| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 |
381. Announcement:Dev Blog: Planetary Conquest: An Update - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
trollsroyce wrote: Previous subject of orbital strike WP count. NPC Warbarges being on a WP count is realistic. Player ships are not. Just lift the WP requirement, and put in place a siege bombardment module that takes a 3 minute cycle to load ...
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.06 13:06:00
|
382. Views on keyboard and mouse in Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Twisted202 wrote: You say that but if you played with a controller how far would you get. Thats not the question, I die a Lot for controller players, but from day 1 CCP have said it will have full support for K/M so that should settle it I t...
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.06 11:38:00
|
383. I wonder..... - in General Discussions [original thread]
When Assault DS shows on Sisi is it likely to belive we get it on 6th may?
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.06 11:10:00
|
384. Views on keyboard and mouse in Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
K/M is here to stay, move on.
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.06 11:08:00
|
385. Announcement:Dev Blog: Planetary Conquest: An Update - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
How many warpoints do we need to use OB in planetary conquest.
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.06 07:19:00
|
386. Announcement:Dev Blog: Planetary Conquest: An Update - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
LXicon wrote: lordjanuz wrote: [/i]If I have have control in space can I call in OB as I am pleased, or is there a limit on it? I believe you still need to earn OB with war points and call them in as needed So a medicore corp that is not...
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.05 19:12:00
|
387. Announcement:Dev Blog: Planetary Conquest: An Update - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
Maximus Stryker wrote: lordjanuz wrote: This is a double post but hope to get a answer : Tried to get a understanding of this, but its not easy, I have some few questions : I buy a starter pack at 80mill and can take a unoccupied dist...
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.05 17:57:00
|
388. Announcement:Dev Blog: Planetary Conquest: An Update - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
I am not looking for a guaranteed district to hold for all time, but if I put 80mill on the table, I would like to have some advantage over attacking corps. I should not be a walkover for nolifers that play 24/7 to take down any district they wh...
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.05 17:48:00
|
389. Announcement:Dev Blog: Planetary Conquest: An Update - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
This is a double post but hope to get a answer : Tried to get a understanding of this, but its not easy, I have some few questions : I buy a starter pack at 80mill and can take a unoccupied district yes ? A random very good corp can attac...
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.05 17:39:00
|
390. [Uprising] Planetary Conquest - The stealing of clones - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tried to get a understanding of this, but its not easy, I have some few questions : I buy a starter pack at 80mill and can take a unoccupied district yes ? A random very good corp can attack me at a time I decide by using timeinforcer ...
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.05 16:07:00
|
391. Weapon Modification? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The first scopes mounted on rifles was in late 1800 , so some attachment in a futuristic game must be exspected..... :)
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.03 18:25:00
|
392. CCP ADD TRADING - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: Hypothetically, how much programming would be required to do 1 on 1 trading? The Left and Right hand trading style? For instance their are two boxes that appear when two players want to trade. In one box, one player pl...
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.03 18:19:00
|
393. Dust Sov warefare by the numbers -Economics- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Will the defenderes if they are surporier in space , be able to use OB as much as they like.
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.03 18:02:00
|
394. CCP ADD TRADING - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sigberct Amni wrote: An ironic shiptoast is still a shiptoast. Nice did you think out this all by yourself..
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.03 17:52:00
|
395. CCP ADD TRADING - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: *cough*farm for likes*cough* :P As stated in the videocast thing we did yesterday this is something we are looking at adding, not for Uprising, but it is on our road map. We know it is needed and we want to add it. CCP N...
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.03 17:49:00
|
396. CCP ADD TRADING - in General Discussions [original thread]
Its the only way, and its a counter to the other tread. Thoose agree with me +1 the others ------->
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.04.03 15:08:00
|
397. New build 'Uprising' on May 6th? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hey. Will we be able to try the new build at fanfest.
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.03.27 08:19:00
|
398. Infantry ithems on the EVE marked - in General Discussions [original thread]
ok , thank you for your response.
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.03.26 20:54:00
|
399. Infantry ithems on the EVE marked - in General Discussions [original thread]
Is this equipment we can buy now and trade to dust514 at a later stage. Its not blueprints. I wounder if I should begin to buy some of it. Has there been any info on this.
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.03.26 20:51:00
|
400. I'm DISGUSTED with MCC squatters right now. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sada Mokmo wrote: Whenever this kind of thread shows up, gm answer is usually that an anti-idle system is being implemented in a future build... Hmmm when do we get a answer that says , Dust514 is being implemented in a future build
- by lordjanuz - at 2013.03.26 09:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |