| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1501. the 6v6 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: ah that special contract action eh? well, it could be as easy as bringing back the 'corp contracts' of yore with different rules.
- by low genius - at 2013.10.12 03:43:00
|
1502. Partial respect with 1.6? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Obodiah Garro wrote: Was thinking since we never got placeholders, the light weapon branch should get a respec allocated to it, am sure a lot of caldari/matari players will use their racial weapon as opposed to AR (maybe other people as well? :...
- by low genius - at 2013.10.12 03:40:00
|
1503. Partial respect with 1.6? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Guildo Crow wrote: I doubt any "respec" will be offered if they add new weapons. I don't think they should. Just start saving some SP on the side for the future. CCP shouldn't have to deal with faulty planning on the part of the player base......
- by low genius - at 2013.10.12 03:38:00
|
1504. the 6v6 - in General Discussions [original thread]
da GAND wrote: squad vs squad or random 6 vs random 6 ? Sounds interesting squad v squad, and for an isk wager.
- by low genius - at 2013.10.12 03:31:00
|
1505. pc needs be disable for a min cuz.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
can someone translate this for us?
- by low genius - at 2013.10.12 03:29:00
|
1506. What would you do for 100,000,000 ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I'm willing to give someone 100,000,000 ISK from my account, but first I want to know what you would be willing to do for it? i'll make sure you don't get ganked while you're trying to drop orbitals. once.
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 19:37:00
|
1507. Complex Shield Extender vs Proto Weapon. Opinions? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: OK this is something very relevant to my interests. OP is dual tanking, which is a playstyle I used to like, but with ordinary plates? The way I see it there are multiple feasible and role based ways to fit a medium suit, ...
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 19:32:00
|
1508. the 6v6 - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: low genius wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: I'll take whatever game types they give us, but I would love a solo only option I think 1v1's are just as important, honestly. Certainly, and to that effect, so is spectator cam...
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 19:31:00
|
1509. Apparently 1.6 will be a light patch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zlocha wrote: According to this interview with Creative director Atli Mar, patch 1.6 will focus on bugs and engine upgrade. winter expansion drops on nov 19th. two weeks after that I bet you get a major dust update.
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 19:26:00
|
1510. Interesting form of censorship... - in General Discussions [original thread]
iceyburnz wrote: CCP seem to have forgotten the thing that got everyone excited about dust in the first place was them telling us whats coming. Now apparently, hiding everything and telling us the next two months are going to be nothing but e...
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 19:23:00
|
1511. Interesting form of censorship... - in General Discussions [original thread]
it's just as likely they were moved to a different location.
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 19:22:00
|
1512. the 6v6 - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: I'll take whatever game types they give us, but I would love a solo only option I think 1v1's are just as important, honestly.
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 19:21:00
|
1513. the 6v6 - in General Discussions [original thread]
how many of you would like to see this as a game-mode? i'd like to see it be variable also. 1v6 through 6v6. isk wagers. agree or disagree?
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 15:24:00
|
1514. FG killing infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
the fg has been neutralized in everything but insta-battles. get some eve support.
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 15:21:00
|
1515. I don't know 1 person in real life who plays this game... - in General Discussions [original thread]
coward.
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 15:20:00
|
1516. Why is the Easiest role in Dust rewarded the most? - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: Honestly, the Logistic role in dust is arguably the easiest role to perform next to AV, yet this role is by far rewarded the most WP for the amount of skill required. The rate at which Logistic can passively gain SP is atrocious....
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 15:19:00
|
1517. I dont want to have to use a Proto suit in Pubs...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
proto in anything but pc is *****-work
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 15:18:00
|
1518. Why some people are against re-specs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Canari Elphus wrote: Respecs would favor newberries more than it would vets (and by vet, I mean beta). As some have mentioned, at a certain point in SP you no longer have anything very interesting to spec into. Your suit and weapons have lost t...
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 02:33:00
|
1519. Why some people are against re-specs - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: low genius wrote: Ansiiis The Trustworthy wrote: Yesterday I was using the squad finder and got into a match with some pretty laid back guys. We were doing good rolling over waves of Gallente when we started talking abou...
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 02:32:00
|
1520. How many Logistics players use their suit to support? - in General Discussions [original thread]
scanner, drop uplink, nanohive.
- by low genius - at 2013.10.11 02:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |