here and beat you over the head with a logic bat until you learn. You don't seem to have enough likes so heres one
Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact Cult of War 668	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:39:00 - [32] - Quote Kane Fyea wrote: Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: OP you are in a abuse relationship with the entire forum, please stop making threads because people(Me) will come here and beat you over the head with a logic bat until you learn. You don't seem to have enough likes so heres one No you ruined my 666 likes.
knight of 6 SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 501	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:43:00 - [33] - Quote heck yes OP tanks will crush you in to tiny bits. maybe if there was more than one of you on a team you could do something to stop it but since all matches are 1v1 and you don't have any form of clan like system, or voice chat, or other means of organizing you are so screwed! HTFU friendo
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 2128	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:47:00 - [34] - Quote Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: OP you are in a abuse relationship with the entire forum, please stop making threads because people(Me) will come here and beat you over the head with a logic bat until you learn. You don't seem to have enough likes so heres one No you ruined my 666 likes. My 420, 666, and 1337 likes got ruined so I'm just spreading the love
gbghg L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder. 3760	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:53:00 - [35] - Quote Kane Fyea wrote: Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: OP you are in a abuse relationship with the entire forum, please stop making threads because people(Me) will come here and beat you over the head with a logic bat until you learn. You don't seem to have enough likes so heres one No you ruined my 666 likes. My 420, 666, and 1337 likes got ruined so I'm just spreading the love you'll get over it when you see 1000 get close.
Justin Tymes Dem Durrty Boyz Public Disorder. 451	Posted - 2013.10.25 22:02:00 - [36] - Quote Atiim wrote: 3 AV to kill a tank? ONE TANK? 6 people for 2 Tanks ? 9 people for 3 tanks? 12 people for 4 tanks? 15 people for 5 tanks? That adds up quickly. In fact I while back I actually made a thread about this. That's not good reasoning. Why should you be able to solo infantry? Because you are in a tank? You should be weak and succeptable to AV because it's AV. THAT'S IT DOING IT'S JOB! You clearly want tanks to be OP and without any AV resistance whatsoever. Good attempt at trying to "balance " this issue ahem....: 3 people for one tank. 3 people take down a single tank. the same 3 people take down 2 more tanks. the same 3 people take down 4 more tanks. the same 3 people take down a full squad of tanks. honestly the only way youd need more than 3 people dealing with us is if your too damn ******** to go after more than one target. when youv destroyed one already... are you too tired to run after you kill one of us off that you need another 3 people to take your place? your making it seem like AV are too damn stupid to destroy multiple targets (which I can say for 95% of the community, that's true).[/quote] [/quote] Does this account for the tanks shooting at you while you try to kill 1 of them? Pincer tanking is a very real and effective strategy. Tanks getting a buff might not be a problem in Skirmish or Domination, but tanks in Ambush is already unbalanced. Buffing them more without removing them from Ambush will make the mode unplayable for new players and extremely tedious to the point where it's not worth playing for everyone else.
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 2128	Posted - 2013.10.25 22:03:00 - [37] - Quote gbghg wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: OP you are in a abuse relationship with the entire forum, please stop making threads because people(Me) will come here and beat you over the head with a logic bat until you learn. You don't seem to have enough likes so heres one No you ruined my 666 likes. My 420, 666, and 1337 likes got ruined so I'm just spreading the love you'll get over it when you see 1000 get close. I'm already past 2000 though lol.
Void Echo Blades of Dust 1953	Posted - 2013.10.25 22:14:00 - [38] - Quote Justin Tymes wrote: Atiim wrote: 3 AV to kill a tank? ONE TANK? 6 people for 2 Tanks ? 9 people for 3 tanks? 12 people for 4 tanks? 15 people for 5 tanks? That adds up quickly. In fact I while back I actually made a thread about this. That's not good reasoning. Why should you be able to solo infantry? Because you are in a tank? You should be weak and succeptable to AV because it's AV. THAT'S IT DOING IT'S JOB! You clearly want tanks to be OP and without any AV resistance whatsoever. Good attempt at trying to "balance " this issue ahem....: 3 people for one tank. 3 people take down a single tank. the same 3 people take down 2 more tanks. the same 3 people take down 4 more tanks. the same 3 people take down a full squad of tanks. honestly the only way youd need more than 3 people dealing with us is if your too damn ******** to go after more than one target. when youv destroyed one already... are you too tired to run after you kill one of us off that you need another 3 people to take your place? your making it seem like AV are too damn stupid to destroy multiple targets (which I can say for 95% of the community, that's true). [/quote] Does this account for the tanks shooting at you while you try to kill 1 of them? Pincer tanking is a very real and effective strategy. Tanks getting a buff might not be a problem in Skirmish or Domination, but tanks in Ambush is already unbalanced. Buffing them more without removing them from Ambush will make the mode unplayable for new players and extremely tedious to the point where it's not worth playing for everyone else.[/quote] no tanks in ambush? remove AV from skirmish or domination, fair is fair
ABadMutha13 Nihil-Obstat Mercs General Tso's Alliance 61	Posted - 2013.10.25 22:22:00 - [39] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: ABadMutha13 wrote: Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Short bus get you home early today? You totally ambushed my tank last night after I killed yours, if it weren't for your swarm buddy I just might have escaped, but you just kind of ninja'd up behind me at ramming speed That was a fun match, chased you off, then you came back with the old "LAV / Forge Combo". Although my favorite was pinning you to my bumper and shooting you at the very end. Good match and at least kept me entertained.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 363	Posted - 2013.10.25 23:34:00 - [40] - Quote I think my work here is done.

Void Echo Blades of Dust 1956	Posted - 2013.10.25 23:36:00 - [41] - Quote Atiim wrote: I think my work here is done. pretty much... youv once again shown how incredibly ignorant and stupid you are.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 363	Posted - 2013.10.25 23:43:00 - [42] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: I think my work here is done. pretty much... youv once again shown how incredibly ignorant and stupid you are. Nah, i've stated my points, and clearly everyone favors tanks So, instead of trying to keep things balanced, I'm gonna just wait for tanks to be OP. Then i'll just use my tank and still do good. The situation is kind of a mix between a losing battle, and a win/win situation. On one hand, you want tanks to be OP, and I don't. But on the other hand, I also use tanks; so if they become OP, I won't be any less sad. So i'll just let the community live with this decision, and when this becomes Tank 514, and HAVs are the next Flaylock Pistol, i'll just be here to say: Atiim wrote: I TOLD YOU SO!
Canari Elphus Pro Hic Immortalis 703	Posted - 2013.10.25 23:46:00 - [43] - Quote Apparently you dont remember the Surya and Sagaris in Chromo. The current tanks are tissue paper compared to those.
THUNDERGROOVE ZionTCD Public Disorder. 1163	Posted - 2013.10.25 23:52:00 - [44] - Quote Canari Elphus wrote: Apparently you dont remember the Surya and Sagaris in Chromo. The current tanks are tissue paper compared to those. They were only tanky because people didn't use any AV but AV grenades and militia swarms.
Canari Elphus Pro Hic Immortalis 703	Posted - 2013.10.25 23:56:00 - [45] - Quote THUNDERGROOVE wrote: Canari Elphus wrote: Apparently you dont remember the Surya and Sagaris in Chromo. The current tanks are tissue paper compared to those. They were only tanky because people didn't use any AV but AV grenades and militia swarms. I had proto swarms back then as well and those tanks were a pain to try to take out. Felt like a real accomplishment to take one out. The only way for tankers to survive now is through speed to get out of the line of fire if they start getting hit. I rarely use my swarms anymore because its just not fair. I have a harder time taking out a LLAV than I do a Maddy.
Void Echo Blades of Dust 1956	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:06:00 - [46] - Quote Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: I think my work here is done. pretty much... youv once again shown how incredibly ignorant and stupid you are. Nah, i've stated my points, and clearly everyone favors tanks So, instead of trying to keep things balanced, I'm gonna just wait for tanks to be OP. Then i'll just use my tank and still do good. The situation is kind of a mix between a losing battle, and a win/win situation. On one hand, you want tanks to be OP, and I don't. But on the other hand, I also use tanks; so if they become OP, I won't be any less sad. So i'll just let the community live with this decision, and when this becomes Tank 514, and HAVs are the next Flaylock Pistol, i'll just be here to say: Atiim wrote: I TOLD YOU SO! so your saying that if tanks are finally able to survive something and be a viable class, they will become OP? biggest scrub ever.. tanks are one of the biggest jokes in the game, FACT. by the way things are, nobody new want to go into tanks because its **** and nearly dead, only those of us that know what to do are able to do anything, and there are maybe 10 of us left (your no tanker). if tanks are finally able to survive, they will be a viable class for once... get that through your biased cod scrub head
Keri Starlight Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 892	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:10:00 - [47] - Quote You can start sucking my particle accelerator.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 364	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:15:00 - [48] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: I think my work here is done. pretty much... youv once again shown how incredibly ignorant and stupid you are. Nah, i've stated my points, and clearly everyone favors tanks So, instead of trying to keep things balanced, I'm gonna just wait for tanks to be OP. Then i'll just use my tank and still do good. The situation is kind of a mix between a losing battle, and a win/win situation. On one hand, you want tanks to be OP, and I don't. But on the other hand, I also use tanks; so if they become OP, I won't be any less sad. So i'll just let the community live with this decision, and when this becomes Tank 514, and HAVs are the next Flaylock Pistol, i'll just be here to say: Atiim wrote: I TOLD YOU SO! so your saying that if tanks are finally able to survive something and be a viable class, they will become OP? biggest scrub ever.. tanks are one of the biggest jokes in the game, FACT. by the way things are, nobody new want to go into tanks because its **** and nearly dead, only those of us that know what to do are able to do anything, and there are maybe 10 of us left (your no tanker). if tanks are finally able to survive, they will be a viable class for once... get that through your biased cod scrub head No i'm saying that the way people are going about this is all wrong, and would/will lead to chaos. Just picture the SOPA act that was proposed in the US, I don't know where you live, so i'll just leave this here You've yet to prove me wrong, you say that I'm no tanker, and yet you still have yet to prove me wrong about being a tanker. A biased COD scrub? LOL I've only played COD once, and then proceeded to have my friend pay for the pizza as payback for making me play that boring, repetitive POS game. And again you aren't baised? YOU ARE THE MOST BIASED PERSON I'VE MET ON THE FORUMS!
gbghg L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder. 3760	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:18:00 - [49] - Quote Canari Elphus wrote: THUNDERGROOVE wrote: Canari Elphus wrote: Apparently you dont remember the Surya and Sagaris in Chromo. The current tanks are tissue paper compared to those. They were only tanky because people didn't use any AV but AV grenades and militia swarms. I had proto swarms back then as well and those tanks were a pain to try to take out. Felt like a real accomplishment to take one out. The only way for tankers to survive now is through speed to get out of the line of fire if they start getting hit. I rarely use my swarms anymore because its just not fair. I have a harder time taking out a LLAV than I do a Maddy. i was running advanced swarms back then on a logi suit with 3 damage mods, and those things were a ***** to try and take down, took some serious time and effort to kill those things. still was always worth it
Void Echo Blades of Dust 1957	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:19:00 - [50] - Quote Atiim wrote: You've yet to prove me wrong, you say that I'm no tanker, and yet you still have yet to prove me wrong about being a tanker. A biased COD scrub? LOL I've only played COD once, and then proceeded to have my friend pay for the pizza as payback for making me play that boring, repetitive POS game. And again you aren't baised? YOU ARE THE MOST BIASED PERSON I'VE MET ON THE FORUMS! you have yet to say why tanks shouldn't be able to survive anything other than the stupid "well I get killed by militia guys all the time, and I make back my isk in one match", there are no reasons tanks shouldn't be buffed and there are many, many reasons tanks shouldn't be ignored

medomai grey WarRavens League of Infamy 286	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:28:00 - [51] - Quote Tanks with substantial SP invested into them are difficult to destroy; it's just that too many pilots are greedy and will sit there and take all the AV thrown at it. Conversely tanks with little to no SP invested in them are too easy to destroy and its virtually impossible to win any confrontation with a tank fitted with higher tier equipment. Fortunately, CCP's vehicle overhaul seems to addresses the real imbalances regarding vehicles and not the QQ of shoddy forum tankers that Atiim pokes with a stick.
Canari Elphus Pro Hic Immortalis 705	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:30:00 - [52] - Quote medomai grey wrote: Tanks with substantial SP invested into them are difficult to destroy; it's just that too many pilots are greedy and will sit there and take all the AV thrown at it. Conversely tanks with little to no SP invested in them are too easy to destroy and its virtually impossible to win any confrontation with a tank fitted with higher tier equipment. Fortunately, CCP's vehicle overhaul seems to addresses the real imbalances regarding vehicles and not the QQ of shoddy forum tankers that Atiim pokes with a stick. Maybe I read this wrong but are you calling Void and Maple shoddy tankers?
Meeko Fent expert intervention Caldari State 1292	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:48:00 - [53] - Quote Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: I think my work here is done. pretty much... youv once again shown how incredibly ignorant and stupid you are. Nah, i've stated my points, and clearly everyone favors tanks So, instead of trying to keep things balanced, I'm gonna just wait for tanks to be OP. Then i'll just use my tank and still do good. The situation is kind of a mix between a losing battle, and a win/win situation. On one hand, you want tanks to be OP, and I don't. But on the other hand, I also use tanks; so if they become OP, I won't be any less sad. So i'll just let the community live with this decision, and when this becomes Tank 514, and HAVs are the next Flaylock Pistol, i'll just be here to say: Atiim wrote: I TOLD YOU SO! Atiim, the reason tanks won't be OP as much as you whine about is this. 1. You can hide from tanks in the interiors of the outposts 2. You can get a militia rail tank and snipe them with the same effectiveness as before. AV will just become less if a hard counter like it is now, and more of a deterrent as you wait for an allied AV tank to kill it for you
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 365	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:48:00 - [54] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: You've yet to prove me wrong, you say that I'm no tanker, and yet you still have yet to prove me wrong about being a tanker. A biased COD scrub? LOL I've only played COD once, and then proceeded to have my friend pay for the pizza as payback for making me play that boring, repetitive POS game. And again you aren't baised? YOU ARE THE MOST BIASED PERSON I'VE MET ON THE FORUMS! you have yet to say why tanks shouldn't be able to survive anything other than the stupid "well I get killed by militia guys all the time, and I make back my isk in one match", there are no reasons tanks shouldn't be buffed and there are many, many reasons tanks shouldn't be ignored. also, you have yet to give any proof that you are a tanker. Ok, I'll be on in an hour, and if your available then I'll show you my tank. I never said tanks shouldn't be buffed or AV shouldn't be nerfed. But the way you are going about nerfing AV will make them useless. And then there are guys who think AV was built for support. I think they need to stop drinking before they get on the Dust (I mean Tank) 514 forums. When did I say I get killed by MLT guys? And yeah you have no grounds calling me biased when you clearly super biased in this issue. I bet you 20 Million that I'm a tanker And if I lose then I'll also create a thread saying that i'm wrong, send apologizes to any tanker in that thread via DUST (I mean Tank) mail. And I'll never use AV again. Even MLT AV
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 366	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:59:00 - [55] - Quote Meeko Fent wrote: Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: Atiim wrote: I think my work here is done. pretty much... youv once again shown how incredibly ignorant and stupid you are. Nah, i've stated my points, and clearly everyone favors tanks So, instead of trying to keep things balanced, I'm gonna just wait for tanks to be OP. Then i'll just use my tank and still do good. The situation is kind of a mix between a losing battle, and a win/win situation. On one hand, you want tanks to be OP, and I don't. But on the other hand, I also use tanks; so if they become OP, I won't be any less sad. So i'll just let the community live with this decision, and when this becomes Tank 514, and HAVs are the next Flaylock Pistol, i'll just be here to say: Atiim wrote: I TOLD YOU SO! Atiim, the reason tanks won't be OP as much as you whine about is this. 1. You can hide from tanks in the interiors of the outposts 2. You can get a militia rail tank and snipe them with the same effectiveness as before. AV will just become less if a hard counter like it is now, and more of a deterrent as you wait for an allied AV tank to kill it for you 1.) Yeah and what about outdoor maps? Should I sit there and pray that the tank doesn't do anything? 2.) I shouldn't have to use a MLT railgun to deal with a tank And so yet again we have another person who believes that the best counter to a tank should be a tank? You clearly don't know what AV stands for, as it means ANTI-VEHICLE, not Temporary watergun untill another tank comes, and once again not everyone has a Tank. The best, strongest, and most absolute counter to Vehicles should be ANTI-VEHICLE. AV was designed to do just that, and when did CCP say that the best counter to a Tank should be a Tank? The fact that you believe that AV should just be "support waterguns" for tankers to use while in combat is ludicrous. It doesn't even follow the common rock paper scissors design. If the best counter to a tank is a tank then that would require everyone to have a tank to be effective, and will lead to this game becoming TANK 514, (hence the OP)
Xender17 MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN. 852	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:05:00 - [56] - Quote The only reason a team would lose against a tank would because they sacrifice AI room for AV. Where they could just sacrifice one to scare em off.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 366	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:07:00 - [57] - Quote Xender17 wrote: The only reason a team would lose against a tank would because they sacrifice AI room for AV. Where they could just sacrifice one to scare em off. Yeah, and when people realize that all 1 AV could do is scare them off then what? It's like me holding a gun at someone who broke into my house with a knife to scare them off, but then they realize that it's a watergun... I think you know what happens next.
Harpyja Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 639	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:08:00 - [58] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread. Can you QQ some more please? Tears are worth more than gold!
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 367	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:12:00 - [59] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread. Can you QQ some more please? Tears are worth more than gold! Nah, but ill give you some buckets form POS tankers like you who do literally the most dumbest sh*t i've ever seen and then cry when AV destroys you because of it. More than gold huh? Ok 20lbs of 20 carat gold for a 3 gallon bucket
Harpyja Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 639	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:12:00 - [60] - Quote Atiim wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: Atiim wrote: Void Echo wrote: pretty much... youv once again shown how incredibly ignorant and stupid you are. Nah, i've stated my points, and clearly everyone favors tanks So, instead of trying to keep things balanced, I'm gonna just wait for tanks to be OP. Then i'll just use my tank and still do good. The situation is kind of a mix between a losing battle, and a win/win situation. On one hand, you want tanks to be OP, and I don't. But on the other hand, I also use tanks; so if they become OP, I won't be any less sad. So i'll just let the community live with this decision, and when this becomes Tank 514, and HAVs are the next Flaylock Pistol, i'll just be here to say: Atiim wrote: I TOLD YOU SO! Atiim, the reason tanks won't be OP as much as you whine about is this. 1. You can hide from tanks in the interiors of the outposts 2. You can get a militia rail tank and snipe them with the same effectiveness as before. AV will just become less if a hard counter like it is now, and more of a deterrent as you wait for an allied AV tank to kill it for you 1.) Yeah and what about outdoor maps? Should I sit there and pray that the tank doesn't do anything? 2.) I shouldn't have to use a MLT railgun to deal with a tank And so yet again we have another person who believes that the best counter to a tank should be a tank? You clearly don't know what AV stands for, as it means ANTI-VEHICLE, not Temporary watergun untill another tank comes, and once again not everyone has a Tank. The best, strongest, and most absolute counter to Vehicles should be ANTI-VEHICLE. AV was designed to do just that, and when did CCP say that the best counter to a Tank should be a Tank? The fact that you believe that AV should just be "support waterguns" for tankers to use while in combat is ludicrous. It doesn't even follow the common rock paper scissors design. If the best counter to a tank is a tank then that would require everyone to have a tank to be effective, and will lead to this game becoming TANK 514, (hence the OP) Tanks should be the hardest hitting AV on the field. No handheld weapon should rival the power of a tank mounted turret. End of discussion.

medomai grey WarRavens League of Infamy 287	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:13:00 - [61] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Can you QQ some more please? Tears are worth more than gold! You missed the obvious sarcasm.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 367	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:22:00 - [62] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Atiim wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: Atiim, the reason tanks won't be OP as much as you whine about is this. 1. You can hide from tanks in the interiors of the outposts 2. You can get a militia rail tank and snipe them with the same effectiveness as before. AV will just become less if a hard counter like it is now, and more of a deterrent as you wait for an allied AV tank to kill it for you 1.) Yeah and what about outdoor maps? Should I sit there and pray that the tank doesn't do anything? 2.) I shouldn't have to use a MLT railgun to deal with a tank And so yet again we have another person who believes that the best counter to a tank should be a tank? You clearly don't know what AV stands for, as it means ANTI-VEHICLE, not Temporary watergun untill another tank comes, and once again not everyone has a Tank. The best, strongest, and most absolute counter to Vehicles should be ANTI-VEHICLE. AV was designed to do just that, and when did CCP say that the best counter to a Tank should be a Tank? The fact that you believe that AV should just be "support waterguns" for tankers to use while in combat is ludicrous. It doesn't even follow the common rock paper scissors design. If the best counter to a tank is a tank then that would require everyone to have a tank to be effective, and will lead to this game becoming TANK 514, (hence the OP) Tanks should be the hardest hitting AV on the field. No handheld weapon should rival the power of a tank mounted turret. End of discussion. Yep ANTI-VEHICLE is clearly not meant for ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for a poking stick. Yep should definitely be the best ANTI-VEHICLE asset on the field, in fact this was clearly designed this way so let's replace Swarm Launchers, Plasma Cannons, Forge Guns, and AV grenades with tanks, as tanks are supposed to be the true ANTI-VEHICLE. TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! WE NEED MOAR TANKS! TANKS SHOULD BE THE ONLY VIABLE AV CLASS AND AV SHOULD BE COMPLETLY USELESS! SMH dude, even the description under Sentinels says that no other class can go toe to toe with enemy vehicles and survive. Tanks should be the unltimate counter to tanks, and AV should do jack sh!t. Solid logic dude
Vitharr Foebane Blood Money Mercenaries 153	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:27:00 - [63] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Tanks should be the hardest hitting AV on the field. No handheld weapon should rival the power of a tank mounted turret. End of discussion. My FG politely disagrees...
Justin Tymes Dem Durrty Boyz Public Disorder. 451	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:53:00 - [64] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Justin Tymes wrote: Does this account for the tanks shooting at you while you try to kill 1 of them? Pincer tanking is a very real and effective strategy. Tanks getting a buff might not be a problem in Skirmish or Domination, but tanks in Ambush is already unbalanced. Buffing them more without removing them from Ambush will make the mode unplayable for new players and extremely tedious to the point where it's not worth playing for everyone else. no tanks in ambush? remove AV from skirmish or domination, fair is fair Logic has already been refuted before. Game mode balance > tanks. If tanks are getting a buff and they are overpowered in Ambush, it won't be fair at all.
Harpyja Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 639	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:57:00 - [65] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yep ANTI-VEHICLE is clearly not meant for ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for a poking stick. Yep should definitely be the best ANTI-VEHICLE asset on the field, in fact this was clearly designed this way so let's replace Swarm Launchers, Plasma Cannons, Forge Guns, and AV grenades with tanks, as tanks are supposed to be the true ANTI-VEHICLE. TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! WE NEED MOAR TANKS! TANKS SHOULD BE THE ONLY VIABLE AV CLASS AND AV SHOULD BE COMPLETLY USELESS! SMH dude, even the description under Sentinels says that no other class can go toe to toe with enemy vehicles and survive. Tanks should be the unltimate counter to tanks, and AV should do jack sh!t. Solid logic dude I never said that infantry AV weapons should be ineffective. All I said was that a tank-mounted turret should be more powerful than any handheld weapon. A few handheld weapons would certainly be able to have more fire power than a turret. You're just failing to realize that tanks should not be soloable unless of course the tank pilot is bad. And you're just one of those people that wants to be able to solo a tank and not require any teamwork at all. Well then, this is not the game for you, good-bye.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 367	Posted - 2013.10.26 02:04:00 - [66] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Atiim wrote: Yep ANTI-VEHICLE is clearly not meant for ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for a poking stick. Yep should definitely be the best ANTI-VEHICLE asset on the field, in fact this was clearly designed this way so let's replace Swarm Launchers, Plasma Cannons, Forge Guns, and AV grenades with tanks, as tanks are supposed to be the true ANTI-VEHICLE. TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! WE NEED MOAR TANKS! TANKS SHOULD BE THE ONLY VIABLE AV CLASS AND AV SHOULD BE COMPLETLY USELESS! SMH dude, even the description under Sentinels says that no other class can go toe to toe with enemy vehicles and survive. Tanks should be the unltimate counter to tanks, and AV should do jack sh!t. Solid logic dude I never said that infantry AV weapons should be ineffective. All I said was that a tank-mounted turret should be more powerful than any handheld weapon. A few handheld weapons would certainly be able to have more fire power than a turret. You're just failing to realize that tanks should not be soloable unless of course the tank pilot is bad. And you're just one of those people that wants to be able to solo a tank and not require any teamwork at all. Well then, this is not the game for you, good-bye. I don't care about soloing tanks, but that idea violates the rock paper scissors ideal: Infantry>Tank>AV>Infantry Something designed to destroy something should be the best at it's job, no questions asked. That's like saying heavies should be the best scouts ever
Harpyja Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 640	Posted - 2013.10.26 02:22:00 - [67] - Quote Atiim wrote: I don't care about soloing tanks, but that idea violates the rock paper scissors ideal: Infantry>Tank>AV>Infantry Something designed to destroy something should be the best at it's job, no questions asked. That's like saying heavies should be the best scouts ever Here's the thing: infantry AV should beat tanks, but not in a 1v1. Teamwork should be required, so 2-3 skilled AV should be able to beat a skilled tank. And more AV if it's unskilled players with militia or standard AV. So this idea doesn't violate the rock paper scissors ideal. Also, keep in mind that tanks can also fall under AV. With the turret changes, missiles will be the ultimate AV weapon and blasters will be the ultimate AI weapon. A missile tank will be strong against other tanks, but weaker to infantry, while a blaster tank will be stronger against infantry while being weaker to other tanks. Dust isn't as simple as rock paper scissors. You have many classes that fall under rock, many that fall under paper, and many others that fall under scissors. Some classes are simply more powerful than others (a single tank vs a single AV infantry), but are still balanced (tanks are big and slow targets, while infantry is small and agile).
medomai grey WarRavens League of Infamy 287	Posted - 2013.10.26 02:52:00 - [68] - Quote Harpyja wrote: (tanks are big and slow targets, while infantry is small and agile). Do we play the same game? The slowest tank is faster than the fastest infantry.
Justin Tymes Dem Durrty Boyz Public Disorder. 451	Posted - 2013.10.26 02:54:00 - [69] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Atiim wrote: I don't care about soloing tanks, but that idea violates the rock paper scissors ideal: Infantry>Tank>AV>Infantry Something designed to destroy something should be the best at it's job, no questions asked. That's like saying heavies should be the best scouts ever Here's the thing: infantry AV should beat tanks, but not in a 1v1. Teamwork should be required, so 2-3 skilled AV should be able to beat a skilled tank. And more AV if it's unskilled players with militia or standard AV. So this idea doesn't violate the rock paper scissors ideal. Also, keep in mind that tanks can also fall under AV. With the turret changes, missiles will be the ultimate AV weapon and blasters will be the ultimate AI weapon. A missile tank will be strong against other tanks, but weaker to infantry, while a blaster tank will be stronger against infantry while being weaker to other tanks. Dust isn't as simple as rock paper scissors. You have many classes that fall under rock, many that fall under paper, and many others that fall under scissors. Some classes are simply more powerful than others (a single tank vs a single AV infantry), but are still balanced (tanks are big and slow targets, while infantry is small and agile). That entire scenerio completely goes against Skill > SP. What you're saying is that a player with "X" SP should be allowed to not only dictate the amount of players needed to kill him, but what tier weapons can actually kill him. If it's not rock < paper < scissors, than it's SP > skill.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1115	Posted - 2013.10.26 03:08:00 - [70] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread. You're joining the few elites on here that cannot accept any arguments or logic by tankers, and continue to post your nonsensical screechings on here against tanks, none of which are based in fact, or sound reasoning.

TYR CAINE Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 0	Posted - 2013.10.26 03:14:00 - [71] - Quote tanks tanks tanks blah blah blah . I like chasing after tanks with an advanced swarm and a grin on my face dont know why i grin as i get splatted like pudding out the truck window at 100 mph. BUT 175M lock on going after dropships is not fair . 1: load up with meat suits 2: they bail take target 3:CANT TOUCH THIS 4: people cry on forums while i decide what flavor i look like as tank rolls over me
Arirana Ancient Exiles 201	Posted - 2013.10.26 03:55:00 - [72] - Quote Atiim wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Tanks are getting slots nerfed to that of their mlt counterparts concerning slot layout. Yes, Commander Tzu told me about this. BUT SOME PEOPLE WANT AV NERFED EVEN FURTHER! Even further? When was AV nerfed before?
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 369	Posted - 2013.10.26 04:52:00 - [73] - Quote Arirana wrote: Atiim wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Tanks are getting slots nerfed to that of their mlt counterparts concerning slot layout. Yes, Commander Tzu told me about this. BUT SOME PEOPLE WANT AV NERFED EVEN FURTHER! Even further? When was AV nerfed before? Swarm Launchers now must face tanks directly to initiate the lock Swarm Launchers have had thier lock times nerfed, the only way to not notice it is if you are either not using a Specialist variant, and have Swarm Launcher Operation Lvl V (+3% reduction to lock times per level)\ Also not that I'm complaining, but they removed the Swarm Launcher exploit where you could empty your entire clip at once and all the swarms would still fire.
chase rowland The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 51	Posted - 2013.10.28 13:34:00 - [74] - Quote Atiim wrote: Arirana wrote: Atiim wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Tanks are getting slots nerfed to that of their mlt counterparts concerning slot layout. Yes, Commander Tzu told me about this. BUT SOME PEOPLE WANT AV NERFED EVEN FURTHER! Even further? When was AV nerfed before? Swarm Launchers now must face tanks directly to initiate the lock Swarm Launchers have had thier lock times nerfed, the only way to not notice it is if you are either not using a Specialist variant, and have Swarm Launcher Operation Lvl V (+3% reduction to lock times per level)\ Also not that I'm complaining, but they removed the Swarm Launcher exploit where you could empty your entire clip at once and all the swarms would still fire. it was a glitch. you should be ashamed. i dont know know closed minded people like you even exist in dust anymore. and AV was never nerfed before. all i can say is your pitiful. why are you still here? go back to COD or get smart. sorry you cant 1HK 360 no-scope the best tankers in dust.
Knight Soiaire Mercenaries of Sunlight 2823	Posted - 2013.10.28 13:35:00 - [75] - Quote Cool! AR 514 was getting boring anyway.
Coleman Gray GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 877	Posted - 2013.10.28 13:55:00 - [76] - Quote Now ya gettin' it kid o7 see you on the battlefiled
Void Echo Blades of Dust 1976	Posted - 2013.10.28 18:35:00 - [77] - Quote Justin Tymes wrote: Void Echo wrote: Justin Tymes wrote: Does this account for the tanks shooting at you while you try to kill 1 of them? Pincer tanking is a very real and effective strategy. Tanks getting a buff might not be a problem in Skirmish or Domination, but tanks in Ambush is already unbalanced. Buffing them more without removing them from Ambush will make the mode unplayable for new players and extremely tedious to the point where it's not worth playing for everyone else. no tanks in ambush? remove AV from skirmish or domination, fair is fair Logic has already been refuted before. Game mode balance > tanks. If tanks are getting a buff and they are overpowered in Ambush, it won't be fair at all. it wont be fair for us if you block us from getting in one game mode and not blocking our rival class from getting in our game mode. double standards
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 425	Posted - 2013.10.28 18:38:00 - [78] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Justin Tymes wrote: Void Echo wrote: Justin Tymes wrote: Does this account for the tanks shooting at you while you try to kill 1 of them? Pincer tanking is a very real and effective strategy. Tanks getting a buff might not be a problem in Skirmish or Domination, but tanks in Ambush is already unbalanced. Buffing them more without removing them from Ambush will make the mode unplayable for new players and extremely tedious to the point where it's not worth playing for everyone else. no tanks in ambush? remove AV from skirmish or domination, fair is fair Logic has already been refuted before. Game mode balance > tanks. If tanks are getting a buff and they are overpowered in Ambush, it won't be fair at all. Hmm. Me agreeing with you? Maybe I am mental. But yes if we are going to have a gamemode with one class, then we have to include it's rival class. That's like playing Rock,Paper,Scissors but everyone picks rock and you aren't allowed to use Scissors. it wont be fair for us if you block us from getting in one game mode and not blocking our rival class from getting in our game mode. double standards Soon my brothers shall see the light, free from the shackles of the Amarr Empire Everyone will taste my Freedom SoonGäó
Operative 1171 Aajli Bragian Order Amarr Empire 670	Posted - 2013.10.28 18:40:00 - [79] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread. This guy is really obsessing over tanks isn't he. Who the hell is having this big of a problem with tanks? Really, who? When I go infantry I really never have a problem with tanks. When I'm in a tank I don't cause that much devastation to warrant them being able to be taken out by one guy. AV can run me off just fine without having to go all the way to dead. Chill out child! You're flogging a dead horse.
DootDoot Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 112	Posted - 2013.10.28 18:41:00 - [80] - Quote Tank's either need to be expendable... to the point of infantry suit costs... and their efficacy brought wayyyy down.... so we would have massive tank on tank battles all through the map. Or make tanks hella more expensive and give infantry only the ability to disable the tank... Take out it's tracks... Take out the ability for the turret to rotate... or fire even... But not kill the tank... that's upto structures or other vehicles... This middle of the road designed to Merc infantry.. tank concept is Re-tarded derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp

Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 426	Posted - 2013.10.28 18:42:00 - [81] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Atiim wrote: I don't care about soloing tanks, but that idea violates the rock paper scissors ideal: Infantry>Tank>AV>Infantry Something designed to destroy something should be the best at it's job, no questions asked. That's like saying heavies should be the best scouts ever Here's the thing: infantry AV should beat tanks, but not in a 1v1. Teamwork should be required, so 2-3 skilled AV should be able to beat a skilled tank. And more AV if it's unskilled players with militia or standard AV. So this idea doesn't violate the rock paper scissors ideal. Also, keep in mind that tanks can also fall under AV. With the turret changes, missiles will be the ultimate AV weapon and blasters will be the ultimate AI weapon. A missile tank will be strong against other tanks, but weaker to infantry, while a blaster tank will be stronger against infantry while being weaker to other tanks. Dust isn't as simple as rock paper scissors. You have many classes that fall under rock, many that fall under paper, and many others that fall under scissors. Some classes are simply more powerful than others (a single tank vs a single AV infantry), but are still balanced (tanks are big and slow targets, while infantry is small and agile). Three rocks for one scissors. Lol yeah ok that doesn't violate the rules at all Soon my brothers shall see the light, free from the shackles of the Amarr Empire Everyone will taste my Freedom SoonGäó
Void Echo Blades of Dust 1976	Posted - 2013.10.28 18:43:00 - [82] - Quote DootDoot wrote: Tank's either need to be expendable... to the point of infantry suit costs... and their efficacy brought wayyyy down.... so we would have massive tank on tank battles all through the map. Or make tanks the same price they are now and give infantry only the ability to disable the tank... Take out it's tracks... Take out the ability for the turret to rotate... or fire even... But not kill the tank... that's upto structures or other vehicles... This middle of the road designed to Merc infantry.. tank concept is Re-tarded derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp fixed
Gelan Corbaine Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic 212	Posted - 2013.10.28 20:50:00 - [83] - Quote Arirana wrote: Atiim wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Tanks are getting slots nerfed to that of their mlt counterparts concerning slot layout. Yes, Commander Tzu told me about this. BUT SOME PEOPLE WANT AV NERFED EVEN FURTHER! Even further? When was AV nerfed before? I remember when my Forge Gun had infinite range ...... Then I remember the 150 meter Forge in the second part of the E3 build where we died ....alot and all vehicles ......even Dropships laughed at us during that dark time before CCP rasied it back too a sensible level.
CharCharOdell 1349	Posted - 2013.10.28 20:55:00 - [84] - Quote You will never be on par with me, as King of QQ. I enraged the community enough to nerf all AV and the AR while buffing tanks. Basically, I'm OP and you are not. Gùñ-é-º+¼+ò+¦GÖÑ+ú+ú+¡ GÖÑ'Ðe+ü+üGùÑ Gùú -ä>-üð+++Ç++§<-¡<-¡ Gùó Speaker of the Mangrove / King of QQ / Co-Founder of the Learning Coalition
CharCharOdell 1349	Posted - 2013.10.28 20:55:00 - [85] - Quote Atiim wrote: Harpyja wrote: Atiim wrote: I don't care about soloing tanks, but that idea violates the rock paper scissors ideal: Infantry>Tank>AV>Infantry Something designed to destroy something should be the best at it's job, no questions asked. That's like saying heavies should be the best scouts ever Here's the thing: infantry AV should beat tanks, but not in a 1v1. Teamwork should be required, so 2-3 skilled AV should be able to beat a skilled tank. And more AV if it's unskilled players with militia or standard AV. So this idea doesn't violate the rock paper scissors ideal. Also, keep in mind that tanks can also fall under AV. With the turret changes, missiles will be the ultimate AV weapon and blasters will be the ultimate AI weapon. A missile tank will be strong against other tanks, but weaker to infantry, while a blaster tank will be stronger against infantry while being weaker to other tanks. Dust isn't as simple as rock paper scissors. You have many classes that fall under rock, many that fall under paper, and many others that fall under scissors. Some classes are simply more powerful than others (a single tank vs a single AV infantry), but are still balanced (tanks are big and slow targets, while infantry is small and agile). Three rocks for one scissors. Lol yeah ok that doesn't violate the rules at all Then make my tank cost 150k isk fully fit and proto Gùñ-é-º+¼+ò+¦GÖÑ+ú+ú+¡ GÖÑ'Ðe+ü+üGùÑ Gùú -ä>-üð+++Ç++§<-¡<-¡ Gùó Speaker of the Mangrove / King of QQ / Co-Founder of the Learning Coalition
Roofer Madness A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 418	Posted - 2013.10.28 20:59:00 - [86] - Quote Atiim wrote: Gunmouse wrote: chase rowland wrote: Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want you know spamming posts wont get you any attention. your last one just got you humiliated Running a tank against my Plasma cannon AV fit will get you humiliated. Oh yeah I forgot about you, PLCs should be nerfed too! I award you no points and may god have mercy on your soul. The Dust 514 AFK song
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 2129	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:38:00 - [87] - Quote "I told you so. I bloody well told you so" DUST 514 just went full COD. Never go full COD.
Seymor Krelborn DUST University Ivy League 1570	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:39:00 - [88] - Quote yep you bloody well told em CCp's newest joke, making setting off your own remote explosives in FW FF... awesome job ccp.
Burntface man112 Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State 96	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:42:00 - [89] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread. .... um AV means Anti Vehicle not Support Vehicle because it would be called SV than.....
True Adamance Scions of Athra 4914	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:42:00 - [90] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread. CRU don't have 150000 armour do they? Oddly enough now that tanks are good...... I haven't tanked meaningfully this build. "Shudder. Again another smart idea from an Amarr..."- Forlorn Destrier (11/12/13) LAWL

Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1481	Posted - 2013.12.16 02:45:00 - [91] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread. Says the guy that called himself a tanker, yet had to use AV to try to destroy tanks. Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
Solitar Greywatch D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 52	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:08:00 - [92] - Quote Atiim wrote: Gunmouse wrote: chase rowland wrote: Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want you know spamming posts wont get you any attention. your last one just got you humiliated Running a tank against my Plasma cannon AV fit will get you humiliated. Oh yeah I forgot about you, PLCs should be nerfed too! All hail Tank514. (kneels)
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 2134	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:19:00 - [93] - Quote Burntface man wrote: .... um AV means Anti Vehicle not Support Vehicle because it would be called SV than..... You must have missed the obvious sarcasm. DUST 514 just went full COD. Never go full COD.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 2134	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:22:00 - [94] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Says the guy that called himself a tanker, yet had to use AV to try to destroy tanks. Lets stoop down to your logic. Says the guy that called himself AV, yet uses HAVs to try to destroy tanks. DUST 514 just went full COD. Never go full COD.
Solitar Greywatch D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 55	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:23:00 - [95] - Quote Atiim wrote: Burntface man wrote: .... um AV means Anti Vehicle not Support Vehicle because it would be called SV than..... You must have missed the obvious sarcasm. Shhhhhh Atiim we have to kneel to our masters; Tank514. Don't displease our masters. (proceeds kneeling)
True Adamance Scions of Athra 4916	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:25:00 - [96] - Quote Solitar Greywatch wrote: Atiim wrote: Burntface man wrote: .... um AV means Anti Vehicle not Support Vehicle because it would be called SV than..... You must have missed the obvious sarcasm. Shhhhhh Atiim we have to kneel to our masters; Tank514. Don't displease our masters. (proceeds kneeling) That is good....we cannot kneel, therefore we are gods. Gods of Tritanium, treads, and firepower! "Shudder. Again another smart idea from an Amarr..."- Forlorn Destrier (11/12/13) LAWL
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 2135	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:30:00 - [97] - Quote Solitar Greywatch wrote: Atiim wrote: Burntface man wrote: .... um AV means Anti Vehicle not Support Vehicle because it would be called SV than..... You must have missed the obvious sarcasm. Shhhhhh Atiim we have to kneel to our masters; Tank514. Don't displease our masters. (proceeds kneeling) Please I fight for the Matari. I'm already familiar with not kneeling to people DUST 514 just went full COD. Never go full COD.
True Adamance Scions of Athra 4917	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:33:00 - [98] - Quote Kneel "Shudder. Again another smart idea from an Amarr..."- Forlorn Destrier (11/12/13) LAWL
Satja Askarin Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic 10	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:34:00 - [99] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Kneel Of course Templar.
True Adamance Scions of Athra 4917	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:35:00 - [100] - Quote Satja Askarin wrote: True Adamance wrote: Kneel Of course Templar. See the Matari do kneel before God's chosen, knowing one day they too will be His children. "Shudder. Again another smart idea from an Amarr..."- Forlorn Destrier (11/12/13) LAWL

Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 2138	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:40:00 - [101] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Kneel I'd sooner commit suicide. DUST 514 just went full COD. Never go full COD.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 2138	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:42:00 - [102] - Quote Satja Askarin wrote: True Adamance wrote: Kneel Of course Templar. It may be impolite to ask, but I must anyway. How does it feel to be locked inside of a basement? Do you find it depressing knowing how you will probably never feel the joys of freedom and/or the ability to make your own decisions? DUST 514 just went full COD. Never go full COD.
DeadlyAztec11 2796	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:44:00 - [103] - Quote You told'em. LOL My alts: GeneralJohnRipper, Draxus Prime, MoonEagle A, Long Evity, CCP Rarara And this is why I am the #1 forum warrior
Satja Askarin Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic 10	Posted - 2013.12.16 03:49:00 - [104] - Quote Atiim wrote: Satja Askarin wrote: True Adamance wrote: Kneel Of course Templar. It may be impolite to ask, but I must anyway. How does it feel to be locked inside of a basement? Do you find it depressing knowing how you will probably never feel the joys of freedom and/or the ability to make your own decisions? Technically Kador doesn't have a basement, nor does he own property in terms of land....technically he doesn't even own me. As for my own decision making....well I have shown Kador that I am worthy of the liberties I now possess.....also what Kador doesn't know wont hurt him....
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 2140	Posted - 2013.12.16 04:02:00 - [105] - Quote Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: You are trying to hard... To save this game from pilots? It's impossible to try to hard then. DUST 514 just went full COD. Never go full COD.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 2140	Posted - 2013.12.16 04:03:00 - [106] - Quote Satja Askarin wrote: Technically Kador doesn't have a basement, nor does he own property in terms of land....technically he doesn't even own me. As for my own decision making....well I have shown Kador that I am worthy of the liberties I now possess.....also what Kador doesn't know wont hurt him.... Well if you are truly happy with your life then so be it I guess. Though I'm sure you know how to reach [TRILB] if (when) you realize that you deserve better. DUST 514 just went full COD. Never go full COD.
knight of 6 SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 845	Posted - 2013.12.16 04:13:00 - [107] - Quote Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks! We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU. And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us. AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits! TANKS! TANKS! TANKS! Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread. CCP for the love of god buff AV! just shut them up! I should check the dust forums OH WAIT IT'S ALL TANK BALANCE THREADS I don't want to be gods, I want a profitable career of driving tanks EVERYTHING else is secondary. at this point I actively want tanks nerfed back into the ground, I love my tank, I want to drive it and make iskies and be happy, but I would give up all of that just to shut you up... grinning from ear to ear. if you could offer me the front page of GD back I would scream to the heavens "if tanks can't be cut down with ARs they ar OP" but you can't how many threads have you made about the same damn thing? why wouldn't one have worked? I don't care if you edit it a million times and the OP is a million pages long but for the love of god making a new thread every ten seconds isn't helping. do you honestly think CCP hasn't read any of this? do you think one more thread from the author of a billion all identical will help? do you feel that anyone, even CCP could possibly be stupid enough not to get your point yet? at this point you have completely devolved from any logical argument, what was here is math and personal experience is now simply "they are all literally satan". why keep posting, do you think you are going to change anyones mind with this garbage? "they are all literally satan" well you have a good point there mister Atim. I was pro tank but you have persuaded me otherwise. report me if you are so inclined, I don't care, make lots of threads about how I am satan, again I don't care, In fact I would probably appreciate it more than your next startling Expos+¬ on how tanks need adjustment. I'm sorry if I offended anyone with my use of satan and don't really know if it will make it through the censor but if you're offended don't be it was just the worst thing I could think of at the moment. Atim, sorry it was your thread I vented in, I stand by every word I wrote, but still. "God favors the side with the best artillery" ~ Napoleon Ko6, scout, tanker. CLOSED BETA VET


Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.