| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. [Feedback] What's OP (+ ideas on how to fix) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: As for the other items, do you disagree that they pose balance issues or do you disagree with the suggested fixes? This is an "idea thread" so if you ideas on how to fix the broken things, feel free to share them. Both, ...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.06.14 22:11:00
|
2. [Feedback] What's OP (+ ideas on how to fix) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You know, for a feedback thread this lacks a lot of explanation, and reasoning 1. Why are Assault frames OP? 2. Why are Scramblers OP? 3. Why are Ferros OP? etc, etc, etc
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.06.14 20:59:00
|
3. [Suggestion] Remove Combat Installations From Ambush - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Well the whole reason they got such a huge HP buff is that they're not intended to be destroyed easily. Instead the idea was that they should be points of interest that you work your way up to to capture either by getting t...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.19 19:37:00
|
4. [Suggestion] Remove Combat Installations From Ambush - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: So in other words instead of letting installations be tactical points of interest that each side attempts to capture in order to secure and advantage over the other team, you would rather they just be removed entirely in ord...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.19 19:13:00
|
5. [Suggestion] Remove Combat Installations From Ambush - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: gustavo acosta wrote: Honestly it's just a way to farm kills without tanks there's no need for them. I have died to you several times from you manning said installations. Why are you trying to campaign for them to be...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.19 18:07:00
|
6. [Suggestion] Remove Combat Installations From Ambush - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kierkegaard Soren wrote: Installations are far more vulnerable than vehicles. They can't move, they only offer limited protection to the operator, and they can't endure sustained AV fire. If you come against a manned blaster turret and can't be...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.19 16:26:00
|
7. [Suggestion] Remove Combat Installations From Ambush - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: cloaked scout or sniper = dead installation user you must not play often to know this obvious fact Listen hear scrub, I always play this game and it doesn't take a genius to see that it's beyond broken that installat...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.19 16:21:00
|
8. [Suggestion] Remove Combat Installations From Ambush - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: The game mode is meant to throw away dropsuits so you can earn money faster. If you don't like throwing away dropsuits, don't do Ambush. I mean it's literally what the mode is for. And YES proto users wil...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.18 19:41:00
|
9. [Suggestion] Remove Combat Installations From Ambush - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: You're complaining, because you get a higher payout of ISK for a greatly reduced time investment? Why not just remove Ambush? The turrets are there to make people who think "it's okay to run proto" a bit more n...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.18 18:41:00
|
10. [Suggestion] Remove Combat Installations From Ambush - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vesta Opalus wrote: gustavo acosta wrote: Honestly it's just a way to farm kills without tanks there's no need for them. They make for mildly more interesting maps by creating strategic points to take/avoid If anything I wish they would...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.18 05:49:00
|
11. [Suggestion] Remove Combat Installations From Ambush - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If a match is only infantry, there should only be infantry. That was the reasoning for removing tanks, now that tanks are gone the installations are the most annoying thing to dispatch. Not to mention it requires way too much effort for a team d...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.17 23:23:00
|
12. [Suggestion] Remove Combat Installations From Ambush - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Honestly it's just a way to farm kills without tanks there's no need for them.
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.17 21:33:00
|
13. Sticky:[Feedback] One teammate left behind when squad queuing and Cance... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cancelling Deployment for the entire squad while waiting for deployment in addition to searching for battle, or squad leader given the ability to kick his squad from battle would be abuse-able and very blunt solutions. Solutions nonetheless Ed...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.03 07:52:00
|
14. What if aim-assists was removed. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Or we could release Project Legion for PC and never have to worry about aim assist again! /helping OR we can stop with the marketing bullshit and upgrade Dust? OR NOW STAY WITH ME ON THIS ...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.03 04:13:00
|
15. What if aim-assists was removed. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KA24DERT wrote: You're right. The complaints about lack of inertia are actually about poor client-side prediction. The game has inertia, and anyone who isn't immune to evidence can strafe left and right and notice the pause themselves. No t...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.01 08:03:00
|
16. [REQUEST] Do not buff the TactAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Archduke Ferd1nand wrote: Oh I'm sorry, will your Amarr Assault Scrubler Rifle no longer be "pub stomper of the month" status? I wouldn't be surprised if OP was a modded controller user tbh.
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.01 04:53:00
|
17. What if aim-assists was removed. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: Starlight Burner wrote: Just add Movement Inertia and the problem is solved. As I said, there IS inertia already and it is testable and provable. But, it is very slight and you have to focus to observe it. I gue...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.04.01 04:49:00
|
18. Remove Cloak Dampening and Buff Profile mods. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
HOLY PERFECTION wrote: Shut Up, for your own sake. Please! No.
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.23 02:54:00
|
19. Remove Cloak Dampening and Buff Profile mods. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Seriously ludicrous that a scout HAS to use the cloak to avoid all active scans. Edit:Maybe remove the cloak bonus on scout suits also, I mean every other suit gets a bonus to things that make their jobs easier. Why should scout suits be given s...
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.23 02:36:00
|
20. (Idea) Surrender - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Instead of the whole team it should be a majority of the team.
- by gustavo acosta - at 2015.03.07 19:58:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |