Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
PEW JACKSON
s i n g u l a r i t y
35
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 00:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
I was playing in a random squad earlier today that had voice comms. I joined a Domination that was nearly finished, but hearing some sensible discussion going on in team chat, I went ahead and joined the squad.
The topic about Uprising vs Chromosome came up while we were all restocking and playing with fits in merc quarters. With all of the forum discussion in mind (that I've read personally) I didn't expect to hear anything much too different from what I've already heard. Our squad leader said something that I personally had forgotten about.
The question was: What made Chrome more addicting than Uprising? Without hesitation, our squad leader said "It took a week or two to skill into another role."
He hit that one home for me. I had to reflect back on what really kept me glued to my t.v. at 3am in the morning. I remember back when in a matter of days you could have a viable new fit to try out for damn near miniscule sp costs. I had roughly 6mil sp when I joined my first corp, and with that I had a basic forge/ hmg heavy, a laser/scrambler scout, a smg/shotgun logi, and an ar/sniper rifle assault.
3.5mil SP went a looooong way last build and was one of the biggest reasons Chrome had the best player retention. Newberries felt like the casual effort they put into the game yielded rewards in a few days/ weeks. Having 18.5 mil sp in Uprising feels like how having 3.5mil sp would in Chrome.
We touched base on the fact that SP in Uprising didn't have the value it did compared to the previous build, and it also translated into the feeling of being robbed of precious time by some of the now dearly departed players. What made Chrome fun and addicting for most of us in the squad, was diversity and the fair to low price for it.
The one thing that was done right in Chrome was the skill tree, it may not have been all shiny and purrty looking, but it served it's purpose and was very efficient.
Name the next big build "Emulation", bring back the old skill system with Chrome's skills prices, add it in with Uprising's polish and new skills, and you have a very very solid mechanic for bringing back some of Dust's old players while also retaining many of the new.
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1618
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 00:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
That was back when the game was being tested. CCP needed to make the top gear more accessible because it had months to test the skill progression for a system intended to last years.
Edit: Though I do bloody miss being able to build a sidearm specialist with minimal SP. Old school SMG & SCP FTW. |
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
394
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 00:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Yup.
But realistically, that ain't gonna happen. Said along time ago that the beta was accelerated and that the it'd take blah blah blah. |
PEW JACKSON
s i n g u l a r i t y
35
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 00:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:That was back when the game was being tested. CCP needed to make the top gear more accessible because it had months to test the skill progression for a system intended to last years.
They can still make the system last years by simply making new additions every so often. |
Melchiah ARANeAE
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
97
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 00:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
The only problem with this is what happens when someone has every skill they want? Sure, this'll happen with the current uprising mechanics, but no where near as quickly as it would with chromosomeGÇÖs skill costs. It would only take a few months to a year to get pretty much everything and then what? As much as I'd love to have all of my skills getting upgraded a lot faster, it'd reach the 'end game' much quicker as well. There isn't enough content currently to carry anything past the grind to get new gear, which is the bigger issue here.
What we really need is a better way to grind for SP instead of just running the same 3 game modes on the same maps over and over again. |
PEW JACKSON
s i n g u l a r i t y
35
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 00:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote:Yup.
But realistically, that ain't gonna happen. Said along time ago that the beta was accelerated and that the it'd take blah blah blah.
Sadly we are still in beta until we have all of the content available to us. |
PEW JACKSON
s i n g u l a r i t y
35
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 00:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
Melchiah ARANeAE wrote:The only problem with this is what happens when someone has every skill they want? Sure, this'll happen with the current uprising mechanics, but no where near as quickly as it would with chromosomeGÇÖs skill costs. It would only take a few months to a year to get pretty much everything and then what? As much as I'd love to have all of my skills getting upgraded a lot faster, it'd reach the 'end game' much quicker as well. There isn't enough content currently to carry anything past the grind to get new gear, which is the bigger issue here.
What we really need is a better way to grind for SP instead of just running the same 3 game modes on the same maps over and over again.
CCP needs to look at new player retention than pleasing the old and already faithful ones. I doubt you'd completely quit the game because you have all the skills maxed for a few months. |
Delta 749
Kestrel Reconnaissance
2019
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 00:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Melchiah ARANeAE wrote:The only problem with this is what happens when someone has every skill they want? Sure, this'll happen with the current uprising mechanics, but no where near as quickly as it would with chromosomeGÇÖs skill costs. It would only take a few months to a year to get pretty much everything and then what? As much as I'd love to have all of my skills getting upgraded a lot faster, it'd reach the 'end game' much quicker as well. There isn't enough content currently to carry anything past the grind to get new gear, which is the bigger issue here.
What we really need is a better way to grind for SP instead of just running the same 3 game modes on the same maps over and over again.
Why do guys say stuff like this, it makes it sound like they only play so they can keep checking off boxes on their character sheets, thats not content Whats supposed to keep the player actually playing is the fun of competition, the social aspect, and possibly exploration and item production if things ever get that far |
Fiddler Galaine
Northwind Alliance Dark Taboo
24
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
Skill boosters are pretty much paying to keep the game going at this point - I don't see them changing the skill system anytime soon, except maybe to add more skills. |
Melchiah ARANeAE
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
97
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
PEW JACKSON wrote:Melchiah ARANeAE wrote:The only problem with this is what happens when someone has every skill they want? Sure, this'll happen with the current uprising mechanics, but no where near as quickly as it would with chromosomeGÇÖs skill costs. It would only take a few months to a year to get pretty much everything and then what? As much as I'd love to have all of my skills getting upgraded a lot faster, it'd reach the 'end game' much quicker as well. There isn't enough content currently to carry anything past the grind to get new gear, which is the bigger issue here.
What we really need is a better way to grind for SP instead of just running the same 3 game modes on the same maps over and over again. CCP needs to look at new player retention than pleasing the old and already faithful ones. I doubt you'd completely quit the game because you have all the skills maxed for a few months.
I agree, new player retention is an issue as well and it has to be addressed, but faster skill progression, in my opinion, isn't the answer.
What could you do once you have all the skills? Stomp pub matches? Put up with glitch abusing try-hards in planetary conquest? Sure, there'd be new content and skills to get. But you'd have so much unspent SP from the previous options you wouldn't need to really do much to get the skills. After that, how long would it be until it gets boring? A few weeks to a month? If I were in that situation, I'd have to stop playing (or at least not play that much) until new content is released. |
|
SgtDoughnut
Red Star Jr. EoN.
219
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Fiddler Galaine wrote:Skill boosters are pretty much paying to keep the game going at this point - I don't see them changing the skill system anytime soon, except maybe to add more skills. You do know that eve online pays entirely for this game. The boosters and stuff is just icing on the cake. |
Chumlee Chummington
Red Star. EoN.
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
The reason ccp set sp requirements so high, and will continue to keep them where theyre at is for one reason: money. If ppl could skill into a new suit or weapon in a week, they wouldnt sell nearly as much aurum. |
Melchiah ARANeAE
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
98
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Melchiah ARANeAE wrote:The only problem with this is what happens when someone has every skill they want? Sure, this'll happen with the current uprising mechanics, but no where near as quickly as it would with chromosomeGÇÖs skill costs. It would only take a few months to a year to get pretty much everything and then what? As much as I'd love to have all of my skills getting upgraded a lot faster, it'd reach the 'end game' much quicker as well. There isn't enough content currently to carry anything past the grind to get new gear, which is the bigger issue here.
What we really need is a better way to grind for SP instead of just running the same 3 game modes on the same maps over and over again. Why do guys say stuff like this, it makes it sound like they only play so they can keep checking off boxes on their character sheets, thats not content Whats supposed to keep the player actually playing is the fun of competition, the social aspect, and possibly exploration and item production if things ever get that far
That's exactly what is missing in this game and it really needs more of it. Ok, I love this game, but there is a lot missing that it needs if it wants to compete with other games and retain its player base.
Currently, the social aspect isn't much greater than the majority of other games and the competition nearly isn't level enough. Half the matches I stomp. The other half I get stomped. |
PEW JACKSON
s i n g u l a r i t y
35
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:12:00 -
[14] - Quote
Melchiah ARANeAE wrote:
I agree, new player retention is an issue as well and it has to be addressed, but faster skill progression, in my opinion, isn't the answer.
What could you do once you have all the skills? Stomp pub matches? Put up with glitch abusing try-hards in planetary conquest? Sure, there'd be new content and skills to get. But you'd have so much unspent SP from the previous options you wouldn't need to really do much to get the skills. After that, how long would it be until it gets boring? A few weeks to a month? If I were in that situation, I'd have to stop playing (or at least not play that much) until new content is released.
Still missing the point I'm making. Faster skill progression was a very effective way to keep players interested. Even if CCP accelerated the progression, it'd still take a considerable amount of time and boosters to reach end-game. From what I understand if you maxed everything, you still wouldn't quit the game. let the newberries skill up and feel useful faster. |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
69
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:16:00 -
[15] - Quote
Melchiah ARANeAE wrote:The only problem with this is what happens when someone has every skill they want? Sure, this'll happen with the current uprising mechanics, but no where near as quickly as it would with chromosomeGÇÖs skill costs. It would only take a few months to a year to get pretty much everything and then what? As much as I'd love to have all of my skills getting upgraded a lot faster, it'd reach the 'end game' much quicker as well. There isn't enough content currently to carry anything past the grind to get new gear, which is the bigger issue here.
What we really need is a better way to grind for SP instead of just running the same 3 game modes on the same maps over and over again.
pve |
Melchiah ARANeAE
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
98
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
PEW JACKSON wrote:Melchiah ARANeAE wrote:
I agree, new player retention is an issue as well and it has to be addressed, but faster skill progression, in my opinion, isn't the answer.
What could you do once you have all the skills? Stomp pub matches? Put up with glitch abusing try-hards in planetary conquest? Sure, there'd be new content and skills to get. But you'd have so much unspent SP from the previous options you wouldn't need to really do much to get the skills. After that, how long would it be until it gets boring? A few weeks to a month? If I were in that situation, I'd have to stop playing (or at least not play that much) until new content is released.
Still missing the point I'm making. Faster skill progression was a very effective way to keep players interested. Even if CCP accelerated the progression, it'd still take a considerable amount of time and boosters to reach end-game. From what I understand if you maxed everything, you still wouldn't quit the game. let the newberries skill up and feel useful faster.
Actually, I see your point, but I feel there are better ways around your point. If there was better matchmaking, more social features, more game modes (including PVE) and more rewards for playing other than ISK and SP, noobs would feel a lot more useful and prevent them from reaching the end-game as fast as if lower skill costs were implemented. Remember, Dust has a 10 year road map. The further away the end-game the better.
But this is my opinion against your opinion, so there isn't a right answer. So I shall end it at that :) |
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
1786
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:24:00 -
[17] - Quote
The skill tree blows.
J-Lewis has a solid thread with multiple ideas on how to redesign the skill tree. I'll post a link when I find it. |
Asirius Medaius
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
529
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:26:00 -
[18] - Quote
CCP increased the training times for two reasons:
- They can make much more money off of you through boosters.
- Even if you don't buy boosters, and you can't use a vehicle immediately, you can use AURUM variants to try and stay competitive; You will resort to this method more if the SP stretch is longer.
- They aren't competent enough (CCP) to make content fast and quick enough to entertain their audience, thus, they increase the SP needed to skill.
Most Fanboys will argue that "it's supposed to be a 9000 year game!" or "We don't want everyone speccing too quick!", however, there is already an SP limitation to your weekly cap, and on top of that, larger amounts of SP needed to get specialized into anything.
Face it, CCP wants your money, and they think they deserve it with the little amount of content they deliver.
Anyone who argues against this is not clear-minded, as you can already see 1.5 and every previous patch a symptom of CCP's work ethic/capitalistic urge to milk out people's money, despite pushing projects further and further back...
CCP's work ethic, as noted very accurately:
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:We have plans, and we are excited to say we will be sharing them next week!
We haven't told you what our plans are yet, sorry about that, maybe soon.
Okay so we've changed our plans, good thing we didn't tell you what they were or you'd get mad lol.
Our plans are now finalized, we will tell you about them next week.
Our plan for a total revamp on feature X is to basically do the same thing as we were doing before, but with slightly new numbers and some hidden nerfs. I hope this blog will make it sound new and exciting though!
Unfortunately, our plans couldn't be completed all in this patch, so you will get a portion of it now and some of it in the next build.
Sorry, it's still not ready this build, but it will definitely be finished in the build after next.
It's finally here, we hope you enjoy the nerfs and broken features.
We find your feedback valuable and we are definitely listening to it, so we will go back to the drawing board and let you guys know when we have a new plan.
We have plans, and we are excited to say we will be sharing them next week!
"But please guys... BUY THOSE OMEGA BOOSTERS!"
-CCP Damage Control |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4338
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:31:00 -
[19] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:That was back when the game was being tested. CCP needed to make the top gear more accessible because it had months to test the skill progression for a system intended to last years.
Edit: Though I do bloody miss being able to build a sidearm specialist with minimal SP. Old school SMG & SCP FTW.
This. There is no other reason. All of it was just for testing purposes. Unfortunately that made some players a bit spoiled. |
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
1787
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:38:00 -
[20] - Quote
I don't get these jabs at CCP for bringing back Omega Boosters. Many people here have been requesting their return since their first appearance. Why try to make CCP look bad for something we asked for? |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
9096
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:43:00 -
[21] - Quote
I think we can there does need to be a stronger emphasis on redoing the tree's individual skills as there are still plenty of skills with no effect, no effect at lvl 2 and 4, no effect beyond lvl 3.
There is the problem of passive verses attached skills though with too many passive skills you wind up with players of the veteran variety getting too strong over the rookies who are just starting out. This also makes passive skills must have skills. While current system could be argued to be similar you would have to purposely choose those kills for the roles you are going for instead of these skills being blanket cover for any role decision choice.
I doubt we can completely go back to the old tree how would it be better shaped or would the branches be stronger? Tanking on the strengths from the previous trees and keeping it fairer in the new one? |
PEW JACKSON
s i n g u l a r i t y
38
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 02:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I think we can there does need to be a stronger emphasis on redoing the tree's individual skills as there are still plenty of skills with no effect, no effect at lvl 2 and 4, no effect beyond lvl 3.
There is the problem of passive verses attached skills though with too many passive skills you wind up with players of the veteran variety getting too strong over the rookies who are just starting out. This also makes passive skills must have skills. While current system could be argued to be similar you would have to purposely choose those kills for the roles you are going for instead of these skills being blanket cover for any role decision choice.
I doubt we can completely go back to the old tree how would it be better shaped or would the branches be stronger? Tanking on the strengths from the previous trees and keeping it fairer in the new one?
The only thing I'd like to see return from the old skill tree is the SP costs of skills. Keep the core change of the skill tree that came with Uprising and even further improve on it as more skills become available, but lower the costs back to Chrome levels.
Those little frequent mile stones in unlocking new gear kept the game fun in MMO aspects. Uprising gained the FPS mechanics needed to make the game a relevant title, but lost the MMO feel due to the massive grind.
Thanks for the post btw |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2641
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 02:06:00 -
[23] - Quote
If you can't make a good game, you have to make a good skinner box. |
Justin Tymes
Dem Durrty Boyz Public Disorder.
425
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 02:20:00 -
[24] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:That was back when the game was being tested. CCP needed to make the top gear more accessible because it had months to test the skill progression for a system intended to last years.
Edit: Though I do bloody miss being able to build a sidearm specialist with minimal SP. Old school SMG & SCP FTW. This. There is no other reason. All of it was just for testing purposes. Unfortunately that made some players a bit spoiled.
The SP needed to unlock specialize was reasonable before Uprising. Now we have proto stomps between new players and vets, with the gap being way more noticeable because of the time needed to customize. If you're playing this game to grind out SP, instead of enjoying the gameplay, there is a serious problem, and the number of players lost over time since Uprising show this. |
SgtDoughnut
Red Star Jr. EoN.
219
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 02:55:00 -
[25] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:That was back when the game was being tested. CCP needed to make the top gear more accessible because it had months to test the skill progression for a system intended to last years.
Edit: Though I do bloody miss being able to build a sidearm specialist with minimal SP. Old school SMG & SCP FTW. This. There is no other reason. All of it was just for testing purposes. Unfortunately that made some players a bit spoiled. Only a bit? Have you seen the outcrys for respecs, for free stuff, for everything in this game to be handed to people without effort. FPS players are spoiled rotten |
RydogV
Shadow Company HQ
396
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 03:28:00 -
[26] - Quote
I couldn't disagree more. I have no interest in unlocking everything in the first few months. If you want different options then create another PSN ID and start a new char with passive SP turned on and build that into your variety.
No what the game needs is more options. More maps, more modes, more reason to log on. I love Dust 514 but a certain boredom factor does set in from time to time. I have stepped away for a week or two here and there...but I always come back. The game does not need EASY MODE when it comes to skill progression. But is does need options for play and not all these elaborate EVE integration ideas...save that for a bit later in the "10 year plan".
The game needs the things shooter fans want to engage in...because despite the EVE setting this is a shooter first and an MMO second...always. Honestly, I stopped caring about SP and what I spent it on at around the 12 million mark LOL. |
PEW JACKSON
s i n g u l a r i t y
40
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 03:40:00 -
[27] - Quote
RydogV wrote:I couldn't disagree more. I have no interest in unlocking everything in the first few months. If you want different options then create another PSN ID and start a new char with passive SP turned on and build that into your variety.
No what the game needs is more options. More maps, more modes, more reason to log on. I love Dust 514 but a certain boredom factor does set in from time to time. I have stepped away for a week or two here and there...but I always come back. The game does not need EASY MODE when it comes to skill progression. But is does need options for play and not all these elaborate EVE integration ideas...save that for a bit later in the "10 year plan".
The game needs the things shooter fans want to engage in...because despite the EVE setting this is a shooter first and an MMO second...always. Honestly, I stopped caring about SP and what I spent it on at around the 12 million mark LOL.
Hey you, yea you... Go away.
You can't unlock everything in a few months. Why go through all that trouble? Cutting sp costs in turn gives players more options. This game has things players (shooters) like to engage in. The problem is for players to enjoy the things they enjoy, they first need to put in months and months of time before being able to firmly plant a foot down to enjoy the experience many of us call New Eden.
I'll gladly take the majority interest over your personal need to have a game that caters to you. In this sense HTFU. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2544
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 03:48:00 -
[28] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:That was back when the game was being tested. CCP needed to make the top gear more accessible because it had months to test the skill progression for a system intended to last years.
Edit: Though I do bloody miss being able to build a sidearm specialist with minimal SP. Old school SMG & SCP FTW.
No. Right before the unveiling of the the final skill tree, it was promised that the costs were being rebalanced, but would stay the same. They lied because SP is their only monetization strategy. |
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
1001
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 05:28:00 -
[29] - Quote
Sell skill spike and clusters. The slots were in there and with AUR gear a day old player could pimp at least a good advanced assault suit. |
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3143
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 05:34:00 -
[30] - Quote
Maybe if they split the bonuses on the suit skills between the specialization suit and it's frame it would make more sense - or hell, giving the frame bonuses at all would make sense.
I have Gallente Medium Frame to 5 solely because I thought that it would give me the first bonus listed under Gallente Assault (5% reduction to Hybrid Weapon PG/CPU) under the pretense that it was like Eve in that you still get bonuses for a Tech 2 ship from having Tech 1 skills.
There is no reason to get the frame skill even though you're forced to get it before getting the suit. Would make more sense if you got a bonus from the frame skill that applied to both the frame and the specialization suit. For instance:
Gallente Medium Frame: 5% reduction to Hybrid Weapon PG/CPU Gallente Assault Suit: Whatever Gallente Logistics Suit: Whatever
So, both the Assault and Logistics got the bonus from the Frame. This would allow new players to have -SOMETHING- while they're speccing into the specialization suits that reduces the blow from higher-skilled players, as well as forced higher skilled players to invest in those skills to get the maximum bonus for the suit they're choosing to role with.
More SP required in the long run but faster application of bonuses. |
|
CallOfDutyGhosts Planetside2
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 05:42:00 -
[31] - Quote
Iskandar Zul Karnain wrote:I don't get these jabs at CCP for bringing back Omega Boosters. Many people here have been requesting their return since their first appearance. Why try to make CCP look bad for something we asked for?
Because, what is the f**king point of getting Omega Boosters when there is no content to pour our newly acquired SP from said boosters?
Come on man, use your damn brain!
CCP keeps pushing s**t back, and making "updates" (notice the quotation marks? that's because I'm skeptical about it being an actual update due to almost no change in the game [if you aren't in a leadership role, then all you are getting is a new WP system]; I'm just making sure I can break everything down for your little mind to understand) and yet they still expect us to buy their boosters?
No thank you.
(Can't wait for these kids to come in here and try to counter-argue; they will probably mention my user name as a staple point to attack my accreditation, but that's typical of Dustbunnies who feel they are actually intelligent)
|
Asirius Medaius
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
535
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 05:52:00 -
[32] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:That was back when the game was being tested. CCP needed to make the top gear more accessible because it had months to test the skill progression for a system intended to last years.
Edit: Though I do bloody miss being able to build a sidearm specialist with minimal SP. Old school SMG & SCP FTW. This. There is no other reason. All of it was just for testing purposes. Unfortunately that made some players a bit spoiled. The SP needed to unlock specialize was reasonable before Uprising. Now we have proto stomps between new players and vets, with the gap being way more noticeable because of the time needed to customize. If you're playing this game to grind out SP, instead of enjoying the gameplay, there is a serious problem, and the number of players lost over time since Uprising show this.
Bingo! The problem is this; the larger the SP needed to skill between stuff (higher multipliers, etc), the more time needed for newbies to catch up to the veterans. If CCP had much more material in the game to use and just shortened the SP gap between skills just marginally, then there would be less complaining about Proto-stomping since more people would be able to access the suit before they feel like the game is an endless grind, and then quit Dust 514.
If CCP really wanted to work on their NPE, they would make it so more people have an opportunity to get to Proto level within weeks so they feel competitive faster, rather than get frustrated at how long it takes for grinding SP; The smarter newbies will realize that this is just a way to influence people to open up their wallets if they don't want to spend months trying to grind out "core" skills.
|
fawkuima juggalo
Hollowed Kings
56
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 09:35:00 -
[33] - Quote
ALRIGHT YEA COME ON. its like almost a few million for proto grenades.... something needs to change more sp or easyier to spend it. not alot a little. ill be sure to give that other link a looksie.
|
PEW JACKSON
s i n g u l a r i t y
43
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 13:01:00 -
[34] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Maybe if they split the bonuses on the suit skills between the specialization suit and it's frame it would make more sense - or hell, giving the frame bonuses at all would make sense.
I have Gallente Medium Frame to 5 solely because I thought that it would give me the first bonus listed under Gallente Assault (5% reduction to Hybrid Weapon PG/CPU) under the pretense that it was like Eve in that you still get bonuses for a Tech 2 ship from having Tech 1 skills.
There is no reason to get the frame skill even though you're forced to get it before getting the suit. Would make more sense if you got a bonus from the frame skill that applied to both the frame and the specialization suit. For instance:
Gallente Medium Frame: 5% reduction to Hybrid Weapon PG/CPU Gallente Assault Suit: Whatever Gallente Logistics Suit: Whatever
So, both the Assault and Logistics got the bonus from the Frame. This would allow new players to have -SOMETHING- while they're speccing into the specialization suits that reduces the blow from higher-skilled players, as well as forced higher skilled players to invest in those skills to get the maximum bonus for the suit they're choosing to role with.
More SP required in the long run but faster application of bonuses.
I like the concept, but that still leaves the huge SP cost towering over newberries. Changes like these would be very welcomed after we have all of the dropsuits available to us.
Question: Would it be too much to ask if we made basic frame skills x3 and racial x5? I also think all core skills need to be reduced back to x1- x2 multipliers. |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
1024
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 13:07:00 -
[35] - Quote
PEW JACKSON wrote:I was playing in a random squad earlier today that had voice comms. I joined a Domination that was nearly finished, but hearing some sensible discussion going on in team chat, I went ahead and joined the squad.
The topic about Uprising vs Chromosome came up while we were all restocking and playing with fits in merc quarters. With all of the forum discussion in mind (that I've read personally) I didn't expect to hear anything much too different from what I've already heard. Our squad leader said something that I personally had forgotten about.
The question was: What made Chrome more addicting than Uprising? Without hesitation, our squad leader said "It took a week or two to skill into another role."
He hit that one home for me. I had to reflect back on what really kept me glued to my t.v. at 3am in the morning. I remember back when in a matter of days you could have a viable new fit to try out for damn near miniscule sp costs. I had roughly 6mil sp when I joined my first corp, and with that I had a basic forge/ hmg heavy, a laser/scrambler scout, a smg/shotgun logi, and an ar/sniper rifle assault.
3.5mil SP went a looooong way last build and was one of the biggest reasons Chrome had the best player retention. Newberries felt like the casual effort they put into the game yielded rewards in a few days/ weeks. Having 18.5 mil sp in Uprising feels like how having 3.5mil sp would in Chrome.
We touched base on the fact that SP in Uprising didn't have the value it did compared to the previous build, and it also translated into the feeling of being robbed of precious time by some of the now dearly departed players. What made Chrome fun and addicting for most of us in the squad, was diversity and the fair to low price for it.
The one thing that was done right in Chrome was the skill tree, it may not have been all shiny and purrty looking, but it served it's purpose and was very efficient.
Name the next big build "Emulation", bring back the old skill system with Chrome's skills prices, add it in with Uprising's polish and new skills, and you have a very very solid mechanic for bringing back some of Dust's old players while also retaining many of the new.
actually I'm finding this till exists...it's sad but after you hit about 22 million sp and you get your core skills out of the way, it really doesn't take long to hit a new role.
it just takes a very long time now to get your first role finished |
RydogV
Shadow Company HQ
398
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 15:47:00 -
[36] - Quote
PEW JACKSON wrote:RydogV wrote:I couldn't disagree more. I have no interest in unlocking everything in the first few months. If you want different options then create another PSN ID and start a new char with passive SP turned on and build that into your variety.
No what the game needs is more options. More maps, more modes, more reason to log on. I love Dust 514 but a certain boredom factor does set in from time to time. I have stepped away for a week or two here and there...but I always come back. The game does not need EASY MODE when it comes to skill progression. But is does need options for play and not all these elaborate EVE integration ideas...save that for a bit later in the "10 year plan".
The game needs the things shooter fans want to engage in...because despite the EVE setting this is a shooter first and an MMO second...always. Honestly, I stopped caring about SP and what I spent it on at around the 12 million mark LOL. Hey you, yea you... Go away. You can't unlock everything in a few months. Why go through all that trouble? Cutting sp costs in turn gives players more options. This game has things players (shooters) like to engage in. The problem is for players to enjoy the things they enjoy, they first need to put in months and months of time before being able to firmly plant a foot down to enjoy the experience many of us call New Eden. I'll gladly take the majority interest over your personal need to have a game that caters to you. In this sense HTFU.
Interesting response. I speak for myself, you are correct. That is generally the first ingredient of an opinion. But you come on and apparently speak for ALL shooter fans. That is pretty ballsy friend. Good luck with your crusade, you will probably need it.
"I cannot teach him, the boy has no patience....Much anger in him..." - Yoda
|
PEW JACKSON
s i n g u l a r i t y
49
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 12:50:00 -
[37] - Quote
Morning Bump :D |
Hellkeizer
The Avutora Complex
127
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 14:30:00 -
[38] - Quote
ISK variant for boosters could help solve it but, with how PC players are farming that's not such a good idea now. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |