That was back when the game was being tested. CCP needed to make the top gear more accessible because it had months to test the skill progression for a system intended to last years.

Yup.

But realistically, that ain't gonna happen. Said along time ago that the beta was accelerated and that the it'd take blah blah blah.

The only problem with this is what happens when someone has every skill they want? Sure, this'll happen with the current uprising mechanics, but no where near as quickly as it would with chromosomeGÇÖs skill costs. It would only take a few months to a year to get pretty much everything and then what? As much as I'd love to have all of my skills getting upgraded a lot faster, it'd reach the 'end game' much quicker as well. There isn't enough content currently to carry anything past the grind to get new gear, which is the bigger issue here.

What we really need is a better way to grind for SP instead of just running the same 3 game modes on the same maps over and over again.

The only problem with this is what happens when someone has every skill they want? Sure, this'll happen with the current uprising mechanics, but no where near as quickly as it would with chromosomeGÇÖs skill costs. It would only take a few months to a year to get pretty much everything and then what? As much as I'd love to have all of my skills getting upgraded a lot faster, it'd reach the 'end game' much quicker as well. There isn't enough content currently to carry anything past the grind to get new gear, which is the bigger issue here.

What we really need is a better way to grind for SP instead of just running the same 3 game modes on the same maps over and over again.

CCP needs to look at new player retention than pleasing the old and already faithful ones. I doubt you'd completely quit the game because you have all the skills maxed for a few months.

Skill boosters are pretty much paying to keep the game going at this point - I don't see them changing the skill system anytime soon, except maybe to add more skills.

Why do guys say stuff like this, it makes it sound like they only play so they can keep checking off boxes on their character sheets, thats not content
Whats supposed to keep the player actually playing is the fun of competition, the social aspect, and possibly exploration and item production if things ever get that far

I agree, new player retention is an issue as well and it has to be addressed, but faster skill progression, in my opinion, isn't the answer.

What could you do once you have all the skills? Stomp pub matches? Put up with glitch abusing try-hards in planetary conquest? Sure, there'd be new content and skills to get. But you'd have so much unspent SP from the previous options you wouldn't need to really do much to get the skills. After that, how long would it be until it gets boring? A few weeks to a month? If I were in that situation, I'd have to stop playing (or at least not play that much) until new content is released.

The only problem with this is what happens when someone has every skill they want? Sure, this'll happen with the current uprising mechanics, but no where near as quickly as it would with chromosomeGÇÖs skill costs. It would only take a few months to a year to get pretty much everything and then what? As much as I'd love to have all of my skills getting upgraded a lot faster, it'd reach the 'end game' much quicker as well. There isn't enough content currently to carry anything past the grind to get new gear, which is the bigger issue here.

What we really need is a better way to grind for SP instead of just running the same 3 game modes on the same maps over and over again.

Still missing the point I'm making. Faster skill progression was a very effective way to keep players interested. Even if CCP accelerated the progression, it'd still take a considerable amount of time and boosters to reach end-game. From what I understand if you maxed everything, you still wouldn't quit the game. let the newberries skill up and feel useful faster.

We have plans, and we are excited to say we will be sharing them next week!

We haven't told you what our plans are yet, sorry about that, maybe soon.

Okay so we've changed our plans, good thing we didn't tell you what they were or you'd get mad lol.

Our plans are now finalized, we will tell you about them next week.

Our plan for a total revamp on feature X is to basically do the same thing as we were doing before, but with slightly new numbers and some hidden nerfs. I hope this blog will make it sound new and exciting though!

Unfortunately, our plans couldn't be completed all in this patch, so you will get a portion of it now and some of it in the next build.

Sorry, it's still not ready this build, but it will definitely be finished in the build after next.

It's finally here, we hope you enjoy the nerfs and broken features.

We find your feedback valuable and we are definitely listening to it, so we will go back to the drawing board and let you guys know when we have a new plan.

We have plans, and we are excited to say we will be sharing them next week!

That was back when the game was being tested. CCP needed to make the top gear more accessible because it had months to test the skill progression for a system intended to last years.

Edit: Though I do bloody miss being able to build a sidearm specialist with minimal SP.
Old school SMG & SCP FTW.

I think we can there does need to be a stronger emphasis on redoing the tree's individual skills as there are still plenty of skills with no effect, no effect at lvl 2 and 4, no effect beyond lvl 3.

There is the problem of passive verses attached skills though with too many passive skills you wind up with players of the veteran variety getting too strong over the rookies who are just starting out. This also makes passive skills must have skills. While current system could be argued to be similar you would have to purposely choose those kills for the roles you are going for instead of these skills being blanket cover for any role decision choice.

I doubt we can completely go back to the old tree how would it be better shaped or would the branches be stronger? Tanking on the strengths from the previous trees and keeping it fairer in the new one?

This. There is no other reason. All of it was just for testing purposes. Unfortunately that made some players a bit spoiled.

This. There is no other reason. All of it was just for testing purposes. Unfortunately that made some players a bit spoiled.

I couldn't disagree more. I have no interest in unlocking everything in the first few months. If you want different options then create another PSN ID and start a new char with passive SP turned on and build that into your variety.

No what the game needs is more options. More maps, more modes, more reason to log on. I love Dust 514 but a certain boredom factor does set in from time to time. I have stepped away for a week or two here and there...but I always come back. The game does not need EASY MODE when it comes to skill progression. But is does need options for play and not all these elaborate EVE integration ideas...save that for a bit later in the "10 year plan".

The game needs the things shooter fans want to engage in...because despite the EVE setting this is a shooter first and an MMO second...always. Honestly, I stopped caring about SP and what I spent it on at around the 12 million mark LOL.

That was back when the game was being tested. CCP needed to make the top gear more accessible because it had months to test the skill progression for a system intended to last years.

Edit: Though I do bloody miss being able to build a sidearm specialist with minimal SP.
Old school SMG & SCP FTW.