Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
103
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:09:00 -
[31] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs!
Justify it then !
Why didn't all tankers 'pool' all their SP and not spec into anything ?
I've seen ppl say no respecs at all even for heavys who have only ever had 1 suit to spec into, why should tankers be the only ones to get a partial respec ?
People saying no is fine it's an opinion but at least explain WHY you have come to that conclusion, nothing is more childish than saying .. No ... No .. No ... if you don't back up your point then it isn't worth anything |
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
103
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:19:00 -
[32] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote: Isn't that a respec?
No. That's a refund for something that is removed. Respec means that everything is given back to you so you may spend them again. We had a respec once. Refunds are acceptable by me, as that is fair for taking things out. Respecs are not, as nothing is removed to warrant a full return of everything. Vehicle users that get SP back for the vehicles removed- that's fine. Refund. Infantry getting respec'd because a weapon changes (but is not removed) is not. Now, if they REMOVED the gun, then that calls for a refund. Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :> Added note: Armored Core: Verdict Day is pretty gnarly and is an enjoyable alternative to Dust 514, if anyone is wondering.
The issue isn't going to be things completely removed, it's that they are completely overhauling vehicles suits and weapons .... as i've said seeing as the current AR is Gallente when the other racial variants come in things like the TAC are likely to be removed because gallente weaps are short ranged high dps weaps .. you see they wont be removed completely but they will have certain general variants removed .. if you want to use a weapon like the TAC you;ll have to go Caldari .. but sadly the current variant is Gallente so the TAC variant has been moved to another skill tree completely ... you seem to be under the impression that all the current variants and weapons will remain in the game untouched .. they wont ...
do you really think it'd take over a year before adding the racial variants if it was as simple as just adding to what they currently have ? Moving variants of current items into new tree's is no different to removing somethign from the game .. it's something you skilled into that has been moved somewhere else .. how anyone can say decisions matter when things like this happen is beyond me
Do you see the point I'm making here ? |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
670
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:53:00 -
[33] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote: you get all the SP and ISK back.
Isn't that a respec?
no, he said 'when something is changed'. a skill tree or a skill itself. |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
670
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:54:00 -
[34] - Quote
kagreen wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :> This is why I quit playing DUST 514. I just troll the forums now. I see some of the "NO RESPC!" crowd are changing their tune now that they are affected. I am enjoying this. I am also enjoying much better games. I may come back and play DUST 514 but I will never spend another dime on a CCP game again. The freeloaders have it right.
no one believes that. |
Toby Flenderson
research lab
90
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 14:14:00 -
[35] - Quote
Guildo Crow wrote:I doubt any "respec" will be offered if they add new weapons.
I don't think they should. Just start saving some SP on the side for the future. CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...
and seriously... why do people keep calling it "Respect" it's Re-Specialization ie. Respec (or am I totally wrong here?)
No, you're completely correct. I agree with you but for slightly different reasons. Since the last respec they haven't really added much. At least that I can recall. People that say "they didn't have everything from the beginning" should have just not played the game until it was all released then. It's a fun game. Just play it. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 15:14:00 -
[36] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Best thing is to pool as mentioned. That and never count on getting anything back. It is better to be a surprised pessimist than a disappointed optimist. This man is a genius! He knows how to dal with CCP! |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
969
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 15:25:00 -
[37] - Quote
Not 1.6
1.7 is looking entirely possible, plausible. Partially, anyways.
The skill tree will have changes to vehicles and possibly Dropsuit Command.
No respecs for new (not racial, new) weapons. We will all have just as much of a chance to spec those as the next guy. They are not basic content. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 15:59:00 -
[38] - Quote
Rinzler XVII wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote: Isn't that a respec?
No. That's a refund for something that is removed. Respec means that everything is given back to you so you may spend them again. We had a respec once. Refunds are acceptable by me, as that is fair for taking things out. Respecs are not, as nothing is removed to warrant a full return of everything. Vehicle users that get SP back for the vehicles removed- that's fine. Refund. Infantry getting respec'd because a weapon changes (but is not removed) is not. Now, if they REMOVED the gun, then that calls for a refund. Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :> Added note: Armored Core: Verdict Day is pretty gnarly and is an enjoyable alternative to Dust 514, if anyone is wondering. The issue isn't going to be things completely removed, it's that they are completely overhauling vehicles suits and weapons .... as i've said seeing as the current AR is Gallente when the other racial variants come in things like the TAC are likely to be removed because gallente weaps are short ranged high dps weaps .. you see they wont be removed completely but they will have certain general variants removed .. if you want to use a weapon like the TAC you;ll have to go Caldari .. but sadly the current variant is Gallente so the TAC variant has been moved to another skill tree completely ... you seem to be under the impression that all the current variants and weapons will remain in the game untouched .. they wont ... do you really think it'd take over a year before adding the racial variants if it was as simple as just adding to what they currently have ? Moving variants of current items into new tree's is no different to removing somethign from the game .. it's something you skilled into that has been moved somewhere else .. how anyone can say decisions matter when things like this happen is beyond me Do you see the point I'm making here ? This is why a partial respec or refund is a good idea when we get the other variants, but a total respec shouldnt happen. You should get back the sp and isk you spent on the content that was drastically changed but getting all sp back for content that was unaffected is unnecessary.
i dont think they'll get rid of the current AR variant, but more of the lines of add more variants to the new ones ie. scrambler rifle.
Which kind of brings me to this point. Rinzler you said you like the TAC version of the current AR so from what i can tell you don't follow the crowd much. But what i see is that most people didnt choose the AR because it was the only AR but because it had a a high dps and damage which made it one of the easiest weapons to kill with. And when the scrambler rifle was introduced most people didnt and don't use the standard version but the high dps assault version.
Say CCP doesn't remove the current variants of the AR and instead jus add a variant to the new ones. i can see most people flocking to the faster shoting variant of the rail rifle then the single shot standard one. And if that rail rifle is easier to kill with then the AR then people will just use the refunded sp to spec into the better rail rifle instead of the standard one. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
9360
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:37:00 -
[39] - Quote
I would like poke CCP Wolfman about getting the new AV stats out but they're more wip than the vehicle stats are. |
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1141
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:39:00 -
[40] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I would like poke CCP Wolfman about getting the new AV stats out but they're more wip than the vehicle stats are. Please do. We can't give proper vehicle feedback without knowing the state of AV in 1.7. |
|
Fire of Prometheus
DUST University Ivy League
638
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:47:00 -
[41] - Quote
What about us dropship pilots? Do we get a respec?
CCP has continuously trolled us by messing with the camera on the ship and by even buffing AV. |
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
809
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 02:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
Fire of Prometheus wrote:What about us dropship pilots? Do we get a respec?
CCP has continuously trolled us by messing with the camera on the ship and by even buffing AV. The only comment I read by a Dev said that SP Respec was on the Table for Discussion Only regarding the vehicle balancing act of undetermined delivery date. Nothing related to SP was being committed to. Period.
So, please Mercs, Tankers, Amarr Light Suit Hopefuls and everybody else. Lighten up or quit. There are no published plans to make the game more reasonable than EVE and EVE has always been notoriously unreasonable.
Patience is the only solution here. If they give anything to anybody they will announce it. Then when it is released and it matches the description I will believe it. Until then. No gonna do it.
But, I am definitely not trusting CCP/Shanghai to do either the right thing nor any logical thing. They have a tradition to follow and why would I expect them to break the mold established in UpRising 1.1? |
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
276
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 03:04:00 -
[43] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 03:10:00 -
[44] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Fire of Prometheus wrote:What about us dropship pilots? Do we get a respec?
CCP has continuously trolled us by messing with the camera on the ship and by even buffing AV. The only comment I read by a Dev said that SP Respec was on the Table for Discussion Only regarding the vehicle balancing act of undetermined delivery date. Nothing related to SP was being committed to. Period. So, please Mercs, Tankers, Amarr Light Suit Hopefuls and everybody else. Lighten up or quit. There are no published plans to make the game more reasonable than EVE and EVE has always been notoriously unreasonable. Patience is the only solution here. If they give anything to anybody they will announce it. Then when it is released and it matches the description I will believe it. Until then. No gonna do it. But, I am definitely not trusting CCP/Shanghai to do either the right thing nor any logical thing. They have a tradition to follow and why would I expect them to break the mold established in UpRising 1.1? but i think they did confirm that they are removing the vehicle variants...
which is an enormous **** slap to dropships since the most viable dropship is the assault version... unless they give dropships an enormous torque boost. |
Mac Dac
Wraith Shadow Guards
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 03:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. No dropship pilots need this more then anyone else...
why is it that when vehicles gets nerfed its like being grounded for HAVs and LAVs and like taking a huge **** in the anus for dropships? |
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp
1092
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 03:23:00 -
[46] - Quote
SgtDoughnut wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Urrrgh. There should only be refunds, not respecs. When they remove something, you get all the SP and ISK back. That's it and all there should ever be.
Any EVE pilot that has been around can agree with me on that. When they removed the learning skills, everyone was refunded not respeced. This guy is right I'm not sorry to inform you that he is completely wrong saying there should only be refunds.
When EVE first began, was there a Frigate for every race? Did EVE start with a rookie ship for each race, 3 Racial Frigates, and 2 Racial Cruisers?
The answer is an emphatic no!
This is not true in DUST 514. All Racial Roles are not represented in the existing classes or weapon types. This forces some players to spec into a Racial Variant simply because they didn't have a choice. By not offering at least a partial respec for players in these situations, CCP would only adding insult to injury.
Respecs should definitely be given with the filling in of Racial Variants for existing Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles and Weapon Types.
Respecs should not be given with the addition of completely new Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles or Weapon Types, unless these new classes/roles/types are not initially added with all Racial Variants. |
Obodiah Garro
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
410
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 14:44:00 -
[47] - Quote
Master Jaraiya wrote:
This is not true in DUST 514. All Racial Roles are not represented in the existing classes or weapon types. This forces some players to spec into a Racial Variant simply because they didn't have a choice. By not offering at least a partial respec for players in these situations, CCP would only adding insult to injury.
Exactly this |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:46:00 -
[48] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote: Isn't that a respec?
No. That's a refund for something that is removed. Respec means that everything is given back to you so you may spend them again. We had a respec once. Refunds are acceptable by me, as that is fair for taking things out. Respecs are not, as nothing is removed to warrant a full return of everything. Vehicle users that get SP back for the vehicles removed- that's fine. Refund. Infantry getting respec'd because a weapon changes (but is not removed) is not. Now, if they REMOVED the gun, then that calls for a refund. Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :> Added note: Armored Core: Verdict Day is pretty gnarly and is an enjoyable alternative to Dust 514, if anyone is wondering. Tankers are usually more intelligent because they have to worry about more things. It requires total situational awareness at all times, plus a play style heavily geared towards a more defensive style to not get blown up.
So, the vehicle skills are being overhauled as well. Should we not get the SP back for that? It is in fact a respec. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:48:00 -
[49] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? Let your SP pool instead of spending like a drunken sailor. New weapons =/= complete overhaul of vehicles. I have a quite nice reserve of SP thank you, thats not the point or even relevant. It's entirely relevant, because infantry keeps crying about a respec when they get more racial weapons and suits. We say respec because they're changing everything about vehicles and we're told to shut up. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:49:00 -
[50] - Quote
Rinzler XVII wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Justify it then ! Why didn't all tankers 'pool' all their SP and not spec into anything ? I've seen ppl say no respecs at all even for heavys who have only ever had 1 suit to spec into, why should tankers be the only ones to get a partial respec ? People saying no is fine it's an opinion but at least explain WHY you have come to that conclusion, nothing is more childish than saying .. No ... No .. No ... if you don't back up your point then it isn't worth anything How many times do we have to say that they're changing everything about vehicles? |
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:53:00 -
[51] - Quote
low genius wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote: you get all the SP and ISK back.
Isn't that a respec? no, he said 'when something is changed'. a skill tree or a skill itself. Like what's going to happen to vehicles? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:07:00 -
[52] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. So you feel it's not reasonable tankers should get a respec because every single thing about vehicles is going to be changed, but it is reasonable to want a respec to get a new suit when it's released? |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
6943
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:10:00 -
[53] - Quote
1.7 will bring a full respec with it, it's pretty obvious to any who've been here through the various beta stages.
|
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
1713
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:20:00 -
[54] - Quote
Guildo Crow wrote:I doubt any "respec" will be offered if they add new weapons.
I don't think they should. Just start saving some SP on the side for the future. CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...
and seriously... why do people keep calling it "Respect" it's Re-Specialization ie. Respec (or am I totally wrong here?)
'' CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base...''
HAHAHA YOU BELIEVE CCP IS THE ONE THAT HAS TO DEAL WITH FAULTY STUFF?
AHAHAHA this dude knows nothing....
+1 for the respec |
Obodiah Garro
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
421
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:31:00 -
[55] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote: Tankers are usually more intelligent because they have to worry about more things. It requires total situational awareness at all times, plus a play style heavily geared towards a more defensive style to not get blown up.
Using a crutch certainly is difficult, this thread is in regards to light weapons not vehicles re-read the OP. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
6944
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:32:00 -
[56] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote: Tankers are usually more intelligent because they have to worry about more things. It requires total situational awareness at all times, plus a play style heavily geared towards a more defensive style to not get blown up.
Using a crutch certainly is difficult, this thread is in regards to light weapons not vehicles re-read the OP. Any thread having to do with respecs has to do with vehicles if you actually take a second to look at what's happening to them.
Also all but the best tanks are absurdly easy to kill, it's not really a crutch so much as it's just bad players whining that they can't kill tanks with militia AV. |
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
1715
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 21:24:00 -
[57] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Thurak1 wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. So you feel it's not reasonable tankers should get a respec because every single thing about vehicles is going to be changed, but it is reasonable to want a respec to get a new suit when it's released?
What i think its BS that ONLY tankers get a respec. I have Fully Proto AV and im pretty sure vehicle changes affect AV weaponry AND AV weaponry will get tweaked too.
So Respec for EVERYONE, or for no one.
This, no to respecs; but just tankers because we have a vehicle redo. Or : No Respecs ; unless my AR gets nerfed.
ITS BULLS**t
Give us ALL repecs options until CCP gets everything out and balaced. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
698
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:04:00 -
[58] - Quote
Master Jaraiya wrote:SgtDoughnut wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Urrrgh. There should only be refunds, not respecs. When they remove something, you get all the SP and ISK back. That's it and all there should ever be.
Any EVE pilot that has been around can agree with me on that. When they removed the learning skills, everyone was refunded not respeced. This guy is right I'm not sorry to inform you that he is completely wrong saying there should only be refunds. When EVE first began, was there a Frigate for every race? Did EVE start with a rookie ship for each race, 3 Racial Frigates, and 2 Racial Cruisers? The answer is an emphatic no! This is not true in DUST 514. All Racial Roles are not represented in the existing classes or weapon types. This forces some players to spec into a Racial Variant simply because they didn't have a choice. By not offering at least a partial respec for players in these situations, CCP would only adding insult to injury. Respecs should definitely be given with the filling in of Racial Variants for existing Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles and Weapon Types. Respecs should not be given with the addition of completely new Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles or Weapon Types, unless these new classes/roles/types are not initially added with all Racial Variants.
In eve you can raise several accounts with full sp without even playing, or you just buy one from another player. In short yout point is null and void, beside that eve is an mmorpg with stable playerbase, dust is a f2p lobby shooter where playercount at primetime decreases by 500 per month. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
6948
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:09:00 -
[59] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote:SgtDoughnut wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Urrrgh. There should only be refunds, not respecs. When they remove something, you get all the SP and ISK back. That's it and all there should ever be.
Any EVE pilot that has been around can agree with me on that. When they removed the learning skills, everyone was refunded not respeced. This guy is right I'm not sorry to inform you that he is completely wrong saying there should only be refunds. When EVE first began, was there a Frigate for every race? Did EVE start with a rookie ship for each race, 3 Racial Frigates, and 2 Racial Cruisers? The answer is an emphatic no! This is not true in DUST 514. All Racial Roles are not represented in the existing classes or weapon types. This forces some players to spec into a Racial Variant simply because they didn't have a choice. By not offering at least a partial respec for players in these situations, CCP would only adding insult to injury. Respecs should definitely be given with the filling in of Racial Variants for existing Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles and Weapon Types. Respecs should not be given with the addition of completely new Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles or Weapon Types, unless these new classes/roles/types are not initially added with all Racial Variants. In eve you can raise several accounts with full sp without even playing, or you just buy one from another player. In short yout point is null and void, beside that eve is an mmorpg with stable playerbase, dust is a f2p lobby shooter where playercount at primetime decreases by 500 per month. You also can't spend $$$ in EVE to get ahead of someone else in SP (aside from buying someones account) |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
523
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
NO to respecs ...
YES to Re-allocations !!
There that's confused you all ... basically when racial variants come out you are given the option to move ALL your invested sp in say Amarr Heavy dropsuits into one of the other racial Heavy dropsuits ... or move all your Caldari HAV skills points into Minmatar HAV.
No need for refunds or respecs ... just need a UI setup like the attribute remap in Eve with sliders to drop points off a Heavy skill and put onto a different Heavy skill or off an AR skill onto another AR skill as and when racial variants are released.
If you didn't want to be a Heavy or a HAV driver or a dropship pilot or a logistics, then you made a wrong decision ... if you skilled something that's FOTM, OP or not working as intended and needs balancing/changing for the good of the game then tuff, save up for the next FOTM using the points you farmed with this one, or start using it how it was intended. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |