Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Obodiah Garro
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
405
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 01:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? |
Guildo Crow
ZionTCD
136
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 01:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
I doubt any "respec" will be offered if they add new weapons.
I don't think they should. Just start saving some SP on the side for the future. CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...
and seriously... why do people keep calling it "Respect" it's Re-Specialization ie. Respec (or am I totally wrong here?) |
Delta 749
Kestrel Reconnaissance
2091
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 01:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
Guildo Crow wrote:I doubt any "respec" will be offered if they add new weapons.
I don't think they should. Just start saving some SP on the side for the future. CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...
and seriously... why do people keep calling it "Respect" it's Re-Specialization ie. Respec (or am I totally wrong here?)
Respec is right, those guys are just idiots Anyway in defense of a respec he does have a point that at a certain point we should get another since some people are forced into spending points into something thats not a correct fit for them with the only alternative being not spending points at all such as all heavies being forced into amarr suits for the playstyles
Now Im not saying everyone should get a respec every time something new is added but one more when all the racial stuff is finally available seems reasonable to me although the rate things are going that might be sometime in 2015 if we are lucky |
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
102
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
Guildo Crow wrote:I doubt any "respec" will be offered if they add new weapons.
I don't think they should. Just start saving some SP on the side for the future. CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...
and seriously... why do people keep calling it "Respect" it's Re-Specialization ie. Respec (or am I totally wrong here?)
Seeing as the current AR variants are actually just general Gallente ones I disagree with you .. I'd be surprised if they are even still in the game when racial variants are added .. we aren;t talking about the addition of extra content here .. racial variants are actually basic content they haven;t added to the game yet, just like vehicles ... there is only 1 Heavy suit .. 1 ... heavy users either have to have stuck to miltia since BETA or spec into the 1 and only option available to them ..
PS Its actually faulty planning on behalf of CCP for not adding basic content that has led to the current situation obviously you have 20m SP and have specced your main loadout fully and have nothing else to spec into so have sp to spare and are fully specced into Proto but asking heavy users to stick to miltia for a year because they may add racial variants at some point in the future is just dumb
Racial variants is going to actually add more content than we currently have in game, we arent talking 1 new weapon or 1 new suit ..we are talking 4 suits of each type 4 weapons of each type 4 vehicles of each type as well as x all that by the 3 tiers too ... I've never cared for a respec but in a situation like this I believe a partial respec to return sp invested in weapons/suits/vehicles is a must |
Clips A'hoy
The Generals EoN.
46
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
I agree there should be a "partial" if not full respec as tankers are getting a "nerf", or so they say.
The reason being you only have two choices, AR (the most popular) or the ScR. Neither of which some players didn't want to pick to begin with but had to make a avoidance-avoidance choice. I for one being an Amarr loyalist and a true Ammatar do desire to RP as one... A loyalist and a full Matari (except for their ideals, of course).
That being the case it should also be established for when the other racial suits come along. It would undoubtedly be an inevitable reason, which from my understanding, most will agree. |
Himiko Kuronaga
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1824
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
No respecs.
Stop looking for reasons to get a respec.
You are not getting a respec. |
Rowdy Railgunner
TRUE TEA BAGGERS EoN.
62
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Until all suits and main weapons are introduced we should get respects with every new patch. Optional ofcourse. Look at heavies. If you want to be a heavy you get one suit and 2 weapons. What if you don't even like those things once the other heavy suits and weapons are introduced? Look at scouts. They are forced between 2 races. Look at the pics of the new guns coming out. I specced AR because I liked the TAR. I used it in chrom and I still use it today. Back then they said that the TAR was a placeholder for the caldari rail rifle. Now they are saying it is not. So when I spec into rail rifles I will have millions of SP invested in a weapon system that I might not want. DUST is still in BETA. 514 is meant to be May 2014. Not May 14, 2013. We are still 7 months away from this game actually being what the devs want it to be.
Every new addition until all the races have their gear should come with a respec. Simple as that. |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
1165
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
I support a SP reallocation from one Rifle to another once we get get them all.
I also support this for my heavy bros. Those guys have been waiting for awhile. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1009
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:13:00 -
[9] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? Let your SP pool instead of spending like a drunken sailor.
New weapons =/= complete overhaul of vehicles. |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
1165
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:16:00 -
[10] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? Let your SP pool instead of spending like a drunken sailor. New weapons =/= complete overhaul of vehicles. Aren't vehicles going to be refunded? At least partially?
Edit:Also, I'd be fine with letting pilots change their vehicle once they are released. |
|
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
228
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:36:00 -
[11] - Quote
A respec sbould be when all (or at least most) of the content is out and CCP isn't drastically changeing stats. But giving outa respec cause your getting new content isn't a good idea. We should get a respec after the vehicle changes and the racial variants of the suit and AR.
And I don't think the original plan was to have a racial variant for every suit. Think about it. In closed and even open beta the suit's race was tied to its role. Gallente were scouts, Amar were beavies, Caldari were assault, and Minmatar were logistics. I honestly think going racial was a more recent thing CCP decided to do, so i don't consider CCP being punctual a solid reason to why we don't have all the racial variants yet, but then again i could be wrong and CCP could have just made themselves look worse then they already do. |
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
666
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
Guildo Crow wrote:I doubt any "respec" will be offered if they add new weapons.
I don't think they should. Just start saving some SP on the side for the future. CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...
and seriously... why do people keep calling it "Respect" it's Re-Specialization ie. Respec (or am I totally wrong here?)
autocorrect on the spelling makes it 'respect' |
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
667
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:40:00 -
[13] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts?
I think it would be really unfair to give a guy like me a full respec. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
228
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:45:00 -
[14] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? Let your SP pool instead of spending like a drunken sailor. New weapons =/= complete overhaul of vehicles. Aren't vehicles going to be refunded? At least partially? Edit:Also, I'd be fine with letting pilots change their vehicle once they are released. if we weren't that would be the biggest **** slap CCP has given to any particular group of Dust 514 players ever. |
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
1130
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 04:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
f**k no! only tankers get respecs! |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1009
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 04:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? Let your SP pool instead of spending like a drunken sailor. New weapons =/= complete overhaul of vehicles. Aren't vehicles going to be refunded? At least partially? Edit:Also, I'd be fine with letting pilots change their vehicle once they are released. They haven't confirmed what they're doing. |
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Cult of War
494
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 04:31:00 -
[17] - Quote
To be honest if you start saving your SP now you will be able to get the proto variant of whatever weapon you think is coming out in 1.6 |
GHOSTLY ANNIHILATOR
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
613
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 04:39:00 -
[18] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:To be honest if you start saving your SP now you will be able to get the proto variant of whatever weapon you think is coming out in 1.6
Or 1.7 |
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
427
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 05:38:00 -
[19] - Quote
Urrrgh. There should only be refunds, not respecs. When they remove something, you get all the SP and ISK back. That's it and all there should ever be.
Any EVE pilot that has been around can agree with me on that. When they removed the learning skills, everyone was refunded not respeced. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1009
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:08:00 -
[20] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote: you get all the SP and ISK back.
Isn't that a respec? |
|
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
428
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:29:00 -
[21] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote: Isn't that a respec?
No. That's a refund for something that is removed. Respec means that everything is given back to you so you may spend them again. We had a respec once. Refunds are acceptable by me, as that is fair for taking things out. Respecs are not, as nothing is removed to warrant a full return of everything.
Vehicle users that get SP back for the vehicles removed- that's fine. Refund.
Infantry getting respec'd because a weapon changes (but is not removed) is not. Now, if they REMOVED the gun, then that calls for a refund.
Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :>
Added note: Armored Core: Verdict Day is pretty gnarly and is an enjoyable alternative to Dust 514, if anyone is wondering. |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
115
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:31:00 -
[22] - Quote
GHOSTLY ANNIHILATOR wrote:Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:To be honest if you start saving your SP now you will be able to get the proto variant of whatever weapon you think is coming out in 1.6 Or 1.7 Or 1.8 |
SgtDoughnut
Red Star Jr. EoN.
263
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:33:00 -
[23] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:Urrrgh. There should only be refunds, not respecs. When they remove something, you get all the SP and ISK back. That's it and all there should ever be.
Any EVE pilot that has been around can agree with me on that. When they removed the learning skills, everyone was refunded not respeced.
This guy is right |
kagreen
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 10:28:00 -
[24] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :> This is why I quit playing DUST 514. I just troll the forums now. I see some of the "NO RESPC!" crowd are changing their tune now that they are affected. I am enjoying this. I am also enjoying much better games. I may come back and play DUST 514 but I will never spend another dime on a CCP game again. The freeloaders have it right.
|
Lady MDK
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
38
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 10:33:00 -
[25] - Quote
Are we talking respect, respect or restecp here :)
Seriously though guys, you are supposed to be able to switch roles for what the battlefield requires here..to keep the enemy offbalance or counter their setup - what's all this talk of respect just cus you flavour of the month got nerf-hammered?
|
Orenji Jiji
Seraphim Auxiliaries
262
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:32:00 -
[26] - Quote
Atiim wrote:GHOSTLY ANNIHILATOR wrote:Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:To be honest if you start saving your SP now you will be able to get the proto variant of whatever weapon you think is coming out in 1.6 Or 1.7 Or 1.8 Or 1.56
Just because CCP. |
Obodiah Garro
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
407
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:35:00 -
[27] - Quote
Guildo Crow wrote:
I don't think they should. Just start saving some SP on the side for the future. CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...
wrong. the fault lies with CCP, they could have easily put placeholders in for everything they had planned for release, we would still use the same gear but our skill points would be in the correct place.
A simple transfer of SP isnt a big deal under the circumstances. And yea you caught out a typo, how very james bond of you sir. |
Obodiah Garro
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
407
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:37:00 -
[28] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? Let your SP pool instead of spending like a drunken sailor. New weapons =/= complete overhaul of vehicles.
I have a quite nice reserve of SP thank you, thats not the point or even relevant. |
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
807
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:40:00 -
[29] - Quote
Best thing is to pool as mentioned.
That and never count on getting anything back.
It is better to be a surprised pessimist than a disappointed optimist. |
Obodiah Garro
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
408
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:44:00 -
[30] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:It is better to be a surprised pessimist than a disappointed optimist.
The sane man's logic for surviving Dust patches I guess.
I know re spec has been a topic brought up a million times, but its been a while since new content, also Ive played Dust from closed beta and my plan to use all 1 racial equipment/weapons hasnt changed. CCP need to be a bit more flexible as the game comes creeping closer to completion imo.
|
|
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
103
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:09:00 -
[31] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs!
Justify it then !
Why didn't all tankers 'pool' all their SP and not spec into anything ?
I've seen ppl say no respecs at all even for heavys who have only ever had 1 suit to spec into, why should tankers be the only ones to get a partial respec ?
People saying no is fine it's an opinion but at least explain WHY you have come to that conclusion, nothing is more childish than saying .. No ... No .. No ... if you don't back up your point then it isn't worth anything |
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
103
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:19:00 -
[32] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote: Isn't that a respec?
No. That's a refund for something that is removed. Respec means that everything is given back to you so you may spend them again. We had a respec once. Refunds are acceptable by me, as that is fair for taking things out. Respecs are not, as nothing is removed to warrant a full return of everything. Vehicle users that get SP back for the vehicles removed- that's fine. Refund. Infantry getting respec'd because a weapon changes (but is not removed) is not. Now, if they REMOVED the gun, then that calls for a refund. Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :> Added note: Armored Core: Verdict Day is pretty gnarly and is an enjoyable alternative to Dust 514, if anyone is wondering.
The issue isn't going to be things completely removed, it's that they are completely overhauling vehicles suits and weapons .... as i've said seeing as the current AR is Gallente when the other racial variants come in things like the TAC are likely to be removed because gallente weaps are short ranged high dps weaps .. you see they wont be removed completely but they will have certain general variants removed .. if you want to use a weapon like the TAC you;ll have to go Caldari .. but sadly the current variant is Gallente so the TAC variant has been moved to another skill tree completely ... you seem to be under the impression that all the current variants and weapons will remain in the game untouched .. they wont ...
do you really think it'd take over a year before adding the racial variants if it was as simple as just adding to what they currently have ? Moving variants of current items into new tree's is no different to removing somethign from the game .. it's something you skilled into that has been moved somewhere else .. how anyone can say decisions matter when things like this happen is beyond me
Do you see the point I'm making here ? |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
670
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:53:00 -
[33] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote: you get all the SP and ISK back.
Isn't that a respec?
no, he said 'when something is changed'. a skill tree or a skill itself. |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
670
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:54:00 -
[34] - Quote
kagreen wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :> This is why I quit playing DUST 514. I just troll the forums now. I see some of the "NO RESPC!" crowd are changing their tune now that they are affected. I am enjoying this. I am also enjoying much better games. I may come back and play DUST 514 but I will never spend another dime on a CCP game again. The freeloaders have it right.
no one believes that. |
Toby Flenderson
research lab
90
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 14:14:00 -
[35] - Quote
Guildo Crow wrote:I doubt any "respec" will be offered if they add new weapons.
I don't think they should. Just start saving some SP on the side for the future. CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...
and seriously... why do people keep calling it "Respect" it's Re-Specialization ie. Respec (or am I totally wrong here?)
No, you're completely correct. I agree with you but for slightly different reasons. Since the last respec they haven't really added much. At least that I can recall. People that say "they didn't have everything from the beginning" should have just not played the game until it was all released then. It's a fun game. Just play it. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 15:14:00 -
[36] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Best thing is to pool as mentioned. That and never count on getting anything back. It is better to be a surprised pessimist than a disappointed optimist. This man is a genius! He knows how to dal with CCP! |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
969
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 15:25:00 -
[37] - Quote
Not 1.6
1.7 is looking entirely possible, plausible. Partially, anyways.
The skill tree will have changes to vehicles and possibly Dropsuit Command.
No respecs for new (not racial, new) weapons. We will all have just as much of a chance to spec those as the next guy. They are not basic content. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 15:59:00 -
[38] - Quote
Rinzler XVII wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote: Isn't that a respec?
No. That's a refund for something that is removed. Respec means that everything is given back to you so you may spend them again. We had a respec once. Refunds are acceptable by me, as that is fair for taking things out. Respecs are not, as nothing is removed to warrant a full return of everything. Vehicle users that get SP back for the vehicles removed- that's fine. Refund. Infantry getting respec'd because a weapon changes (but is not removed) is not. Now, if they REMOVED the gun, then that calls for a refund. Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :> Added note: Armored Core: Verdict Day is pretty gnarly and is an enjoyable alternative to Dust 514, if anyone is wondering. The issue isn't going to be things completely removed, it's that they are completely overhauling vehicles suits and weapons .... as i've said seeing as the current AR is Gallente when the other racial variants come in things like the TAC are likely to be removed because gallente weaps are short ranged high dps weaps .. you see they wont be removed completely but they will have certain general variants removed .. if you want to use a weapon like the TAC you;ll have to go Caldari .. but sadly the current variant is Gallente so the TAC variant has been moved to another skill tree completely ... you seem to be under the impression that all the current variants and weapons will remain in the game untouched .. they wont ... do you really think it'd take over a year before adding the racial variants if it was as simple as just adding to what they currently have ? Moving variants of current items into new tree's is no different to removing somethign from the game .. it's something you skilled into that has been moved somewhere else .. how anyone can say decisions matter when things like this happen is beyond me Do you see the point I'm making here ? This is why a partial respec or refund is a good idea when we get the other variants, but a total respec shouldnt happen. You should get back the sp and isk you spent on the content that was drastically changed but getting all sp back for content that was unaffected is unnecessary.
i dont think they'll get rid of the current AR variant, but more of the lines of add more variants to the new ones ie. scrambler rifle.
Which kind of brings me to this point. Rinzler you said you like the TAC version of the current AR so from what i can tell you don't follow the crowd much. But what i see is that most people didnt choose the AR because it was the only AR but because it had a a high dps and damage which made it one of the easiest weapons to kill with. And when the scrambler rifle was introduced most people didnt and don't use the standard version but the high dps assault version.
Say CCP doesn't remove the current variants of the AR and instead jus add a variant to the new ones. i can see most people flocking to the faster shoting variant of the rail rifle then the single shot standard one. And if that rail rifle is easier to kill with then the AR then people will just use the refunded sp to spec into the better rail rifle instead of the standard one. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
9360
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:37:00 -
[39] - Quote
I would like poke CCP Wolfman about getting the new AV stats out but they're more wip than the vehicle stats are. |
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1141
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:39:00 -
[40] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I would like poke CCP Wolfman about getting the new AV stats out but they're more wip than the vehicle stats are. Please do. We can't give proper vehicle feedback without knowing the state of AV in 1.7. |
|
Fire of Prometheus
DUST University Ivy League
638
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:47:00 -
[41] - Quote
What about us dropship pilots? Do we get a respec?
CCP has continuously trolled us by messing with the camera on the ship and by even buffing AV. |
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
809
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 02:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
Fire of Prometheus wrote:What about us dropship pilots? Do we get a respec?
CCP has continuously trolled us by messing with the camera on the ship and by even buffing AV. The only comment I read by a Dev said that SP Respec was on the Table for Discussion Only regarding the vehicle balancing act of undetermined delivery date. Nothing related to SP was being committed to. Period.
So, please Mercs, Tankers, Amarr Light Suit Hopefuls and everybody else. Lighten up or quit. There are no published plans to make the game more reasonable than EVE and EVE has always been notoriously unreasonable.
Patience is the only solution here. If they give anything to anybody they will announce it. Then when it is released and it matches the description I will believe it. Until then. No gonna do it.
But, I am definitely not trusting CCP/Shanghai to do either the right thing nor any logical thing. They have a tradition to follow and why would I expect them to break the mold established in UpRising 1.1? |
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
276
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 03:04:00 -
[43] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 03:10:00 -
[44] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Fire of Prometheus wrote:What about us dropship pilots? Do we get a respec?
CCP has continuously trolled us by messing with the camera on the ship and by even buffing AV. The only comment I read by a Dev said that SP Respec was on the Table for Discussion Only regarding the vehicle balancing act of undetermined delivery date. Nothing related to SP was being committed to. Period. So, please Mercs, Tankers, Amarr Light Suit Hopefuls and everybody else. Lighten up or quit. There are no published plans to make the game more reasonable than EVE and EVE has always been notoriously unreasonable. Patience is the only solution here. If they give anything to anybody they will announce it. Then when it is released and it matches the description I will believe it. Until then. No gonna do it. But, I am definitely not trusting CCP/Shanghai to do either the right thing nor any logical thing. They have a tradition to follow and why would I expect them to break the mold established in UpRising 1.1? but i think they did confirm that they are removing the vehicle variants...
which is an enormous **** slap to dropships since the most viable dropship is the assault version... unless they give dropships an enormous torque boost. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 03:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. No dropship pilots need this more then anyone else...
why is it that when vehicles gets nerfed its like being grounded for HAVs and LAVs and like taking a huge **** in the anus for dropships? |
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp
1092
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 03:23:00 -
[46] - Quote
SgtDoughnut wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Urrrgh. There should only be refunds, not respecs. When they remove something, you get all the SP and ISK back. That's it and all there should ever be.
Any EVE pilot that has been around can agree with me on that. When they removed the learning skills, everyone was refunded not respeced. This guy is right I'm not sorry to inform you that he is completely wrong saying there should only be refunds.
When EVE first began, was there a Frigate for every race? Did EVE start with a rookie ship for each race, 3 Racial Frigates, and 2 Racial Cruisers?
The answer is an emphatic no!
This is not true in DUST 514. All Racial Roles are not represented in the existing classes or weapon types. This forces some players to spec into a Racial Variant simply because they didn't have a choice. By not offering at least a partial respec for players in these situations, CCP would only adding insult to injury.
Respecs should definitely be given with the filling in of Racial Variants for existing Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles and Weapon Types.
Respecs should not be given with the addition of completely new Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles or Weapon Types, unless these new classes/roles/types are not initially added with all Racial Variants. |
Obodiah Garro
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
410
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 14:44:00 -
[47] - Quote
Master Jaraiya wrote:
This is not true in DUST 514. All Racial Roles are not represented in the existing classes or weapon types. This forces some players to spec into a Racial Variant simply because they didn't have a choice. By not offering at least a partial respec for players in these situations, CCP would only adding insult to injury.
Exactly this |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:46:00 -
[48] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote: Isn't that a respec?
No. That's a refund for something that is removed. Respec means that everything is given back to you so you may spend them again. We had a respec once. Refunds are acceptable by me, as that is fair for taking things out. Respecs are not, as nothing is removed to warrant a full return of everything. Vehicle users that get SP back for the vehicles removed- that's fine. Refund. Infantry getting respec'd because a weapon changes (but is not removed) is not. Now, if they REMOVED the gun, then that calls for a refund. Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :> Added note: Armored Core: Verdict Day is pretty gnarly and is an enjoyable alternative to Dust 514, if anyone is wondering. Tankers are usually more intelligent because they have to worry about more things. It requires total situational awareness at all times, plus a play style heavily geared towards a more defensive style to not get blown up.
So, the vehicle skills are being overhauled as well. Should we not get the SP back for that? It is in fact a respec. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:48:00 -
[49] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? Let your SP pool instead of spending like a drunken sailor. New weapons =/= complete overhaul of vehicles. I have a quite nice reserve of SP thank you, thats not the point or even relevant. It's entirely relevant, because infantry keeps crying about a respec when they get more racial weapons and suits. We say respec because they're changing everything about vehicles and we're told to shut up. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:49:00 -
[50] - Quote
Rinzler XVII wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Justify it then ! Why didn't all tankers 'pool' all their SP and not spec into anything ? I've seen ppl say no respecs at all even for heavys who have only ever had 1 suit to spec into, why should tankers be the only ones to get a partial respec ? People saying no is fine it's an opinion but at least explain WHY you have come to that conclusion, nothing is more childish than saying .. No ... No .. No ... if you don't back up your point then it isn't worth anything How many times do we have to say that they're changing everything about vehicles? |
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:53:00 -
[51] - Quote
low genius wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote: you get all the SP and ISK back.
Isn't that a respec? no, he said 'when something is changed'. a skill tree or a skill itself. Like what's going to happen to vehicles? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:07:00 -
[52] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. So you feel it's not reasonable tankers should get a respec because every single thing about vehicles is going to be changed, but it is reasonable to want a respec to get a new suit when it's released? |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
6943
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:10:00 -
[53] - Quote
1.7 will bring a full respec with it, it's pretty obvious to any who've been here through the various beta stages.
|
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
1713
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:20:00 -
[54] - Quote
Guildo Crow wrote:I doubt any "respec" will be offered if they add new weapons.
I don't think they should. Just start saving some SP on the side for the future. CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...
and seriously... why do people keep calling it "Respect" it's Re-Specialization ie. Respec (or am I totally wrong here?)
'' CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...''
HAHAHA YOU BELIEVE CCP IS THE ONE THAT HAS TO DEAL WITH FAULTY STUFF?
AHAHAHA this dude knows nothing....
+1 for the respec |
Obodiah Garro
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
421
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:31:00 -
[55] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote: Tankers are usually more intelligent because they have to worry about more things. It requires total situational awareness at all times, plus a play style heavily geared towards a more defensive style to not get blown up.
Using a crutch certainly is difficult, this thread is in regards to light weapons not vehicles re-read the OP. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
6944
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:32:00 -
[56] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote: Tankers are usually more intelligent because they have to worry about more things. It requires total situational awareness at all times, plus a play style heavily geared towards a more defensive style to not get blown up.
Using a crutch certainly is difficult, this thread is in regards to light weapons not vehicles re-read the OP. Any thread having to do with respecs has to do with vehicles if you actually take a second to look at what's happening to them.
Also all but the best tanks are absurdly easy to kill, it's not really a crutch so much as it's just bad players whining that they can't kill tanks with militia AV. |
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
1715
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 21:24:00 -
[57] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Thurak1 wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. So you feel it's not reasonable tankers should get a respec because every single thing about vehicles is going to be changed, but it is reasonable to want a respec to get a new suit when it's released?
What i think its BS that ONLY tankers get a respec. I have Fully Proto AV and im pretty sure vehicle changes affect AV weaponry AND AV weaponry will get tweaked too.
So Respec for EVERYONE, or for no one.
This, no to respecs; but just tankers because we have a vehicle redo. Or : No Respecs ; unless my AR gets nerfed.
ITS BULLS**t
Give us ALL repecs options until CCP gets everything out and balaced. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
698
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:04:00 -
[58] - Quote
Master Jaraiya wrote:SgtDoughnut wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Urrrgh. There should only be refunds, not respecs. When they remove something, you get all the SP and ISK back. That's it and all there should ever be.
Any EVE pilot that has been around can agree with me on that. When they removed the learning skills, everyone was refunded not respeced. This guy is right I'm not sorry to inform you that he is completely wrong saying there should only be refunds. When EVE first began, was there a Frigate for every race? Did EVE start with a rookie ship for each race, 3 Racial Frigates, and 2 Racial Cruisers? The answer is an emphatic no! This is not true in DUST 514. All Racial Roles are not represented in the existing classes or weapon types. This forces some players to spec into a Racial Variant simply because they didn't have a choice. By not offering at least a partial respec for players in these situations, CCP would only adding insult to injury. Respecs should definitely be given with the filling in of Racial Variants for existing Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles and Weapon Types. Respecs should not be given with the addition of completely new Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles or Weapon Types, unless these new classes/roles/types are not initially added with all Racial Variants.
In eve you can raise several accounts with full sp without even playing, or you just buy one from another player. In short yout point is null and void, beside that eve is an mmorpg with stable playerbase, dust is a f2p lobby shooter where playercount at primetime decreases by 500 per month. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
6948
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:09:00 -
[59] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote:SgtDoughnut wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Urrrgh. There should only be refunds, not respecs. When they remove something, you get all the SP and ISK back. That's it and all there should ever be.
Any EVE pilot that has been around can agree with me on that. When they removed the learning skills, everyone was refunded not respeced. This guy is right I'm not sorry to inform you that he is completely wrong saying there should only be refunds. When EVE first began, was there a Frigate for every race? Did EVE start with a rookie ship for each race, 3 Racial Frigates, and 2 Racial Cruisers? The answer is an emphatic no! This is not true in DUST 514. All Racial Roles are not represented in the existing classes or weapon types. This forces some players to spec into a Racial Variant simply because they didn't have a choice. By not offering at least a partial respec for players in these situations, CCP would only adding insult to injury. Respecs should definitely be given with the filling in of Racial Variants for existing Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles and Weapon Types. Respecs should not be given with the addition of completely new Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles or Weapon Types, unless these new classes/roles/types are not initially added with all Racial Variants. In eve you can raise several accounts with full sp without even playing, or you just buy one from another player. In short yout point is null and void, beside that eve is an mmorpg with stable playerbase, dust is a f2p lobby shooter where playercount at primetime decreases by 500 per month. You also can't spend $$$ in EVE to get ahead of someone else in SP (aside from buying someones account) |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
523
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
NO to respecs ...
YES to Re-allocations !!
There that's confused you all ... basically when racial variants come out you are given the option to move ALL your invested sp in say Amarr Heavy dropsuits into one of the other racial Heavy dropsuits ... or move all your Caldari HAV skills points into Minmatar HAV.
No need for refunds or respecs ... just need a UI setup like the attribute remap in Eve with sliders to drop points off a Heavy skill and put onto a different Heavy skill or off an AR skill onto another AR skill as and when racial variants are released.
If you didn't want to be a Heavy or a HAV driver or a dropship pilot or a logistics, then you made a wrong decision ... if you skilled something that's FOTM, OP or not working as intended and needs balancing/changing for the good of the game then tuff, save up for the next FOTM using the points you farmed with this one, or start using it how it was intended. |
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
6959
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:34:00 -
[61] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:If you didn't want to be a Heavy or a HAV driver or a dropship pilot or a logistics, then you made a wrong decision ... if you skilled something that's FOTM, OP or not working as intended and needs balancing/changing for the good of the game then tuff, save up for the next FOTM using the points you farmed with this one, or start using it how it was intended. I know right, it's not like vehicles are being removed, skills are being drastically altered or removed, manditory skills are being added, and AV is getting a complete "balance pass"
It's almost as if when our decisions were made, they had nothing to do with CCPs sweeping changes.
Wow, figure that. |
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
111
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 08:47:00 -
[62] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:NO to respecs ...
YES to Re-allocations !!
There that's confused you all ... basically when racial variants come out you are given the option to move ALL your invested sp in say Amarr Heavy dropsuits into one of the other racial Heavy dropsuits ... or move all your Caldari HAV skills points into Minmatar HAV.
No need for refunds or respecs ... just need a UI setup like the attribute remap in Eve with sliders to drop points off a Heavy skill and put onto a different Heavy skill or off an AR skill onto another AR skill as and when racial variants are released.
If you didn't want to be a Heavy or a HAV driver or a dropship pilot or a logistics, then you made a wrong decision ... if you skilled something that's FOTM, OP or not working as intended and needs balancing/changing for the good of the game then tuff, save up for the next FOTM using the points you farmed with this one, or start using it how it was intended.
That would be fine, I dont want a respec to switch to a diff suit/weapon i just want to be able to reallocate the sp i have invested into the only current AR variant into a caldari variant of the same weapon when it is introduced and im sure heavies feel the same, they have been forced to go down the amarr suit route because they havent had any other option since the game was 1st introduced and most heavies would like to reallocate the sp into the variant of suit they wanted in the 1st place .. this really goes for all current weapons suits vehicles .. the whole FoTM issue is one entirely derived from CCP nnot balancing everything properley .. I've played mmo's for over a decade and when things are balanced their isn;t ever an issue of FoTM .. it's only an issue here because certain weapons/suits etc are stronger than other suits/weapons |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
528
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 16:19:00 -
[63] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Needless Sacermendor wrote:If you didn't want to be a Heavy or a HAV driver or a dropship pilot or a logistics, then you made a wrong decision ... if you skilled something that's FOTM, OP or not working as intended and needs balancing/changing for the good of the game then tuff, save up for the next FOTM using the points you farmed with this one, or start using it how it was intended. I know right, it's not like vehicles are being removed, skills are being drastically altered or removed, manditory skills are being added, and AV is getting a complete "balance pass" It's almost as if when our decisions were made, they had nothing to do with CCPs sweeping changes. Wow, figure that. Sorry took a while to respond ... couldn't get on last night.
Vehicles are not being removed ... variants are being removed ... if you wanted to fly a dropship you still can, if you wanted to drive a HAV you still can ... it's like saying 'I want a full respec cos they're temporarily removing the tactical variant of the swarm launcher'.
Skills being 'drastically' altered is because they are not working as intended ... skills being removed will have those skill points reimbursed like they did when they removed skills in the past.
Mandatory skills being added ... I presume you mean there are some pre-requisites being added ... precedent in Eve has been that if you could fly it or use it before, then you will be able to after ... however if you want the bonuses from the new skills you'll have to train them. Not sure what skills you're talking about to be honest, so if you could clarify I could answer that part better.
AV is getting a balance pass because vehicles are being changed ... it would be counter-productive to rebuild all the vehicles and their variants based around the values of current AV ... especially since current AV is so out of balance with each other ... AV grenades offer too much potential without significant drawback to a frontline assault fitting, and there are imbalances between the 'proper' AV weapons since Plasma Cannon is useless, swarms and forges do very different damage bonuses to armour and shields and Forges sacrifice very little anti-infantry ability where swarms sacrifice all of it. So OF COURSE av is getting a balance pass at the same time, make the vehicles work properly, then make the AV work properly against them.
When MY decisions were made, they were made around the type of role I wanted to fill on the battlefield ... NOT by what everyone else was using and doing well with ... or by what was best on paper ... but by what I enjoyed doing.
It's nobody elses fault but your own if you made your decisions based on what would kill people faster, then found out down the line that it needed to be balanced with everything else, yet you didn't like using it beyond the fact it was the fastest way to kill people ... tuff, you should have gone with what you enjoyed and been productive on the forums discussing how to bring it up to standard. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
6999
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 16:22:00 -
[64] - Quote
I went logistics dropship pilot for PC matches full bore with Uprising, then had a legitimate anxiety attack after two weeks of doing everything I possibly could to make them work and burning through nearly 100 million ISK from my year in the Beta
Don't ******* talk to me about skilling into **** because I want to kill things |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
528
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 16:24:00 -
[65] - Quote
Rinzler XVII wrote:Needless Sacermendor wrote:NO to respecs ...
YES to Re-allocations !!
There that's confused you all ... basically when racial variants come out you are given the option to move ALL your invested sp in say Amarr Heavy dropsuits into one of the other racial Heavy dropsuits ... or move all your Caldari HAV skills points into Minmatar HAV.
No need for refunds or respecs ... just need a UI setup like the attribute remap in Eve with sliders to drop points off a Heavy skill and put onto a different Heavy skill or off an AR skill onto another AR skill as and when racial variants are released.
If you didn't want to be a Heavy or a HAV driver or a dropship pilot or a logistics, then you made a wrong decision ... if you skilled something that's FOTM, OP or not working as intended and needs balancing/changing for the good of the game then tuff, save up for the next FOTM using the points you farmed with this one, or start using it how it was intended. That would be fine, I dont want a respec to switch to a diff suit/weapon i just want to be able to reallocate the sp i have invested into the only current AR variant into a caldari variant of the same weapon when it is introduced and im sure heavies feel the same, they have been forced to go down the amarr suit route because they havent had any other option since the game was 1st introduced and most heavies would like to reallocate the sp into the variant of suit they wanted in the 1st place .. this really goes for all current weapons suits vehicles .. the whole FoTM issue is one entirely derived from CCP nnot balancing everything properley .. I've played mmo's for over a decade and when things are balanced their isn;t ever an issue of FoTM .. it's only an issue here because certain weapons/suits etc are stronger than other suits/weapons Which is why I think it's the fairest way to go about it ... keeps everyone happy ... apart from the people that just skill the FOTM n they don't warrant any joy, they've already had their joy from pretending they were good ! |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
528
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 16:40:00 -
[66] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:I went logistics dropship pilot for PC matches full bore with Uprising, then had a legitimate anxiety attack after two weeks of doing everything I possibly could to make them work and burning through nearly 100 million ISK from my year in the Beta
Don't ******* talk to me about skilling into **** because I want to kill things Sorry the last paragraph wasn't specifically aimed at you, I ment generally people who use FOTM stuff.
I burned through 120 mil isk at the same time cos the Amarr Logistics suit didn't work at anything but proto level. But I brought it up on the forums n they fixed it ... people have brought up many problems with vehicles, so they're fixing them ... your logi dropship will do what it's supposed to do by the time they come back, until then you'll still have a dropship you can fly ... n if that's not what you wanted ... refer to my previous post ! |
Joel II X
AHPA
33
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 19:13:00 -
[67] - Quote
I think everyone should get only one respec. That way, nobody will QQ. I'm still with my first character I ever created and effed around with the skills. That means I have some skills allocated where I now know I won't ever use. I've never once had a respectable since I joined in June and, personally, I don't even care about getting one. If you want to ditch anything you already have, start from scratch to specialize in whatever it is you want. This way, new players will stand more if a chance. Maybe. Point is: it's just a game, so just spend more time on it paying to earn those new shiny things. It's not like you haven't done so already. Babies.
TL; DR: Stop being a baby and deal with not having a respec. One is enough. |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
767
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 19:46:00 -
[68] - Quote
My only fear is that they will turn the TAC AR into the Rail Rifle and I'll be left with only the Standard AR. I don't need a respec, but it'd be kind of screwed up if I needed to skill into a new weapon because I specced into a "placeholder". Also I don't want to have to spec into a Caldari weapon to use the TAC. |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
767
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 19:50:00 -
[69] - Quote
Joel II X wrote:I think everyone should get only one respec. That way, nobody will QQ. I'm still with my first character I ever created and effed around with the skills. That means I have some skills allocated where I now know I won't ever use. I've never once had a respectable since I joined in June and, personally, I don't even care about getting one. If you want to ditch anything you already have, start from scratch to specialize in whatever it is you want. This way, new players will stand more if a chance. Maybe. Point is: it's just a game, so just spend more time on it paying to earn those new shiny things. It's not like you haven't done so already. Babies.
TL; DR: Stop being a baby and deal with not having a respec. One is enough.
Seriously though, I hear about people speccing into a full Proto weapon or suit, not liking it, and wanting a respec. Basic doesn't require a huge SP invesment. If you can't be effective with or enjoy a weapon at standard, then you probably won't care for it at Proto either. |
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
824
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 01:28:00 -
[70] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote: -- snip -- I burned through 120 mil isk at the same time cos the Amarr Logistics suit didn't work at anything but proto level. But I brought it up on the forums n they fixed it ... people have brought up many problems with vehicles, so they're fixing them ... your logi dropship will do what it's supposed to do by the time they come back, until then you'll still have a dropship you can fly ... n if that's not what you wanted ... refer to my previous post ! Have you read what the current plan is? I mean really read the entire post from the Devs?
They are fixing vehicles by removing all the ADV vehicles. They are gone. The STD vehicles will have significantly Less functionality than the current version. As in they are losing low and high slots. PG, CPU and HP. The tanks are being redesigned to be an 'empty husk' that will be very fragile until the super special new modules that last 1/3 the time compared to current while requiring significantly more time to recharge (2-3 times). So run in fast, push the modules, hammer away for 20 seconds and run like your life depends on it. Because it will. Then spend several minutes back at base recharging, restocking ammo and waiting for the very limited functionality that CCP/Shanghai believes Tanks should be restricted to will be available. And, no, we don't know what the significantly reduced roles that are supported by CCP/Shanghai because we have nothing to work with. Except a few google docs and they are what put the twist in vehicle owners knickers.
Now consider the DS pilots. Fragile bricks that are difficult to fly* and provide next to nothing for rewards for using them. The only ships worth using are being removed. They will, no doubt, suffer the very same fate as the Tanks. LLAVs are gone as well.
There is not only no time frame for this balancing act but there is no time frame as to when the functionality will be replaced. If ever as there is no guarantees with CCP. Decisions have consequences. And do they ever when CCP refuses to behave like a freaking grown up.
Thanks for the time you put in because we just destroyed your character. Start a different one because your SP is locked into something we destroyed. With a very special HTFU from CCP!
* Why would anybody make the DS such a piece of Kitten Excrement to fly? It is the worst possible method to use for flight controls and it absolutely inconsistent with the rest of New Eden. Recall that EVE is basically a spread sheet. And flying means click and point, but down in the DUST the DS uses horrible controls that make no sense. Plus a constantly changing camera view that is only changeable by the Devs, not the operator. Classic CCP/Shanghai, now that I think of it. |
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1041
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:06:00 -
[71] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Thurak1 wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. So you feel it's not reasonable tankers should get a respec because every single thing about vehicles is going to be changed, but it is reasonable to want a respec to get a new suit when it's released? What i think its BS that ONLY tankers get a respec.I have Fully Proto AV and im pretty sure vehicle changes affect AV weaponry AND AV weaponry will get tweaked too. So Respec for EVERYONE, or for no one.This, no to respecs; but just tankers because we have a vehicle redo.Or : No Respecs ; unless my AR gets nerfed.ITS BULLS**tGive us ALL repecs options until CCP gets everything out and balaced. So what do you think is going to happen to AV? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1041
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:06:00 -
[72] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote:SgtDoughnut wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Urrrgh. There should only be refunds, not respecs. When they remove something, you get all the SP and ISK back. That's it and all there should ever be.
Any EVE pilot that has been around can agree with me on that. When they removed the learning skills, everyone was refunded not respeced. This guy is right I'm not sorry to inform you that he is completely wrong saying there should only be refunds. When EVE first began, was there a Frigate for every race? Did EVE start with a rookie ship for each race, 3 Racial Frigates, and 2 Racial Cruisers? The answer is an emphatic no! This is not true in DUST 514. All Racial Roles are not represented in the existing classes or weapon types. This forces some players to spec into a Racial Variant simply because they didn't have a choice. By not offering at least a partial respec for players in these situations, CCP would only adding insult to injury. Respecs should definitely be given with the filling in of Racial Variants for existing Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles and Weapon Types. Respecs should not be given with the addition of completely new Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles or Weapon Types, unless these new classes/roles/types are not initially added with all Racial Variants. In eve you can raise several accounts with full sp without even playing, or you just buy one from another player. In short yout point is null and void, beside that eve is an mmorpg with stable playerbase, dust is a f2p lobby shooter where playercount at primetime decreases by 500 per month. How many times do I have to say that Dust isn't a lobby shooter? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1042
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:11:00 -
[73] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I went logistics dropship pilot for PC matches full bore with Uprising, then had a legitimate anxiety attack after two weeks of doing everything I possibly could to make them work and burning through nearly 100 million ISK from my year in the Beta
Don't ******* talk to me about skilling into **** because I want to kill things Sorry the last paragraph wasn't specifically aimed at you, I ment generally people who use FOTM stuff. I burned through 120 mil isk at the same time cos the Amarr Logistics suit didn't work at anything but proto level. But I brought it up on the forums n they fixed it ... people have brought up many problems with vehicles, so they're fixing them ... your logi dropship will do what it's supposed to do by the time they come back, until then you'll still have a dropship you can fly ... n if that's not what you wanted ... refer to my previous post ! Lol... I'm actually surprised they fixed the large turret problem at all. With their history as it pertains to vehicles, I'm surprised CCP didn't say HTFU and have us deal with terrible turret angles. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1042
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:12:00 -
[74] - Quote
Joel II X wrote:I think everyone should get only one respec. That way, nobody will QQ. I'm still with my first character I ever created and effed around with the skills. That means I have some skills allocated where I now know I won't ever use. I've never once had a respectable since I joined in June and, personally, I don't even care about getting one. If you want to ditch anything you already have, start from scratch to specialize in whatever it is you want. This way, new players will stand more if a chance. Maybe. Point is: it's just a game, so just spend more time on it paying to earn those new shiny things. It's not like you haven't done so already. Babies.
TL; DR: Stop being a baby and deal with not having a respec. One is enough. That's because Uprising was deployed before June, and with it came an optional total respec, or account reset. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1042
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:13:00 -
[75] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Needless Sacermendor wrote: -- snip -- I burned through 120 mil isk at the same time cos the Amarr Logistics suit didn't work at anything but proto level. But I brought it up on the forums n they fixed it ... people have brought up many problems with vehicles, so they're fixing them ... your logi dropship will do what it's supposed to do by the time they come back, until then you'll still have a dropship you can fly ... n if that's not what you wanted ... refer to my previous post ! Have you read what the current plan is? I mean really read the entire post from the Devs? They are fixing vehicles by removing all the ADV vehicles. They are gone. The STD vehicles will have significantly Less functionality than the current version. As in they are losing low and high slots. PG, CPU and HP. The tanks are being redesigned to be an 'empty husk' that will be very fragile until the super special new modules that last 1/3 the time compared to current while requiring significantly more time to recharge (2-3 times). So run in fast, push the modules, hammer away for 20 seconds and run like your life depends on it. Because it will. Then spend several minutes back at base recharging, restocking ammo and waiting for the very limited functionality that CCP/Shanghai believes Tanks should be restricted to will be available. And, no, we don't know what the significantly reduced roles that are supported by CCP/Shanghai because we have nothing to work with. Except a few google docs and they are what put the twist in vehicle owners knickers. Now consider the DS pilots. Fragile bricks that are difficult to fly* and provide next to nothing for rewards for using them. The only ships worth using are being removed. They will, no doubt, suffer the very same fate as the Tanks. LLAVs are gone as well. There is not only no time frame for this balancing act but there is no time frame as to when the functionality will be replaced. If ever as there is no guarantees with CCP. Decisions have consequences. And do they ever when CCP refuses to behave like a freaking grown up. Thanks for the time you put in because we just destroyed your character. Start a different one because your SP is locked into something we destroyed. With a very special HTFU from CCP! * Why would anybody make the DS such a piece of Kitten Excrement to fly? It is the worst possible method to use for flight controls and it absolutely inconsistent with the rest of New Eden. Recall that EVE is basically a spread sheet. And flying means click and point, but down in the DUST the DS uses horrible controls that make no sense. Plus a constantly changing camera view that is only changeable by the Devs, not the operator. Classic CCP/Shanghai, now that I think of it. We don't have ADV vehicles to begin with. |
Joel II X
AHPA
34
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 13:45:00 -
[76] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Joel II X wrote:I think everyone should get only one respec. That way, nobody will QQ. I'm still with my first character I ever created and effed around with the skills. That means I have some skills allocated where I now know I won't ever use. I've never once had a respec since I joined in June and, personally, I don't even care about getting one. If you want to ditch anything you already have, start from scratch to specialize in whatever it is you want. This way, new players will stand more if a chance. Maybe. Point is: it's just a game, so just spend more time on it paying to earn those new shiny things. It's not like you haven't done so already. Babies.
TL; DR: Stop being a baby and deal with not having a respec. One is enough. That's because Uprising was deployed before June, and with it came an optional total respec, or account reset. I know. But I also wrote that I didn't care whether I got one or not. People should just see if they like some gear by trying out the standards and THEN deciding whether to move on to proto or not.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |