| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
4701. handheld shield transporter - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Draxus Prime wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: why not? armor tanks get all the love, so why not shields. shh! armour tanks are widely considered UP RUN BEFORE THE C...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.25 02:37:00
|
4702. Announcement:Update on Uprising 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
KalOfTheRathi wrote: FATPrincess - XOXO wrote: Release vehicle patch in 1.5 so we can give feedback for 1.6. -XOXO Ah ... no. Please do not request Devs to release a broken patch intentionally . Broken patches or patches with broken feat...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.25 02:22:00
|
4703. handheld shield transporter - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Draxus Prime wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: why not? armor tanks get all the love, so why not shields. shh! armour tanks are widely considered UP RUN BEFORE THE COMMUNITY FINDS YOU!!!!!!!!!!! 60 sec hardener, 87...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.25 02:19:00
|
4704. CCP - Community Opinion on VEHICLE BALANCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: How many times did you reply to my thread, yet here you are, yet again, a non-pilot making another tank thread. You are a non AV making AV weapon threads.(and no, having level 3 swarms does not m...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.25 02:16:00
|
4705. handheld shield transporter - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Draxus Prime wrote: why not? armor tanks get all the love, so why not shields.
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.25 02:06:00
|
4706. CCP - Community Opinion on VEHICLE BALANCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: True Adamance wrote: I wouldn't mind, having slightly better active module that would be fantastic, nor to mention a slightly better turning speed. but yeah some slight EHP buff, an AMARR HAV ...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.25 00:56:00
|
4707. CCP - Community Opinion on VEHICLE BALANCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Sheild tanks Passive Health: Pitiful (500- 1.5K) Equivalent Active Health: Collasal (20-30 K) Main turret power: Low Speed: Hypersonic Ammo reserves: Moderate ** Rail: 40 ** Blaster: 300 **Missile: 30 salvos The sheild tank ...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.25 00:50:00
|
4708. CCP - Community Opinion on VEHICLE BALANCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Sheild tanks Passive Health: Pitiful (500- 1.5K) Equivalent Active Health: Collasal (20-30 K) Main turret power: Low Speed: Hypersonic Ammo reserves: Moderate ** Rail: 40 ** Blaster: 300 **Missile: 30 salvos The sheild tank ...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.25 00:47:00
|
4709. CCP - Community Opinion on VEHICLE BALANCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: I wouldn't mind, having slightly better active module that would be fantastic, nor to mention a slightly better turning speed. but yeah some slight EHP buff, an AMARR HAV release and pilot suit and I'm a happy man. well a...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 23:12:00
|
4710. To non-pilots making tank threads - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: [quote=gbghg][quote=Monkey MAC] Then where are the scissors, in the papers hands? Oh god a tank! Corporal get on the line we need an anti-tank tank But sarge they already have an anti (anti-tank tank) tank...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 23:00:00
|
4711. CCP - Community Opinion on VEHICLE BALANCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
i think shield tanks need a big speed buff, 500 hp buff, then a forge gun nerf a little, passive resistance modules, go like this MLT 11% STD 13% or 14% ADV 16% pro 18%. then buff boosters, by 100 hp MINIMUM, passive shield regen rate of 300 p/s ...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 22:49:00
|
4712. Its time for Socks IV to gain its proper place in society - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: Forlorn Destrier wrote: Forlorn Destrier wrote: SOCKS IV SOCKS IV SOCKS IV SOCKS IV Trimmed excessive post length - CCP Logibro Insert crude joke here. What does logibro use socks IV? (Please make socks IV be an Arcti...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 22:40:00
|
4713. So... hows 'bout them thar dev blogs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: For every request for a dev blog I delay mine. I wish... community probably won't let me delay it... it should be out later today. :) i hope forge guns and swarms get nerfed. mostly forge guns
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 22:25:00
|
4714. Shield tanks got nerfed again... - in General Discussions [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: Void Echo wrote: Anmol Singh wrote: Knight Soiaire wrote: Armour tank speed should not be nerfed. Shield tank speed should be buffed, but in the end, armour tanks will be slower because almost every fit has at lea...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 10:34:00
|
4715. Triple and Doulble sp How about a week of Triple or Double isk - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Protostomp week, that sounds amazing... prototype gear is too expensive, lower it by 10-15% for infintry, 50%-60% vehicles, 700K+ ISK for a turret is just ******* rediculous. then enable 2X ISK week.
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 10:25:00
|
4716. AR is NOT broken, it is fine the way it is. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: I feel sorry for those specced into the GAR its gonna be nerfed when the combat and rail are released, and so many GAR users will complain about wasted sp! The current ar is a placeholder all the stats are rolled into 1, henc...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 10:20:00
|
4717. AR is NOT broken, it is fine the way it is. - in General Discussions [original thread]
meri jin wrote: Michael Arck wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: meri jin wrote: Michael Arck wrote: So what's really your point? Seriously, what's everybody's point complaining about the AR? There is no point. Man, I'm trying ...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 10:19:00
|
4718. AR is NOT broken, it is fine the way it is. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: meri jin wrote: Michael Arck wrote: So what's really your point? Seriously, what's everybody's point complaining about the AR? There is no point. Man, I'm trying to find that out to...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 10:18:00
|
4719. Vehicle Recall Restrictions - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thurak1 wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Thurak1 wrote: I had this happen to me last week also when i was using my proto breach FG to bust a tank. The driver jumped out and recalled between shots. Dam charge up time. I learned my lesson wi...
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 09:28:00
|
4720. Shield tanks got nerfed again... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: If you do quit dibs on your ISK Tanking will be very expensive to maintain after 1.4 let alone the clusterfuck that 1.5 looks to be how so?
- by jerrmy12 kahoalii - at 2013.09.24 08:45:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |