| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
601. So Gunny Nelson - in General Discussions [original thread]
Oh. Thanks, I guess I need to watch more twitch.tv
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.04.25 20:43:00
|
602. So Gunny Nelson - in General Discussions [original thread]
What are you referring to? IDK who/what Gunny Nelson is...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.04.25 20:37:00
|
603. Why you think scouts and cloaks are OP vs why they actually ARE. - in General Discussions [original thread]
[/quote] I was talking about passive scans Logis got a passive scan buff[/quote] Reference source, please. And personally idgaf about cloaks, scouts or cloaked scouts. You kill me it's my fault for not killing you first. Or having someone else...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.04.11 21:56:00
|
604. Why you think scouts and cloaks are OP vs why they actually ARE. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dexter307 wrote: Duke Noobiam wrote: Dexter307 wrote: Duke Noobiam wrote: I think the biggest issue with 1.8 is that passive scanning is only a viable option for scouts. Accually it works well on logis now with the buff they got ...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.04.11 20:12:00
|
605. Question for observant people out there - in General Discussions [original thread]
Onesimus Tarsus wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: The Jungian wrote: Reign Omega wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: I more often see other observant players spinning with their guns out to look for that telltale flash of blue and open fi...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.04.05 23:40:00
|
606. Y does everyone say logis shouldn't get bonus for using cloak? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Brokerib wrote: As a long term scout, I'm more than happy with Logi's using cloaks. Bring it. Thank You, I appreciate that. +1
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.04.03 23:50:00
|
607. Y does everyone say logis shouldn't get bonus for using cloak? - in General Discussions [original thread]
All the slayerlogis' abuse that inspired all the QQ has come home to roost.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.04.03 21:49:00
|
608. We are leaving Dust, and here is why. - in General Discussions [original thread]
noobsniper the 2nd wrote: Just send all the money to me so I can use for the noob housing program Gravediggaz, nikkaz. 6 feet deep!
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.04.03 18:00:00
|
609. The Plasma Cannon - CCP's forgotten bastard stepchild - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roofer Madness wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Tek Hound wrote: It needs something but I don't know if I want ccp touching it. ^This. PLC is not "bad", it just requires actual use training besides buying a "skillbook/training" . I have had ...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.04.02 23:37:00
|
610. The Plasma Cannon - CCP's forgotten bastard stepchild - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tek Hound wrote: It needs something but I don't know if I want ccp touching it. ^This. PLC is not "bad", it just requires actual use training besides buying a "skillbook/training" . I have had "bug" shots (somehow I fired and the round flew...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.04.02 19:36:00
|
611. Remove vehicles from ambush and have vehicle deployment cost wp? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I sort to want to avoid the whole 'kill streak' feel that CoD has established though, maybe for arenas but for war modes I think a better option is timers like a fueled bandwidth. Too many vehicles on the field? OB from b...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.03.30 00:45:00
|
612. Cloaks really do make you invisible. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skullmiser Vulcansu wrote: I was using a Logistics suit. Hush before you get us all QQ nerfed please.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.03.29 23:56:00
|
613. So tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
PARKOUR PRACTIONER wrote: All I know is in academy this guy went 45-0 with his Soma militia blaster. That guy...sounds like an ******* farming academy to gloat about being beast
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.03.29 23:49:00
|
614. CCP PLEASE REMOVE TANKS FROM AMBUSH - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: Your in-block is late by a year. We've had request for no HAVs in Ambush since Chromosome. These posts are classic and still enjoyable to read. True dat, I meant the inb4 for the OP more than anyone else so we could a...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.03.29 23:41:00
|
615. Are there any logistics out there enjoying the patch? - in General Discussions [original thread]
1st is that if you set your tv to one of the low-res settings (as advised by more than one thread poster not too long ago) to compensate for PC framerate issues, change that sh*t back, HD will let you see the cloak shimmers. 2nd I'd say we real...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.03.29 21:56:00
|
616. CCP PLEASE REMOVE TANKS FROM AMBUSH - in General Discussions [original thread]
SALH wrote: Infantry only? That sounds wonderful. Just tired of being uplinked trapped by tanks . *cough*Smart deploy sucking is a totally different issue than that tanks need to be removed*cough*
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.03.29 20:45:00
|
617. CCP PLEASE REMOVE TANKS FROM AMBUSH - in General Discussions [original thread]
What can I say? Learing to fight tanks instead of constantly qqing about tanks is bringing sexy back.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.03.29 20:30:00
|
618. CCP PLEASE REMOVE TANKS FROM AMBUSH - in General Discussions [original thread]
SALH wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Go get your OP militia tank and I'll go get my UP AV fit and we can compare who and what ain't ****. Is BF a better balance between infantry and vehicles? In some ways. Are troopers in BF tactically more effect...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.03.29 20:13:00
|
619. CCP PLEASE REMOVE TANKS FROM AMBUSH - in General Discussions [original thread]
Go get your OP militia tank and I'll go get my UP AV fit and we can compare who and what ain't ****. Is BF a better balance between infantry and vehicles? In some ways. Are troopers in BF tactically more effective in dealing with vehicles than mos...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.03.29 19:54:00
|
620. Clack scout - in General Discussions [original thread]
I got the clack once. The burning with that endless dripping was turrible. *shudders*
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.03.29 19:21:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |