|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1009
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? Let your SP pool instead of spending like a drunken sailor.
New weapons =/= complete overhaul of vehicles. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1009
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 04:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? Let your SP pool instead of spending like a drunken sailor. New weapons =/= complete overhaul of vehicles. Aren't vehicles going to be refunded? At least partially? Edit:Also, I'd be fine with letting pilots change their vehicle once they are released. They haven't confirmed what they're doing. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1009
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote: you get all the SP and ISK back.
Isn't that a respec? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote: Isn't that a respec?
No. That's a refund for something that is removed. Respec means that everything is given back to you so you may spend them again. We had a respec once. Refunds are acceptable by me, as that is fair for taking things out. Respecs are not, as nothing is removed to warrant a full return of everything. Vehicle users that get SP back for the vehicles removed- that's fine. Refund. Infantry getting respec'd because a weapon changes (but is not removed) is not. Now, if they REMOVED the gun, then that calls for a refund. Besides, everyone knows that the ex-tankers will be roflstomped into oblivion if they go infantry. :> Added note: Armored Core: Verdict Day is pretty gnarly and is an enjoyable alternative to Dust 514, if anyone is wondering. Tankers are usually more intelligent because they have to worry about more things. It requires total situational awareness at all times, plus a play style heavily geared towards a more defensive style to not get blown up.
So, the vehicle skills are being overhauled as well. Should we not get the SP back for that? It is in fact a respec. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Obodiah Garro wrote:Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :O).
Kinda seems fair, maybe even restrict the respect so points can only go into the new weapons or whatever. The long and short of it is, gonna suck having Ms of SP in weapons that wont be touched anymore, entirely at the fault of CCP not giving placeholders.
Thoughts? Let your SP pool instead of spending like a drunken sailor. New weapons =/= complete overhaul of vehicles. I have a quite nice reserve of SP thank you, thats not the point or even relevant. It's entirely relevant, because infantry keeps crying about a respec when they get more racial weapons and suits. We say respec because they're changing everything about vehicles and we're told to shut up. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
Rinzler XVII wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Justify it then ! Why didn't all tankers 'pool' all their SP and not spec into anything ? I've seen ppl say no respecs at all even for heavys who have only ever had 1 suit to spec into, why should tankers be the only ones to get a partial respec ? People saying no is fine it's an opinion but at least explain WHY you have come to that conclusion, nothing is more childish than saying .. No ... No .. No ... if you don't back up your point then it isn't worth anything How many times do we have to say that they're changing everything about vehicles? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
low genius wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote: you get all the SP and ISK back.
Isn't that a respec? no, he said 'when something is changed'. a skill tree or a skill itself. Like what's going to happen to vehicles? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. So you feel it's not reasonable tankers should get a respec because every single thing about vehicles is going to be changed, but it is reasonable to want a respec to get a new suit when it's released? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1041
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Thurak1 wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:f**k no! only tankers get respecs! Ha! why are tankers so special? Dropsuits are in a very similar situation where a vast majority of the content they plan to release has not been released. So you feel it's not reasonable tankers should get a respec because every single thing about vehicles is going to be changed, but it is reasonable to want a respec to get a new suit when it's released? What i think its BS that ONLY tankers get a respec.I have Fully Proto AV and im pretty sure vehicle changes affect AV weaponry AND AV weaponry will get tweaked too. So Respec for EVERYONE, or for no one.This, no to respecs; but just tankers because we have a vehicle redo.Or : No Respecs ; unless my AR gets nerfed.ITS BULLS**tGive us ALL repecs options until CCP gets everything out and balaced. So what do you think is going to happen to AV? |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1041
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote:SgtDoughnut wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Urrrgh. There should only be refunds, not respecs. When they remove something, you get all the SP and ISK back. That's it and all there should ever be.
Any EVE pilot that has been around can agree with me on that. When they removed the learning skills, everyone was refunded not respeced. This guy is right I'm not sorry to inform you that he is completely wrong saying there should only be refunds. When EVE first began, was there a Frigate for every race? Did EVE start with a rookie ship for each race, 3 Racial Frigates, and 2 Racial Cruisers? The answer is an emphatic no! This is not true in DUST 514. All Racial Roles are not represented in the existing classes or weapon types. This forces some players to spec into a Racial Variant simply because they didn't have a choice. By not offering at least a partial respec for players in these situations, CCP would only adding insult to injury. Respecs should definitely be given with the filling in of Racial Variants for existing Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles and Weapon Types. Respecs should not be given with the addition of completely new Dropsuit/Vehicile Classes/Roles or Weapon Types, unless these new classes/roles/types are not initially added with all Racial Variants. In eve you can raise several accounts with full sp without even playing, or you just buy one from another player. In short yout point is null and void, beside that eve is an mmorpg with stable playerbase, dust is a f2p lobby shooter where playercount at primetime decreases by 500 per month. How many times do I have to say that Dust isn't a lobby shooter? |
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1042
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I went logistics dropship pilot for PC matches full bore with Uprising, then had a legitimate anxiety attack after two weeks of doing everything I possibly could to make them work and burning through nearly 100 million ISK from my year in the Beta
Don't ******* talk to me about skilling into **** because I want to kill things Sorry the last paragraph wasn't specifically aimed at you, I ment generally people who use FOTM stuff. I burned through 120 mil isk at the same time cos the Amarr Logistics suit didn't work at anything but proto level. But I brought it up on the forums n they fixed it ... people have brought up many problems with vehicles, so they're fixing them ... your logi dropship will do what it's supposed to do by the time they come back, until then you'll still have a dropship you can fly ... n if that's not what you wanted ... refer to my previous post ! Lol... I'm actually surprised they fixed the large turret problem at all. With their history as it pertains to vehicles, I'm surprised CCP didn't say HTFU and have us deal with terrible turret angles. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1042
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:12:00 -
[12] - Quote
Joel II X wrote:I think everyone should get only one respec. That way, nobody will QQ. I'm still with my first character I ever created and effed around with the skills. That means I have some skills allocated where I now know I won't ever use. I've never once had a respectable since I joined in June and, personally, I don't even care about getting one. If you want to ditch anything you already have, start from scratch to specialize in whatever it is you want. This way, new players will stand more if a chance. Maybe. Point is: it's just a game, so just spend more time on it paying to earn those new shiny things. It's not like you haven't done so already. Babies.
TL; DR: Stop being a baby and deal with not having a respec. One is enough. That's because Uprising was deployed before June, and with it came an optional total respec, or account reset. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1042
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:13:00 -
[13] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Needless Sacermendor wrote: -- snip -- I burned through 120 mil isk at the same time cos the Amarr Logistics suit didn't work at anything but proto level. But I brought it up on the forums n they fixed it ... people have brought up many problems with vehicles, so they're fixing them ... your logi dropship will do what it's supposed to do by the time they come back, until then you'll still have a dropship you can fly ... n if that's not what you wanted ... refer to my previous post ! Have you read what the current plan is? I mean really read the entire post from the Devs? They are fixing vehicles by removing all the ADV vehicles. They are gone. The STD vehicles will have significantly Less functionality than the current version. As in they are losing low and high slots. PG, CPU and HP. The tanks are being redesigned to be an 'empty husk' that will be very fragile until the super special new modules that last 1/3 the time compared to current while requiring significantly more time to recharge (2-3 times). So run in fast, push the modules, hammer away for 20 seconds and run like your life depends on it. Because it will. Then spend several minutes back at base recharging, restocking ammo and waiting for the very limited functionality that CCP/Shanghai believes Tanks should be restricted to will be available. And, no, we don't know what the significantly reduced roles that are supported by CCP/Shanghai because we have nothing to work with. Except a few google docs and they are what put the twist in vehicle owners knickers. Now consider the DS pilots. Fragile bricks that are difficult to fly* and provide next to nothing for rewards for using them. The only ships worth using are being removed. They will, no doubt, suffer the very same fate as the Tanks. LLAVs are gone as well. There is not only no time frame for this balancing act but there is no time frame as to when the functionality will be replaced. If ever as there is no guarantees with CCP. Decisions have consequences. And do they ever when CCP refuses to behave like a freaking grown up. Thanks for the time you put in because we just destroyed your character. Start a different one because your SP is locked into something we destroyed. With a very special HTFU from CCP! * Why would anybody make the DS such a piece of Kitten Excrement to fly? It is the worst possible method to use for flight controls and it absolutely inconsistent with the rest of New Eden. Recall that EVE is basically a spread sheet. And flying means click and point, but down in the DUST the DS uses horrible controls that make no sense. Plus a constantly changing camera view that is only changeable by the Devs, not the operator. Classic CCP/Shanghai, now that I think of it. We don't have ADV vehicles to begin with. |
|
|
|