Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jal R
The Southern Legion
19
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 00:21:00 -
[61] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:RAGING GIGGLES wrote:Yeah, american servers are full pretty much 24/7, but the oceanic rooms are usually open, making it a great place to "test", but, Southern Legion, (an australian corp i believe) definitely has the right to protest your nuclear testing or whatever you are doing on their hometurf....... so to speak. Best explanation I've gotten so far that wasn't just mindless trolling and "deal with it". But, like I said in a previous post. I now know who to look for and who to avoid. Had a really good joke but... Nah....
Sorry Aeon, but I have to point out some thing here. This was the first reply you got that wasn't 'mindless trolling', yet you had to reply to it as if it was, and mind you, in a trolling fashion too:
Aeon Amadi wrote:RKKR wrote:Oceanic servers are the best option to test things out in a certain timezone, but it still stays a playing server and stuff like that will happen weter people are aware of your testing or not.
You're better of for lobbying for a test-server (or atleast a other server option where no WP,... can be gained or something like that) to CCP/CPM after all the results you already have posted on this forums that definitly has helped this game.
With that being said I think there is a chance you will only attract more douchebags with a post like this. Was from your corporation so I can only imagine.
Now quite easy to see why RK is defensive in all his other posts.
Also, who's to say these people didn't know of your 'testing team' and thought you were just afking. Hell I'd go out of my way to team kill an afker. |
WhiskeyJack Otako
The Southern Legion
122
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 00:23:00 -
[62] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Please don't over harass the testing crews, they're investigating the weirdest things Dust 514 that majority of has been unintended behavior.
Aeon Amandi and his crew has been invaluable lately.
Then give them a test server. The CPM endorses cheating now? Saber you can **** right off. Test that. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7021
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 00:25:00 -
[63] - Quote
I am not sure how many of are familiar with Eve Test servers, but opening up a test server WON'T stop the behavior described, after all one could be doing an important physics test, and the other party involved non-consensually decides to test their 'latest' fit on bug hunters.
However going after the players who do has been shown to be more effective. I would like to see the results of crowd sourcing bad behavior on XBONE is going to do soon enough. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7022
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 00:48:00 -
[64] - Quote
WhiskeyJack Otako wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Please don't over harass the testing crews, they're investigating the weirdest things Dust 514 that majority of has been unintended behavior.
Aeon Amandi and his crew has been invaluable lately. Then give them a test server. The CPM endorses cheating now? Saber you can **** right off. Test that.
Cheating? if you want to black and white everything, Killing an ally in a non-FF allowed game is considered cheating as well. |
Jaqen Morghalis
Abandoned Privilege General Tso's Alliance
285
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 00:52:00 -
[65] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:WhiskeyJack Otako wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Please don't over harass the testing crews, they're investigating the weirdest things Dust 514 that majority of has been unintended behavior.
Aeon Amandi and his crew has been invaluable lately. Then give them a test server. The CPM endorses cheating now? Saber you can **** right off. Test that. Cheating? if you want to black and white everything, Killing an ally in a non-FF allowed game is considered cheating as well.
To a random bystander, "testing" could look a lot like boosting.
(and, conversely, boosters could easily claim that they are "testing") |
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
371
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 00:59:00 -
[66] - Quote
Looking through this thread, I see some of us need to brush up on our reading comprehension.
He is the core gamer, the bastard child of the casual and hardcore gamer. He invests the former's effort and cries when he doesn't get the latter's results.
CrotchGrab 360 wrote:You're so philosophical. please adorn me with more pearls of wisdom. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7022
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 00:59:00 -
[67] - Quote
Jaqen Morghalis wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:WhiskeyJack Otako wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Please don't over harass the testing crews, they're investigating the weirdest things Dust 514 that majority of has been unintended behavior.
Aeon Amandi and his crew has been invaluable lately. Then give them a test server. The CPM endorses cheating now? Saber you can **** right off. Test that. Cheating? if you want to black and white everything, Killing an ally in a non-FF allowed game is considered cheating as well. To a random bystander, "testing" could look a lot like boosting. (and, conversely, boosters could easily claim that they are "testing")
I won't argue that but from what other people who 'tested' boosting its is a crap tonn of work for so little gains. The AFK system currently almost discourages boosting but soon as AFKing gets fixed I expect boosting to become a thing.
You can discourage bad behavior while encouraging good behavior, name and shame the boosters. After all he may wind up in a corp in the future that that sort of reputation does follow people. |
Jaqen Morghalis
Abandoned Privilege General Tso's Alliance
285
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 01:12:00 -
[68] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Jaqen Morghalis wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:WhiskeyJack Otako wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Please don't over harass the testing crews, they're investigating the weirdest things Dust 514 that majority of has been unintended behavior.
Aeon Amandi and his crew has been invaluable lately. Then give them a test server. The CPM endorses cheating now? Saber you can **** right off. Test that. Cheating? if you want to black and white everything, Killing an ally in a non-FF allowed game is considered cheating as well. To a random bystander, "testing" could look a lot like boosting. (and, conversely, boosters could easily claim that they are "testing") I won't argue that but from what other people who 'tested' boosting its is a crap tonn of work for so little gains. The AFK system currently almost discourages boosting but soon as AFKing gets fixed I expect boosting to become a thing.
That's not really what I meant.
If I was in a game, and I happened upon two opposing players, one allowing the other to shoot him repeatedly, my first thought would probably be that they were boosting or cheating, not that they were testing weapon damage (as a hypothetical example).
At the same time, two players who actually were boosting could easily claim that they were simply "testing", in order to continue their cheating unabated.
Personally, I've always been big on testing, myself. I'm curious that way and like to know how things work. Unfortunately, testing in a live game environment is not without it's challenges and difficulties, and interferrence from other players is inevitable and should be expected.
This is EXACTLY why test servers exist in the first place, so testers can do their thing, free from interruptions such as these. |
CoD isAIDS
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
132
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 01:14:00 -
[69] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Alright, so - I'm throwing this out there to everyone.
There are easier ways to boost in this game than to fire one round and have someone repair the damage.
So, when you see three people on the Oceania server (because, yanno, we don't have a test server) why do you feel the need to be -that- kind of douchebag and actually infringe on testing? You made two easy kills on a server that has, at most, 8 players. Congratulations.
You know what I find sad? Not only did you have to get your kicks by killing a testing team - which it's pretty well known that I am, in fact, a legitimate tester by the feedback I've been posting on the forums, but you had to put a 5 man squad into an empty server to secure a victory - I'd say that's more along the lines of boosting than anything else.
So, without further adieu, here's a giant middle finger to the five man squad that feels the need to get their rocks off intereferring with the only legitimate test method in this game.
Edit: Oh, and dropping vehicles on friendlies? Nice move, you're doing your corporation a real service. Waaaaaaaaaaaaah |
WhiskeyJack Otako
The Southern Legion
122
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 03:01:00 -
[70] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:WhiskeyJack Otako wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Please don't over harass the testing crews, they're investigating the weirdest things Dust 514 that majority of has been unintended behavior.
Aeon Amandi and his crew has been invaluable lately. Then give them a test server. The CPM endorses cheating now? Saber you can **** right off. Test that. Cheating? if you want to black and white everything, Killing an ally in a non-FF allowed game is considered cheating as well.
A cheat is anything that gives someone an unfair advantage. Boosting is cheating. It's a stupid infinitesimal advantage, but it's cheating all the same. I didn't say anything about killing friendlies. I do however advocate for FF in the MCC...
If these jokers are really testing for CCP then they should have to wear funny hats or sommat while they're about it. I cannot fathom why the CPM has put their mouth on this? Dirty dirty CPM. |
|
RKKR
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:07:00 -
[71] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Thing is though we don't have an ISD Bug Hunter division either. I also have a funny suspicion that even if they do make a test battle server like you suggested RKKR, your justifications for screwing with a tester still applies there regardless.
And just wow RKKR just wow... I don't know what to say you're saying you want this game to fail and Oceania to remain the ghost town as it is? You seem driven towards that goal RKKR.
As for player based quality assurance name me one successful MMO that doesn't rely on people fishing and whining about the game being broken.
The absolute bottom line RKKR though is players is what gives CCP work, No players no work. Period.
Don't put words in my mouth if I want to see this game fail I shouldn't be playing it. Suspicions work the same way as assumptions. It's also clear on whose side you are on and just want to paint a bad image over me, so you still think it's OK for a player to dictate how others need to play the game in a game that promoted a FREE world? Or are you just going to keep responding to PARTS of my post that favor your standpoint?
I also want to make one thing clear: I never interrupted a testing crew and I never plan to, this is all about the attitude of this thread...
If you want to be a testing crew then you have to be aware that it comes with risk and there is a chance to get killed, aeon seems to be aware of that judging from his post where he states that there is less risk on Oceanic servers.
If he gets killed? So what? Charge it to the game...take a protective team with you....don't cry on the forums, crybabies get called out all the time on these forum but for some reason there are different rules for aeon? Again where is the FREE WORLD part that New Eden is sooo know for? yet I can't call it fair game?
There was nothing wrong with my first post, but aeon just couldn't help himself to make a nasty remark and he then continued to threaten with bounties and such things...well he claims I ruined our corps image (too bad he doesn't realise I'm an individual) but I guess it's the same for his image. He is just a bigmouthed crybaby that happends to help the game by testing it in this thread. you fanboys only want to see the latter part.
PS IWS: how hard is it for CCP to make a new gamemode with friendly fire (only 12 players to prevent interupters) with both teams physically seperated,...?
With the exception of my last post (I guess I tried to paint it to black/white) I tried to give a solution for the testing team, but I'm sorry I'm not in CPM and aware of everything, I guess I must be a troll! I hope you think twice before trying to paint a negative picture on someone next time.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7029
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:17:00 -
[72] - Quote
RKKR wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Thing is though we don't have an ISD Bug Hunter division either. I also have a funny suspicion that even if they do make a test battle server like you suggested RKKR, your justifications for screwing with a tester still applies there regardless.
And just wow RKKR just wow... I don't know what to say you're saying you want this game to fail and Oceania to remain the ghost town as it is? You seem driven towards that goal RKKR.
As for player based quality assurance name me one successful MMO that doesn't rely on people fishing and whining about the game being broken.
The absolute bottom line RKKR though is players is what gives CCP work, No players no work. Period. Don't put words in my mouth if I want to see this game fail I shouldn't be playing it. Suspicions work the same way as assumptions. It's also clear on whose side you are on and just want to paint a bad image over me, so you still think it's OK for a player to dictate how others need to play the game in a game that promoted a FREE world? Or are you just going to keep responding to PARTS of my post that favor your standpoint? I also want to make one thing clear: I never interrupted a testing crew and I never plan to, this is all about the attitude of this thread... If you want to be a testing crew then you have to be aware that it comes with risk and there is a chance to get killed, aeon seems to be aware of that judging from his post where he states that there is less risk on Oceanic servers. If he gets killed? So what? Charge it to the game...take a protective team with you....don't cry on the forums, crybabies get called out all the time on these forum but for some reason there are different rules for aeon? Again where is the FREE WORLD part that New Eden is sooo know for? yet I can't call it fair game? There was nothing wrong with my first post, but aeon just couldn't help himself to make a nasty remark and he then continued to threaten with bounties and such things...well he claims I ruined our corps image (too bad he doesn't realise I'm an individual) but I guess it's the same for his image. He is just a bigmouthed crybaby that happends to help the game by testing it in this thread. you fanboys only want to see the latter part. PS IWS: how hard is it for CCP to make a new gamemode with friendly fire (only 12 players to prevent interupters) with both teams physically seperated,...? With the exception of my last post (I guess I tried to paint it to black/white) I tried to give a solution for the testing team, but I'm sorry I'm not in CPM and aware of everything, I guess I must be a troll! I hope you think twice before trying to paint a negative picture on someone next time.
That is probably a massive waste of battle server space and bandwidth though which is STILL prone to people being holes even though there is nothing to gain from it, which again Test servers in Eve have proven this for 6 years. One of the reasons Corp vs Corp was taken out because of the lack of fights on any side for the 'results' that came out of it was not worth the enjoyment. There have been specific testing battles in the past with CCP support but CCP was at the controls of the servers and were able to spin up a battle in the mercenary tab for the testers volunteering for the task to join. In which even then losses are still real there and its still a physical place in tranquility. Tranquility has a weird sense of not liking virtual losses which is why (lossless) arenas was a canceled feature Eve side. |
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
2392
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:34:00 -
[73] - Quote
Jal R wrote:
Sorry Aeon, but I have to point out some thing here. This was the first reply you got that wasn't 'mindless trolling', yet you had to reply to it as if it was, and mind you, in a trolling fashion too:
Than you read it entirely in the wrong light and after re-reading it myself I can't determine how you managed to consider it a 'trolling fashion'.
Jaqen Morghalis wrote:
That's not really what I meant.
If I was in a game, and I happened upon two opposing players, one allowing the other to shoot him repeatedly, my first thought would probably be that they were boosting or cheating, not that they were testing weapon damage (as a hypothetical example).
At the same time, two players who actually were boosting could easily claim that they were simply "testing", in order to continue their cheating unabated.
Personally, I've always been big on testing, myself. I'm curious that way and like to know how things work. Unfortunately, testing in a live game environment is not without it's challenges and difficulties, and interferrence from other players is inevitable and should be expected.
This is EXACTLY why test servers exist in the first place, so testers can do their thing, free from interruptions such as these.
And is exactly why we sent a message explaining what we were doing, however heated - which I'm not sorry for considering the turn of events and troll responses that we got.
RKKR wrote:
If you want to be a testing crew then you have to be aware that it comes with risk and there is a chance to get killed, aeon seems to be aware of that judging from his post where he states that there is less risk on Oceanic servers.
If he gets killed? So what? Charge it to the game...take a protective team with you....don't cry on the forums, crybabies get called out all the time on these forum but for some reason there are different rules for aeon? Again where is the FREE WORLD part that New Eden is sooo know for? yet I can't call it fair game?
Yet somehow you still refuse to acknowledge that this wasn't just a coincidental killing it was an outright assault that even went so far as to commit to friendly fire. What do you -not- understand about that? Testing servers wouldn't fix that issue they'd just have a quaint area to commit to the griefing - imagine that for a second, a server where I know people will be that I could personally **** with.
Free world though, right? |
RKKR
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:34:00 -
[74] - Quote
Thanks for answering a PART of my post.
If only 6 persons are allowed on one side (and the opposite team seperated due to map-design), it isn't that hard to find 6 people to test with you without interruption of players aware or not-aware of your testing activities? Anyway it's seems it's no use to suggest a creative solution but I could also ignore all the other parts of your post and say you're wrong. |
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
2392
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:38:00 -
[75] - Quote
RKKR wrote:Thanks for answering a PART of my post.
If only 6 persons are allowed on one side (and the opposite team seperated due to map-design), it isn't that hard to find 6 people to test with you without interruption of players aware or not-aware of your testing activities? Anyway it's seems it's no use to suggest a creative solution but I could also ignore all the other parts of your post and say you're wrong.
And why should six players have to be pried away from actually playing the game to ensure the safety of a test crew on a -TEST SERVER-? Dude, your idea is flawed and you're just throwing ideas out there without even thinking of the outside variables, that's why I'm only answering part of your post.
That and the rest of your post consisted of calling me a cry-baby so I can only assume that you want me to respond to your trolling so you can get a rise.
-Jazz hands and magical fackin fairy dust- |
RKKR
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:42:00 -
[76] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:
Yet somehow you still refuse to acknowledge that this wasn't just a coincidental killing it was an outright assault that even went so far as to commit to friendly fire. What do you -not- understand about that? Testing servers wouldn't fix that issue they'd just have a quaint area to commit to the griefing - imagine that for a second, a server where I know people will be that I could personally **** with.
Free world though, right?
I don't see how i refuse to acknowledge coincidental killing when I said: "...offcourse they are going to kill anything on sight or who tries to ruin their experience. It's their way to say "Hey CCP this game is broken"." Guess what? Complaining isn't going to help either.
Grab a bunch of guys that would like to help along (Hell even I would help out if you ask nicely), try to sync together in a battle...there you go...it's a free world indeed. (You should stop doing that sarcastic thing because it's not working out for you I suggest you stick to testing stuff out).
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7030
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:42:00 -
[77] - Quote
I think he was addressing me. |
RKKR
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:46:00 -
[78] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:RKKR wrote:Thanks for answering a PART of my post.
If only 6 persons are allowed on one side (and the opposite team seperated due to map-design), it isn't that hard to find 6 people to test with you without interruption of players aware or not-aware of your testing activities? Anyway it's seems it's no use to suggest a creative solution but I could also ignore all the other parts of your post and say you're wrong. And why should six players have to be pried away from actually playing the game to ensure the safety of a test crew on a -TEST SERVER-? Dude, your idea is flawed and you're just throwing ideas out there without even thinking of the outside variables, that's why I'm only answering part of your post. That and the rest of your post consisted of calling me a cry-baby so I can only assume that you want me to respond to your trolling so you can get a rise. -Jazz hands and magical fackin fairy dust-
It was a response to IWS.
Isn't that what you do now? grab some people and not actually play the game to test things out? but then complain about getting killed while in such a game-mode you could do all the testing you want without getting disturbed?
I call you a cry-baby because well...you are crying. |
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
2392
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:48:00 -
[79] - Quote
RKKR wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:RKKR wrote:Thanks for answering a PART of my post.
If only 6 persons are allowed on one side (and the opposite team seperated due to map-design), it isn't that hard to find 6 people to test with you without interruption of players aware or not-aware of your testing activities? Anyway it's seems it's no use to suggest a creative solution but I could also ignore all the other parts of your post and say you're wrong. And why should six players have to be pried away from actually playing the game to ensure the safety of a test crew on a -TEST SERVER-? Dude, your idea is flawed and you're just throwing ideas out there without even thinking of the outside variables, that's why I'm only answering part of your post. That and the rest of your post consisted of calling me a cry-baby so I can only assume that you want me to respond to your trolling so you can get a rise. -Jazz hands and magical fackin fairy dust- It was a response to IWS. Isn't that what you do now? grab some people and not actually play the game to test things out? but then complain about getting killed while in such a game-mode you could do all the testing you want without getting disturbed? I call you a cry-baby because well...you are crying.
You should actually watch some of my videos - one of which actually shows me getting hit by an LAV when doing tests. Did I complain about getting killed then? No. I didn't.
We done here? |
RKKR
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:52:00 -
[80] - Quote
I wonder why you made this thread then?
I guess we are done here. |
|
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
2394
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:54:00 -
[81] - Quote
RKKR wrote:I wonder why you made this thread then?
I guess we are done here.
Lolololololololo
You have short term memory loss if you already forgot the issue I brought on team-killing and trolling messages in response to stating what we were doing there. |
RKKR
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:01:00 -
[82] - Quote
Read this thread again and try to figure out how the Oceanic player base feels.
Complaining isn't going to help. New Eden is a free world, bring a protective team.
Done. |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
222
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:02:00 -
[83] - Quote
Jaqen Morghalis wrote:Regardless of which server you're on, it is still an "active" game, and not a test server. To think that everyone will just leave you be to do your own thing seems a little nieve (seriously, have you never played an online game before?).
The ONLY way you'll avoid this is if you can somehow manage to fill the match with only people who are in on the testing and who you can trust not to interfere. Good luck with that.
Otherswise, unless they introduce either a test server or private matches, you'll just have to test at your own risk. Or he forms up two full squads and sincs on Oceana inside Skirmish matches during peak North America hours. Highest provability of getting AFK-ers, long matches, big maps, and one third of the potential risks are removed.
Of the few times I've hung out on Oceana all the combat action was in Domination and Ambushes. Even those didn't always fill up. |
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
2394
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:06:00 -
[84] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:Jaqen Morghalis wrote:Regardless of which server you're on, it is still an "active" game, and not a test server. To think that everyone will just leave you be to do your own thing seems a little nieve (seriously, have you never played an online game before?).
The ONLY way you'll avoid this is if you can somehow manage to fill the match with only people who are in on the testing and who you can trust not to interfere. Good luck with that.
Otherswise, unless they introduce either a test server or private matches, you'll just have to test at your own risk. Or he forms up two full squads and sincs on Oceana inside Skirmish matches during peak North America hours. Highest provability of getting AFK-ers, long matches, big maps, and one third of the potential risks are removed. Of the few times I've hung out on Oceana all the combat action was in Domination and Ambushes. Even those didn't always fill up.
Yes, because I'm sure 12 people want to drop everything their doing and stand around for 20-30 minutes, lol.. It's just no feasible, nor practical, unfortunately. |
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
2394
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:07:00 -
[85] - Quote
RKKR wrote:Read this thread again and try to figure out how the Oceanic player base feels.
Complaining isn't going to help. New Eden is a free world, bring a protective team.
Done.
Oh, so I'm not complaining about dying anymore I'm complaining about the Oceanic Player Base?
Round and around we go where your argument is nobody knows. |
RKKR
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:10:00 -
[86] - Quote
I thought you were done? Please call me a troll...
I think you really need to read the thread again and then read that post again and show me where I said you were complaining about Oceanic player base.
i'll be waiting. |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
222
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:12:00 -
[87] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Rusty Shallows wrote:Jaqen Morghalis wrote:Regardless of which server you're on, it is still an "active" game, and not a test server. To think that everyone will just leave you be to do your own thing seems a little nieve (seriously, have you never played an online game before?).
The ONLY way you'll avoid this is if you can somehow manage to fill the match with only people who are in on the testing and who you can trust not to interfere. Good luck with that.
Otherswise, unless they introduce either a test server or private matches, you'll just have to test at your own risk. Or he forms up two full squads and sincs on Oceana inside Skirmish matches during peak North America hours. Highest provability of getting AFK-ers, long matches, big maps, and one third of the potential risks are removed. Of the few times I've hung out on Oceana all the combat action was in Domination and Ambushes. Even those didn't always fill up. Yes, because I'm sure 12 people want to drop everything their doing and stand around for 20-30 minutes, lol.. It's just no feasible, nor practical, unfortunately. Please go back and read my very first response on page one. Link the two and well... you'll be set. |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
697
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 02:31:00 -
[88] - Quote
I'm seriously at a loss about this. As an Oceanic player, and leader of The Southern Legion I have seen MCCs full of AFKers, people cross-hacking on opposite sides of the match, while avoiding shooting each other, and various other forms of 'testing' and abuse on our servers.
Oceanic Servers have been dubbed the 'AFK' Servers by most of the US and European Population, and it seriously dampens our own enjoyment of the game that whenever something needs to be 'tested' or 'abused' people flood our servers to do it. And it seriously needs to stop.
People say a Test server wont help. Well it would. Yes, you'd still have people trying to 'test' and AFK on Oceanic Servers, but at least honest testers have some where else to go where they can legitimately complain about people shooting them while they are testing something.
If you are on a 'play' server expect that you will be hunted for whatever reason. Whether it be AFKing, or sitting off in your own little world 'testing' when it comes to it... you aren't playing with us, or for us, or even against us in a game that relies on teamwork to get the job done.
If I see 3-4 people AFK in the MCC, I get upset... if I see 3-4 players sitting on our redline, it's the same. If you're not in the fighting, you're detracting from our own experience.
Using ANY play server as a dumping ground detracts from someone's game.
If you are so 'out of the way' while testing.. the American and/or European servers should be a viable alternative.. unless they also hunt you down. Just because we have low population servers, shouldn't make us the 'refuse dump' for the rest of the servers.
|
mollerz
Minja Scouts
839
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 03:54:00 -
[89] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:mollerz wrote:The thing here, RK, may I call you RK?
RK, the thing here is that by interfering with them, you are actually hurting yourself. Aeon is providing a service, much like the Egyptian Plover. An example I might also use that might strike closer to home is the Bluestreak Cleaner Wrasse.
These are symbiotic animals that clean the mouths of deadlier predators. They get a food chain pass due to the service they provide. Kind of one of those cool unwritten rules of nature.
So I assume you see where I am going with this? Did I just get compared to a toothbrush or a fish? Not sure if honored or insulted
I was just talking in terms he'd understand. |
RKKR
The Southern Legion
307
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 09:23:00 -
[90] - Quote
mollerz wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:mollerz wrote:The thing here, RK, may I call you RK?
RK, the thing here is that by interfering with them, you are actually hurting yourself. Aeon is providing a service, much like the Egyptian Plover. An example I might also use that might strike closer to home is the Bluestreak Cleaner Wrasse.
These are symbiotic animals that clean the mouths of deadlier predators. They get a food chain pass due to the service they provide. Kind of one of those cool unwritten rules of nature.
So I assume you see where I am going with this? Did I just get compared to a toothbrush or a fish? Not sure if honored or insulted I was just talking in terms he'd understand.
Let me lower to that kind of communication.
Just like humans need bacterias and the bacterias humans to survive. What happens if the numbers of bacteria get too high? The humans get sick. Our immunesystem/Antibiotica is there to kill them off, so we get healthy again.
So I assume you see where I am going with this?
God this was lame.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |