Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Seeth Mensch
highland marines
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 20:51:00 -
[61] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote:I'll just say what I said in the other Crybaby Tanker thread:
What you aren't thinking about is the fact that there are literally only FOUR weapons in this entire game that are not capable of killing ... kill a Heavy Much Much MUCH MUCH faster than they can destroy a HAV. The same is true for Installation turrets.
Exhibit A -Observe how the AV user opens his post specifically stating "Crybaby Tanker" a juvenile insult tactic to make himself feel more empowered in.... The childish insult arena? -Notice how the heavy list is "capable of" while the tank list is "effective". If you were to swap those two blurbs around you would have to remove the sniper, shotgun, HMG, flaylock and nova knife. Then you'd have to add to the tank side mass driver, plasma cannon, remote explosives, uh.. And the rocks on the terrain. All of which I have used to take out tanks... Except for the rocks of course.
You haven't used the rocks? Pfft. noob. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
2091
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 20:58:00 -
[62] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote:I'll just say what I said in the other Crybaby Tanker thread:
What you aren't thinking about is the fact that there are literally only FOUR weapons in this entire game that are not capable of killing a Heavy. These being AV grenades, Flux grenads, Proximity Mines, and Swarm Launchers. Every other weapon has the potential to kill a Heavy. So, lets list the weapons capable of killing a Heavy Lets see...
Assault Rifle Scrambler Rifle Sniper Rifle Shotgun Mass Driver Plasma Cannon HMG Forge Gun Scrambler Pistol Flaylock Pistol SMG Remote Explosives Nova Knife Locus Grenades
Take into account the different variants of these and there is A LOT of weapons on the field which can kill a Heavy, which are by and far much more prevalent on the battlefield than AV weapons. Indeed 100% of players on the battlefield are carrying at least 1 weapon which is capable of killing a Heavy at any given point in a match.
Lets see what can effectively destroy a HAV
AV Grenades Swarm Launchers Forge Guns Proximity Mines
These maybe account for 10% of all weapons fielded in battle at any given time
Now take into account that your HAV has thousands more HP than a Heavy Dropsuit, with more speed. Your rail turrets have a zoom ability where a Forge Gun does not, a higher RoF, No reload time, No charge time.
I'll also add that Tank turrets both small and large can kill a Heavy Much Much MUCH MUCH faster than they can destroy a HAV. The same is true for Installation turrets.
Exhibit A -Observe how the AV user opens his post specifically stating "Crybaby Tanker" a juvenile insult tactic to make himself feel more empowered in.... The childish insult arena? -Notice how the heavy list is "capable of" while the tank list is "effective". If you were to swap those two blurbs around you would have to remove the sniper, shotgun, HMG, flaylock and nova knife. Then you'd have to add to the tank side mass driver, plasma cannon, remote explosives, uh.. And the rocks on the terrain. All of which I have used to take out tanks... Except for the rocks of course. I can effectively kill a heavy with a sniper, shotgun, flaylock, or HMG. I've heard the nova knife is good at killing heavies too as long as you get close enough. |
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
1218
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 22:59:00 -
[63] - Quote
I'd rather rails get a splash radius buff. |
DeadlyAztec11
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
2291
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 23:10:00 -
[64] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Wallaby1 wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote: how many times do we have to go through this topic!! Its all getting changed anyway lol FG = higher Alpha dmg/ on a suit Rail gun = higher DPS (scope)/ on a tank What is the problem? i mean really? just sayin..... You are not helping your cause at all. You fail to be objective, not to mention you completely contort the basis of analytical thinking. Trying to be a smart @ss and not even willing to discuss and counter points of the othee side is rude and makes you look ignorant and un informed. Im sorry what have i missed? this topic HAS been done and redone many times, im sorry if ive hit a nerve but if your accusing me of not being objective then i can pretty much say the same of everyone else in this thread... Heavies and tanks both have their advantages and disadvantages that trasfer to other weapon systems. You play to your advantages, yes a tank cant trundle down a corridor but it can pretty much ignore all small arms fire and take a serious beating besides. Rail guns apply pinpoint high dmg shots at a high rate of fire, FG's are similar but at a lower rate of fire. Please feel free to argue the point instead of being a bit of a douch I was even talking about you! I was talking to Wallaby.
What a dumb@as... |
Wallaby1
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
33
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 23:19:00 -
[65] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Wallaby1 wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote: how many times do we have to go through this topic!! Its all getting changed anyway lol FG = higher Alpha dmg/ on a suit Rail gun = higher DPS (scope)/ on a tank What is the problem? i mean really? just sayin..... You are not helping your cause at all. You fail to be objective, not to mention you completely contort the basis of analytical thinking. Trying to be a smart @ss and not even willing to discuss and counter points of the othee side is rude and makes you look ignorant and un informed. Im sorry what have i missed? this topic HAS been done and redone many times, im sorry if ive hit a nerve but if your accusing me of not being objective then i can pretty much say the same of everyone else in this thread... Heavies and tanks both have their advantages and disadvantages that trasfer to other weapon systems. You play to your advantages, yes a tank cant trundle down a corridor but it can pretty much ignore all small arms fire and take a serious beating besides. Rail guns apply pinpoint high dmg shots at a high rate of fire, FG's are similar but at a lower rate of fire. Please feel free to argue the point instead of being a bit of a douch I was even talking about you! I was talking to Wallaby. What a dumb@as... ffs not you again stay on topic or dont post please , im sick of forum rage wars |
Jastad
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
173
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 23:21:00 -
[66] - Quote
Keri Starlight wrote:Jastad wrote:
Proto Raild DMG 178 Proto IAF 1500
Raw damage from the Ishukone AFG is higher than 1600, actually... ...but the real numbers are different. FG Proficiency Level 5 A/1 Series with 2 Complex Damage Mods Total +35% Let's be objective here.
Yeah but if you count the DMG from skill and DMG mod we need to do the same thing on tank, and the numbers stay the same.
Also i'm in the slowest suit, vulnerable to all weapon, not just 3.
Guys be objective. |
BRIANNA BEACH
Pradox One
58
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 23:24:00 -
[67] - Quote
I think we should still bring up the obvious fact that the render issue has screwed up the rail ads to a point where you're aiming at invisimercs and invisitanks Not to mention the fg has better splash damage and damage per shot Also has anyone seen a rail tank 1 shot another tank? |
Meeko Fent
expert intervention Caldari State
1247
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 23:27:00 -
[68] - Quote
Sigh, let me explain how this is balanced (Weapon Wise, AV is certainly much to strong right now)
FG. Fastest refire rate, one every two and a half seconds.
Rails. Fastest refire rate, .6 or something like that seconds.
Rails-DPS.
Forges-Alpha Strike. |
medomai grey
WarRavens League of Infamy
273
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 23:31:00 -
[69] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: Yeah... No point replying to people who are crude.
At least half the tankers can crack a joke every now and then, but a good majority of the AV "specialists" seem to go all angsty 13 year old child. One who is trying to hump his computer screen while thinking his boring text makes him sound tough... You know they'll read just enough to reply like a robot, and not think about it enough to reply like a human. Not to say it doesn't also go the other way, but it is seeming like most of the juvenile snark comes from AV.
But seriously, they don't read, they don't think, they just try to insult while others look on with sheer boredom.
Many of your gripes with others apply to Wallaby1, Void_Echo, and you yourself. Its funny that you feel you have the right to berate others for what you yourself are guilty of.
Also I do believe I told you to stay the hell away from anything that requires you to draw conclusions because your inability to be objective. You don't have to go out of your way to prove me right you know. |
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
275
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 23:37:00 -
[70] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:My Blurble. I can effectively kill a heavy with a sniper, shotgun, flaylock, or HMG. I've heard the nova knife is good at killing heavies too as long as you get close enough. What you are stating is "Capable of". Yes all of those weapons are capable of killing a heavy, but not the most "effective to" kill a heavy. That's the entire difference I'm pointing out with the wording. |
|
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
275
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 23:43:00 -
[71] - Quote
medomai grey wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: Yeah... No point replying to people who are crude.
At least half the tankers can crack a joke every now and then, but a good majority of the AV "specialists" seem to go all angsty 13 year old child. One who is trying to hump his computer screen while thinking his boring text makes him sound tough... You know they'll read just enough to reply like a robot, and not think about it enough to reply like a human. Not to say it doesn't also go the other way, but it is seeming like most of the juvenile snark comes from AV.
But seriously, they don't read, they don't think, they just try to insult while others look on with sheer boredom.
Many of your gripes with others apply to Wallaby1, Void_Echo, and you yourself. Its funny that you feel you have the right to berate others for what you yourself are guilty of. Also I do believe I told you to stay the hell away from anything that requires you to draw conclusions because your inability to be objective. You don't have to go out of your way to prove me right you know.
Exhibit B: -Subject is both boastful and feels cornered, so turns to an attempt at petty insults and vague personal attacks. -Observe how the AV user quoted here refused to actually read the post he quoted.
|
Wallaby1
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
38
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 23:50:00 -
[72] - Quote
medomai grey wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: Yeah... No point replying to people who are crude.
At least half the tankers can crack a joke every now and then, but a good majority of the AV "specialists" seem to go all angsty 13 year old child. One who is trying to hump his computer screen while thinking his boring text makes him sound tough... You know they'll read just enough to reply like a robot, and not think about it enough to reply like a human. Not to say it doesn't also go the other way, but it is seeming like most of the juvenile snark comes from AV.
But seriously, they don't read, they don't think, they just try to insult while others look on with sheer boredom.
Many of your gripes with others apply to Wallaby1, Void_Echo, and you yourself. Its funny that you feel you have the right to berate others for what you yourself are guilty of. Also I do believe I told you to stay the hell away from anything that requires you to draw conclusions because your inability to be objective. You don't have to go out of your way to prove me right you know. i dont understand what your problem is pal , i haven't been trying to insult any1 except that 1 idiot who was an obvious troll ,i dont no why people like you have to come along with their smug sarcastic BS acting all high and mighty , i can just imagine you writing that sentence with your eyes closed |
medomai grey
WarRavens League of Infamy
273
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:31:00 -
[73] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:medomai grey wrote:Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: Yeah... No point replying to people who are crude.
At least half the tankers can crack a joke every now and then, but a good majority of the AV "specialists" seem to go all angsty 13 year old child. One who is trying to hump his computer screen while thinking his boring text makes him sound tough... You know they'll read just enough to reply like a robot, and not think about it enough to reply like a human. Not to say it doesn't also go the other way, but it is seeming like most of the juvenile snark comes from AV.
But seriously, they don't read, they don't think, they just try to insult while others look on with sheer boredom.
Many of your gripes with others apply to Wallaby1, Void_Echo, and you yourself. Its funny that you feel you have the right to berate others for what you yourself are guilty of. Also I do believe I told you to stay the hell away from anything that requires you to draw conclusions because your inability to be objective. You don't have to go out of your way to prove me right you know. Exhibit B: -Subject is both boastful and feels cornered, so turns to an attempt at petty insults and vague personal attacks. -Observe how the AV user quoted here refused to actually read the post he quoted. I see it's your tactic to avoid directly confronting the points made against you. Not that you could; that would require a spine, something you lack. You completely ignore my last rebuttal and now you won't even touch the points that i criticise you on. Hell, you won't even address me directly. Yet you speak of petty insults and refusing to read quoted posts?
Also to prove your inability to be objective, where is it ever implied that I am spec'd into AV? Only in your posts? Funny, what lead you to believe that i have any SP invested to AV?... You assumed because I disagree with you and you chose to label me something derogatory to you, AV. You despise AV, it is quite literally a tanker's bane. Yet I do not have a single SP invested into AV. You are so biased that you unable to draw solid conclusions.
|
Mo Gallas Gentralde
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
185
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:39:00 -
[74] - Quote
medomai grey wrote:I see it's your tactic to avoid directly confronting the points made against you. Not that you could; that would require a spine, something you lack. You completely ignore my last rebuttal and now you won't even touch the points that i criticise you on. Hell, you won't even address me directly. Yet you speak of petty insults and refusing to read quoted posts? Also to prove your inability to be objective, where is it ever implied that I am spec'd into AV? Only in your posts? Funny, what lead you to believe that i have any SP invested to AV?... You assumed because I disagree with you and you chose to label me something derogatory to you, AV. You despise AV, it is quite literally a tanker's bane. Yet I do not have a single SP invested into AV. You are so biased that you unable to draw solid conclusions.
Dude... You've obviously plugged your eyes over. You're not going to say anything constructive nor useful.... why should anyone reply to you?
To make you feel some semblance of importance? You're whipping yourself like a sad, soggy puppy left out to shiver in the rain... o_o; |
medomai grey
WarRavens League of Infamy
273
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:56:00 -
[75] - Quote
Mo Gallas Gentralde wrote:medomai grey wrote:I see it's your tactic to avoid directly confronting the points made against you. Not that you could; that would require a spine, something you lack. You completely ignore my last rebuttal and now you won't even touch the points that i criticise you on. Hell, you won't even address me directly. Yet you speak of petty insults and refusing to read quoted posts? Also to prove your inability to be objective, where is it ever implied that I am spec'd into AV? Only in your posts? Funny, what lead you to believe that i have any SP invested to AV?... You assumed because I disagree with you and you chose to label me something derogatory to you, AV. You despise AV, it is quite literally a tanker's bane. Yet I do not have a single SP invested into AV. You are so biased that you unable to draw solid conclusions. Dude... You've obviously plugged your eyes over. You're not going to say anything constructive nor useful.... why should anyone reply to you? To make you feel some semblance of importance? You're whipping yourself like a sad, soggy puppy left out to shiver in the rain... o_o; Why indeed? |
abarkrishna
The Elysian Knights
23
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 01:17:00 -
[76] - Quote
You obviously did not see this.
http://web.ccpgamescdn.com/dust/news.control/65170/1/Turret_Changes.png
I wish people would check facts before opening their mouth.
I hate making you guys look stupid.
|
abarkrishna
The Elysian Knights
23
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 01:18:00 -
[77] - Quote
BRIANNA BEACH wrote:I think we should still bring up the obvious fact that the render issue has screwed up the rail ads to a point where you're aiming at invisimercs and invisitanks Not to mention the fg has better splash damage and damage per shot Also has anyone seen a rail tank 1 shot another tank?
Mine |
medomai grey
WarRavens League of Infamy
273
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 01:58:00 -
[78] - Quote
Wallaby1 wrote: i dont understand what your problem is pal , i haven't been trying to insult any1 except that 1 idiot who was an obvious troll ,i dont know why people like you have to come along with their smug sarcastic BS acting all high and mighty , i can just imagine you writing that sentence with your eyes closed
DeadlyAztec11 summarized it quite well didn't he?DeadlyAztec11 wrote: You are not helping your cause at all. You fail to be objective, not to mention you completely contort the basis of analytical thinking. Trying to be a smart @ss and not even willing to discuss and counter points of the other side is rude and makes you look ignorant and uninformed. Regardless of intent, you have obviously offended someone. And there was no sarcasm when I called you stupid.
PS: It takes great skill to type a sentence with one's eyes closed. I'm so glad you noticed that one sentence. I was beginning worry that no one would notice. <<< This is sarcasm. |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
432
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 03:03:00 -
[79] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:33% across the board is the magic number atm
Still tho it doesnt look good enough I find it hard to beleive CCP Wolfman would pull a mega douche move like that. Unless they are looking at nerfing other things as well. Including Blasters, Rails, HAV tanking in general.
Then again this is CCP we are talking about. CCP does hate Heavies. |
Gabriella Grey
XERCORE E X T E R M I N A T U S
76
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 03:11:00 -
[80] - Quote
I think forge guns are only balanced when they are in relation to HAV's, and not other vehicles. But just like vehicles, and turrets currently are, AV is not balanced as well.I don't think a single forge gun user should solo vehicles the way they currently do. Only tanks can afford to engage them. Any other vehicle has to run away, and hope for the best. Swarms need to obey to some kind of physics. Currently, Swarms can move around objects without even the least bit of input from the initial lock on and fire. I feel if a swarm volley is shot and the vehicle user is purposely moving to place objects into the swarms trajectory towards the vehicle, they should not be cutting around corners. I really don't mind swarms adjusting in flight when they are homing into a vehicles signature. But they need to obey to some kind of physics like the rest of things. Forge guns need to be balanced with the vehicles changes coming and proto AV in general needs to be stripped from the game until the vehicles that are able to withstand/be on par to their damage output are introduced. Forge and AV in general reminds me a little similar to chromosome and how easy it was to kill clones as a militia sniper. |
|
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
432
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 03:14:00 -
[81] - Quote
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote:nakaya indigene wrote:there is a real sickness in this game.. i'm convinced that is mostly coming from AV. I dunno maybe? Yeah... No point replying to people who are crude. At least half the tankers can crack a joke every now and then, but a good majority of the AV "specialists" seem to go all angsty 13 year old child. One who is trying to hump his computer screen while thinking his boring text makes him sound tough... You know they'll read just enough to reply like a robot, and not think about it enough to reply like a human. Not to say it doesn't also go the other way, but it is seeming like most of the juvenile snark comes from AV. But seriously, they don't read, they don't think, they just try to insult while others look on with sheer boredom. You have that reversed there kiddo. You really need to stop trying to have this entire game cater to your style of play. There's been a political campaign to get anything that can be used for AV to be nerfed to ineffectiveness. "Nuclear Baseballs," referring to the slowest firing class weapon in the game as "Rapid Firing."
It's pretty sad your method of argument is demonizing those who disagree with you. Good Forum Metagame. |
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
1220
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 03:22:00 -
[82] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Sigh, let me explain how this is balanced (Weapon Wise, AV is certainly much to strong right now)
FG. Fastest refire rate, one every two and a half seconds.
Rails. Fastest refire rate, .6 or something like that seconds.
Rails-DPS.
Forges-Alpha Strike.
it is true...dails do more damage, ultimately. theyre also more accurate and have infinite ammo. if anything, i'd fix rendering and boom. it's better. |
mr Bandito
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 04:54:00 -
[83] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote: You have that reversed there kiddo. You really need to stop trying to have this entire game cater to your style of play. There's been a political campaign to get anything that can be used for AV to be nerfed to ineffectiveness. "Nuclear Baseballs," referring to the slowest firing class weapon in the game as "Rapid Firing."
It's pretty sad your method of argument is demonizing those who disagree with you. Good Forum Metagame.
Plasma... Cannons? Also I think they called those grenade things un needed because You can throw 4 for about 6-8k damage then switch to a swarm? Both of which do home in on their target. Imagine if there were grenades that homed in on infantry or a flaylock that did? You can't say you wouldn't be complaining about that. |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
432
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 05:26:00 -
[84] - Quote
mr Bandito wrote:Rusty Shallows wrote: You have that reversed there kiddo. You really need to stop trying to have this entire game cater to your style of play. There's been a political campaign to get anything that can be used for AV to be nerfed to ineffectiveness. "Nuclear Baseballs," referring to the slowest firing class weapon in the game as "Rapid Firing."
It's pretty sad your method of argument is demonizing those who disagree with you. Good Forum Metagame.
Plasma... Cannons? Also I think they called those grenade things un needed because You can throw 4 for about 6-8k damage then switch to a swarm? Both of which do home in on their target. Imagine if there were grenades that homed in on infantry or a flaylock that did? You can't say you wouldn't be complaining about that. Yes mr Bandito you are correct I would be pissed if my slow-@ssed crappy buffer tanked suit was made even easier to kill.
Have no fear if Plasma Cannons post re-balance can do any AV then they'll be added to the nerfing demands.
AV grenades had to either be homing or the vehicle speeds severally reduced. Take your pick. I prefer my Ishukone Watch LAV keep the zip. The only thing that really bothered me about the AV grenades was hearing about people using them on airborne dropships. |
Wallaby1
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 05:38:00 -
[85] - Quote
medomai grey wrote:Wallaby1 wrote: i dont understand what your problem is pal , i haven't been trying to insult any1 except that 1 idiot who was an obvious troll ,i dont know why people like you have to come along with their smug sarcastic BS acting all high and mighty , i can just imagine you writing that sentence with your eyes closed
DeadlyAztec11 summarized it quite well didn't he? DeadlyAztec11 wrote: You are not helping your cause at all. You fail to be objective, not to mention you completely contort the basis of analytical thinking. Trying to be a smart @ss and not even willing to discuss and counter points of the other side is rude and makes you look ignorant and uninformed. Regardless of intent, you have obviously offended someone. And there was no sarcasm when I called you stupid. PS: It takes great skill to type a sentence with one's eyes closed. I'm so glad you noticed that one sentence. I was beginning worry that no one would notice. <<< This is sarcasm. !facepalm! , please be relevant to the original post and stop **** stirring i dont have to love your opinions and you dont have to love mine , but your comments are worthless to the point and only serve to make yourself seem like an ultra elitist d0uchebag |
medomai grey
WarRavens League of Infamy
274
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 06:13:00 -
[86] - Quote
Wallaby1 wrote: !facepalm! , please be relevant to the original post and stop **** stirring i dont have to love your opinions and you dont have to love mine , but your comments are worthless to the point and only serve to make yourself seem like an ultra elitist d0uchebag
It's funny that you still believe your thread topic is still relevant after several people have already explained why it's currently pointless to discuss. Oh right, you don't have enough brain capacity to actually read you own thread. I really should be more considerate to your... handicap.
You want me to stop trolling you... Whats the matter, can dish it out but can't take it? |
Wallaby1
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 06:31:00 -
[87] - Quote
medomai grey wrote:Wallaby1 wrote: !facepalm! , please be relevant to the original post and stop **** stirring i dont have to love your opinions and you dont have to love mine , but your comments are worthless to the point and only serve to make yourself seem like an ultra elitist d0uchebag
It's funny that you still believe your thread topic is still relevant after several people have already explained why it's currently pointless to discuss. Oh right, you don't have enough brain capacity to actually read you own thread. I really should be more considerate to your... handicap. You want me to stop trolling you... Whats the matter, can dish it out but can't take it? how am i dishing it out...? half the thread is your comments talking cr@p to people, honestly man the way you talk to people is absolute rubbish , its clear you THINK you're very intelligent , you accuse half the people on this thread of being idiots because there opinions differ to your own then you accuse me of being offensive and a troll? wtf!? whatever bro your clearly way to yoloswag intelligent for me to handle. |
medomai grey
WarRavens League of Infamy
274
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 06:39:00 -
[88] - Quote
Wallaby1 wrote: how am i dishing it out...? half the thread is your comments talking cr@p to people, honestly man the way you talk to people is absolute rubbish , its clear you THINK you're very intelligent , you accuse half the people on this thread of being idiots because there opinions differ to your own then you accuse me of being offensive and a troll? wtf!? whatever bro your clearly way to yoloswag intelligent for me to handle.
Correction idiot, I have only called you stupid. I called the other guy spineless.
|
Stupid Blueberry
Butt Hurt Try Hards
61
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 06:43:00 -
[89] - Quote
sage |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1413
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 07:32:00 -
[90] - Quote
aaaand thread has failed... thanks for all the fish etc |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |