| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
1801. are tanks worth it? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: a cautious tank driver can be an asset without the required infantry support. though i can still be effective soloing, i've found that the trick to tanking with minimal/no infantry support is not to anger the other t...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.04.05 02:08:00
|
1802. are tanks worth it? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Madrugar is an armor tank it has if memory serves 5 low slots. and sorry [Classified] i can say is all proto/complex under the hood
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.04.04 22:27:00
|
1803. are tanks worth it? - in General Discussions [original thread]
as long as it pays back what is owes you (in my case surviving 3 matches in my Madrugar) it's a fine death.
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.04.04 22:25:00
|
1804. are tanks worth it? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anmol Singh wrote: Are they worth the sp and isk?? or are they just a tin can full of SHlT in the end of the day even with the sagaris or suyura? Do you want to drive a tank? if you do. go for it, tanks are sturdy dependable platforms. if yo...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.04.04 22:14:00
|
1805. did tanks get nerferd?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: You're waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay late into the beta dude. Missile tanks got nerfed looooooooooong before open beta. Also, avoid poles at all costs. Apparently the corporation that manufactures those poles uses military-grade ...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.04.04 21:22:00
|
1806. Will The Respec Equal more Protos? - in General Discussions [original thread]
i already have 2 hyper-focused builds (tanker and logi, tanker is my main), i have to admit i love my surya, but i don't drop them all that often. i might get rid of AR 4, i don't use it very much... i'll probably keep the surya just because it se...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.04.03 19:32:00
|
1807. PFB/Whoever else is considered a "top clan" atm. - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: General Tiberius1 wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: We really should get one though. Top corps should battle eachother without fear of Rep or having it plastered everywhere. If it's done in this format it's not some big deal since it...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.04.02 03:14:00
|
1808. I have a Blueberry standing next to me and _____________________ - in General Discussions [original thread]
i have a blue berry standing next to me and i really wish he'd get off my tank. you wanna ride get an LAV.
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.28 01:16:00
|
1809. Eligable Contractees - in General Discussions [original thread]
though i can't speak in any official capacity for Zion TCD, LRA, or any member corps. i might suggest that you consider joining an alliance that would suit your defence needs. there are a number of good dust alliances that have popped up that mig...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.27 02:16:00
|
1810. HAVs aren't just vehicles... They're a class! - in General Discussions [original thread]
tanks aren't the back bone of anything. the back bone holds up the body. infantry specifically assault infantry is the back bone. that specializes further than assault infantry serves to support or perform a special task unsuited to infantry. ta...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.25 17:23:00
|
1811. back ground color of portraits - in General Discussions [original thread]
that makes sense thanks
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.23 03:26:00
|
1812. back ground color of portraits - in General Discussions [original thread]
i've seen both red and black, do the colors mean anything? IE your starter race EDIT: if this needs to be moved to the recruits section feel free.
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.23 03:20:00
|
1813. New Game Mode Being "Considered"... Infantry Only Ambush! - in General Discussions [original thread]
i'd be willing to compromise. Though IGÇÖm strongly against further dividing the community by adding "infantry only" anything. i have no malice against supply depots (in fact i really like them). i would support a buff to the HP of existing suppl...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.23 03:05:00
|
1814. wow dang titan down - in General Discussions [original thread]
the sky box was gorgeous. the fire textures on the burning titan chunks may have left something to be desired though...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.23 02:05:00
|
1815. New Game Mode Being "Considered"... Infantry Only Ambush! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: BobThe843CakeMan wrote: ICECREAMK1NG wrote: Funny how things change. I made a thread requesting this 9 or 10 months ago. One idiot said to me, quote '' I will defend to the death my right to bring tanks to ambush'' Tan...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.22 02:34:00
|
1816. New Game Mode Being "Considered"... Infantry Only Ambush! - in General Discussions [original thread]
my concern is that the non-infantry only ambush would just become one massive vehicle fest. tanks can't survive without infantry support. non-infantry only would die because anti-infantry tanks (blaster) wouldn't be able to make a profit anymore b...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.22 01:59:00
|
1817. Seraphim Initiative. Who/where are these guys..! - in General Discussions [original thread]
it is interesting isn't it? since the open beta started up... it wasn't unusual to have at least 4 people from either Zion or Seraphim per pub match. now it's a rarity to get 1. we used to be giants. everyone knew Seraphim, most respected it too. ...
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.20 21:44:00
|
1818. Why are the Null cannons firing missiles instead of Null? - in General Discussions [original thread]
aa installations (bigger ones) that fire null charges at MCCs would be awesome.
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.18 02:37:00
|
1819. Do newberies even know how to use skill points? - in General Discussions [original thread]
no, skilling is something that comes only after you've messed up a few times. and the idea that just because you can use it doesn't mean you are properly skilled to do so is even more forign
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.18 01:53:00
|
1820. earth - in General Discussions [original thread]
probably all dead. they left to find resources, without steady resources from the WH IGÇÖd doubt that they're doing too well now.
- by knight of 6 - at 2013.03.17 02:46:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |