|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Void Echo
Blades of Dust
1948
   |
Posted - 2013.10.25 19:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
*walks into room*
.....your that desperate huh?
*walks out of room* |
Void Echo
Blades of Dust
1949
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 20:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Void Echo wrote:*walks into room*
.....your that desperate huh?
*walks out of room*
(oh look, his alt liked his post LOL) nah, i don't use alts to like my post Gunmouse liked it sry
its funny how 100% of these wishes you posted are nothing of what we want... talk about stupidity. |
Void Echo
Blades of Dust
1951
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 21:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Void Echo wrote:Atiim wrote:3 AV to kill a tank? ONE TANK?
6 people for 2 Tanks ?
9 people for 3 tanks?
12 people for 4 tanks?
15 people for 5 tanks?
That adds up quickly. In fact I while back I actually made a thread about this.
That's not good reasoning.
Why should you be able to solo infantry? Because you are in a tank?
You should be weak and succeptable to AV because it's AV. THAT'S IT DOING IT'S JOB!
You clearly want tanks to be OP and without any AV resistance whatsoever. Good attempt at trying to "balance " this issue ahem....: 3 people for one tank.3 people take down a single tank. the same 3 people take down 2 more tanks. the same 3 people take down 4 more tanks. the same 3 people take down a full squad of tanks. honestly the only way youd need more than 3 people dealing with us is if your too damn ******** to go after more than one target. when youv destroyed one already... are you too tired to run after you kill one of us off that you need another 3 people to take your place? your making it seem like AV are too damn stupid to destroy multiple targets (which I can say for 95% of the community, that's true).
that quote actually debunks you completely |
Void Echo
Blades of Dust
1951
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 21:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Atiim wrote:TechMechMeds wrote:Tanks are getting slots nerfed to that of their mlt counterparts concerning slot layout. Yes, Commander Tzu told me about this. BUT SOME PEOPLE WANT AV NERFED EVEN FURTHER!
AV has NEVER been nerfed before, all AV has gotten were buff after buff... its the tanks that have gotten nerfed every ******* build.
and if they do get nerfed further than tanks do this time, there might actually be balance because then tanking would actually be a viable class for once. |
Void Echo
Blades of Dust
1953
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 22:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:Atiim wrote:3 AV to kill a tank? ONE TANK?
6 people for 2 Tanks ?
9 people for 3 tanks?
12 people for 4 tanks?
15 people for 5 tanks?
That adds up quickly. In fact I while back I actually made a thread about this.
That's not good reasoning.
Why should you be able to solo infantry? Because you are in a tank?
You should be weak and succeptable to AV because it's AV. THAT'S IT DOING IT'S JOB!
You clearly want tanks to be OP and without any AV resistance whatsoever. Good attempt at trying to "balance " this issue ahem....: 3 people for one tank.3 people take down a single tank. the same 3 people take down 2 more tanks. the same 3 people take down 4 more tanks. the same 3 people take down a full squad of tanks. honestly the only way youd need more than 3 people dealing with us is if your too damn ******** to go after more than one target. when youv destroyed one already... are you too tired to run after you kill one of us off that you need another 3 people to take your place? your making it seem like AV are too damn stupid to destroy multiple targets (which I can say for 95% of the community, that's true).
[/quote]
Does this account for the tanks shooting at you while you try to kill 1 of them? Pincer tanking is a very real and effective strategy.
Tanks getting a buff might not be a problem in Skirmish or Domination, but tanks in Ambush is already unbalanced. Buffing them more without removing them from Ambush will make the mode unplayable for new players and extremely tedious to the point where it's not worth playing for everyone else.[/quote]
no tanks in ambush?
remove AV from skirmish or domination, fair is fair |
Void Echo
Blades of Dust
1956
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 23:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
Atiim wrote:I think my work here is done. 
pretty much...
youv once again shown how incredibly ignorant and stupid you are. |
Void Echo
Blades of Dust
1956
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 00:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Void Echo wrote:Atiim wrote:I think my work here is done. pretty much... youv once again shown how incredibly ignorant and stupid you are. Nah, i've stated my points, and clearly everyone favors tanks So, instead of trying to keep things balanced, I'm gonna just wait for tanks to be OP. Then i'll just use my tank and still do good. The situation is kind of a mix between a losing battle, and a win/win situation. On one hand, you want tanks to be OP, and I don't. But on the other hand, I also use tanks; so if they become OP, I won't be any less sad. So i'll just let the community live with this decision, and when this becomes Tank 514, and HAVs are the next Flaylock Pistol, i'll just be here to say: Atiim wrote:
I TOLD YOU SO!
so your saying that if tanks are finally able to survive something and be a viable class, they will become OP?
biggest scrub ever..
tanks are one of the biggest jokes in the game, FACT.
by the way things are, nobody new want to go into tanks because its **** and nearly dead, only those of us that know what to do are able to do anything, and there are maybe 10 of us left (your no tanker).
if tanks are finally able to survive, they will be a viable class for once... get that through your biased cod scrub head |
Void Echo
Blades of Dust
1957
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 00:19:00 -
[8] - Quote
Atiim wrote:
You've yet to prove me wrong, you say that I'm no tanker, and yet you still have yet to prove me wrong about being a tanker.
A biased COD scrub? LOL I've only played COD once, and then proceeded to have my friend pay for the pizza as payback for making me play that boring, repetitive POS game.
And again you aren't baised? YOU ARE THE MOST BIASED PERSON I'VE MET ON THE FORUMS!
you have yet to say why tanks shouldn't be able to survive anything other than the stupid "well I get killed by militia guys all the time, and I make back my isk in one match", there are no reasons tanks shouldn't be buffed and there are many, many reasons tanks shouldn't be ignored |
Void Echo
Blades of Dust
1976
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 18:35:00 -
[9] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:Void Echo wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:
Does this account for the tanks shooting at you while you try to kill 1 of them? Pincer tanking is a very real and effective strategy.
Tanks getting a buff might not be a problem in Skirmish or Domination, but tanks in Ambush is already unbalanced. Buffing them more without removing them from Ambush will make the mode unplayable for new players and extremely tedious to the point where it's not worth playing for everyone else.
no tanks in ambush? remove AV from skirmish or domination, fair is fair Logic has already been refuted before. Game mode balance > tanks. If tanks are getting a buff and they are overpowered in Ambush, it won't be fair at all.
it wont be fair for us if you block us from getting in one game mode and not blocking our rival class from getting in our game mode. double standards |
Void Echo
Blades of Dust
1976
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 18:43:00 -
[10] - Quote
DootDoot wrote:Tank's either need to be expendable... to the point of infantry suit costs... and their efficacy brought wayyyy down.... so we would have massive tank on tank battles all through the map.
Or make tanks the same price they are now and give infantry only the ability to disable the tank... Take out it's tracks... Take out the ability for the turret to rotate... or fire even... But not kill the tank... that's upto structures or other vehicles...
This middle of the road designed to Merc infantry.. tank concept is Re-tarded derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp
fixed
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|