Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
lateriss
ObscuriLateris
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 05:11:00 -
[121] - Quote
This is a great update. |
TechMechMeds
Swamp Marines Kleenex Inc.
217
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 05:21:00 -
[122] - Quote
All looks good, it's beginning to come along nicely, looking forward to further integration, there's alot of corps built on the integration patiently waiting |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3716
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 05:39:00 -
[123] - Quote
My Cheetos-stained fingers are ready to grab a hold of those patchnotes. |
Flint Beastgood III
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
42
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 06:13:00 -
[124] - Quote
Sounds great! 2 of my 10 most wanted features in one update? Sweet! |
D legendary hero
THE WARRIORS OF LEGEND
687
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 06:35:00 -
[125] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:new battlefinder crap and other crap we dont need? Thats great CCP, its like you dont listen to the community. Get off IIRC and maybe play your game on the live servers a bit. The new battle finder was actually a requirement for delivering our modified matchmaking system. We needed to change how it worked anyway so we took the opportunity to make it more relevant at the same time. The real motivation behind the change is to create more accessible and balanced battles which I think we can all agree is a worthwhile goal.
you shut that dude DOWN! high five! |
Silas Swakhammer
GamersForChrist Orion Empire
70
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 07:00:00 -
[126] - Quote
Great update. No doubt the three new battlegrounds will be the most noticeable, and probably most appreciated, addition.
I'm also very eager to see the role that the corp tax will play when player corps are given much needed features. |
mollerz
Minja Scouts
900
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 07:06:00 -
[127] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:My Cheetos-stained fingers are ready to grab a hold of those patchnotes.
No wonder your nova knives are orange |
Robert JD Niewiadomski
NULLIMPEX INC
429
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 07:37:00 -
[128] - Quote
Nyra Volki wrote:So what are these Other Special contract (...) Wanted to ask the same :) Can you give us at least a vague idea of what those special contracts could be? Is it for personal use? Or for public view? Will we see EVE pilots requests there? Ex. For attacking PI colonies? Or is it for something different? Drone infestations Tell us something |
Kevall Longstride
DUST University Ivy League
480
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 08:47:00 -
[129] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:"We have also dramatically reduced the issues with LAV collision damage; They now do damage based on the speed that a vehicle is traveling. This means it is far more difficult to roadkill infantry, though not impossible. You just have to mean it more! :)"
ccp gives in to ****** demands that make no sense
we arent playng on a airplane landing strip
after this crappy event im gone , there is a good month coming full in good games
i will be back next year and hopefully game isnt a CoD clone
if things still sucks you deserve 1 more chance of 6 months break then its delete time for Rust514
FLOP
Ahhh, the first tears from those that can only use the easy ways to get a kill.
After months of these no skill killers getting an easy ride we can finally drink their tears.
CCP Giving in to ****** demands that a LAV shouldn't kill a Prototype Heavy when it's only traveling at 1mph and receives no damage as a consequence?
My only problem with it is that it took this long to fix it!! |
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
922
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 08:49:00 -
[130] - Quote
Looks interesting ... specially the Contracts, and bonuses. Still... i will love to see the full release notes, what are this "moods" you talking about ? looks tasty.... |
|
Sgt Pseudo
Nexus Marines
16
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 09:34:00 -
[131] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:"We have also dramatically reduced the issues with LAV collision damage; They now do damage based on the speed that a vehicle is traveling. This means it is far more difficult to roadkill infantry, though not impossible. You just have to mean it more! :)"
ccp gives in to ****** demands that make no sense
we arent playng on a airplane landing strip
after this crappy event im gone , there is a good month coming full in good games
i will be back next year and hopefully game isnt a CoD clone
if things still sucks you deserve 1 more chance of 6 months break then its delete time for Rust514
FLOP
You're a Troll. Please go. ty |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1229
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 09:45:00 -
[132] - Quote
Quote:a full 5k terrain with three battlegrounds called Craters is the reward system balanced to support the vehicle use that will be needed for those maps battles? or is the infantry doom to huff it on foot the distance because scouts will more popular if that happens cause vehicles are not cost effective right now with the current reward system. |
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1154
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 10:21:00 -
[133] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:new battlefinder crap and other crap we dont need? Thats great CCP, its like you dont listen to the community. Get off IIRC and maybe play your game on the live servers a bit. The new battle finder was actually a requirement for delivering our modified matchmaking system. We needed to change how it worked anyway so we took the opportunity to make it more relevant at the same time. The real motivation behind the change is to create more accessible and balanced battles which I think we can all agree is a worthwhile goal.
Nullarbor just ignore the whiny self entitled trolls :).
everyone iv spoken too is well pumped for 1.4 though i did notice somthing in the screen shot
other contracts....would this by chance be fore event stuff if so gleeeeeeeee |
LEE THE PALADIN
HERO'S OF DUST
14
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 11:04:00 -
[134] - Quote
Brovo , good reasons to keep playing , awesome ccp |
KrazyEyeKilla
The Phalanx Inc
25
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 11:39:00 -
[135] - Quote
Will corps be able to put up contracts between themselves without being involved in Planetary Conquest? Like it was in Chromosome. Nice Update nonetheless. |
XERO CHAOS
M.E.R.C. Elite D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 11:46:00 -
[136] - Quote
Take out that stupid forge-gun its a load of crap it does anything AV its a fancy flame thrower in the description i.e. plazma. swarms are fine because chaff or flares but that gun is doing some things that are making people wonder if playing 4 rounds fighting your ass off to pay for that badass drop ship or tank is worth it. Drop ships need a BIG BUFF vehicles : dropship needs buff, tanks just fine, lav what the hell are you doing over there!
if you want to snipe get a rifle not a Forge-gun .
PLEEZ fix my dropships and get rid of that newb gun as far as AV . AP is ok and fine |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die
1965
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 12:13:00 -
[137] - Quote
XERO CHAOS wrote:Take out that stupid forge-gun its a load of crap it does anything AV its a fancy flame thrower in the description i.e. plazma. swarms are fine because chaff or flares but that gun is doing some things that are making people wonder if playing 4 rounds fighting your ass off to pay for that badass drop ship or tank is worth it. Drop ships need a BIG BUFF vehicles : dropship needs buff, tanks just fine, lav what the hell are you doing over there!
if you want to snipe get a rifle not a Forge-gun .
PLEEZ fix my dropships and get rid of that newb gun as far as AV . AP is ok and fine
Forge Gun is okay, only problem is the Breach Vs DSes and its effectiveness Vs infantry.
Really, Swarms are okay?
At least you have to aim the Forge. |
Ferocitan
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
46
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 12:24:00 -
[138] - Quote
One thing I'm disepointed abot is the daily logi bonus. It makes it feel like a facebook game. And reward peeps to do nothing more to log in and log out characters. |
Robert JD Niewiadomski
NULLIMPEX INC
433
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 12:58:00 -
[139] - Quote
Wrong thread sorry. Moved here |
Vespasian Andendare
Subsonic Synthesis Alpha Wolf Pack
140
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 14:00:00 -
[140] - Quote
What happened to better matchmaking/matchmaking changes coming? Are we still going to be pitted against a team running all proto when we're mixed with militia and advanced? |
|
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S.
564
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 14:13:00 -
[141] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:new battlefinder crap and other crap we dont need? Thats great CCP, its like you dont listen to the community. Get off IIRC and maybe play your game on the live servers a bit. The new battle finder was actually a requirement for delivering our modified matchmaking system. We needed to change how it worked anyway so we took the opportunity to make it more relevant at the same time. The real motivation behind the change is to create more accessible and balanced battles which I think we can all agree is a worthwhile goal. C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!!! |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
603
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 15:40:00 -
[142] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:new battlefinder crap and other crap we dont need? Thats great CCP, its like you dont listen to the community. Get off IIRC and maybe play your game on the live servers a bit. The new battle finder was actually a requirement for delivering our modified matchmaking system. We needed to change how it worked anyway so we took the opportunity to make it more relevant at the same time. The real motivation behind the change is to create more accessible and balanced battles which I think we can all agree is a worthwhile goal. you shut that dude DOWN! high five!
I can understand with idiots like this guy why CCP can be on edge with us...CCP Nullarbor I applaud your handling of him.
I am one of many who are excited about 1.4, over all great job!
some things in this patch I think you will see need tweaking but I will reserve my judgment and comments on those things until I myself have played 1.4 |
Gorgoth24Reborn
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
25
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:56:00 -
[143] - Quote
+10
Definitely continuing to head in the right direction!
(Personal favorite being new game map) |
Gorgoth24Reborn
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
25
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:59:00 -
[144] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:new battlefinder crap and other crap we dont need? Thats great CCP, its like you dont listen to the community. Get off IIRC and maybe play your game on the live servers a bit. The new battle finder was actually a requirement for delivering our modified matchmaking system. We needed to change how it worked anyway so we took the opportunity to make it more relevant at the same time. The real motivation behind the change is to create more accessible and balanced battles which I think we can all agree is a worthwhile goal.
Now this is how to shut down a flaming troll. Bravo |
ROEG X
Northwind Alliance Dark Taboo
5
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 12:38:00 -
[145] - Quote
Logibro brought tears to my eyes, 1.4 and 1.5 sounds wonderful. I hoping to hear something about the player economy, I guess all in time. Dust 514 will be so amazing I can't wait to see what they do on the PlayStation 4. I see galactic warfare going on all throughout New Eden, I'm a power hungry mercenary, I wanna be a mercenary so powerful I could fund war fronts across New Eden, stock pile exotic weapons, vehicles and dropsuits and sell to the highest bidders in my merc quarters on my own private auction channel haha that would be awesome. I can't wait to see the day when you can customize your character dropsuits, weapons and vehicles to standout from the other mercs. The future looks bright for Dust 514 I' m excited. |
West Warder
Death in Two Strikes
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 10:41:00 -
[146] - Quote
Thumb Green wrote:Don't like the disabling of shared squad vision. It was alright when they disabled shared team vision but I think this is a little much. I mean it's something that can be lived with it'll just make finding were the hell the enemy is a lot more annoying.
If this stays CCP certainly needs to make it so that when you fire your weapon it gives your position away for a few moments. Which makes perfect sense since how our radars are actually sonars. Perhaps even implement a new skill that suppresses the sound made by your weapon.
No. |
FROM ALASKA
DUST CORE DARKSTAR ARMY
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 13:14:00 -
[147] - Quote
Buddha Brown wrote:Sounds awesome, **** that guy above me ha good one |
Crimson Ryu
G.U.T.Z Covert Intervention
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 15:27:00 -
[148] - Quote
I am personally really excited about what 1.4 will provide for us. Even getting some new visual aspects is exciting enough for me to know that the gameplay will be different and in a good way! |
Bullets2yaface
Ancient Exiles
56
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 21:26:00 -
[149] - Quote
We have also dramatically reduced the issues with LAV collision damage; They now do damage based on the speed that a vehicle is traveling. This means it is far more difficult to roadkill infantry, though not impossible. You just have to mean it more! :)
Favorite line because obviously u don't care if we run people over lol.
Also I noticed you made it so you can see the location of deployment. Do you think you can you make it so that when you request a vehicle it doesn't deploy on the exact spot that the player is standing?
Oh I forgot maybe do something about invisible missiles from swarm launchers I mean c'mon that should be a priority. |
FROM ALASKA
DUST CORE DARKSTAR ARMY
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 02:17:00 -
[150] - Quote
Z3R0 GR4VITY wrote:Aero Yassavi wrote:Z3R0 GR4VITY wrote:Can't wait to see the patch notes....I'm kind of hoping that there will be some new weapons. If there were new weapons they would of said something in the blog, no point in hiding something like that. You don't have to be so cynical about it. CCP is quite vague with most things. Who knows what to expect in the patch notes... they will be adding in a new scope for the laser rifle its basically like the scrambler rifles scope |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |