******
**** ??
wow... neither the group or the leader? how about some *** ?
hm... no triple k either.
what about taliban ?
sweet that one works. gay pride parade?

CCP your censor is on the gay pride parade. stop it!

Let's see you find all the censors!

you better, or else i'll go and play bf4 or something

i don't give a fucks about the crack head ***** censors they shouldn't censor names or groups.
Stalin?

The bottom line is that 1337 red-dot I killed is only going to come back anyway.

To be honest, I like to do away with the WP system to where it gives airstrikes, after all, it the only thing it does right now. I prefer it if they made it a cooldown, like they did in MAG or how they demonstrated back in the Dust keynote back at 2012's Fanfest.

Please, the moment we started catering to CoD and bf3 fanatic's is the moment this game started its downward climb to crap.

You are thinking too small. The l337 red dot will often have lost his pub-stomping proto suit and is likely to come back with a cheaper fit after losing an expensive fit. If so, that's definitely worth the points.

Also, the WP's determine your rank at the end of the match which determines your share of the payout pool.

If you are worried about too many orbital bombardments then it's not hard to up the WP required to earn one -- though it might take a while.

That same 1337 isn't going to reduce his/her suit in a PC match.

I can't argue with that.

We need a conceptual break between where the new player experience happens and PC. While the game may be about PC to many most newer players won't have any reason to care about it for a very long time.

While it seems like a bad idea in general, it is also just 10 WP, for something that doesn't happen often. It provides a bit of extra dopamine after a headshot kill. So to sum it up, it's dumb but fun and largely inconsequential. Nothing worth complaining about imo.

I'll entertain you, but I don't know what you want. Is it videogame examples or real world politics? Either way, I present a few examples (for the political ones, I refuse to express my opinion on it and I expect the same from everyone else):

Exhibit A: The Patriot Act. Passed under Bush, expanded under Obama
Exhibit B: European appeasement when Hit-lur (can't spell his name on this site ) came into power. Hit-lur kept expanding until France and Britain said he'd came too far.
Exhibit C: Under Theodore Roosevelt, many Trusts (which he deemed as evil) were broken down. Under Taft, even more trusts were broken down (despite Teddy's dissatisfaction)
Exhibit D: Lincoln elected--> Civil War --> Emancipation Proclamation --> War ends --> 13th Amendment

Exhibit E: Battlefield 1942 has vehicles in multiplayer --> SOCOM 3 has them too now (Seth Luisi admitted to this)
Exhibit F: MW2 introduces those "candy handouts", almost every FPS/TPS has done it since.
Exhibit G: The praise for Bad Company 1/2 lead to the class design choose of BF3 (which in my opinion is just BC3)
Exhibit H: CoD has perks! Now so does Halo Reach!

Top of my head.

Lots of nice examples, and historical too, but i'm gonna go out an a limb and say that you've got a wee bit more work to do before showing the relevance of pre-WW2 appeasement to CCP's game design choices ;)

Let's try controlling some variables: Fix the game desiger. I'll choose CCP. Now let's look at their only other game, EVE.

There are no WP in EVE, but CCP's design philosophy is fairly obvious: there are no perks, and every player error is punished. If it isn't punished, it means you got bulls*** lucky.

Now i do have my concerns about CCP softening up EVE lately, i hope that doesn't happen because i'll quit the game.

But for now, based on past experience with the developer, i'm not going to worry about hand-holding carebear creep in dust - although i do want to see the AA nerfed. I'm guessing it will be, hopefully in 1.6

Here's a question, who cares? it's extra points that weren't there before and probably didn't take alot of work to put in, what are you complaining about?

<----------------------------------Point
Your head*

This bullcrap happens in CoD and rewarding people for sucking or doing something a little out of the ordinary. We should be getting points for the kill alone and not how we get it.



Lol
You can't be serious. If I wasted loads of ammo on a guy, that's my own fault. Saving ammo by getting a headshot is a reward in its self.

And how could I possibly miss with the massive hit-boxes we have now?



That's exactly what I'm getting at. I don't want this kind of garbage.^



If politics ever taught me anything, it's that small changes leads to big ones.

[

You said yourself that CCP has softened EVE lately. Don't you think they'll bring the same to Dust?

And forgive me, what's "AA", is it anti-air?

a res is 60 points, a headshot makes sure that can't happen. seems like a fair trade.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-aircraft_warfare

"Nicknames for anti-aircraft guns include AA, AAA or triple-A, an abbreviation of anti-aircraft artillery, "ack-ack""

I personally like that you get 10 more WP then normal with a headshot kill, kinda rewards skill or whathaveyous...

And increasing WP increases skill gain... Which is shnazzy.

I don't know... seems pointless to whine about giving people WP for doing things they are supposed to do.

We're gonna have to start calling you Tom because that QQ was so damn Petty

While we are on that low genius, if headshots prevent revival, should explosives get "Explosive Kill +60" are should we give explosives a chance to terminate instead?

I as an md user, believe in the second option!

Give me 10+ for bleeding someone out and I'll be fine.