| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1221. What is the CPM doing about the assault rifle? - in General Discussions [original thread]
in the first cpm election... vote pirate
- by low genius - at 2013.11.07 15:15:00
|
1222. Too Many Crutches CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
they've already given you a way around roof forges.
- by low genius - at 2013.11.07 15:12:00
|
1223. What Game did you come from before Dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Descent was my first online fps. does that count? that was flying spaceships through mines wasn't it? I guess technically I was playing doom2 on a 14.4 modem back in 96...
- by low genius - at 2013.11.07 03:42:00
|
1224. What Game did you come from before Dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
warhawk. proflight :) MAG. 13 vet levels. EVE: Online. (because dust looked like MAG but better)
- by low genius - at 2013.11.07 03:41:00
|
1225. So How Is 1.6 going for everyone? - in General Discussions [original thread]
the hit detection really just improved the range on the ar and smg. the sharpshooter skills need to be removed from those weapons imo. why didn't they change the blaster-ar range when they patched 1.6?
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 21:59:00
|
1226. Nades don't need another nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
nanohives need to stop replacing grenades. let the supply depot do that.
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 21:58:00
|
1227. Discussion: Respecs for Aurum... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jadd Hatchen wrote: low genius wrote: in eve you don't lose a percentage of you sp. you lose your biggest skill. even if it took you 2 months to get. it's gone, and gone forever. Ok, I could be wrong about the percentage thing, but it do...
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 21:56:00
|
1228. Discussion: Respecs for Aurum... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: You realize that this would make the game p2w right? At least make an ISK respec (that doesn't cost something ridiculously high like 50m) it would be far more than 50mil.
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 21:53:00
|
1229. Discussion: Respecs for Aurum... - in General Discussions [original thread]
ELITE INQUISITOR wrote: Money bought respecs are a benefit to online games both free and paid for. Look at Dcu online. If a person wants to pay to spec into something else they feel is a better suit for their playing style then let them. It's a...
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 21:52:00
|
1230. Discussion: Respecs for Aurum... - in General Discussions [original thread]
howard sanchez wrote: Things I like about Respec for Aurum: gives players a choice, gives CCP income Things I dont like about respec for Aurum: adds to the Pay to Win argument Comment: if CCP allows players to sell Aurum for isk ( the way the...
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 21:50:00
|
1231. Discussion: Respecs for Aurum... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jadd Hatchen wrote: Cosgar wrote: If this is a full respec, you should have to give up 25% of your lifetime SP. An interesting idea. I know in EVE Online, if you are killed while in a clone that is not fully up to date, then you can loose...
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 21:49:00
|
1232. Discussion: Respecs for Aurum... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think it's a terrible idea to have a respec in any fashion. doesn't matter what you lose, or what you spend, it's still a bad idea. it takes away the weight of your decisions, and it compounds small balance problems within the game. no respecs...
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 21:47:00
|
1233. Laser rifle users - in General Discussions [original thread]
king checkmate and I have had some pretty fun laser duels.
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 20:32:00
|
1234. Respec Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Petersen wrote: 100.000 AUR for a respec. Normal to play for this service. It-¦s your own damn fault if you waste your skillpoints on silly things when building your clone. Pay & smile or let it be. not even close to enough. 1.5 mil ...
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 18:30:00
|
1235. RIP playing on this account - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: Best Tanker I have ever played with, period. But, with that -plus a small playerbase- comes the drawback... When else would 3/4s of an entire enemy team spawn in with Swarm Launchers at the start of the match, other than when th...
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 18:28:00
|
1236. RIP playing on this account - in General Discussions [original thread]
never heard of this guy.
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 18:26:00
|
1237. So what should I waste points on now that ccp killed my set up - in General Discussions [original thread]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev7RDGnXkkE
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 06:05:00
|
1238. Community Poll: Who plays EVE? - in General Discussions [original thread]
1 heard about dust at e3 2010? 2011? not sure which
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 04:00:00
|
1239. Adapting and/or dying yet again. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: Once again the other classes have gotta adapt to the midframe whored once again and if we point it out we always get the same responce. "Adapt or die. " So sick of seeing this **** from assault players, and before anyon...
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 00:56:00
|
1240. This get's old ccp fix it... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have to agree. if the match-making knows that it's throwing me into a losing situation, I should get strongly compensated for staying in the match.
- by low genius - at 2013.11.06 00:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |