Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Marlin Kirby
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
39
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
We don't need this candy handout bullcrap and it doesn't directly help the team either.
What's next? You going to give us extra points for killing someone after dying three times in a row? |
Sleepy Zan
TeamPlayers EoN.
2482
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
Marlin Kirby wrote: give us extra points for killing someone after dying three times in a row? Thats a great idea! |
Marlin Kirby
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
39
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:Marlin Kirby wrote: give us extra points for killing someone after dying three times in a row? Thats a great idea!
It's like CoD! Everyone loves CoD.......right?
.............right? |
Sleepy Zan
TeamPlayers EoN.
2482
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Marlin Kirby wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:Marlin Kirby wrote: give us extra points for killing someone after dying three times in a row? Thats a great idea! It's like CoD! Everyone loves CoD.......right? .............right? right |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1734
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
love it, great idea. |
Marlin Kirby
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
39
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
ladwar wrote:love it, great idea.
How about some extra points for killing someone right after he/she kills your bro? Or how about some points where you kill two guys in one second!?
The kids will love it! |
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
506
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
a res is 60 points, a headshot makes sure that can't happen. seems like a fair trade. |
Marlin Kirby
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
39
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:12:00 -
[8] - Quote
low genius wrote:a res is 60 points, a headshot makes sure that can't happen. seems like a fair trade.
By that logic, I should get 10+ for bleeding some out, but we don't/won't. |
KingBlade82
The Phoenix Federation
201
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:13:00 -
[9] - Quote
Marlin Kirby from KILL-EM-QUICK suggested it folks
" You going to give us extra points for killing someone after dying three times in a row?" directed at CCP |
General John Ripper
TeamPlayers EoN.
2772
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
I like this idea. Your just mad because maybe you don't know how to aim? |
|
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
1487
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:Marlin Kirby from KILL-EM-QUICK suggested it folks
" You going to give us extra points for killing someone after dying three times in a row?" directed at CCP
I'd rather we get extra points for terminating a clone on a kill streak... if they killed five in a row get extra points for putting them out of action. |
GVGMODE
WorstPlayersEver
42
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:15:00 -
[12] - Quote
It would be great. for snipers since some of them pull some awesome shots |
General John Ripper
TeamPlayers EoN.
2772
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
Crash Monster wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:Marlin Kirby from KILL-EM-QUICK suggested it folks
" You going to give us extra points for killing someone after dying three times in a row?" directed at CCP I'd rather we get extra points for terminating a clone on a kill streak... if they killed five in a row get extra points for putting them out of action. Then I would constantly become a target.... I love this idea too! No longer must I run around to get kills. I can just chill and let everyone come to me. |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD
982
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
low genius wrote:a res is 60 points, a headshot makes sure that can't happen. seems like a fair trade. I like your take on it, low genius. Also saves the team ammo=nanites.
Tbh, the +60 WP might be a small nod to CoD, but it's a harmless one, so far as i can tell. |
Marlin Kirby
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
40
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:28:00 -
[15] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:Marlin Kirby from KILL-EM-QUICK suggested it folks
" You going to give us extra points for killing someone after dying three times in a row?" directed at CCP
<----------------------------------Point Your head*
This bullcrap happens in CoD and rewarding people for sucking or doing something a little out of the ordinary. We should be getting points for the kill alone and not how we get it.
General John Ripper wrote:I like this idea. Your just mad because maybe you don't know how to aim?
Lol You can't be serious. If I wasted loads of ammo on a guy, that's my own fault. Saving ammo by getting a headshot is a reward in its self.
And how could I possibly miss with the massive hit-boxes we have now?
Crash Monster wrote: I'd rather we get extra points for terminating a clone on a kill streak... if they killed five in a row get extra points for putting them out of action.
That's exactly what I'm getting at. I don't want this kind of garbage.^
Vrain Matari wrote:Tbh, the +60 WP might be a small nod to CoD, but it's a harmless one, so far as i can tell.
If politics ever taught me anything, it's that small changes leads to big ones. |
pegasis prime
BIG BAD W0LVES
1085
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:32:00 -
[16] - Quote
ladwar wrote:love it, great idea.
I wad thinking the same thing. .......... I love getting multi dongs on my blaster fits. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
1488
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:33:00 -
[17] - Quote
Marlin Kirby wrote:Crash Monster wrote: I'd rather we get extra points for terminating a clone on a kill streak... if they killed five in a row get extra points for putting them out of action.
That's exactly what I'm getting at. I don't want this kind of garbage.^
Except that precisely aligns rewards with actions that help the team... some guy is owning your team and you are the one who takes the pressure off your team.
What are the points for otherwise... we could just use integer counters tracking kills.
Throwing in things that you can't control yourself, based on how much of a contribution you make, is a way to encourage people to keep trying when things get tough. |
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
3920
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:37:00 -
[18] - Quote
Uh oh guys, an extra 10 WP's is going to make OB's spammable. Hurry and send death threats to everyone you know! |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD
982
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:43:00 -
[19] - Quote
Marlin Kirby wrote:Vrain Matari wrote:Tbh, the +60 WP might be a small nod to CoD, but it's a harmless one, so far as i can tell. If politics ever taught me anything, it's that small changes leads to big ones.
That sounds very wise. Now all you need to get my attention is a plausible model built up from eveidence and causation. Otherwise i vote for actually running the experiment in the field as opposed to the armchair...
|
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1734
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:45:00 -
[20] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Uh oh guys, an extra 10 WP's is going to make OB's spammable. Hurry and send death threats to everyone you know! you never know, it might be 50+ kill 60+ head shot (for 110) but hey i don't think so but it could be. |
|
General John Ripper
TeamPlayers EoN.
2774
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:46:00 -
[21] - Quote
ladwar wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Uh oh guys, an extra 10 WP's is going to make OB's spammable. Hurry and send death threats to everyone you know! you never know, it might be 50+ kill 60+ head shot (for 110) but hey i don't think so but it could be. I dont think u will get 110 for a headshot kill... that would be dumb. |
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles
139
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 19:13:00 -
[22] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:Marlin Kirby wrote: give us extra points for killing someone after dying three times in a row? Thats a great idea!
Rewarding someone beyond them getting passed adversity for themself's.... is a spoiled ass backward's way to give points... And very unlike the EVE universe....
Don't reward people who don't deserve it.... reward them for what they do... You can't tailor a game around making a noob "feel" better. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1734
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 19:20:00 -
[23] - Quote
General John Ripper wrote:ladwar wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Uh oh guys, an extra 10 WP's is going to make OB's spammable. Hurry and send death threats to everyone you know! you never know, it might be 50+ kill 60+ head shot (for 110) but hey i don't think so but it could be. I dont think u will get 110 for a headshot kill... that would be dumb. i wouldn't put it past CCP not to try something like it. but i do think it is highly unlikely but it is CCP... finally getting counter hacking points. |
dogmanpig
black market bank
15
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 19:26:00 -
[24] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:Marlin Kirby wrote: give us extra points for killing someone after dying three times in a row? Thats a great idea! Rewarding someone beyond them getting passed adversity for themself's.... is a spoiled ass backward's way to give points... And very unlike the EVE universe.... Don't reward people who don't deserve it.... reward them for what they do... You can't tailor a game around making a noob "feel" better. you better, or else i'll go and play bf4 or something |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
1688
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 19:26:00 -
[25] - Quote
ladwar wrote:General John Ripper wrote:ladwar wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Uh oh guys, an extra 10 WP's is going to make OB's spammable. Hurry and send death threats to everyone you know! you never know, it might be 50+ kill 60+ head shot (for 110) but hey i don't think so but it could be. I dont think u will get 110 for a headshot kill... that would be dumb. i wouldn't put it past CCP not to try something like it. but i do think it is highly unlikely but it is CCP... finally getting counter hacking points. Sorry but even my 10 year old cousin wouldn't make that mistake. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1734
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 19:30:00 -
[26] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:ladwar wrote:General John Ripper wrote:ladwar wrote:TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Uh oh guys, an extra 10 WP's is going to make OB's spammable. Hurry and send death threats to everyone you know! you never know, it might be 50+ kill 60+ head shot (for 110) but hey i don't think so but it could be. I dont think u will get 110 for a headshot kill... that would be dumb. i wouldn't put it past CCP not to try something like it. but i do think it is highly unlikely but it is CCP... finally getting counter hacking points. Sorry but even my 10 year old cousin wouldn't make that mistake. well im sure your 10 year old cousin would at lest test something they made before giving it out to make sure it works ok. |
Marlin Kirby
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
40
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 19:34:00 -
[27] - Quote
Crash Monster wrote:Except that precisely aligns rewards with actions that help the team... some guy is owning your team and you are the one who takes the pressure off your team.
What are the points for otherwise... we could just use integer counters tracking kills.
Throwing in things that you can't control yourself, based on how much of a contribution you make, is a way to encourage people to keep trying when things get tough.
The bottom line is that 1337 red-dot I killed is only going to come back anyway.
To be honest, I like to do away with the WP system to where it gives airstrikes, after all, it the only thing it does right now. I prefer it if they made it a cooldown, like they did in MAG or how they demonstrated back in the Dust keynote back at 2012's Fanfest.
I can do one orbital bombardment every X minutes. Instead we have "If we kill one more guy, we get the magic lighting from the stars!"
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:Uh oh guys, an extra 10 WP's is going to make OB's spammable. Hurry and send death threats to everyone you know!
We're going to get more WP in the next patch. if I'm forced to deal with WP system, I'd prefer it if the increase the WP necessary for an OB.
ladwar wrote:50+ kill 60+ head shot (for 110) but hey i don't think so but it could be.
I'm pretty sure it's 60 WP for a headshot kill, not 110.
Vrain Matari wrote:Marlin Kirby wrote: If politics ever taught me anything, it's that small changes leads to big ones.
That sounds very wise. Now all you need to get my attention is a plausible model built up from eveidence and causation. Otherwise i vote for actually running the experiment in the field as opposed to the armchair...
I'll entertain you, but I don't know what you want. Is it videogame examples or real world politics? Either way, I present a few examples (for the political ones, I refuse to express my opinion on it and I expect the same from everyone else):
Exhibit A: The Patriot Act. Passed under Bush, expanded under Obama Exhibit B: European appeasement when Hit-lur (can't spell his name on this site ) came into power. Hit-lur kept expanding until France and Britain said he'd came too far. Exhibit C: Under Theodore Roosevelt, many Trusts (which he deemed as evil) were broken down. Under Taft, even more trusts were broken down (despite Teddy's dissatisfaction) Exhibit D: Lincoln elected--> Civil War --> Emancipation Proclamation --> War ends --> 13th Amendment
Exhibit E: Battlefield 1942 has vehicles in multiplayer --> SOCOM 3 has them too now (Seth Luisi admitted to this) Exhibit F: MW2 introduces those "candy handouts", almost every FPS/TPS has done it since. Exhibit G: The praise for Bad Company 1/2 lead to the class design choose of BF3 (which in my opinion is just BC3) Exhibit H: CoD has perks! Now so does Halo Reach!
Top of my head. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1734
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 19:43:00 -
[28] - Quote
****** **** ?? wow... neither the group or the leader? how about some *** ? |
Melchiah ARANeAE
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
79
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 19:46:00 -
[29] - Quote
Tbh, with a squad order it'll be 72 WP. That might be a bit too much IMO. |
calvin b
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
637
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 19:47:00 -
[30] - Quote
As a sniper I love it, its like icing on a freakin cake made out noob tears and sugar bombs. Yay F***** sugar
http://www.mondomedia.com/games/sugar-high/ |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |