| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1861. CCP Blam, could you tell us any info on dropship update progress? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dropships, scouts, heavies, the sp rollover system, combat rifle, rail rifle... all things that have been put on hold while they work on core mechanics. I wouldn't expect new content until 1.5 at the earliest.
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.08 01:28:00
|
1862. trying Harder - in General Discussions [original thread]
Want people to try harder? 5SP/WP + 0 SP/s Reward contribution, not time spent in battle.
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.08 00:40:00
|
1863. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xender17 wrote: Buster Friently wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: Please everyone... Just ignore this guy. Don't even bother posting in this thread, just let it die. Why is that? You don't like what the actual data shows? You didn't add a t...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.08 00:36:00
|
1864. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buster Friently wrote: I've heard this about PC. I've also stated that if someone actually put some numbers up, that I'd agree that the Flaylock is a problem for PC. I don't play PC. Most players don't. People can respec, and have been given t...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 23:55:00
|
1865. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: When this game is balanced, every one of those will be the same number of kills. No they definitely never will... and many weapons are niche weapons designed only for certain situations. Once we have all 4 racial varia...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 23:45:00
|
1866. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buster Friently wrote: Actually, no, it doesn't undermine my claim. An OP weapon damages diversity. The Flaylock isn't, the AR is. No, if a weapon is effective for people that use it, that is an indication of viability, not OP. For viability ...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 23:21:00
|
1867. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: Your FOTM OP weapon will be nerfed into the ground Are you paying attention CCP? No one in your player base expects reasonable nerfs, you always nerf weapons into uselessness, that's jus...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 22:36:00
|
1868. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buster Friently wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: All i'm gonna say is... I hope CCP knows now not to balance weapons by their use in public matches, and instead by their use in organized corp matches (see planetary conquest). Planetary conquest ...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 22:23:00
|
1869. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
All i'm gonna say is... I hope CCP knows now not to balance weapons by their use in public matches, and instead by their use in organized corp matches (see planetary conquest).
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 22:08:00
|
1870. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Please everyone... Just ignore this guy. Don't even bother posting in this thread, just let it die.
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 21:51:00
|
1871. Passive-aggressive AFK'ing - in General Discussions [original thread]
Honestly.. I hate afk farming as much as you hate me afk farming. But until CCP implements a system where you don't lose SP at the end of the week if you don't cap... its going to happen. Its just how this game is... you need SP to progress, and ...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 21:45:00
|
1872. Nerf the Flaylock pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
1.5m blast radius for all tiers, reduce splash by 40%, FP Op increases splash by 5% per level. Done, easy.
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 20:29:00
|
1873. flaylock pistols - in General Discussions [original thread]
Blerf Naster wrote: All they really need is to not increase the radius by rank. As it stands, the standard Flaylock has a 1m radius, the advanced 1.5m, and the proto 2m (this is not counting the blast radius bonus from the Flaylock Operation ...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 19:25:00
|
1874. flaylock pistols - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maverick Raidon wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Let's just get rid of anything that isn't an AR. Seriously dude? Flaylock pistols are sidearms, so that arguement is irrelevant. However, easy solution is to make it a light weapon. Ignore...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 18:40:00
|
1875. Militia Amarr Medium Suit = Orgasmic! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I never understood why people intentionally gimp themselves by using militia gear...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 16:54:00
|
1876. Passive-aggressive AFK'ing - in General Discussions [original thread]
What we really need is a game mode called "afk farming" where you have two MCC's like skirmish but no assets/null cannons on the ground. Each match takes about an hour and a half as the MCCs duke it out. Should be able to cap in a game or two at ...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 15:19:00
|
1877. Use a flaylock= admitting lack of gungame (and ideas for a fix) - in General Discussions [original thread]
It is too OP... however you always hear the same thing.. the std sucks balls, the adv is not bad, and pro is hella op... whats the difference? The splash radius. What I think it needs: Low RoF slightly... around 15% Normalize splash radius to 1....
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 02:18:00
|
1878. Passive SP reinstatement - in General Discussions [original thread]
No reason every character shouldn't have passive sp
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 00:47:00
|
1879. To the Heavy Players: are you just waiting or did you give in? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I really wish CCP would just come out and say whether or not they will respec heavies and scouts when they release the new variants. It would REALLY help manage expectations.
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.07 00:25:00
|
1880. AFKing is to Dust what bookmarks were to EVE - in General Discussions [original thread]
If they removed passive in match sp gain, and introduced sp rollover system, theat would go a long way in this game. You would also try harder to gain wps, thus playing harder for more rewards... But if you don't do sp rollover at the same time, ...
- by ZDub 303 - at 2013.07.06 22:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |